TPMDC

Brown Wins Kennedy Seat In Massachusetts, Erasing Democrats' 60-Seat Super Majority

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

MA Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) and Senator-Elect Scott Brown (R-MA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Massachusetts voters chose state Sen. Scott Brown as their next U.S. Senator, sending a Republican to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and damaging the chances of passing health care bill that Democrats have spent months crafting.

The Associated Press and CNN declared Brown the victor over Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) with two-thirds of precincts reporting. (See returns here.) Kennedy held the seat 47 years until his death last summer.

It was the first statewide special election in the state's history, and unpredictable from the start. Democrats were caught off guard less than two weeks ago when polls showed Coakley, who had won the primary in December, had just a slim lead.

But as national attention focused on the race it raised the stakes for health care and her edge slipped away. Independent voters flocked to Brown and Democrats turned to the Kennedy family to help raise money for the battle.

President Obama made a last minute pitch for Coakley, appearing at a Sunday rally that was turned into a television ad. The DNC's Organizing for America made nearly 2 million calls into the state for Coakley and tea party groups flocked to Massachusetts to help Brown.

Brown has vowed to be the "41st vote" to block the health care bill.

Comments (76) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

January 19, 2010 9:33 PM   

For all of you who participated in this election, thank you. I am sorry it was not enough. Hopefully Plan B goes into effect now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:47 PM    in reply to Isepick

If by Plan B, you mean reconciliation, let's hope the Dems do that. Is that what you meant?

An even better option would be to scuttle the current bill and use the nuclear option in the Senate to pass Medicare for All, which I suspect would be more palatable to the average American. The tea party crowd would still whine and complain (someone on another site actually threw the Jefferson quote about tyranny and the blood of patriots at me in regard to the health care bill!), but I think a certain number of Independents could be won back. Medicare for All is simple to understand, the exisiting Medicare is popular, and if the Dems only need 51, then the recalcitrant DINOs would not be the ones shaping (and screwing up) the bill.

And the idea that the Dems ever had 60 was a fantasy in the first place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:34 AM    in reply to Wordie

Yes I meant reconciliation...That was not a rhetorical 'Plan B' ;)...When teabaggers start throwing out that particular quote, I like to remind them that McVeigh was wearing that on a t-shirt when he was arrested, and I also point out that since they are such great patriots themselves, perhaps they wouldn't mind watering that tree with their own blood. I usually offer to help them with that, for free >:)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:13 PM    in reply to Isepick

I think Hell just froze over.

Man this is amazing guess this is what happens when you dont keep your promises.

Was passing Kennedy's bill really so hard to do? Was passing a Public option and embracing your base rather than back stabbing them really that hard to do?

Was kissing olympia snowes ass really worth it.

Man what a epic failure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:54 PM    in reply to Isepick

Fire Rahm. NOW.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 7:25 AM    in reply to again

How 'bout Tim Kaine, too? Howard Dean was winning when the chips were down. The current folks have returned to the 'snatch defeat from the jaws of victory' strategy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:34 PM   

Stuff like this makes my head hurt, its just so amazing how stupid people are. Makes me want to move to a different country and say the hell to America it gets what it deserves. But thats not fair, only 50 percent of it deserves it. Those 50 percent though...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 8:54 AM    in reply to musgrove

Man, I busted my ass for that campaign ever since the first Rasmussen poll. It's too bad it's for naught.

My experience from phone banking and talking to people on the street is that:

-- Fox News and Hate Radio are extremely powerful; they set the agenda.
-- People know very little about how the political process works.
-- There is no such thing as "winning independents." My experience is that independents hate any party that is in power. They aren't independent: they are contrarian.

Anyways... I hope that Scott Brown has the sense to realize that his best chance is to be a moderate Republican. He won't have the independents to lean on three years from now. And after three years people will be angry that Scott Brown has not delivered on his campaign promises. Junior Senators are powerless.

Congratulations to Brown for running a much better campaign than Coakley.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:35 PM   

She deserved to lose because she was a lazy, arrogant candidate who didn't work as hard as Brown did. Simple as that.

Dems needed a good kick in the face of reality, and they sure as hell got it tonight.

And I am 100% with Josh...all Democrats, shut you damn mouths and keep working. Quit acting like such pansies all the damn time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:36 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

Co-sign on that last bit, and I wish I had faith that they would do so.

Not so much on the Dems needing a dose of reality--of course they do, but I'd have very much preferred that it not come in this form.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:38 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

Maybe she did deserve to lose, but do Americans deserve to have this douche mess things up for everyone else?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:36 AM    in reply to musgrove

as I said Mass. voters just cut off their noses to spite the rest of america. thanks alot you creeps. No vacationing in Mass. for our family I can tell you that. They get none of our money.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 9:20 AM    in reply to IMNOTBITTER

That's exactly what they did. I hope they rue the day they voted for him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:45 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

In that sense, she reminds me a little of Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primaries. Clinton seemed to believe she was entitled to the nomination and, as a result, ran a sloppy, arrogant campaign.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:50 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

And someone needs to tell the Democratic leadership when these races come along. It seems like they missed this one. Obama was "surprised" that it was so close. Where were his advisors? Pollsters? If this race was so goddam important why did he wait to be "asked" at the last minute to jump into the race? He's the LEADER of the party for Christ's sake.

