TPMDC

Tea Partiers' Next Target: American Business?

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!

Read More

Tea Party

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The end-all-regulation, my-health-insurance-company-is-just-fine-thanks crowd in the Tea Party movement have found an unlikely target for their next national effort: Corporate America.

The Tea Party Patriots group is planning a "National Day of Strike" for Jan. 20, one year to the day after President Obama's inauguration. The goal of the strike, according to the website where it's being planned, is to "financially cripple" the companies across America the group says are "backing the leftist agenda" and "funding socialism."

How can you tell which companies are funding socialism? The answer, according to organizers: they advertise on CNN and/or MSNBC, and they donate money to Democratic candidates.

Former Christian Coalition state legislative director and conservative political strategist Allen Hardage is organizing the effort. In his message calling on tea partiers to join the strike, he says he knows from experience that some corporations are sending a message to the left with their advertising dollars.

"Having spent the last 21 years working in advertising I can tell you that before someone take out an advertising plan on CNN, MSNBC etc, they know where they stand," he writes. "Contrary to popular belief it's not just about money, if it were MSNBC would have no advertisers."

On Jan. 20, Hardage is calling on tea partiers to "expose" the socialist-supporting companies, and bombard them with phone calls, emails and protests to demand they stop advertising with "liberal" media outlets and contributing to Democratic campaigns. If they, don't, the tea partiers will promise to boycott the firms into financial ruin.

It's not clear how organized the strike movement is at this point. (An email to Hardage was not returned Dec. 24.) The plan was first announced Dec. 20, and on the strike website organizers say they have several thousand followers on various social networks. But the site says Hardage is still searching for regional directors and staff to orchestrate the scheme across the country.

Some conservatives are warning the tea partiers against the strike. On his blog, conservative law professor William Jacobson argues the plan is doomed to failure, based not least on the fact that conservatives could be alienating a potential ally when they take on the machinery of capitalism:

I completely sympathize with the emotion behind the idea. But the idea is a really bad idea for at least two reasons.

First, conservatives are not about boycotting commerce. We are about generating commerce and free enterprise. We also are about working hard, so taking the day off as a means of protest runs against our grain.

And just who is it that we would hurt? The small business people who are a critical part of our movement. A boycott of innocent businesses sends the wrong message, even if for only one day.

Jacobson says the second reason not to strike is found among the progressive groups who've tried boycotts in the past. He ticks off a list of boycotts against Glenn Beck advertisers, "Mormons and the state of Utah" and writes, "Not one of the boycotts worked, and these failures left the boycotters looking foolish and less powerful."

Comments (62) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (2)

December 24, 2009 12:00 PM   

Tea Baggers expressing freedom and their independence by letting Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist and the "Club for Growth" organize them into a day of protest with pre-printed talking points.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:00 PM   

The idea that corporations support socialism makes my head hurt a little... What is IN that tea?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 1:52 PM    in reply to Cracker Jack

Good question about the tea. A better question, should they actually succeed in organizing a strike against those who advertise on CNN, MSNBC and all them lib congress folk: How will they get to all the protest events when those struck corporations no longer fund their bus transport, print the legible signs for them, etc.? (I mean, I know United Health, CIGNA, and other corporations that organize these "grass roots" movements post ads there... .)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:17 AM    in reply to Cracker Jack

I remember in the daze of my youth something about "magic mushrooms" found growing on cow pies. Never know what inventive methods can be employed nowadays to nurture specific flavoring into tea leaves. After all, there's that cat-scat coffee that's the rage of the coffee aficionados - the one where the bean passes thru the cat's digestive system that adds an intense flavor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:07 PM   

An excellent chance for the Tea Party "movement" to show how ineffective and insignificant they really are.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

DR

user-pic

December 24, 2009 12:12 PM   

So I guess Newsmax is a socialist promoting company. They advertise on MSNBC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:42 PM    in reply to DR

ha. true, true

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:14 PM   

So either they are corporate tools of the Far Right or they are "community organizers," the type derided by Sister Sarah in her RNC acceptance speech.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:14 PM   

Die Fahne Hoch!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

TJF

user-pic

December 24, 2009 12:20 PM   

They can protest MSNBC by turning off their G.E. light bulbs and sitting in the dark.

