TPMDC

Landrieu, Lincoln: No Final Public Option Deal Until CBO Weighs In

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Health care negotiators have not yet sealed the deal to remove the opt out public option from the Senate bill. Speaking to reporters this afternoon, Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA)--two health care swing votes who helped negotiate a bourgeoning compromise on the public option--said much still depends on what the CBO concludes about the menu of alternatives sent their way.

Lincoln was reluctant to describe last night's news as a deal.

"There was no compromise," Lincoln corrected, refusing to weigh in on the broad outline on the table. "There were a lot of ideas, where there was consensus that we needed more information to move forward."

Landrieu was more forthcoming. Regarding the proposal to allow people between the ages of 55 and 64 to be insured by Medicare, she said, "it's just one of the ideas that we as a group--again, we don't speak for the entire senate, we represent different viewpoints--but that might be, again, something that should be considered. But because we don't have a score, we can't tell."

"There are a lot of small business people who are between the ages of 55 and 64," Landrieu said.

"We, all 10 of us, think that's a very good idea, given our negotiations," Landrieu noted. "But until we get a score, nothing will be settled."

"We actually think some of the things we did might save money, and we can use that money to expand, she went on."

Sen. Russ Feingold is also saying he's waiting for the CBO to weigh in.

Comments (9) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

December 9, 2009 3:42 PM   

How wonderful these dogs - blue or otherwise- must feel to have the entire nation's health future in their hands?

By the way I thought Reid paid Landrieu... what more does she want?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 3:47 PM   

Could be a "yes" vote.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 3:50 PM   

"There was no compromise," Lincoln corrected, refusing to weigh in on the broad outline on the table. "There were a lot of ideas, where there was consensus that we needed more information to move forward."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 4:00 PM   

Lincoln still lists on her web site that she favors a public option. I think it is a typo and she means a pubic option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 4:02 PM   

...much still depends on what the CBO concludes about the menu of alternatives sent their way
And if the new CBO analysis concludes that the Reid's original version of the Public Option is more cost-effective, does that mean L&L will now vote for the Public Option?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to BronxInTN

No.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 4:11 PM   

The L & L girls from the Senate are really enjoying dicking the rest of the country around! I hope we can dick them around next election cycle for each of them!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 4:15 PM   

"bourgeoning" == "burgeoning"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 9, 2009 5:14 PM    in reply to agio

No, "bourgeoning" == "a legislative process by which a bill is made more bourgeois". Term of art.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on