TPMDC

SEIU's Stern Softens Tone And Outlines What He Wants From Final Bill

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

SEIU President Andy Stern

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Service Employees International Union president Andy Stern, who criticized the Senate health care bill last week, issued a statement last night calling the vote a step closer to "reforming" the system.

"While the process to get to sixty and the willingness of individual Senators to use the Senate's rules to distort democracy for their own interest was disappointing - make no mistake about it: for working Americans this vote signals progress," Stern said.

He also blasted Republicans for sitting on the sidelines "jeering, rooting for America to fail."

Stern said there will be a chance to improve the bill after it passes the Senate and lawmakers look to a conference committee to merge that legislation with the House bill. He outlined on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday what he'd like to see changed during the conference process.

Stern said he wants:

• more affordability provisions
• different subsidies for middle-income Americans
• improving at least on the tax on benefits, if not eliminating it
• more insurance regulation

Stern said he was "as disappointed as anyone" there isn't going to be a public option in the bill, but said progressives want to see progress.

"We now have to fight for the changes we want in the conference committee, and then make a decision when it's over," he said.

He also said voters are still waiting to see the change Obama promised during the campaign.

His members, he said, "elected 60 Democratic senators because they promised them they would promote change."

"And all we've done with that gift, I would say, is squander it. You know, we have not even been able to have a legitimate debate about some of these issues in the Senate," he said. "This is crazy, that people can use their individual votes to distort democracy. Americans wanted them to have real debates, they promised them an opportunity, and they need to do something about it."

He complained about Senate rules, saying "This is about one human being able to stand up and thwart change. I don't think that's what people voted for. I think they're getting enormously frustrated in the lack of change."

Though he added, "We are really proud that this president has kept this health care debate alive right now."

Comments (15) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

December 21, 2009 10:31 AM   

SEIU just lost an organizing election at Memorial Hospital in Santa Rosa, CA.
NUHW beat SEIU's effort to "poach" membership, by something like 283-13.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 10:43 AM   

Just gloating? Or is there some relevance that escapes me? Maybe NUHW (an acronym not nearly as familiar as SEIU) has something to say about Health Care Reform? Or not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 3:53 PM    in reply to converse

Gloating? No. Speculating that Stern is strategizing against being blown away again in Los Angeles in January? Yes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:12 AM   

SEIU is a top-down, undemocratic union. In california, some unions have decertified from the SEIU and joined the NUHW and other unions. One should not be surprised at Stern's pandering comments or the fact that he is willing to accept such a sell-out bill. We'll see if he gets any of his demands. He's like all the other gang of union piecard bosses, they don't recognize that unions expand their base by empowering their members, rather than viewing them as sources of revenues. Hmm, come to think of it, not much different from the democrats, now, are they?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:21 AM    in reply to sabocat

Stern and the SEIU have done more good for more people than you and NUHW will ever hope to accomplish. Same goes for the Democratic Party and the future of the Health Care Reform bill. But then, that's not how you and your's measure success, is it? It's only your way or the highway. Good luck with that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

December 21, 2009 11:40 AM   

I think that's a reasonable, attainable set of demands.

It seems like the House should have a lot of leverage to make demands like that in conference if they're being expected to trade away the public option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:48 AM   

"We now have to fight for the changes we want in the conference committee, and then make a decision when it's over," he said.

He also said voters are still waiting to see the change Obama promised during the campaign.

I mostly agree. We'll see what the majority is able to do. Decide accordingly after that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:25 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

I know we're on the same side of this issue I don't foresee any positive changes in conference. If Dems had the guts to do something like that they wouldn't have capitulated to begin with.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:15 PM    in reply to wbgonne

If I were making bets, I wouldn't bet on the bill moving to the left.

But hey, the democratic party has their chance to do it, and I hope they do.

But I tend to agree that the calculation was made to give the industry what they want in order to score a win. I'll fight that all I can, and if that's the way the game is gonna be played, I definitely will find better candidates/organizations to support. After all, that is how our system works.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:23 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

Ditto. Merry Christmas!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 2:57 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

You do that. Forgetting, of course, that the last time that happened, the so-called "progressives" of America helped elect Bush for eight years. I guess some groups are only happy when they're on the outside yelling at the "bad guys" who are doing the messy work of bringing change.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:17 PM   

That's just not true that 60 Democratic senators promised change. Maybe 50 did. Lieberman and Nelson were known creatures of the status quo when they were reelected, and the way the Senate works, they get vetoes. We need to get past being angry and recognize that enough Democrats to form a simple majority did do everything they could. Now we need to get them to remove the institutional blinders and recognize the need to reform the Senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 3:01 PM   

the so-called "progressives" of America helped elect Bush for eight years

Wrong reading of history. Dead wrong. But no wonder Establishment Democrats are your spineless heroes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 3:52 PM    in reply to wbgonne

If, by "Establishment Democrats", you mean the ones that know how to count to sixty, then, yeah, I'll take those over sophists and idealogues any day.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 10:31 PM   

Disappointing that SEIU /Stern and the progressive senators like Feingold won't fight for the public option. What is the power of organizing, delivering elections if your agenda is ignored and undermined by the President who ran on 'change'. Back room deals with big pharma, no re-importation, no regulation on the insurance companies while we hand them a boondoggle. Hard to understand when the corporatists will be held accountable-- not on war, not on finance, not on healthcare????

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on