"Hell no, we won't glow!"

I've seen plenty of stupid protesters from one end of the political spectrum to the other, but these folks stand alone in their utter incoherence.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:21 AM    in reply to TJF

One gets the impression they still believe every logo out there is unique and a stand-alone corporate entity. Seems they must have been asleep during the merger mania back the the Reagan days when the big guys started buying out all the little guys.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:24 PM   

Tea Baggers : "In order to defeat socialism, we need to become socialists and strike!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:24 AM    in reply to GermanyOrFlorida

They actually have to employ a method used by unions to bend business practices to support a social agenda the work environment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:31 PM   

Man, when they realize who the principal organizers of boycotts are, it'll be like an outtake from Scanners...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:35 PM   

The Tea Party has unionized. lol!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:48 PM   

Retirees don't work, so how could they strike?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:49 PM   

Gee, for a guy who claims to have worked in advertising, Hardage sure is ignorant. Advertising on TV -- especially on cable TV -- isn't about the number of viewers, it's about targeting certain audiences. And, no, it's not about "sending a message" about the politics of a network (MSNBC, with four hours a day of wingnut Joe S certainly has trouble being portrayed as "socialist")

If we use web site traffic demographics as an indicator of viewer demographics, we can see that advertisers aren't favoring large numbers or certain political persuasions, they're favoring MONEY!

55% of those visiting Fox.com earn less than $60,000 a year.

59% of those visiting CNN.com and MSNBC.com earn MORE than $60,000 a year (30% earn more than $100K at both sites)

Now, if I want to advertise to sell a product, shall I advertise to people who have lots of money, or people who don't have very much money? Hmmm....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 4:10 PM    in reply to AmericanDad

Absolutely. Several advertisers "dropped" Glenn Beck, Fox moved other advertisers into his spots, and his numbers went up and up, so the remaining advertisers just got more audience from the loony bin they want to reach.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 7:14 PM    in reply to AmericanDad

lying with math. if 55% who visit fox make less then $60,000 it would mean 45% make more. 45% of fox viewers are alot more viewers then cnn, and msnbc, ever get. sometimes combined. try again, pea-brain.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 9:36 PM    in reply to jjdjjd

Got any numbers to back that up, or are you just letting us know how things happen in your reality?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 3:07 AM    in reply to Kuyleh

sure do, the tv cable ratings come out every month. last month o'reilly had an average of 2.6 million people, olberman 400,000 and cnn holding up the rear with 280,000. it gets worse for the other programs in prime time. you, of course, can type in 'cable tv ratings' on your toolbar to find this info out, but i don't think you'll like it. personally, i don't either. i just don't like people playing with the math. i find o'reilly and hannitty to be buffoons, as is olberman. like you i find maddow to be hot. i think you're a hottie too. merry christmas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 27, 2009 12:05 AM    in reply to jjdjjd

You're as ignorant as the fool in the story. Cable TV allows for pin-pointed advertising. A rifle-shot rather than the old shot-gun approach. So your "big numbers" theory doesn't hold. But nice try.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 27, 2009 7:05 AM    in reply to AmericanDad

hey jerk, what does that have to do with the fact that more libs watch fox then msnbc? in fact, i had more people at my house on christmas then watch msnbc.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 12:21 PM    in reply to jjdjjd

jjdjjd,
You, Obviously, "Suffer" from the Fox-lovers Head-Up-ASS Syndrome!
My Dad flew a P-47 Thunderbolt, in WWII. Bill O'Lielly SAID, summer, 2006, "The Americans slaughtered 87 GERMANS, at Malmedy, during the Battle of the Bulge". TRUTH?The damn Germans SLAUGHTERED 87 Americans!!!One of MY friends Dad SAW their BODIES laying in the Snow, 3 Days later.Fox CONSTANTLY Lies, Distorts, Twists& BULLSHITS (ALL) the Stupid A-Holes who Watch them.Years&Years, of NO Experience& They STILL have the Brains Of a CHICKEN, just like the Republican Party!
free-man You people are So F-ing STUPID!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:26 AM    in reply to AmericanDad

That's why he's a political strategist - he couldn't make a living in advertizing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:50 PM   

Marx Almighty, save us! If I were a CEO at one of these demoislamsocialist corporations, I know I'd be duct-taped inside my Tatra hybrid at the very thought of being boycotted for one day by a bunch of fat ole men with no disposable income!

