
If and when health care passes, the White House and the Congress will be tugged in two seemingly different directions. On the one hand, with unemployment in the double digits (and an election around the corner), Democrats will have to do something about jobs--and that means another spending bill. The House has already begun its work and the Senate will have to follow suit if the economy is to improve, and if Democrats want to avoid a political blood bath. But the White House, and a bipartisan bloc in the Senate, have made very clear that they'll pay equal, or greater, attention to addressing the country's perilous fiscal situation. And that could touch off yet another tug of war between liberal Democrats and centrist legislators over the country's priorities.
Last month, liberals were taken by surprise when a number of senators--including several Democrats--issued a chilling ultimatum: let us tinker with entitlement programs and taxes, they said, or we'll block raising the amount of debt the government can take on. According to Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), 11 or 12 senators have said they will not vote for must-pass legislation to raise the country's debt ceiling unless they are authorized to create an external commission with extraordinary power over Medicare, Social Security and so on.
This week, Conrad and several of his supporters unveiled their proposal, and it turns out, liberals may have had less to worry about than it seemed at first blush. Not because the members of the commission would like to be gentle to American welfare programs, but because its authors seem to have set it up to fail.
The commission's recommendations will be far from set in stone. They'll have to receive the support of three-fourths of the task force and three-fifths of both chambers of Congress in order to become law.
So even if Conrad's creates his committee, he doesn't get carte blanche with the nation's budget. But the fact is, an influential bloc in the Senate sees reducing long term budget deficits as the issue Congress needs to address.
And the White House agrees, at least rhetorically. Obama has made it known that getting the debt under control is a key medium-to long-term priority for him, and an immediate rhetorical one.
The good news for those who think the top priority ought to be jobs, there is some good news. Recently, Obama showed some sympathy to the liberal view--and the view of many leading economists--that jobs should come before deficits. "The single most important thing we could do right now for deficit reduction is to spark strong economic growth, which means that people who've got jobs are paying taxes, and businesses that are making profits have taxes, are paying taxes."
We understand that in this administration. That's not always the dialogue that's going on out there in public, and we're going to have to do a better job of educating the public on that.The last thing we would want to do in the midst of a -- what is a weak recovery, is us to essentially take more money out of the system either by raising taxes or by drastically slashing spending. And frankly, because state and local governments generally don't have the capacity to engage in deficit spending, some of that obligation falls on the federal government.
And in recent days, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has discussed the possibility of enacting a program that would provide near-term stimulus, and long-term pay-fors, making it deficit neutral in the CBO's budget window. At her press conference yesterday, she said, "we hope next week that in our final appropriations bill we will be able to have a jobs piece that will create jobs in the near term to address the needs of those who are unemployed and do so in a fiscally sound way."
But the Democratic party is far from united on this score. The Senate's still immersed in health care. And if the appetite in the Senate after health care is for a counter-stimulative program of tax increases and spending cuts, it's hard to see how a significant jobs package can pass. That's a key tensions to keep an eye out for in the weeks ahead.
Indie Pro
December 11, 2009 10:48 AM
centrist legislators, bwahahahahahaha.
That'd be the conservative democrats and the DLC crowd I assume. Classic framing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tatere
December 11, 2009 11:09 AM
Well, each one is the center of his or her own universe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mostman
December 11, 2009 11:56 AM
"Only NOW...with the advent of 'Potato Day' has tyranny reached our shores!"
Every time I see bullshit like this it makes me think of John Stewarts take on the hypocrisy of these arguments. Where were these assholes when Bush was raiding the piggy bank and running this country into the ground, below the ground, and out the other side? Give me a break.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
December 11, 2009 12:18 PM
Wow, that "Invictus" pop-up is a whole new level of annoying.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
December 11, 2009 12:28 PM
The deficit and debt are serious problems. Very, very serious problems.
And about the least serious of the problems we're dealing with right now. As for entitlements, Medicare is in bad shape but is being addressed in the health care bill. It will likely need more addressing but we're getting there. Social Security is in a condition Wall Street banks could only wish for and not all that hard to fix.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
December 11, 2009 12:38 PM
I really hate Kent Conrad. He's a big frog in a little pond and he just loves to stir things up, just because he can.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
December 11, 2009 12:44 PM
Okay , a little clarification. I grew up in small town filled with men like Kent Conrad, JayCees, local business owners, conservative, full of themselves, pushing people around because they had the power. They kept the business district to 3 blocks because they didn't want competition, the only bookstore was owned by a Bircher, when someone came in from outside (rarely) they made sure he was one of them, or they drove him out. It was a horrible town, people tell me it's changed in the last 15 years, but who knows - I never go back and they keep re-electing one of the stupidest conservatives in the House, Dave Camp. Midland, Michigan
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mimi katz
December 11, 2009 1:39 PM
This is a false choice. It is the centrists who refuse to make doctors and hospitals lower health care costs and want to take it all out of subsidies and coverage. It is the centrists who refuse sensible and equitable tax increases on the very people whose incomes have skyrocketed while the other 99% sink, many of them into real poverty. It is the centrists who refuse to cut war spending.
The centrists are hypocrites opn this as nearly every other issue. Thney refuse to make hard choices that will hurt themselves and their friends and donors. They expect all the pain to be borne by the constituents of Progressives.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?