
Boehner: 'There Aren't That Many Places Where We Can Come Together'
Appearing on Meet The Press, House Minority Leader John Boehner downplayed the possibility of bipartisanship. "Listen, there aren't that many places where we can come together. The President-- is-- he was the most liberal member of the United States Senate. You don't get there by accident," said Boehner. "And if you look at the policies that we've seen over the course of this year from the Administration and -- his Democratic colleagues in Congress-- there are all these leftist proposals. And the people of Massachusetts, the people of Virginia, the people of New Jersey are sending a pretty loud signal, just like the other 47 states to -- to Washington, saying, 'Stop. This is -- this is way more than we ever want -- wanted Washington to do.'"
Gibbs: Health Care Reform 'Still Inside The Five-Yard Line'
Appearing on State of the Union, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Democrats are "still inside the five-yard line" on health care reform. "We're one vote in the House of Representatives from making health care reform a reality," said Gibbs, though he was noncommittal on whether it was definite strategy to have the House of Representatives pass the Senate bill: "I don't think we know yet the answer on the process of this."
Scott Brown: 2012 Talk 'Overwhelming, And It's Extremely Humbling'
Appearing on This Week, Sen.-elect Scott Brown (R-MA) was asked whether he would rule out a presidential run in 2012. His response: " I have to tell you, I don't even have a business card. I haven't even been sworn in. I don't have any exploratory committees started. I don't have any -- anything -- it's -- it's overwhelming, and it's extremely humbling. I don't know how -- what else to tell you."
Scott Brown: 'I Disagree' That Tea Party Movement Was Influential In My Win
Also during his appearance on This Week, Sen.-elect Scott Brown (R-MA) disputed the idea that the Tea Party movement had an important role in his victory. "Well, you're making an assumption that the Tea Party movement was influential," he told Barbara Walters, "and I have to respectfully disagree. It was everybody."
Gibbs: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 'Going To Meet His Maker'
During his appearance on State of the Union, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is "is going to meet justice and he's going to meet his maker." Gibbs was then asked by John King whether this would happen in a federal courtroom or in a military commission. Gibbs simply replied: "He will be brought to justice and he is likely to be executed for the heinous crimes that he committed in killing - in masterminding the killing of 3,000 Americans. That you can be sure of."
Axelrod On Alito: 'We Have Become Accustomed To Unusual Outbursts'
Appearing on Meet The Press, White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod brushed off Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's mouthing of the words "not true" during the State of the Union Address, when President Obama criticized the Citizens United decision. Axelrod said that "in this weird political season, we have become accustomed to unusual outbursts" -- seemingly comparing Alito to Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC), and his "You lie!" outburst back in September.
Barbour: Obama Is Often The One Who Says People On The Other Side Are Bad
Appearing on Face The Nation, Gov. Haley Barbour (R-MS) shot back at President Obama's remarks on Friday, when he said that the Republican Party was making bipartisanship impossible because of negative rhetoric. "It is often the president who is the person that says the people on the other side are bad, anybody who is not for what I'm for, they've got bad motives, they're representing bad people," said Barbour.
Lamar Alexander: 'Perhaps' Holder Should Resign
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Senate GOP Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said that Attorney General Eric Holder should resign: "(Holder's) doing a better job of interrogating CIA employees than he is of interrogating terrorists, and he's not making a distinction between enemy combatants and terrorists flying into Detroit trying to blow up planes and American citizens who are committing a crime. He needs to go to Congress and say I made that decision, and here's why. And based on that perhaps he should step down."
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 1:23 PM
And Republicans continue to misrepresent Obama. Dog bites man. Water is wet. The sun will rise in the East.
Scott Brown in 2012? Um, sure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 1:55 PM in reply to CT Voter
And . . . the right-wing media keeps touting the lies and distortions as fact. Nobody ever calls the repukes on it.
I was watching barbara wawa on this week and she asked "heck of a job" brownie what domestic discretionary spending he would cut, mind you it's only 15% of the federal budget, you could cut it all and there would still be a huge deficit. No response, other than talking points, and no answer. Now, why on earth wasn't the follow-up, ok, that's nice, now what are the top three programs you would cut? Probably again there would be no answer, then the follow up should be ask it again, and again, and again, until brownie answers. Nah, that would be too easy. Just give him a pass and talk about his nudie photos and how his daughter should be on american idol again. Pathetic.