About the only company these guys could shut down is Miller Brewing, makers of Old Milwaukee™ and several store-brand generics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:52 PM   

Because nothing says "Socialist" like "Capitalist Tool".

The stupid - it burns!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:57 PM   

The "czars with power" sign in the photo is a hoot too. The purpose of a powerless czar is...?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:31 AM    in reply to ericf

Interesting isn't it, those signs all represents leftovers issues that the Bu$h administration didn't want to address and left for Obama to deal with.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 12:59 PM   

I like the idea. Take a day off to strike against your employer. I wonder if any of them would have the sense to go down to the unemployment office and file for that big fat unemployment check from the government after they tell thier bosses why they are on strike! I have a picture of roving bands of redneck ditto heads just waiting to get railed up by any body against any cause because they are too chicken shit to admit the real reason for all thier anger - flipping racist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 1:04 PM   

Tim Rutten, writing in the LA Times, has some interesting data, too:

"So, is the lesson here that most Americans want their news refracted through the sort of forthrightly ideological lens both Fox and MSNBC now provide? No, and here's why. First of all, the universe of cable news viewers, while growing, remains relatively small. Fox's average prime-time audience increased an impressive 10% in 2009, but it still was just 699,000. MSNBC averaged 307,000 viewers and CNN 299,000. (A reasonably sized U.S. newspaper rolls up comparable numbers.) Moreover, over any given 24-hour period in 2009, the average Fox audience was 320,000; CNN had 185,000 viewers and MSNBC 149,000.

"What these numbers suggest is that the cable networks attract a relatively small national audience of what might be called "news junkies," who follow events throughout the day and are more likely to be strongly partisan than other Americans. By the time evening rolls around, they're hungry for analysis rather than recycled reportage, and like most Americans today, they prefer interpretation that reinforces their own opinions. The significance of this preference tends to be exaggerated because news junkies include most of the people who write about the media."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 1:05 PM   

Still, I've been expecting this ever since Air America went on the air and some radio stations were openly liberal, and I've been expecting it at any moment since MSNBC started carrying open liberals. I'll admit it worries me because I've long heard that advertisers are squeamish about having their ads run in liberal media in a way they just aren't with conservative media, suggesting liberal media is much more vulnerable to boycotts of advertisers than conservatives. I especially figured the boycott of Glenn Beck was going to have blowback.

My guess, or maybe it's a hope, is that people on the left will be willing to support our media by making a point of letting advertisers know we responded to their ads and opening up our wallets to donate directly. Otherwise we'll never beat the boycotts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 5:43 AM    in reply to ericf

It's all very simple.
* Liberals question
* Conservatives accept
So it's easier to spend your advertising dollar in a market where your product, methods and motives won't be questioned or criticized.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 1:11 PM   

It's so cute watching the tea-birthers throw their little tantrums, like a 3 year old who doesn't want to take a nap.

Maybe this 'strike' will be as successful as their little 'Die In' last week. Anyone remember how well that one went over?

Eventually, babies that cry and cry will wear themselves out, and just go to sleep.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 1:54 PM   

Posting a bulletin on social networking sites isn't really organizing anything.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 2:08 PM   

Tim Rutten, writing in the LA Times, has some interesting data, too:

"So, is the lesson here that most Americans want their news refracted through the sort of forthrightly ideological lens both Fox and MSNBC now provide? No, and here's why. First of all, the universe of cable news viewers, while growing, remains relatively small. Fox's average prime-time audience increased an impressive 10% in 2009, but it still was just 699,000. MSNBC averaged 307,000 viewers and CNN 299,000. (A reasonably sized U.S. newspaper rolls up comparable numbers.) Moreover, over any given 24-hour period in 2009, the average Fox audience was 320,000; CNN had 185,000 viewers and MSNBC 149,000.

