TPMDC

Snowe's A No For Now, But Is She Still In Play?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

After months of negotiating, struggling, and agonizing, Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) has come off the fence. She does not support the Senate health care bill. That's much to President Obama's disappointment. As recently as this weekend he was trying to bring her into the fold.

"He was trying to solicit my support for this legislation," Snowe told reporters.

But is she out of the picture for good? The answer is: probably. But she's not ruling out voting for the legislation that comes out of negotiations between the House and Senate.

I asked her if she'd ruled out voting for the conference report.

"I have no idea...and I said I would help to play a constructive role in any way that I could," Snowe said. "But I wanted time to be able to modify this legislation. I mean, it really, it, I think it defies logic and reasonableness on this generational change that is transcendent for the President and for Congress, and not to have the opportunity to amend it. I mean it's almost absurd, frankly."

So. Not likely. But maybe!

Comments (14) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

December 21, 2009 8:48 AM   

What was she doing all of Autumn?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 8:57 AM   

Dear Sen. Snowe,

What's absurd is that you, as a member of a party that filibustered a bill that provided funding for our combat troops would dare cast aspirations on the opposing party.

This isn't your first rodeo, Ms. Snowe. You know full well that any further delay gives aid and comfort to the entrenched interests that want to kill HCR at any cost, as they have for over 50 years.

You also know that the only reason your party, the party that spread the death panel lies, has decided that it would rather be legislative terrorists than negotiate in good faith to pass the best HCR bill possible is for naked political gain.

The inescapable fact is that you are a hypocrite, just like your colleague, Susan Collins, and no amount of projecting or obfuscating can change that fact.

Merry Christmas,

Rich

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 9:14 AM   

Either 1) She has redefined the word "flake," taking it to new levels of absurdity; or 2) she's playing the usual bullshit "moderate Republican" game of Lucy; or 3) She's ready for her closeup now, Mr. DeMille.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 9:24 AM   

We do not need Senator Snowe. Why??? She does not have any conscience. This is the same group of people that found the money for the wars but not to make people healthy. I don't understand these people. Where are they from? These people are not human beings. They are just a bunch of selfish people. They need to be voted out of office. They have their own insurance but not us the taxpayers. Forget the Republican Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 9:41 AM    in reply to Sode

Totally agree. She gives no coherent rationale for her opposition. She's been working on this for the better part of a year and she still needs more time? There are 45,000 people dying every year because they don't have health insurance and she's willingness to let them keep dying because of some unexplained, apparently minor misgivings? For shame.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:18 PM    in reply to Sode


"These people are not human beings"

Sounds a little extreme. They are being irrational though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 9:54 AM   

snowe knew all along she was not voting for this bill, and obama was a fool to keep dealing with her and the rest of the gop. all they did was hold things up, which is what they wanted

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:09 PM    in reply to neesy08

That's not really clear that she was negotiating in bad faith (unlike Lieberman). She did join with Collins and Specter in supporting the stimulus. Hopefully she will support climate change legislation.

I do agree that what's absurd is asking for more time at this point in the game.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 10:11 AM   

If she insists on joining the rest of the Republican obstructionists in Congress who are desperate to stop ANYTHING and EVERYTHING just because they can, Snowe will face serious criticism from the majority of her constituents, possibly to the point of threatening her long-standing political security.

If the 'baggers go after her from the right, and the centrists abandon her for leaning too far to the right on this issue particularly, she may very well face a challenge she can't overcome from a moderate Dem.

She's skating on thin ice if she joins the obstructionists.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 10:19 AM   

Here's the problem:

A combined bill comes back to Senate from negotiations with House and it CANNOT further be amended after that process which as we know is called the "conference".

It cannot be amended upon returning to the Senate but it can be filibustered. The insurance barons (and their paid stooge, Revoltin' Joe's wife) will have lots more cracks at Revoltin' Joe until that point, and since the post-conference bill will somehow be different from what was sent to House no matter what, he can say that such difference whatever it is is a dealbreaker -- he now must filibuster owing to what we sniggeringly call his conscience.

So Snowe's vote may again be needed to break the filibuster. So it's time to such up to her again, unfortunately.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bk

user-pic

December 21, 2009 11:26 AM   

My hope is that the House will vote for the Senate bill, and pingpong it right to President Obama's desk. I think, for now, this is the best we can get, so we need to bite the bullet. Time for incremental changes is within the next 2-5 years. It does insure an additional 30million people; there is some choice in the insurance exchanges; children with serious illnesses are immediately covered; so I hope that the "perfect" will not become the enemy of the good on the part of House members.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bk

user-pic

December 21, 2009 11:28 AM   

I meant to add, this way we don't need Senator Snow's vote, and she becomes irrelevant. She had her chance and blew it. Let the voters of Maine decide if she had them in mind when she said no to healthcare reform.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:55 AM   

Is anyone buying this other than brain-dead pundits? If she actually wanted to offer amendments, she didn't need "time," she only needed to say what she wanted in return for her vote. Reid almost certainly would have given her anything that wouldn't lose Democratic votes. This is nearly as transparent as McCain's whining that Obama didn't try to work with Republicans.

If you're going to BS, at least have some pride and do a good job -- this is just lame!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:10 PM    in reply to Redshift

Agreed. Republicans idea of "working the Democrat party," as they say, is that they get to be the decider.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on