The problem is the repukes get away with the lies and distortions, so why not keep doing it? It's not rocket science. Keep lying all the way to the bank while america burns. Talk about terrorists and living in fear and the repukes are the only ones that can keep us safe, they did a heck of a job as we all know. Worst terrorist attack in us history happened when they were running the show, invaded an independent country for sh*ts and giggles, which killed hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children and increased the stature and recruiting for al queda, but they keep us safe. Yeah right. It's Kafkaesque the insanity.
And see by the way, see how the right-wing media has spun obama's smack down of the repukes???????? They made it sound like he was coming with hat in hand begging the repukes to play ball AND that the dems have been ignoring all of the wonderful repuke proposals and bills that would have solved everything and not cost a dime. Like I said the other day, waste of time and actually a huge mistake.
The nightmare continues.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 2:08 PM in reply to Michael A
I don't agree that the media has spun it as Obama hat in hand, Michael. In fact, I'd say the coverage was pretty ok. Sure, there were the obligatory mentions that whoever was at the podium would be at an advantage (like Bush would have had an advantage, presumably--HAHAHAHAHA) but outside of that, it wasn't too bad. Yes, the sense that Republicans are the ones in power still pervades the mindsets of people on the cable shows, but that's not going to change anytime soon.
I don't watch the Sunday morning blabberfests. They're just a bunch of Washington insiders trying to maintain their insider-ness. And the fact that Candy Crowley is now going to be doing CNN's Sunday show, and Barbara Walters (!) is doing ABC's reveals just how bankrupt the Sunday morning blabathons are in terms of finding talented people born after 1920 to cover politics.
David Gregory is excluded from that list because of the whole talent issue.
But seriously, they are becoming anachronisms because of the web. And their influence is waning. They just don't know it yet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 2:21 PM in reply to CT Voter
I should probably stop watching them as well. I just get pissed off. I stopped watching all of them except this week and that is getting really, really bad. Meet the press went down the tubes when david "The repuke talking head" gregory took over. Why that guy even has a job escapes me. He has talked about how all the "journalists" were giving the king a complete free pass and acted as props leading up to the iraq debacle. Why isn't he in another profession?
I have read some of the reports and stuff on the smack down and it doesn't sound very good. I actually watched the smackdown on MSNBC with keith and the rest of them spinning it. They didn't even do that great a job touting the wonderful smackdown. It's really people's perceptions. Obama did great, but so did the repukes for the uninformed. The repukes really have an amazing marketing machine. Everyone keeps talking about how the repukes have been shut out of the process and how wonderful they are and that they have all these wonderful proposals which dems have ignored and how dems shut them out of the process. It's infuriating.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 3:04 PM in reply to Michael A
Here's something to cheer you up. How did Mark Halperin, the quintessential conventional wisdom spouter describe the Q & A?:
Obama's House Republican Q&A tour de force has scrambled the D.C. dynamic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 3:13 PM in reply to CT Voter
Thanks.
I have been getting more and more depressed about the situation over the last year. Virtually nothing has been accomplished and dems have completely lost control of the situation and they have major majorities in both houses. Major majorities and they have accomplished nothing. How is that possible? Dems are looking to get slaughtered in 2010. It is not looking pretty and nothing will get done. Nothing. Very depressing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 3:27 PM in reply to Michael A
How is that possible?
Because not all Dems have the best interests of the country at heart. And they're not too good at reading the public mood, either.
I will become as depressed as you if they let healthcare reform die a quiet death. And then they will richly deserve their punishment coming in November.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 3:37 PM in reply to Michael A
And here's another thing to cheer you up. Susan Collins pathetic YouTube address isn't the talk of the blabberheads. It's not even mentioned on Memeorandum. John Edwards isn't even a topic. A couple of years ago, a Republican attacking the Democratic attorney general for being incompetent would have been big news, and salacious details about an affair by a prominent Democrat would have been even bigger news.
The WH is doing so many things that the blabberheads literally can't keep up.
Could be better, of course.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 31, 2010 3:40 PM in reply to Michael A
You are depressed because you keep buying into falsehoods like the Dems have done nothing. While what they have done might not be on your top 5 or top ten list, they have done plenty. They really do have something to show at the end of the day. Dems are just piss poor at bragging about their accomplishments. The GOP has nothing and that's why they turn every topic back to terrorism.
