
If you needed any more evidence, tonight's decision on Afghanistan may prove once and for all that President Obama is no Socialist. Following Obama's war speech this evening, a quick perusal of American Socialist sites proved that the political movement Obama is so often falsely associated with wants nothing to do with his plans for Afghanistan.
At the Party for Socialism And Liberation they're planning a march on Washington on March 20 to "demand the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. and NATO forces from Afghanistan and Iraq."
At the Socialist Party USA, they're offering party members tips on how "protest any increase or continuation of the war and occupation of Afghanistan." One example of how they suggest Socialists should "show unity of purpose" tomorrow: "make an appointment that day with at least one group that you're not already a member of -- a church, union, civic group, etc. -- and speak with them about the war."
In the pages of The Militant, the weekly newspaper of the Socialist movement, reports compare Obama's Afghanistan plan to the surge in Iraq, which the paper reports "is seen by more and more as a success for the ruling class." (For those unfamiliar with Socialism: "success for the ruling class" = bad news.)
Dorn76
December 1, 2009 10:11 PM
And my having two legs means I'm not a dog.
This is not journalism. For goodness sakes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
December 1, 2009 10:14 PM in reply to Dorn76
I don't mean to be a jerk, but why does Obama have to prove a negative, and why does the media have to help?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PeachesNYC
December 1, 2009 10:20 PM
"Party for Socialism And Liberation"
I was at that party. Got laid then passed out in a compost bin in the backyard. All in all a pretty good night.
(yeah, I know this is a dumb comment, but this is an even dumber article!)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
OhioGuy
December 1, 2009 10:30 PM
Did the Soviet war in Afghanistan prove Brezhnev wasn't a Communist?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
December 1, 2009 11:29 PM
Well, if I had the opportunity of choosing between Barack and Bernie....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
December 1, 2009 11:56 PM in reply to bluebell
heebus jeebus!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jorge
December 2, 2009 12:17 AM
But... the army is a government program... and Obama's adding more funding... so doesn't that mean this proves he IS a socialist?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 2, 2009 7:47 AM in reply to Jorge
You take that back! The Military is Good and Government Programs are Bad, so the Military can't be a Gobernment Program.
Okay, actually, the whole private contractor explosion under Bush is starting to make some sense now . . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
December 2, 2009 12:18 PM
Probably just another factional split that the Socialists have been known for since the beginning
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?