
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) says he's revisited his initial concerns over Obama Justice Department nominee Dawn Johnsen, and has decided to support her confirmation.
"After voting 'pass' (which means no position) in the Judiciary Committee, I had a second extensive meeting with Ms. Johnsen and have been prepared to support her nomination when it reaches the Senate floor," reads a statement Specter sent to TPMDC.
Johnsen's nomination languished all of last year, in part because Specter, and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) had both suggested they'd join a GOP filibuster of her confirmation vote. However, Johnsen has always enjoyed the support of Republican Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN), meaning leadership needed only one of the two Democratic hold outs to change their positions in order to reach the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster.
Because she could not be confirmed before the end of 2009, President Obama will have to resubmit her nomination (the White House says he plans to do this after the Senate returns from winter recess next week).
With Specter now in the 'yes' column, there are no obvious impediments to her confirmation. She will have to be re-approved by the Judiciary Committee, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will have to bring the question of her confirmation to the floor. The question now is when and whether that will happen. Throughout much of last year, progressives grew furious with the White House and Senate leadership for not pursuing her confirmation in earnest. With the vote count now no longer in doubt, that anger will surely rise if Johnsen is not confirmed quickly.
Once a moderate Republican, Specter became a Democrat last spring, and has moved significantly to the left since Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) began a primary challenge shortly thereafter. Just this week, Sestak challenged his opponent to revisit his reported opposition to Johnsen, and it seems very much as if Specter was listening.
felix
January 12, 2010 4:02 PM
Thanks again Joe Sestak!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 12, 2010 4:14 PM in reply to felix
+1
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 12, 2010 4:20 PM in reply to felix
Joe Sestak and Toomey, as well.
Were it not for the TeaBaggin' Toomey, Arlen would still be a Republican. . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 12, 2010 4:26 PM in reply to CT Voter
True dat!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
January 12, 2010 4:15 PM
Yay!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
January 12, 2010 4:49 PM
I'm sure this had NOTHING to do with trying to hold onto his seat in the face of serious challenges from Sestak and Toomey.
*snicker, snicker*
Does anyone really think Specter's change of heart is a genuine reevaluation of Johnsen's qualifications?
Anyone?
Bueller?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 12, 2010 5:14 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Isn't that how we want all our politicians to fear? a serious challenge?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 12, 2010 5:41 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
My suspicion is that it was his opposition that was fake.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
January 12, 2010 11:47 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Everything about Specter has been fake for a very long time. It's amazing he's been able to hold on for this long.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 12, 2010 5:31 PM
I bet Brown will vote to filibuster if he gets elected next week.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
January 13, 2010 6:58 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
Brown will do anything his new master, 'Chins' McCaonnell tells him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 13, 2010 10:58 AM
I don't remember why Specter was against her in the first place. Was he still a "republican" then? If so, then I guess that was all the reason he needed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?