"What these numbers suggest is that the cable networks attract a relatively small national audience of what might be called "news junkies," who follow events throughout the day and are more likely to be strongly partisan than other Americans. By the time evening rolls around, they're hungry for analysis rather than recycled reportage, and like most Americans today, they prefer interpretation that reinforces their own opinions. The significance of this preference tends to be exaggerated because news junkies include most of the people who write about the media."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 2:29 PM   

I love Jacobson saying that with such a move "conservatives could be alienating a potential ally".

Uh...yeah! Even though the trail is slippery and control of some of these organizations is starting to slip from their grasp, there's a moderately well defined organizing trail leading to the fat wallets of a few insurance and oil tycoons and corps there.

About that moderately well defined trail? Thank you, Rachel (once more):

In addition to fronting that group, Dick Armey is a senior policy adviser at a law firm called DLA Piper. DLA Piper just happens to have received $830,000 this year, so far, from a giant pharmaceutical firm called Medicines Company. This after the $1.5 million Medicines Company paid Mr. Armey's firm last year.

The fact that Dick Armey and FreedomWorks are standing alongside regular Joes like Rick Scott to lead the charge against health care reform should be no surprise.

(Taken directly from Rachel Maddow show transcript of August 6, 09; there were other shows where she mapped out the trail with much greater specificity; it's in her transcripts somewhere, but I just haven't taken the time to dig that out at this point; feel free, right? It's there.

In case you missed it: FreedomWorks had their little bus tour pumping up the baggers (does that sound as potentially salacious as it appears???) with their Nazi final solution comparisons. The show transcript quoted and linked above with the Rick Scott dude interview is also very, very revealing of corporate ties (including his) behind this supposed "grass roots" bagger movement.

In full fairness (though this ain't no fair fight on their side), after the airing of this show and another one where Maddow revealed Armey's ties to DLA Piper and its tendrils into Big Medicine, he severed those ties (on paper) and focused exclusively on his work with FreedomWorks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 3:18 PM   

What tools. Not to mention fools, dupes and stooges.

So the "teabaggers" are going to expose "socialist-supporting companies" and bring them to their economic knees?

This is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Obviously the word oxymoron is not in the typical "teabagger" vocabulary. And your typical teabagger obviously has never heard of Open Secrets.org. Of course that would require Internet literacy.

But what this little teabagger temper tantrum illustrates is how the reactionary right as successfully turned a small segment of American society against its own best self interests.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 10:58 PM    in reply to ETSpoon

Obviously the word oxymoron is not in the typical "teabagger" vocabulary.

Nope, but they have the "moron" part covered pretty well. For years we were told that public school systems in the US were not teaching critical thinking. If any proof is needed, here it is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 26, 2009 11:20 PM    in reply to ETSpoon

The only "oxy-" they understand is "oxycontin."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 3:37 PM   

Good Idea. They should protest in front of the offices of Blue Cross, Cigna et el who gave money to Sen Baucus, Conrad, liebermann!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 3:37 PM   

Somebody spiked the eggnog. Or the eggnog chai.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 4:18 PM    in reply to MassDem

To induce hallucinations like those, it would have to be spiked with some of Rash's old Oxy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 4:07 PM   

What, they're not going to go down and collect their welfare? They're not going to post any anti-Obama comments on blogs?

This really made me laugh: "We are about generating commerce and free enterprise. We also are about working hard, so taking the day off as a means of protest runs against our grain."

Yeah, none of the Tea Baggers EVER takes a day off to protest. But then they don't have to, the ones that aren't unemployed are retired, collecting that non-government Medicare.

They are totally to laugh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 4:46 PM   

The Tea Party Patriots group is planning a "National Day of Strike" for Jan. 20

Well, of they're going to go on strike, then they need a strike song. How about:

There once was a teabaggin' maid, who always was afraid
Of brown-skinned folks and ACORN votes and death panels on parade.
She went to the National Mall, when a rally it was called
But when a city kid came too near,
She just about peed from fear.

