
In the course of a few hours yesterday, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) sent the tea party crowd on the same emotional rollercoaster progressives have been riding with the senator since the start of the health care reform debate this year.
Tea partiers arrived in Washington yesterday morning fired up about Lieberman, the man they thought might fulfill all their "kill the bill" fantasies with his refusal to sign on to the Democratic reform package as long as it contained a public option and other "socialist" programs. But by the afternoon, Lieberman was praising the Democratic bill and one tea partier had literally put an X through the "Stand With Joe" written on the sign he waved.
It was a story of love and loss with Joe Lieberman that would fit right in on any DailyKos diary without changing much. Like progressives have at points during the debate, conservatives for a fleeting moment thought that Lieberman might come around to their side and "save" health care reform.
For the record, tea partiers don't like Lieberman as a general rule. Protestors in D.C. yesterday said he was bad on climate change (he believes it exists) and worse when it comes to being an "insider" (as they say about most politicians, they believe Lieberman has been in Washington too long to have any clue about what's going on in the real world). But Lieberman's role as the 60th vote on health care meant that Lieberman was the one man that could make the tea party dreams come true.
"He's hearing what we are saying," Victor LaBarre, a tea partier from Chester, CT, said at around nine a.m. yesterday morning as he stood across the street from the Capitol. "He's made it clear he stands against the public option."
"He's listening to his what his constituents want," LaBarre said as he headed off to visit his senator's office and tell Lieberman to keep up the good work. "But I'm afraid he'll flinch."
LaBarre took two tea partiers from Georgia along with him to visit Lieberman. Carol Wilson, from Macon, GA, hinted at the troubled waters ahead for the tea partiers relationship with Lieberman.
"Lieberman has a special part in this," she said. "But so did [Sen.] Mary Landrieu [D-LA]." Wilson said she feared that Lieberman would be "bought" like Landrieu had been and would eventually vote for the bill. She said that she was with him that morning, but if he voted for any health care reform package at all she'd go right back to protesting him.
By 1:15 p.m., Wilson's promise had been fulfilled. At the tea party rally held across from the Senate by Americans For Prosperity, leaders of the Tea Party Patriot movement promised to humiliate Lieberman on the Internet after they went to protest his decision to support public option-free health care reform. They were, they say, thrown out of Lieberman's office by staff.
In the back of the crowd was Tom, another tea partier from Connecticut who held the crossed out "Stand With Joe" sign. He said he'd made the change after he heard on the radio driving in that Lieberman had agreed to join the Democrats and vote for reform. Tom said he'd voted for Lieberman in the past but had grown tired of the man who he once thought "was a true Independent, like me."
"That's just Joe taking care of Joe," Tom said of Lieberman's decision to stand with Democratic leaders in the Senate in favor of the reform bill. "He's just up here for himself."
Walter Mitty
December 16, 2009 10:04 AM
What is this supposed to mean?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
December 16, 2009 10:23 AM
The teabaggers cries of "we're *independents*!" are giving "crying baby on an airplane" a run for its money as most ANNOYING sound ever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
December 16, 2009 2:12 PM in reply to Matt Jones
It's like Monty Python's "Life of Brian" when the crowd chants in unison "We are all individuals."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mikedrevguy
December 16, 2009 2:37 PM in reply to condew
just to add the visual for those who might not know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dal20402
December 16, 2009 10:26 AM
Teabaggers thrown out of Joementum's office...
There is such an astounding amount of fail in that concept I think my head is going to explode. I wish I could have been there to laugh at it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Zell
December 16, 2009 10:39 AM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
December 16, 2009 2:10 PM in reply to Zell
Yeah, when did this happen? TPM hasn't reported any such thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
December 16, 2009 2:15 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
If the "deal" is referring to his supposed "praise" referenced above, that's not correct. Faint praise about being "encouraged" never indicate actual support. He's just being sneaky and trying to cloak his obstructionism. He never voices actual support for a real HCR bill of any kind. (And when he does, he flipflops two months later)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tinmanic
December 16, 2009 10:55 AM
Ah, Joe "a three-way split decision for third place" Lieberman. I will always remember that particular gem.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 16, 2009 10:59 AM
The difference is that the Teabaggers are gun nuts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 16, 2009 2:22 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Yeah, I think Joe might do well to remember that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joshua the Teacher
December 16, 2009 11:17 AM
'Like progressives have at points during the debate, conservatives for a fleeting moment thought that Lieberman might come around to their side and "save" health care reform.'