And no I'm not going to provide a list or link of what they have done. Look it up and give them a little credit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 4:00 PM in reply to Viva!America!
I closely follow what is going on and nothing is going on. It's a stalemate in congress with dems in the majority in both houses. The house has passed cap and trade, financial regulations, healthcare with a public option, and a few other things. The senate has done nothing except stall.
Where have been all the bill signings by obama? There haven't been any other than the stimulus bill a year ago, which had all kinds of "goodies" for repukes and they voted against it.
List out the 5 things that dems have accomplished. They have not accomplished squat. Sorry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 4:20 PM in reply to Michael A
Exactly so. And THAT is why Ted Kennedy's seat went to Teabag Brownie. The Dems are in control and people want results. Bi-partisanship is nice but people want results. Health care reform has been one of the worst messes in AMerican political history. A colossal failure on every level.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 31, 2010 6:32 PM in reply to Michael A
More has been accomplished than you think.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_01/022177.php
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 6:45 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Well, I was all excited and I clicked on the link, and the article basically confirms what I said. The stimulus bill and that's it. Stuff has passed the house, but it isn't going anywhere.
I understand that things are supposed to move at a snail's pace, but it has been that way for as long as I can remember. The economy has completely collapsed. It has been going downhill for a long time now and nothing has been done and is being done. Nothing. It's not just the issue of pumping dollars into the economy. There are major structural problems that need to be addressed and nothing is happening. Nothing.
By the way, I have an economic suggestion, that I do not know why it hasn't taken off. How about every corporation that outsources overseas puts that label on every advertisement and product. I sure don't want to contribute money to that corporation as I am sure alot of americans don't. Why not do that? I called this company the other day and I was on the phone for 10 minutes to just get my name and address to them. 10 MINUTES. I wasn't on hold, I was speaking with some person in india or elsewhere, I am actually not sure. Eventually I gave up and hung up. The customer service person was obviously overseas somewhere and was completely clueless. It was incredibly frustrating and I did not want to give the company a penny.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 4:15 PM in reply to CT Voter
Amen to that. Candy Crowley?! Are you f-ing joking? I heard her the other day say (in her best Gergen-esque voice), "well, bi-partisanship is failing because the Democrats haven't really tried to compromise with the Repubs." Is she stupid?! CNN is PATHETIC. And dangerous b/c most people think CNN is legitimate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 4:23 PM in reply to wbgonne
CNN is faux entertainment on steroids. They have the history of being allegedly neutral, which unfortunately gives them "credibility" when they deserve none. They have gotten more and more like faux entertainment over the last 5 years. It really is disgusting. They just repeat repuke talking points as fact. No follow-up, no fact checking, no pressing repukes spewing garbage. I can't stand to watch it anymore. I'd rather watch faux entertainment for entertainment value and to scream at the tv.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kgb999
January 31, 2010 4:31 PM in reply to Michael A
Oh, come now. They fact-checked that SNL skit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 4:37 PM in reply to Michael A
And why do they insist on hiring STUPID on-air "talent"? Their anchors are fricking imbeciles sucking on DC teats. And don't get me started on The Worst Political Team on Television.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 1, 2010 5:07 AM in reply to CT Voter
Scott Brown would have some things going for him -- mainly that he's not Palin or any of the other losers and he's little known.
He can campaign again as the Joe Truck fella. That's good enough for at least 30% of voters even before he opens his mouth. Add a few more in to vote for him cuz he's not black, plus there's the male stripper constituency ("he's so dreamy!"). Let's not forget that Americans were **stupid** enough to go for Bush in 2000 (pretty much) and the people in Massachusetts already bought Brown's line.
Who can I name who would be a better Republican candidate? No one, as I think about it. I hope there are skeletons, or he gets chawed up in primaries, or doesn't run, cuz as a general election candidate, he might appeal to a whole lot of dumb people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fpie
February 1, 2010 5:59 AM in reply to Overreach THIS!
If he drinks Bud he's a shoe in.