Someone else will have to take it from there.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 4:54 PM   

Like the Republicans, the Tea Baggers are driven by a dark force. That force being a bottomless hole that runs straight through the center of them. That hole must be fed with fear, greed, hate, ignorance, and they serve their dark master well.

Thick as thieves they are - these tea baggers and republicans. They recognize this devouring hole in each other, and that common bond unites them in hating all that is good and loathing good people who do not have to feed such a relentless and incessantly hollow hole. In short, their dark secret love is to destroy.

It's simple human nature.

And they have their very own TV station - FOX.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 6:55 PM   

Beck is now reduced to advertising that Goldline junk after all of the top tier advertisers left. How is that nothing to show for? The stupid conservative guy is right about one thing though...this will be anohter epic fail just like the teabagger hate ins. These people will continue to marginalize themselves further and further away from reality. Besides, many of the companies they want to go after are in New York City and these rubes are not going to sway them with their antics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 24, 2009 11:31 PM   

It will be interesting if these guys are able to organize an effective strike. What if they realize the power available to an organized group. Maybe they'll organize in their workplace next and negotiate for better benefits and working conditions. Maybe they will want to form ... you know, unions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 12:33 AM   

If I thought any of them actually had jobs, I'd think this was a great idea. Once their bosses fire them it'll leave at least 200 positions open for some out of work Democrats.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 2:45 AM   

These first five post's truly display why America can not afford to ever allow the American Taliban Conservatives back in power. The level of uncontrolled hate and ignorance displayed speaks volumes.
http://www.topnflnews.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 3:33 AM   

It takes a deliciously stupid person to not understand the phenomenal irony that is boycotting private corporations that are supposedly helping to support the dissemination of a political agenda that serves to hurt the whole notion of free private enterprise.

Give them enough rope...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 11:32 AM   

Coming soon, organized shoplifting as a means of teabagger protest.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 1:50 PM   

If these morons boycott Co.s that advertise on MSANBC they'll have to go without their Cialis!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 4:41 PM    in reply to kaylaspop

You're giving them too much credit. How many of them do you think actually get laid?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 25, 2009 1:52 PM   

If these morons boycott Co.s that advertise on MSANBC they'll have to go without their Cialis!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 26, 2009 12:20 AM   

Karl Rove can't wipe his ass. He's eating shit and getting his head kicked in with a baseball bat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 26, 2009 6:27 PM   

Kunt Reckless lost in a big way today. Grand new party on the ropes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 26, 2009 7:26 PM   

These teatards just get crazier and crazier. Socialism is root in corporate america? What it demonstrates is that these buffoons don't have a clue what socialism actual is for that matter they don't really know what fascism or communism are either. If there really are enough of these morons to change the direction of America see ya in Denmark

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 26, 2009 7:36 PM   

These teatards just get crazier and crazier. Socialism is root in corporate america? What it demonstrates is that these buffoons don't have a clue what socialism actual is for that matter they don't really know what fascism or communism are either. If there really are enough of these morons to change the direction of America see ya in Denmark

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 5:30 AM   

It does have to do with George W Bush's dead sister. Died from leukimia around 5 years of age. You don't feel bad at all about them. George HW Bush's daugther. Barbara also went to the ER recently. Dick Cheney's enlarged heart, ER visits, sitting on a wheelchair election day. Nice camacade.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 29, 2009 1:47 AM   

"On Jan. 20, Hardage is calling on tea partiers to "expose" the socialist-supporting companies."

I read this from above and rolled onto the ground. Anytime one can find tea-baggers and the word "expose" in the same sentence, it creates great fodder for us juveniles.

I believe we should expose the companies that back the right wing agenda that are supporting the tea-baggers by funding national events along with giving the supposed tea baggies talking points to be used at these "staged" events.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 30, 2010 1:48 PM   

nice share. i didnt know newsmax was a socialist promoting company http://www.m65jacket.com

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on