Maybe the candidate sucked, but the Democratic leadership surely did.

Shut up? Why? So these assholes can sleep through another one? It seems to me that they need someone screaming in their face 24/7.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:17 PM    in reply to henk

When Josh said "Shut Up" he meant that Dems need to stop pointing fingers, get to work and get things done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:05 PM    in reply to Viva!America!

So just 'fall into line'? We're not allowed to analyze, unpack, look at all the 'what ifs'? This is not a natural disaster. This is the work of people and organizations. It could have been avoided. It's everyone's responsibility to ask 'how?'.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:15 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

She wasn't arrogant, and I don't believe she was lazy, either, but still a bad candidate with a poor campaign strategy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:32 AM    in reply to acf_ma

Yeah evidently her campaign was "SO WHEN DO I MOVE TO WASHINGTON?" She thought it was a cake walk. Never take anything for granted....Oh and once again Shame on the people off Mass. for cutting off their noses to spite the rest of america.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:36 PM   

Quick question: Since this is a special election, what is the length of Brown's term? Is it a full 6 years?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:38 PM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

2 years

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:39 PM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

Per Wikipedia: "It was a special election to fill the Massachusetts Class I Senate seat for the remainder of the term ending January 3, 2013."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:43 PM   

"But as national attention focused on the race it raised the stakes for health care and her edge slipped away."

- So it WAS a referendum on ObamaCare then.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:47 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

I doubt it.

Obamacare is far more conservative than RomneyCare which is what they have in MA and what Scott Brown voted for.

It was a referendum on her, on Washington and on the do-nothing Democrats. I think people just got sick of watching the Democrats dither in DC.

Obamacare will be the casualty, but I think that a 10% unemployment rate was the real reason why she lost. People just got sick of the fighting in DC over healthcare while the REAL problem - jobs weren't being dealt with adequately.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:13 PM    in reply to jsdc007

She lost because she was a lousy candidate with a lousy campaign. It never should have happened. She got out early in the primary, and the pros were enthralled by the thought female Senator from MA, and didn't want to know anything else. I didn't support her then, but did for the final because the alternative was Brown and his throwback to the Bush years positions.

Incumbency is a powerful tool, and in 2 years Brown will have that, and possibly a Republican governor to help him in that race. Who can take him on?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:18 PM    in reply to jsdc007

make no mistake this WAS OBAMA'S FAULT.

This happened because he betrayed the Unions and alienated his base.

Its going to get alot worse if he diesnt scuttle the senate bill resurrect Ted Kennedy's bill merge it with the house bill and pass that minus stupack

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:47 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

Er, no. Not in the least. It was the media that turned it into what you perceive to be true. People do not know the specifics of the health care bill. Which will save lives. End of story.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:53 PM    in reply to dswx

It's the end of the story all right but the end could be foreseen six months ago when Democrats got blind-sided by the teabaggers. The couldn't explain the insurance reform bill then and they still can't explain it. Of course, it's not all about healthcare but it is about a party too clueless to explain itself to the voters. If you don't know where you are going any road will get you there, but that might be over a cliff. Americans want to know where we're going.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:50 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

I'm glad you interpreted that sentence; it reads like total gibberish to me.

The sentence that follows is a puzzler too: Independent voters flocked to Brown and Democrats turned to the Kennedy family to help raise money for the battle. Yeah, so?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:46 PM   

At least we no longer have to hear press pretend Dems have "60 votes" when one of those is Lieberman. "With 60 votes, why aren't you doing anything?"

Funny tho, this takes us back to the beginning of 2009, before Spector switched. Keep that in mind. If Scott tis the "end of the world" for Dems, why wasn't Spector the "end of the world" for GOP? Just the usual rightward double standards. Franken's win wasn't spun into a larger narrative either.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:09 PM    in reply to AnswerFrog

Co-sign. Not only the part about the bias in the media spin re Specter, Franken vs. Brown, but also the take-away that in fact, we never had 60 votes. One of the silver linings of this result is that it will (or, at least, should) take the thunder and the microphone away from Holy Joe. It also opens a number of possibilities for passing HCR in stages: non-budgetary insurance regulation in a bill under regular order, and budget-affecting measures (including, ahem, the still-highly-popular "new public plan" (aka public option) that, according to contemporaneous 2007-08 reportage in CNN, ChiTrib, WaPo, NYT, and others, was a linchpin of both the Democratic Party platform and the Obama campaign.

