
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA), who switched from the Republicans to the Democrats earlier this year, is now trying to seize the left ground against his primary challenger, Rep. Joe Sestak. Specter's campaign is accusing Sestak of flip-flopping by supporting the Afghanistan surge, when he'd previously wanted a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq -- and Sestak is firing back that Specter supported George W. Bush on Iraq and Afghanistan.
Specter's campaign has posted this on their Web site:
Not only does Joe Sestak support expanding the war in Afghanistan, he also opposes a timetable for withdrawal, a clear flip flop from his 2006 Congressional campaign when he strongly urged the use of a timetable in Iraq.
Advocating "an exit strategy of measurements," on MSNBC last night, Sestak said of President Obama's commitment to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan in 18 months: "I wish he hadn't set a definitive timetable."
That plea comes in stark contrast to Sestak's 2006 support for a strict timeline for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.
In response, Sestak has given TPM this statement, pointing out that Specter supported the Bush administration on Afghanistan and Iraq for years, when he was a Republican:
"I understand that Arlen is going to play politics on this issue, like he does on most issues. The reason we're struggling in Afghanistan now is that Republicans like Arlen Specter and George Bush took their eyes off the ball and went to war in Iraq instead of finishing the job in Afghanistan against the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. But as someone who served in the Navy for 31 years and as someone who saw firsthand how the ill-conceived war in Iraq undermined what we need to do in Afghanistan to protect our national security, I'm simply unwilling to take the path of political convenience."
Walter Mitty
December 2, 2009 6:10 PM
What a sorry attempt at pandering to the left by Specter. And the audacity to call Sestak on a flip-flop (that wasn't even a flip-flop) when Specter has 30 years of voting Republican, including 8 year of voting 95% with Bush. He set it up perfectly for a Sestak reply.
Here is a hint Arlen, Iraq and Afghanistan are different wars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oblio
December 3, 2009 12:52 AM
okay, I'm now endorsing Sestak in this primary. Sestak is at least honest. Specter, I just don't trust as being a liberal vote after 2010.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenesq
December 3, 2009 9:36 AM
Pandering: it's not just for breakfast anymore.
Of course, what offends me the most about Specter's attack is that he draws a parallel between Iraq and Afghanistan. Hello, two different situations...or did you forget that when you were cheerleading for both of them?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sharonsj
December 3, 2009 10:11 AM
I live in Pennsylvania and I can't decide between these two. I'm definitely not fond of Specter. However, Sestak has spent a long time in the military and he serves on a military budget committee. That means he will NOT deal with our bloated, wasteful defense budget which is the biggest in the world. I don't see how he is different from wingnut Republicans who call for tax breaks and cutting social programs but won't touch a penny of the Pentagon's monopoly money. So we have planes that don't fly and tanks that don't run but no protective gear for our soldiers. And we need to get out of Iraq and Afghanistan now. But will a life-long military man finally take our side?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?