
In a major setback for Democratic chances in 2010, Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, a son of Vice President Joe Biden, has announced that he will not run in this November's special election for his father's former Senate seat.
In his official statement, Beau Biden cited the importance of his current work on a high-profile child abuse case in Delaware. Sources close to Vice President Biden suggested to TPMDC that Beau did not want to walk away from such a high-profile case.
"However, my first responsibilities are here in Delaware. I have a duty to fulfill as Attorney General -- and the immediate need to focus on a case of great consequence," Beau Biden writes. "And that is what I must do. Therefore I cannot and will not run for the United States Senate in 2010. I will run for reelection as Attorney General."
Delaware has been a strongly Democratic state in recent elections. But with the widespread feeling that this is going to be a tough year -- and the concrete evidence of that from the Republican victory in the Massachusetts special Senate election -- yet another Dem seat is going to be very hard to retain.
Republicans already have a strong candidate in the race, Rep. Mike Castle, who has held the state's only House seat since 1992, and was governor for eight years before that. With a strong Republican in the race and currently no Democrat, this race has to be seen as a likely GOP takeover for now.
Polls had previously shown a close race between Castle and Beau Biden, with one poll showing Castle ahead and another poll having Biden ahead.
Late Update: National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesman Colin Reed released this statement:
"Clearly, Beau Biden's decision not to run for the United States Senate represents a major recruiting setback for national Democrats, who have been counting on his candidacy to keep the Vice President's former seat in Democrat control. As we saw in Massachusetts last week, voters clearly stated that these seats belong to the people - not to either political party or dynasty. Voters want independent-minded leaders who will put their interests first and not simply serve as a rubberstamp for the out-of-control spending and big government agenda that we've witnessed in Washington under the Democrats' control. Congressman Mike Castle has a proven record of independence and bipartisanship that puts him in a strong position to win this seat in November."
Xantar
January 25, 2010 10:06 AM
Speaking as someone who spent a few years in Delaware recently, I don't see this as a setback at all. Beau Biden is seen in the state as riding on his father's coattails. He was allowed to become Attorney General, but had he made a bid for his father's senate seat, I think it would have been seen as too much. As I recall, the polls support this: Beau Biden polled very weakly against Republican candidates despite his name.
Hopefully the Democrats will find a good candidate to run, but as it is now, I see this as more akin to pulling a Dodd rather than an actual setback.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jarl van Hoother
January 25, 2010 10:15 AM in reply to Xantar
Well it was a while ago (politically speaking) but the mid-November poll had Beau in the lead.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/poll-beau-biden-ahead-of-mike-castle-in-delaware-senate-race.php
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 25, 2010 10:21 AM in reply to Xantar
He was "allowed to become attorney general"? Who allowed him? Oh, you mean the voters who elected him?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Xantar
January 25, 2010 10:51 AM in reply to FreeRider
Poor choice of words, I suppose, but a lot of politically connected people in Delaware really did treat the race that way. He had backing from the Democratic party when he ran for Attorney General, but it wasn't enthusiastic.
Of course the voters made their own choice, but I don't think you can deny that they were heavily influenced by Beau Biden's name.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 25, 2010 12:41 PM in reply to Xantar
Personally, I respect what you're saying. Makes sense, intuitively.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
January 25, 2010 10:13 AM
There have to be other well-known Democrats in Delaware who can challenge Mike Castle. Frankly, while Beau Biden is a great guy, many voters would have been turned off by his candidacy due to expected charges of nepotism by the play-dirty-all-the-time Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 25, 2010 10:19 AM in reply to jsdc007
I can hear it now: this isn't Joe Biden's seat! This is Delaware's seat (via Scott Brown in MA).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barbara63
January 25, 2010 11:36 AM in reply to CT Voter
Exactly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 25, 2010 12:43 PM in reply to barbara63
Yeah, exactly. That would have been slogan 1 for *any* opponent. The sense of entitlement! The arrogance! Arrogance of power! Another American dynasty?!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
January 25, 2010 10:29 AM in reply to jsdc007
In another year, maybe. Perhaps Ruth Ann Minter, the former governor.
