
Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman sent Sen. Ben Nelson a letter today asking him to vote against the health care bill and to join Republicans in a filibuster of the bill.
Nelson (D-NE) is one of the most precarious health care votes in the Democratic caucus.
Heineman told Nelson he is "the 60th vote" and called the bill an "unfunded mandate."
Full letter after the jump.
"I am writing you today because the current Senate health care bill is bad news for Nebraska. America's health care system needs improvement, but this bill is not the answer. You are now the 60th vote, and as Governor of the State that we both represent, I urge you to vote against this bill and against cloture."You have said that the debate on health care reform needs to be based on facts, not rhetoric. I agree. The facts are compelling and undeniable. This bill increases taxes, cuts Medicare and is an unfunded expansion of Medicaid.
"In reviewing the current Senate bill, it appears that while the increased state costs for the initial three years of the Medicaid expansion would be covered, the program quickly becomes a substantial unfunded Medicaid mandate. Late yesterday, the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services completed the analysis of the bill in full. The report is enclosed.
"In just six years, FY 2014-FY 2019, the Nebraska Medicaid program will cumulatively grow by a new $2,493,852,279. This $2.5 billion will be passed on to citizens through direct or indirect taxes and fees.
"Federal reimbursement to the State would fall short by approximately $45.5 million by FY 2019. Ultimately, this means the cost will be greater than $450 million over a ten year period. Furthermore, program costs are projected to increase twice as fast as reimbursements.
"The State of Nebraska cannot afford an unfunded mandate and uncontrolled spending of this magnitude. Additionally, Nebraskans are very concerned about the bill's increase in payroll taxes. Rural hospitals are very concerned about their ability to survive. Seniors are very concerned about the cuts in Medicare.
"The bottom line is the current Senate bill is not in Nebraska's best interest. Therefore, I strongly urge you to oppose the current Senate health care legislation. Please vote "no" on cloture and vote "no" on the bill. Thank you."
Walter Mitty
December 16, 2009 6:05 PM
This guy will take Nelson's seat next time it's up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Outwest
December 16, 2009 7:32 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I don't know if you're saying this tongue-in-cheek or not, but you are correct. That is exactly what is going to happen. It helps explain why Nelson is trying to out-GOP the GOP.
There's no end to politicians of this ilk in the state of Nebraska.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Outwest
December 16, 2009 7:56 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I don't know if you're saying this tongue-in-cheek or not, but you are correct. That is exactly what is going to happen. It helps explain why Nelson is trying to out-GOP the GOP.
There's no end to politicians of this ilk in the state of Nebraska.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
December 16, 2009 11:43 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I wouldn't count on it. Nelson is the most popular senator in the country based on support from one's own constituents.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
December 16, 2009 6:12 PM
How nice for the Republican governor to recommend the same action that Howard Dean is advocating. The governor must understand, as it is self-evident, that passing the bill will definitely be bad for the Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
OhioGuy
December 16, 2009 6:25 PM
I had no idea so many Republicans were good progressives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
December 16, 2009 6:37 PM
If he were a good progressive, he wouldn't care if the government couldn't afford it. He would just make up some bullcrap about cutting waste and then proceed to blame people opposed to him for causing the deaths of American citizens.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 16, 2009 8:41 PM
Well, DUH! A GOP gov. tells him to filibuster. Shocking news!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 16, 2009 9:03 PM
Politics, diplomacy and construction projects share one thing in common: friends make phone calls, enemies write letters.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
December 16, 2009 9:42 PM
so that's the next talking point: unfunded mandate.
yep, there it is:
http://republican.senate.gov/public/?CFID=29152481&CFTOKEN=42611387
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steaming Pile
December 17, 2009 8:30 AM
If he's opposing it because it is an unfunded mandate, he's absolutely right. KO said as much last night. Mandates without the PO make the situation worse, not better.
Maybe I'm not used to seeing a Republican oppose something for the right reasons. Or maybe it's such a no-brainer that if the mandates went away, Gov. Heineman would find some other bullshit reason to oppose it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?