The scary part of this joke is that it isn't that far a stretch. Now if only he had a really rich daddy Karl Rove would be knocking on his door.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 1, 2010 8:27 AM in reply to fpie
I don't think it's a stretch at all. Palin's running; might have been the front runner at least before this. If she can be qualified somehow, he *certainly* can.
A Scott Brown candidacy could be a way to give the ruralists a yokel who is not a total imbecile. I hope he's got skeletons; it does scare me.
Maybe Obama should start taking his vacations on dusty ranches rather than in Hawaii. And bitch about how the guv'mint don't play fair with country folk nohow! He could "rediscover" his love of country music, etc.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
January 31, 2010 1:27 PM
(1) boehner's right. historically speaking, promulgating policies that tow the country out of economic and social ruin do seem to be decidedly "leftist" activities.
(2) WTF is barbour talking about? has he been in a coma?
(3) alexander is hilarious. although i suspect he wasn't trying to be funny.
(4) "scott brown for president" is a pretty telling statement on the present state of the GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
January 31, 2010 1:43 PM
As for Scott Brown he would by then have roughly as much national legislative experience as Obama. So why not him?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 31, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to shooter242
The most "liberal" democratic senator today is to the far right of richard nixon for pete's sake. So, what's your point?
Keep burying your head in the sand and everything will be alright with more tax cuts for the super rich. That's the ticket. What a joke.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kgb999
January 31, 2010 4:30 PM in reply to shooter242
Hey, if the GOP wants to run Brown ... more power to them. If you think Brown would win, I think you are an idiot. But sticking with the whole "inexperienced" meme can only bring diminished returns: either you acknowledge that Obama's experience wasn't a factor in performance, or you have to explain to America how Obama's "inexperience" was bad but yet you'd like to duplicate the "error" and elect someone who is equally inexperienced .... Yeah, that just SCREAMS "we're serious about government".
And with the declaration of Obama as "super-liberal", the GOP has turned the idea of "liberal" as meaningful description of ideology into an absurd joke.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PeninsulaMatt
January 31, 2010 1:45 PM
Yes, please, Scott Brown in 2012!!!!! He might even be easier to defeat than Palin. Question: Of the people who support this idea, did any of them criticize Obama for being too inexperience as a first term Senator and former State Legislator? I'm thinking yes. So does that mean that they now believe Obama was experienced enough based on his resume? Or are they saying that Brown is just as qualified? Wouldn't they be discounting Obama's 4 yeas AS president by then? What is my point? That Republicans aren't logical. What? You already knew that? Oh. Right. So did I...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 1, 2010 5:12 AM in reply to PeninsulaMatt
So then you kind of disproved your point.
I can't honestly name a better Republican candidate. As I said above, "He can campaign again as the Joe Truck fella. That's good enough for at least 30% of voters even before he opens his mouth. Add a few more in to vote for him cuz he's not black, plus there's the male stripper constituency ("he's so dreamy!"). Let's not forget that Americans were **stupid** enough to go for Bush in 2000 (pretty much) and the people in Massachusetts already bought Brown's line."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Icon
January 31, 2010 1:50 PM
Something tells me a certain self-avowed "democratic socialist" from Vermont is very offended to hear that.
I'd take leftist proposals that work over rightist proposals that don't. So would the American people.
Perhaps Sen. Alexander should resign. He's certainly doing more immediate harm to the country than AG Holder is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GayIthacan
January 31, 2010 2:04 PM
Gee - I guess the voters from NY23 and Oregon and CA05 didn't get the memo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TBender
January 31, 2010 2:06 PM in reply to GayIthacan
Odd how Boehner et al. never mention those races...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 2:51 PM
Boehner: 'There Aren't That Many Places Where We Can Come Together'
As expected. Agent Orange gives Obama the middle finger again. Now where is the White House response? They've let this kind of leftist/liberal gibberish gone unanswered far too long. I hope Obama realizes this. Otherwise, his Administration is dead and the country is screwed. Obama must make the GOP clowns pay a price for their vitriol and nonsense.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 31, 2010 3:44 PM in reply to wbgonne
WTH? where is the WH response? Is that snark?
Did you not watch the SOTU or the Q + A?
this must be snark.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 3:51 PM in reply to Viva!America!
