TPMDC

Is Obama Failing On AIDS?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Read More

AIDS, Barack Obama

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

World AIDS Day 2009 is a date that many U.S. activists in the fight against the spread of HIV/AIDS thought would be a high water mark in their decades-long struggle against the deadly disease. President George W. Bush had dramatically increased U.S. AIDS funding during his term in office -- albeit with caveats activists say hurt some of their efforts -- and President Obama had promised to do even more on the campaign trail.

But as activists nationwide take time today a day to focus on a disease that's killed more than half a million Americans, some of them say the promises of a renewed focus on AIDS that came with Obama haven't been realized.

"It's heartbreaking," Matthew Kavanagh, director of U.S. advocacy for Health GAP told TPMDC. His group was among four U.S. AIDS groups that gave Obama a "D+" on AIDS policy yesterday. Kavanagh said that to his shock, he felt Bush had a better record on AIDS research than Obama. "I could not imagine I would be saying that now [last year]. Many folks in the global AIDS movement were so looking forward to stepping up the fight with Obama."

Dr. Paul Zeitz, executive director of the Global AIDS Alliance, said he would have given Bush a B+ this time last year. The shift since Obama has been "shocking" to the activists around the world, he said.

"It's outrageous," Zeitz told TPMDC from a protest his group and others held near the White House today. He said activists around the world are "dismayed" by what they've seen from Obama's commitment to AIDS in his first year.

There are two main complaints with Obama's AIDS policy from activists. First, funding. Bush raised AIDS funding to its highest level while in office, and budget requests sent by Obama to Congress for next year call for funding to essentially remain at the Bush administration levels.

The groups that issued the "report card" yesterday claim that's not enough. According to the report it issued, "flat-lining" the AIDS budget line is effectively reducing the U.S. commitment to fighting AIDS because "it will not even keep pace with global medical inflation, estimated at 4-10% this year."

"Their excuse is the economy -- that there's no money to increase AIDS funding right now," Zeitz said of the Obama administration. He was an invited guest to yesterday's World AIDS Day program hosted by the administration and said he's spoken with a number of officials about his concerns over the budget. "You know, we've heard excuses and excuses time and time again," Zeitz said of the discussions. "And the world is watching them break their commitment."

The second move angering AIDS activists is Obama's decision to back off a campaign promise to end the ban on needle exchange programs in government-funded aid programs. As Time reported earlier this year, the promise took a backseat to political concerns as Obama and the Democrats worried they'd be painted as soft on drugs if they supported it.

"Many of us worked hard to get him elected, based on the things he said" about needle exchanges and other AIDS programs, Kavanagh said. "Now we don't see it happening."

Administration officials point to Obama's lifting of the nation's entry ban for AIDS patients as well as ongoing efforts to pay for research and treatment as evidence that Obama is fully committed to expanding the U.S.' role in the global AIDS fight.

"It is clear that our nation's investments in HIV/AIDS are having an impact," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters yesterday. "President Obama and I are dedicated to enhancing America's leadership in the fight against global AIDS."

The end of the travel ban, which started with action by Congress that began under the Clinton Administration and had the support of Bush, led organizers of the annual International AIDS Conference to schedule the first American meeting for Washington, D.C. in 2012. At the event attended by Secretary Clinton yesterday, Obama's AIDS adviser, Amb. Eric Goosby, hailed the announcement of the 2012 conference as evidence that the administration is advancing the fight against AIDS and HIV.

"We are just getting started," Goosby said in a speech at the event, "but President Obama has demonstrated solid leadership on domestic and global HIV/AIDS issues, and it is an exciting time to be a part of his team."

Kavanagh said Obama is still talking the talk on AIDS and he said he has hope that Obama will live up to the promises Kavanagh said he made to AIDS activists.

"He's done some positive stuff," Kavanagh said. "And all the things he's doing rhetorically are spot on."

"It's just unclear to me why he hasn't come through on actually doing it so far," he said.

Late Update: White House spokesperson Shin Inouye responded to our story. On funding, he pointed to what he called "unprecedented steps" taken by Obama to use the stimulus to "shore up financing" for states hit by the economic downturn.

"However, [AIDS funding] is a shared responsibility between the federal and state governments," he said. "And the federal government cannot be expected to fill in for all of the gaps in services resulting from state budget cuts."

Inouye had this to say about needle exchange programs: "[Obama] has said that he supports lifting the ban on federal funding for needle exchange when it is part of comprehensive, evidence-based programs. We are committed to getting this done as part of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy."

Comments (23) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

December 1, 2009 2:58 PM   

It's never enough.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:06 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

No. His administration is obviously a colossal failure on a scale never before seen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:10 PM    in reply to CT Voter

His administration is a breath of fresh air compared to the last 8 years of failed Bush policies.

