TPMDC

The Week That Was: What Happened In Health Care This Week, And What To Look Forward To

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Democratic Senators Harry Reid, Chris Dodd and Tom Harkin

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's been a busy week by the standards of the United States Senate, but it's also been fairly confusing. With the Senate's long, lumbering push for reform now in its final stages, we've seen debate, votes, and back room wheeling and dealing on contentious issues like the public option and abortion. So what does all of it mean.

To break it down into simpler terms, the crucial developments--the ones that will determine whether this bill passes or fails--have yet to come. In the mean time, there are tea leaves, and technical developments, but that's about it. If the Senate health care bill is in a slow motion run to the finish line, we'll know next week whether it breaks through the ribbon, or staggers and falls to the ground.

In the past week, members have filed (i.e. announced their intent to introduce) scores of amendments. A small handful have actually received votes, and more will come to the floor this weekend. But none, so far, have been particularly politically weighty. In other words, the amendments that will make or break this bill, are still being hashed out.

Currently, conservative Democrats are crafting a public option amendment that would be introduced if leadership can't secure 60 votes for the public option in the bill right now. And it seems they can't.

If it becomes necessary, leadership will likely bundle a compromise on the public option with several other amendment in a so-called "manager's amendment." That will need 60 to pass, and it will be a must-watch vote.

Separately, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) will almost certainly receive a stand-alone vote on an abortion amendment. He says his plan is modeled on the so-called Stupak language in the House health care bill, which prevents people who, under the bill, will be receiving insurance subsidies from the government from buying insurance that covers abortion. Such an amendment likely doesn't have 60 votes in the Senate, but Nelson's threatening to filibuster if he doesn't get his way.

Democrats are scrambling to figure out how to end that stand-off. "At the end of the day we need Senator Nelson's vote," Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told reporters today. "We don't have the promise of a vote on the Republican side."

That amendment, too, will be a must-watch. Either the vast majority of Democrats, or Nelson himself, will have to blink, or else Democratic leaders will find it extremely difficult to pass a bill.

Despite all of the hurdles, though, Democrats remain hopeful. Even public option opponent Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) today spoke of the future "when health reform becomes law." Not if.

Comments (21) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

December 4, 2009 5:56 PM   

I'm not sure the Mikulski vote can be considered as inconsequential. There's a good chance that it might be bargained away with Stupak-Pitts in conference as they cancel each other out. Nelson certainly doesn't have the votes - hell he won't even get to 50. The real question will be whether he'd refuse to join the majority to break a filibuster absent such language and whether or not Snowe or Collins would take his spot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 4, 2009 9:45 PM    in reply to Mintcon

I don't see how Mikulski cancels out Stupak/Pitts. I mean, I know there are some groups screaming about it being a backdoor to mandate abortion funding, but I've seen no evidence that they're right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 10:27 AM    in reply to Jen R

I don't think it cancels it out in a meaningful way, but rather in a bargaining way. The GOP hates birth control and family planning almost as much as they hate abortion - not like Capps is a pro-choice solution. I think canceling out both to return to a pretty regressive status quo is likely. Again, not because they both deal with the same issue but because they both deal with the GOP's hatred of women's autonomy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

LFC

user-pic

December 4, 2009 5:58 PM   

Thank you Sen. Ben Nelson for being so pro-life that you're willing to fight for a ban on a private company providing coverage for abortions while letting uninsured people die every day due to your delays.

What a douche.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 8:28 AM    in reply to LFC

Ditto

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 4, 2009 7:45 PM   

Thank you Democratic Party for being so "pro-choice" that you're willing to fight against a ban on abortion policies in a plan set up and subsidized with taxypayer dollars while letting uninsured people die every day due to your delays.

What a bunch of douches.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 3:43 AM    in reply to masanf

pro choise on health care and not pro choice on a womans rights, you must brush your @$$ and wipe your teeth your conflicted so mentally conflicted, are you a member of REPUBLICANSFORRAPE and want to protect your work perhaps? did you survive a back alley abortion? your pro choise and your not so when you get asked paper or plastic do attack the bag boy? he is giving you the choice that you are taking away from women so he must die right?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 4, 2009 8:24 PM   

Ben Nelson is a coward. He will cave under pressure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 4, 2009 10:12 PM    in reply to ilovebacon

I don't think Ben Nelson is a coward, but I think he'll come around for Democrats and the nation once he goes through the motions. I just don't think, given how far health care has gone, any Senate Democrat wants to be regarded as the the Bill Buckner of one of the party's greatest aspirations over the last 60 years.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 1:49 PM    in reply to jimbomoron

Bill Buckner! Perfect analogy. I remember that game. Ball went right through the glove. He's been in hiding ever since, hasn't he?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 2:22 AM   

Ben Nelson is a creepy old fart. He needs to wise up and get his old ass in gear. He and his famliy don`t have to worry about health insurance, But I do. Because, I don`t have any. On Nov. 24th 2009 I had heart catherization surgery through my femural artery by way of my groin . I stayed over night. Today Dec. 4th, 2009, I got the hospital bill, $77,482.95 . I need to have the same health care as Ben Nelson and his family, as my taxes pay for his and his family`s.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 8:39 AM    in reply to dbl.r7711

Senators and congressmen are PARASITES! They shouldn't be for sale and shouldn't be forever on government trough. They should have a job and should SERVE PEOPLE FOR FREE, for prestige! Like first senators and congressmen. They should have only one or two terms. Period!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Ted

user-pic

December 5, 2009 10:17 AM    in reply to El Camino

I know you are serious and mean well. However, if we follow your advice, the members of Congress will all be fat cats (since if not paid need lots of money already in pockets so as to live in DC), who know very little to nothing about government, and who by the time they figure out what they need to know, will be out of Congress again (term limits). Under those circumstances the amateur Congress will be run by those lobbyists who can persuade ignorant Congressmen that they (the lobbyists) are truth tellers who can help the Congressmen muddle through.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 1:52 PM    in reply to dbl.r7711

Awful! I just got a letter from BCBS telling me that my insurance rates will "only rise 15%" this year. I can't afford $900 a month! I simply cannot.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 8:37 PM    in reply to dbl.r7711

That's awful! I understand your predicament. I just got a letter from Blue Cross telling me they're "only" raising my premium 15% this next year. I can't afford 900 bucks per month! I'm just a musician! I will have to go without and pray for a public option to take effect in 2013 (and not have to see doctors in the mean time!)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 9:03 AM   

Save your ire people. The Senate bill is only a suggestion. Any chances it will resemble the final product are virtually nil.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 9:28 AM   

Here’s a fresh idea. Let’s just scrap health care completely and take a page from the Babe Ruth playbook – hit a home run for one sick person at a time and keep our fingers crossed:

http://bit.ly/xPZHh

(satire)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 6:12 PM   

Read the comments and vomit: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/70751-obama-will-try-to-rally-senate-dems-on-sunday

Add your own, if you are so inclined..,

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 5:59 AM    in reply to ilovebacon

I left my last seven hours there as a comment read it if you wish. Its in my name somewhere on page 3 or 4. I am partly enraged right now so later till I can do this with out having to worry that i will snap.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 10:50 PM   

It needs to be understood that a no vote or fillibuster on universal health care is commiting political suicide. It will also likely damage the party.
Oh, & it's also deplorable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 2:09 AM   

Sorry to go OT, but there are 23 spam posts taking up space on the recent reader's posts list in TPM Cafe. This is becoming more trouble than it's worth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on