TPMDC

Will President Obama Renominate Dawn Johnsen To Top DOJ Post?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Nominee for Office of Legal Counsel Dawn Johnsen

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Remember Dawn Johnsen?

It seems like eons have passed since newly-inaugurated President Obama nominated the Indiana University law professor to serve as head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, but in reality it's been about 10 months. After months of sitting in limbo, Johnsen has not received a confirmation vote in the Senate. And now, if Obama still wants her to serve in has administration, he will have to renominate her and start the confirmation process largely from scratch.

Senate rules require that nominees who have not received a vote by the end of the legislative session must either be carried over to the following session by unanimous consent, or be resubmitted by the administration. At the end of last week--presumably unable to achieve universal agreement--the Senate returned a handful of nominees to the White House, including Johnsen.

That prompted a number of posts by progressive bloggers--who admire Johnsen and blame the blame the administration for failing to push for her confirmation--declaring her nomination officially dead.

That's not necessarily true. But Johnsen will certainly face at least a couple more hurdles. First, it's up to Obama to decide whether to send her nomination back to the Senate. White House spokesman Bill Burton could offer no guidance today as to what the President plans to do. If he taps her again, though, she'll have to clear the Judiciary Committee again, and then get 60 votes on the Senate floor to overcome an expected Republican filibuster.

There are 60 members in the Democratic caucus. Of them, the one major holdout has been Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE). Months ago, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) was also threatening to join a filibuster, but he has since moved considerably to the left as he fends off a primary challenge from Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA).

Assuming Specter's arm can be twisted, Democrats have 59 votes. They also have a pledge from Johnsen's home state Senator, Dick Lugar (R-IN), to support her confirmation. In other words, Democrats are very close. Presumably they can get her confirmed. The questions now are, will they have a chance? And, if so, will they (finally) pull the trigger?

Comments (18) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

December 28, 2009 12:04 PM   

I believed this during the Bush years also. Political appointments, and cabinet-level positions, should be exempt from the filibuster. Give 'em a straight up or down vote. Likewise no secret holds on them either. OTOH Supreme Court picks are a different matter. They DO need to be held to a higher standard. In return, there should be no "burrowing" of political appointees directly into career positions.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 12:38 PM   

The question is what will those purported Senate moderates Snowe and Collins from Maine do. Neither seems to be exactly a profile in courage.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 4:19 PM    in reply to Scarce

They're Republicans. If we've got Lugar and all the Dems except Nelson, screw'em.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 12:40 PM   

There's also another possibility--with the Deputy Attorney General, David Ogden, now leaving, Obama could nominate Johnsen for Deputy AG and submit an new nominee for OLC. This might actually be easier to get through--sounds illogical, but that is the way Senatorial minds work sometimes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 1:05 PM   

This is a joke. The only thing remotely controversial about her is a loose connection to abortion advocacy. Her job would have nothing to do with pushing policy in this area any way. People who think she's controversial for being a stickler for following the rule of law ought to be laughed out of government. Obama has let her languish because either he is breaking the law for covering for others who have broke the law. Anything else is a smoke screen. Senators blocking Dawn Johnson are doing it at the behest of the White House, just as the Senators who blocked a good health care bill did it with the White House's blessing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:12 PM    in reply to dick c

Yes, that's right! Obama nominates Johnson then instructs the Senate to block her appointment for year because (a) he never wanted her in the first place and (b) he wants the senate to make him look weak and ineffective by not getting his nominees approved.

Gosh, you people are brilliant! LOL!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 4:33 PM    in reply to FreeRider

'you people'??

is dick c a designated spokesperson for some group??

how do we tell the commenters who speak for themselves from the commenters who speak for others?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 6:39 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

dick c is a designated spokesman for the many people here who post the exact same kind of stupidity on every subject.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:36 PM    in reply to dick c

"Senators blocking Dawn Johnson are doing it at the behest of the White House, just as the Senators who blocked a good health care bill did it with the White House's blessing."

Thanks for distilling the Obama-hating left's stupidity into one easy-to-mock sentence for us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 4:22 PM    in reply to dick c

Obama has let her languish because either he is breaking the law for covering for others who have broke the law.

How does letting her languish do that? (Be literate.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 1:15 PM   

She should absolutely be re-nominated, though I doubt she will be. Obama doesn't seem to have much fight in him and lets his nominees twist in the wind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 1:20 PM   

Obama has let her languish because either he is breaking the law for covering for others who have broke the law.


Trenchant, concise, and utterly depressing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:03 PM   

Its beyond ridiculous that the Senate Democratic Caucus with 60 members can't get their President's nominees to a confirmation vote. Dawn Johnson should have been confirmed within two months of her nomination.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:18 PM    in reply to QuiteAlarmed

Yet another reason for me to say: Fuck You, Ben Nelson!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:04 PM   

Obama hasn't used the "emergency appoitment" that is available to him when Congress is in recess. Nothing illegal or unethical about this option. Why not and get Dawn onboard!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

December 28, 2009 2:32 PM   

Absolutely he should re-nominate her, and what about making a recess appointment while Congress is on Christmas break? I don't think Obama has used that power at all, or if he has, I haven't seen any reports of it. Granted, those tend to be seen by Congress as a poke in the eye, but when a well-qualified nominee does not even receive the courtesy of an up or down vote, seems to me maybe Congress needs a poke in the eye.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 3:42 PM    in reply to slb

Is Congress taking an official recess?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 6, 2010 10:34 PM   

Yes, that's right! Obama nominates Johnson then instructs the Senate to block her appointment for year because (a) he never wanted her in the first place and (b) he wants the senate to make him look weak and ineffective by not getting his nominees approved.

Gosh, you people are brilliant! LOL!

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on