It's this AIDS stuff that simply doesn't matter that much in the big scheme of things. We should just get our priorities straight.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:16 PM   

The reality is Obama lifted the travel ban, and is developing a National Policy on AIDS for the first time.

I know they have to raise money, but why these groups resort to such histrionics after less than a year is beyond me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:19 PM    in reply to Dorn76

They are just joining the chorus of the others.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

December 1, 2009 5:11 PM    in reply to Viva!America!

Rev. Warren refused to condemn the Ugandan law proposing the death penalty for homosexuals.

You fail to keep AIDS funding on pace with inflation and you wimp out on needle exchange.

I still want that pony.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 6:25 PM    in reply to AJM

We're workin' on that pony!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:20 PM   

That's American politics in a nutshell. On the right, they follow when they should dissent, on the left they dissent when they should follow.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 6:32 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Amen

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:22 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

when the 'issue' involves people DYING, you rearrange your priorities, you moron.

Or at least sane and rational human beings do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 3:27 PM   

Evan was right to pose this title as a question. Nothing in that article suggests that he is failing. What are the other points?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 4:19 PM    in reply to Viva!America!

Evan is merely employing the Cavuto Mark. It's standard journalism practice.

Wait. Is Evan a Fox News Plant? News at 11!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 5:24 PM   

I disagree that he's failing but there is certainly a realignment of interests. Most of the negative comments in the article deal with the US presence in international work; and recently there have been more and more cases of new infections among younger, often African-American MSM's here in the US. There is only a finite amount of money and I think NIAID is returing their gaze to domestic prevention.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 6:13 PM   

The Obama administration's policy seems to be largely in line with Bush's right now, but Bush was getting a "B+" rating and Obama gets a "D+" rating, despite having ended the HIV travel ban?

Curious.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 6:24 PM   

I want to thank all of the little people that made this honor happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 6:29 PM   

It never fails when the dems get in office, all the special interests groups think their issue is the most important. It isn't as though he's been twiddling his thumbs looking for something to do and just ignored the AIDS issue.

This is just more bullshit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:04 PM   

Obviously the president's job entails more than just handling one issue, but can't we take some criticism on this one? Aside from ending the travel ban, can we point to other constructive steps the administration is taking? The point is that more needs to be done and I think we can acknowledge that. What are the ramifications of this D+ grade? None that are significant. It should just serve as a wake-up call.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:28 PM   

This seems strikingly ridiculous. There are basically no grounds whatever for giving Obama a worse grade than Bush, in that Obama is basically maintaining Bush's policies, but also lifted the entry ban. So clearly, whatever grade Bush had, Obama ought to have a slightly better one. Is Obama perfect on AIDS policy? Of course not. Is he worse than Bush? That seems like a pretty hard to defend proposition.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:34 PM   

This is an issue where a good speech accomplishes nothing. People who are dependent on expensive drugs to keep alive can't use talk instead. Moderation and taking time to form a consensus don't work here either.

The President has done more than disappoint; he's given the United States Treasury away to the investment banks, essentially accomplishing Grover Norquist's goal of shrinking government until it can be drowned in the bathtub. Although the goal has been achieved, it will now take a few painful years to become obvious. It's not necessarily Obama's fault, but I'd sure like to see him wake up and throw a bunch of his economic advisers overboard.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:35 PM   

When Obama was a candidate, courting the LGBT vote, he campaigned on topics like increased funding for AIDS prevention and HIV research, support for reasonable and responsible needle exchange programs to promote risk reduction, ending Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and equal rights for everyone - regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. Since becoming President, he has done what, exactly? He has lifted the travel ban on HIV+ people (a relic from Reagan's time), frozen HIV funding at Bush's levels (which is effectively a 4-10% decrease when medical inflation is taken into account), back tracked on his stand on needle exchange, and spoken out against gay marriage. As a gay man, forgive me for feeling less than enamored with this President. Meanwhile, there seems to be plenty of money to bail out Wall Street, fund the wars he promised to end, and to prop up GM and Ford. Giving him a "D" is generous in my opinion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 7:53 PM    in reply to GeneR

Agreed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 8:39 PM    in reply to GeneR

Ford was propped up? Really? You might want to check that, along with a few other of your erroneous statements. At any rate, I doubt anyone in Michigan shares your flippant attitude about the importance of those actions with regards to GM. 30% or so unemployment is already plenty enough, thanks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 1, 2009 8:27 PM   

I think that pushing for universal healthcare, with no denial of coverage for preexisting conditions like AIDS, and ending the AIDS travel ban should count for something? Silly me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on