But given the national tide against the Democratic Party, what credible candidate is going to want to risk their political future going against someone of Castle's stature in the state? It's not like they'd be running against a Scott Brown type that few had ever heard of. Castle has been a fixture in Delaware politics for almost three decades, and despite the state's partisan lean, he remains very popular there.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
itsjibba
January 25, 2010 10:36 AM
Excellent. Enough nepotism, lets have a real race where the best person wins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 25, 2010 11:20 AM in reply to itsjibba
It would have been nepotism if Beau was appointed to take his father's seat. Had he put his name on the ballot and the voters had chosen him as the next Senator, it would have been called an election.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
January 25, 2010 10:37 AM
Key thing for Dems is to find realyl good candidates and run good campaigns.
Be bold. Who thought that Al Franken would win Minnesota? Where Dems get in trouble is when they pick some insider political hack who they view as the "safe choice" but is actually very unappealing to the public. Think Coakley, John Kerry, etc. Dems do better when they pick a bold choice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
January 25, 2010 12:29 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
Agreed. The problem is, bold Dems are becoming scarce.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
January 25, 2010 10:49 AM
Too bad this wasn't more evident a year ago when someone more than a placeholder could have been appointed.
If there's a silver lining (doubtful, but who knows) it's that if the Dems find a good candidate, he or she can run a populist, anti-incumbent/change campaign against Castle since he's been in Congress (and before that the State House) for so many years and can be held accountable for how badly things suck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
barbara63
January 25, 2010 11:46 AM in reply to Moose49
I think Castle has been in Congress since 1993, so he certainly isn't a newcomer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
January 25, 2010 2:59 PM in reply to barbara63
Not only is he a newcomer, he showed himself to be your typical GOP hypocrite on the stimulus bill by voting against it, yet taking credit for any benefits it brought Delaware.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
January 25, 2010 10:53 AM
Upon further thought, perhaps Beau Biden's decision was driven by the Supreme Court's ruling turning our democracy into a corporatocracy (is this a word?). Considering how many corporations make Delaware their headquarters, not to mention DuPont's domination of the state, any Democrat probably has to figure having to go up against tens of millions of dollars in attack ads. Corporations could easily set a record in dollars-per-vote spent.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 25, 2010 12:45 PM in reply to Moose49
Might be the winning comment!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
January 25, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to Moose49
I think you nailed it. Democrats have no chance in Delaware as long as this law stands. They will be buried under an avalanche of propaganda and smears. I bet the corporations spend over a billion dollars this year on negative ads against democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 25, 2010 10:54 AM
Well, the yolk's on me. I posted a link to the item in the Atlantic saying this story was wrong.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 25, 2010 12:47 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Yeah, it didn't seem very credible when I followed that blasted link. But still, yours was a quest for truth!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 25, 2010 11:05 AM
That pedophile case in Delaware could have over 100 victims in it. As AG you can't run from that for your own personal ambitions. I always got the feeling that his father wanted him to run for the Senate (now) more than he did. I could even see him run for Governor after his AG gig rather than running for the Senate.
I don't think he would have won election either, because he would have been smeared for leaving the pedophile case, would have been the same feeling as in Massachusetts with "Kennedy's seat". and I don't know if he could have been his own man with his father as VP. And if he ever voted against an Administration policy it would be made in to bigger news than it probably deserved to be.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jim43
January 25, 2010 11:07 AM
I think the only hope for the Dems is to make Michelle Obama an honorary "citizen of the nation" and let her run in every race across the country. She's the only Dem that can win...
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
January 25, 2010 11:53 AM
He has to continue family tradition of shining shoes for Dupont Chemical and credit-card usurers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
January 25, 2010 12:28 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Whereas the reThugs?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lord Mike
January 25, 2010 12:53 PM
And of course, the GOP has to be an incredible jerks about the whole thing with their statement. Are they ever even close to being respectful? Castle's popular, but he still can be teabagged (more likely to be now) and has the stain of incumbency. Unfortunately, it seems that no one is up for the challenge. A grassroots Dem can still win this if they work hard enough for it!
This is certainly disappointing to say the least!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TaylorB1
January 25, 2010 1:34 PM
I'm amazed...I've read all the comments here and there is not ONE nasty, name-calling attack from our GOP friends...is there a special Tea Bag Convention today? Or maybe they're busy starting their campaign to destroy Castle as just another "RINO." Note that this election will be for only the remaining four years of VP Biden's term...I would imagine Beau will be more interested in running in 2014.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?