It's not snark at all. And, yes, I watched both SOTU and the Q&A, and I saw Obama reaching his hand out yet again to the Repubs. And now the House GOP has given its answer. F.U. And the Repubs MUST be called on it. This is an ongoing battle and the White House must pound away over and again until the GOP suffers or changes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SpiderPig
January 31, 2010 4:32 PM in reply to wbgonne
He keeps reaching and the r's keep slapping it away. I'm fine with him keeping on showing the American people that he's the reasonable one, trying to work with the other side. The people will eventually catch on after seeing it enough times (they're kinda slow, I'm sure you've noticed...).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 4:41 PM in reply to SpiderPig
Well, that last part is just what concerns me. I'm not so sure the message is getting through. I fear a sizable percentage of Americans buys that GOP Obama = liberal-leftist crap. You'll never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people (Will Rogers). The White House has to pound away, just like the GOP does. The effort must be relentless and Dem Congress critters should be deputized to carry some weight.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 31, 2010 4:56 PM in reply to wbgonne
I think if the American public were being fooled by the Republican propaganda, they'd trust him significantly less than they do. They blame him less for this mess than Republicans.
Nonetheless, though, I do agree that the WH needs to respond more forcefully to the "crazy left" verbiage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 31, 2010 5:22 PM in reply to CT Voter
But you see they've already won, by getting you and others to say that Obama needs to respond. Rahm already has, i.e. F*&K the left. Until the party has the guts to attack the right, they're going to be stuck responding to attacks by moving to the right. Which is of course exactly what the Republicans wanted all along.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
February 1, 2010 3:19 PM in reply to bluebell
I worded my thoughts badly. I think the response should be along the lines of "Why is it liberal to want to care for people", or something like that.
In other words, what should be responded to is the "crazy" premise, not the "left" premise.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 31, 2010 5:23 PM in reply to wbgonne
Whoa, no, wouldn't want Obama anywhere near the forbidden L word. They've already won.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 31, 2010 6:37 PM in reply to bluebell
I see your point and I agree that there should be a spirited defense of liberalism. The problem is most people don't even know that means anymore. Liberalism must be re-defined to escape caricature. Certainly Obama and all Dems should take the antigovernment nihilists on directly: Government is how civilized people come together to solve their problems. In a democracy like ours we ARE the government. So, yes, I agree that must be done again and again and again to re-build the foundation for government action. But I think it is generally counterproductive to use labels like liberal and left. It only distracts people. Just focus on the policies, forget about the characterizations. In any event, it is plainly false to call Obama a liberal or a progressive. He is not an ideologue of any sort so far as I can tell. He is a reasonable and pragmatic problem-solver. It just so happens that the actual solutions to our problems generally fall in the "liberal" sphere. Talk about the policies. The public option was the key to successful HCR but it was jettisoned, in part, b/c it was labeled "liberal." Frankly, I don't care about the label: I want the solutions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
January 31, 2010 5:52 PM
The right-wingers listed here just can't help themselves. They're worse than pre-programmed robots or just like a toy that repeats a few lines when you push it just right. I'll bet I've got about a one in five chance of predicting their response(s). There is no point in even asking, especially on every Sunday show every Sunday morning, speaking of predictable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ottis
January 31, 2010 7:26 PM
Caught Rodger Ailes on TV this morning. Roger and Rush, two of a kind. They both look like fattening hogs ready for the butcher. What a team!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cy Guy
January 31, 2010 7:26 PM
"The President-- is-- he was the most liberal member of the United States Senate. You don't get there by accident,"
Right, it was no accident, he was democratically elected by a clear majority of the populace - so obviously it is the will of the people that we have a liberal administration. Now if only Obama and the Dems in Congress also realized this....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 1, 2010 5:33 AM in reply to Cy Guy
This is a good meme for explaining intransigence. The problem is thus not the Republicans saying No to everything; it is a Obama himself. He is the tumor that must be excised.
And the Republicans are great to replace him, since they're now the Idea Party!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Decider
February 1, 2010 10:05 AM
I thought John Kerry was the most liberal. That's what they told me when I ran against him in 2004. Rove always claimed that Feingold and Kennedy and Boxer and that dude from Vermont were the most liberal. Maybe it's a tie for first among all the Dems. Heh, heh!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
February 1, 2010 10:09 AM
Most Liberal Member of the Senate du jour; Obama (used to be Kerry, then Hillary...oh, and don't forget Gore.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?