Evan, progressives haven't for a moment believed Lieberman would save anything other than his Sunday morning appearances.
I understand that JMM is taking a pragmatic approach to the final bill, and trying to discern emotion/frustration from policy. That's fine, but your post here seems to go a step further and speak for peoples' frustration with what comes off as something close to contempt. Keep in mind that while progressives pursue policy with a similar amount of passion, to connect them with a wildly violent, racist, and ignorant group like the tebaggers is pretty bush-league.
Try not sucking in your future posts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
December 16, 2009 11:58 AM
What's interesting about all this are the people from Georgia who went along with the lone CT tea bagger. Check out their quotes and then, somehow, relate it to what Georgia senators actually did from '03-'09.
They really have no clue what they're doing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbeats
December 16, 2009 12:42 PM
Are you watching C-Span right now? WTF is wrong with our govt!?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slick bottom
December 16, 2009 12:57 PM
Teabag the teabaggers! Remove Lieberman from office in 2012. Fire the spineless Democrats! The only solution to the health care dilemma is to let the system go into total collapse with the uninsured (teabaggers included) clogging up hospital waiting rooms, people dropping dead at an alarming rate from no insurance and costs spiraling beyond the reach of normal citizens and the Government. Only then will the brain-dead teabaggers and other mental midgets get a clue about the real issues involved and the thieves who are perpetuating the health care disaster.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
December 16, 2009 1:05 PM
A bejowled martinet
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
solo
December 16, 2009 1:06 PM
Joe Lieberman is single-handedly gutting health care reform. And it's time someone held him accountable. So we're going to make sure every voter in Connecticut knows what he's doing. And then, when he comes up for re-election, we'll make sure we send him home for good. Can you chip in to make Joe pay?
https://pol.moveon.org/donate/lieberman.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DownriverDem
December 16, 2009 1:23 PM
Tea Baggers are prancing racist ignorant white people who, for reasons unknown to me, act like they are rich and have no needs. Yet when I see them prancing around, they look like a bunch of needy losers. How could they be against health care reform when they look so needy? They are against a government program to help others. Many yell out against touching my Medicare. Hello????? Medicare is a government program!!!!
What a bunch of nut jobs!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bruce Webb
December 16, 2009 1:28 PM
"had grown tired of the man who he once thought "was a true Independent, like me." "
That is too funny. A true independent running because he thought he was still the best representative of his constituents might have decided to establish a party called 'Lieberman for Connecticut'. On the other hand a total narcissist bordering on sociopathy would name that party 'Connecticut for Lieberman' How much clue did you need to understand that it was the 'All About Joe' party.
Astonishingly instead of slinking away in shame the Connecticut for Lieberman Party still exists even as it runs candidates on an explicitly anti-Lieberman platform.
Uh what? Did anyone think there was any other purpose? Was there any huge gap between party creation and entry into the race? Buy these guys some hearing aids, because cognitive dissonance has made them deaf. How hard could it be to rename the Party?http://ctforlieberman.blogspot.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmack
December 16, 2009 2:11 PM
"Astonishingly instead of slinking away in shame the Connecticut for Lieberman Party still exists"
This was a ju-jitsu move. Someone who was a vocal critic of Lieberman realized he created the party but didn't appoint any officers, so he filed paperwork and made himself chairman. He then created bylaws that the only people eligible for membership are critics of Lieberman and Lieberman himself. The party exists now simply to kick Lieberman in the nuts, as the party platform stands in direct contrast with Lieberman himself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 16, 2009 2:27 PM in reply to pmack
Now that's funny. Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
miles born
December 16, 2009 2:32 PM
I feel so sorry for the disappointed little tea party folks. Oh well, at least they have TruckNutzĀ®!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
December 16, 2009 3:57 PM
WRONG, noone on Dkos ever liked Lieberman. He is a snake in a mummy's clothing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ScapeGoat
December 17, 2009 1:48 PM
"That's just Joe taking care of Joe," Tom said of Lieberman's decision to stand with Democratic leaders in the Senate in favor of the reform bill. "He's just up here for himself."
Joey only cares about joey. He loves the attention and publicity.
He is a jerk.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?