
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has a lesson for fellow legislators: wait until legislative proposals have been unveiled in writing before making final judgments (unless those proposals involve the public option or a Medicare buy-in).
"One of the things we've learned in the hectic last couple of weeks is that we all ought to be looking at paper," Lieberman told reporters this morning. "We ought to be looking at specific legislative language before we say I agree or I object."
Of course, Lieberman has objected to a public option compromise, that would allow people age 55-64 to buy into Medicare. "But to be as explicit as I can be now, if, as appears to be happening, the so-called public option government run insurance program is out, and the Medicare buy-in...is out, and there's no other attempts to bring things like that in, then I'm gonna be in a position where I can say--I'm getting to the position where I can say what I wanted to say all along: that I'm ready to vote for health care reform."
So if all of his demands are met, then maybe he'll likely vote for reform.
Lieberman doubled down today on his explanation of why he supported the Medicare buy-in just three months ago.
"I did that before the Finance committee came out with this very large--and again, I'd say generous, but I support it--system of subsidies, to bring, basically lower-middle income people into the health insurance system," Lieberman said.
I asked, "weren't those subsidies baked into the health care reform architecture long before that, with the HELP Committee bill..."
"Not to that extent," he said.
OK then.
Walter Mitty
December 15, 2009 12:24 PM
Can we stop with Lieberman photos - his face makes me nauseous.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
December 15, 2009 12:27 PM
I hope connecticut is happy that they sent this fool back to the senate. I remember the argument why he was "ok" was because he was "liberal" on social issues. WTF? Liberal my a**. He should just go over to the repukes. That's where he belongs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
December 15, 2009 12:30 PM in reply to Michael A
The AFL-CIO supported him whole Hog.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
December 15, 2009 12:29 PM
This lying jerk deserves nothing but contempt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
December 15, 2009 12:43 PM
This is what happens when you spend too much time hanging out with Republicans - the "it's OK if I do it, but FU if *you* do it" mentality is apparently contagious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
December 15, 2009 12:45 PM
Lieberman: "I'm getting to the position where I can say what I wanted to say all along: that I'm ready to vote for health care reform."
And he'll continue to say it -- while he looks around for the next phony objection he can use to deep six the bill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
artwrite
December 15, 2009 12:55 PM
Joe was instrumental in killing health care reform in 1994. Should not be a surprise that he's doing it again. Joe, you should read the bill too. Then read the writing on the wall that says you'll never get elected to public office again. Never.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonigo
December 15, 2009 1:08 PM in reply to artwrite
I don't think he'll mind all the much. There's always a spot waiting for him as a commentator on Fox.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
December 15, 2009 1:14 PM in reply to tonigo
Representing "the left" no doubt.
A Faux token liberal: just the role he was born to play.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
December 15, 2009 12:55 PM
duplicity - deceitfulness in speech or conduct; speaking or acting in two different ways concerning the same matter with intent to deceive; double-dealing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
December 15, 2009 12:56 PM
Oh that crazy Joe. You just never know what'll come out of his mouth next. But, count on it being a complete reversal of something he said previously.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeeJo
December 15, 2009 1:11 PM
Joe "Rent a Senator" Liarman is not to be taken seriously on anything he says. He has flip - flopped his way through out the debate and has done nothing but carry the messages of those who have rented him. The one thing about him is that he is not for sale. If he were we would know where he would stand on an issue. Because he is for rent he can change as the bids change. What a dink!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
December 15, 2009 1:13 PM
Huh? That was total gibberish.
He was FOR Medicare buy-in (which the CBO says would REDUCE the deficit and help shore-up Medicare), before the Finance Committee did it's subsidy thingy, which would ADD to the deficit, and he's always said cost was his concern?
The guy can't even be consistent hour to hour.
What a farging icehole.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
December 15, 2009 1:30 PM
another 123 die today! Thanks Steny!
All members of Congress will give up their public run health care insurance untill all Americans are insured!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
December 15, 2009 1:43 PM in reply to Progressive Party
If you're going to spam comment rolls you should work on your spelling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
December 15, 2009 1:36 PM
Those of us 60-64 will never see any benefits from this bill; instead, we'll be subjected to all it's horrors. It probably will be good for those in the future but it will bankrupt me. There is NOTHING in this bill that will benefit us and a lot that will make it even worse than it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
December 15, 2009 1:45 PM in reply to Andreams
Good luck surviving those 4 years. Maybe it's like the 'weeder classes' in college. (no offense meant, purely satirical)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
December 15, 2009 1:45 PM
Lieberman is a lying, vindictive sack. And Generalisimo Francisco Franco is still dead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
December 15, 2009 2:32 PM in reply to fbacon2
Aren't they one and the same? :-)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Peter Principle
December 15, 2009 3:11 PM in reply to dswx
Well, I can think of one way in which I wish they were both the same.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?