
SEIU President Andy Stern doesn't like the Senate health care bill. But he can't quite bring himself to oppose it. In a letter to members, after an emergency meeting of the SEIU executive committee yesterday, Stern has penned a letter to members highlighting both the good and the bad in the legislation, and urging a fight to improve it.
The good:
We talked about everything that makes this reform meaningful:
· The 30 million more people who will have healthcare they can count on;
· The people who will no longer lose their coverage if they get sick;
· All of us who no longer have to worry about being denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions;
· Women who will no longer be discriminated against just because of their gender.
The bad:
while it is not entirely clear what the Senate bill will look like, it is becoming clearer that:
· For many people, care will still be too expensive to afford.
· Some of you would face an additional burden because your health insurance benefits would be taxed.
· And the best way we saw possible to hold insurance companies accountable was no longer an option.
Stern's frustrations aren't just substantive, but political. In the letter he calls out Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) in all but name. "[A]t the very moment that we saw real and meaningful changes within our grasp, one Senator came forward to say "no we can't." He can't let the Senate have an up-or-down vote on health insurance reform."
Frustrated? Yes. Hoping the more progressive House bill wins out in conference? But ready to kill the bill? Not just yet. You can read the entire letter here.
BohemianBill
December 17, 2009 9:36 AM
Sure, fight for amendments to the health care legislation. Just like all of those side agreements regarding environmental controls, worker safety and workers rights which were supposed to have been passed when NAFTA and WTO were passed. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice,... Sorry, no sale this time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
December 17, 2009 10:05 AM
word
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
December 17, 2009 10:22 AM in reply to Indie Pro
this a comment in agreement with the commenter above
no mandates! No corporate insurance bailout!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
December 17, 2009 10:30 AM in reply to Indie Pro
I like this from his letter:
Our challenge to you, to the President, to the Senate and to the House of Representatives is to fight. Now, more than ever, all of us must stand up, remember what health insurance reform is all about, and fight like hell to deliver real and meaningful reform to the American people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hologram5
December 17, 2009 10:11 AM
The bill that is in the senate is so watered down that it's a joke. I can see it now, if this one passes and they start fining people for not buying something they cannot afford, there will be many class action lawsuits against the fed gov't stating that this violates the constitution. I think they are counting on that. You cannot fine me for something I can't afford. These politicians are such dumbasses I don't think they are human anymore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
December 17, 2009 10:58 AM in reply to hologram5
They are NOT dumbasses.
They are wholly bought off tools of those who will profit from this arrangement BTW, the same group that profited from NAFTA.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 17, 2009 10:15 AM
Yes. Let's pass the clunker we have now and improve it via reconciliation LATER.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
December 17, 2009 10:23 AM in reply to ilovebacon
Oh sure. That's gonna happen. No doubt next year the Senate Dems will force a public option though in reconciliation.
Do you realize how ridiculous that is? Really, do you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CommunityOrganizer
December 17, 2009 10:39 AM
Ted Kennedy would be working to improve the bill, not to kill it, even if it didn't have a public option.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
December 17, 2009 11:01 AM in reply to CommunityOrganizer
No one can speak for the dead, but I doubt that if Kennedy were alive this bill would be quite so awful, or that he would support it in its current form.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 17, 2009 8:39 PM in reply to mjshep
Please. Teddy was in the Senate since the mid-1960s and never got any bill through. It's testament to Obama's genius that he's getting one through.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
December 17, 2009 11:23 AM in reply to CommunityOrganizer
Please don't disinter Sen Kennedy and drag him out to defend this feckless White House. Kennedy was A FIGHTER!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 17, 2009 8:38 PM
Even without a public option, I'll take this bill over the status quo. The status quo is untenable!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?