That, or the Dem leadership could revert to the same old "we could get everything done if only we had [insert excuse here: a majority in Congress / a bigger majority in Congress / the White House / 60 votes in the Senate]" meme.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:47 PM   

The Democrats need to get very mean. Instead of being called elitist by the Republicans, they need to be called dirty bastards. It is time to get nasty in Washington and bludgeon the Republicans and shut them and the special interests out of every single piece of legislation and do everything by reconciliation until next year when the filibuster can be defeated. It is still 59 to 41. We still have the majority. Government by supermajority does not seem democratic. It has always been majority rule. It is time to reframe this whole debate and have the Democrats vow to carry out the Mandate we gave them in the last election and totally ignore the Republicans.

Coakley was lazy and the Healthcare bill moves Massachusetts backwards because they have to pay for it and get no benefit. I believe the people want results and that the Democrats need to roll over the Republicans and start producing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:57 PM    in reply to toomuchpr

Good luck with that. After this loss they'll listen to the Village Media, get more timid, try to "work" with Republicans and get totally screwed for their efforts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:22 AM    in reply to toomuchpr

The Democrats need to get very mean.

Absolutely. Most of the red states are rural and depend very much on agriculture, heavily subsidized agriculture. OK, direct subsidies may not be what they once were, but when the indirect ones come up, it will only take 40 urban Democrats to put someone's balls in a vise and say "You want this? Well, I want that.".

Unfortunately, it won't happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:25 AM    in reply to toomuchpr

You are right and they can start by first GETTING RAHM EMANUEL OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE! Second ram this health care bill down their throats WITH A PUBLIC OPTION BY USING THE 51 vote option STOP THE BI PARTISAN BS. OBAMA DON"T YOU GET IT THEY DON"T WANT YOU TO SUCCEED THEY WANT YOU TO FAIL AND THEY HATE YOUR GUTS!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:47 PM   

This is why we can never get any meaningful shit done in this country (sigh)...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:51 PM    in reply to cfarnham

Well, there was that AUMF thingey a few years back ...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:50 PM   

Martha Coackely was a bad candidate-period. She believed she was entitled to Kennedys seat because was is a democrat. Democrats mistake was assuming the seat belong to Ted Kennedy and not the people of Mass. Tonight's message to democrats is not to slow down like the media is suggesting. The message is stop the bickering. Quit letting the Bayh's Nelson, Landreiu's and the party dictate the peoples agenda and start passing meaningful legislation. And don't give up on HCR

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:53 PM   

The MSM are already misinterpreting this as a rejection of health care reform.

It is a rejection of Obama and the Senate's phony, coporate and conservative appeasing insurance industry giveaway masquerading as health care reform.

That combined with their other corporate and monied interests first-people last policies like Geithner's bankster coddling bailout and the PHARMA deal made this inevitable.

But all is not lost. At least the fillibuster rule continues to be honored and maintained.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:55 PM    in reply to tommyo

Fillibuster must go.

I hope Biden's remarks are hinting at that. It's a stupid rule. The House got rid of it years ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:20 PM    in reply to tommyo

You and the MSM are both wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:54 PM   

They have to win this seat back in 2012.

Brown will have only "no" votes and no accomplishments by then.

Vapid pretty boy will be revealed to be the usual GOP tool who votes party line on every issue.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 9:57 PM   

I took a year out from Grad school in 08, fully devoting to the Obama campaign. I’m sure there are many who had spend money, time and life hoping for a better tomorrow. So, I don’t consider myself making any more of a sacrifice that many hardcore volunteers I had encountered.
Ever since I have, preposterously, invested even more time, emotion and resources- at times excited and hopeful and other times concerned and disgruntled- but rooting for the success of the Obama agenda, for most part
The severe compromises on healthcare as it grinded through the House and the Senate and the stories on WH close ties and unreasonable favors to Wall Street have been heart wrenching to notice. Not to mention, I will graduate this semester- and I’m afraid of the prospects of plunging into the empty swimming pool with unemployment rate at 10%
Anyway, while I haven’t paid much close attention to the MA-Senate race- in the past few weeks and especially tonight I did feel I had wasted an year of my life on the road, and even more at my desk getting informed and opinionated on all political issues- naively assuming that somehow this is all connected to my own life.
I have a shit load of debt, and though a long time coming- I had a reality check in the past few weeks. Let the politicians and politics, and those who actually get paid to pay attention, take care of the circus. Frankly, it doesn’t matter much who wins or loses- it doesn’t seem change our lives much.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:04 PM    in reply to kash79

One thing that will effect your life are appointments to the Supreme Court. If Obama gets one more appointment, (and makes a good choice) it will have been worth your time. The rest is best forgotten.

Good luck with the job search.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:00 PM    in reply to kash79

It's not wasted. It's not. It's just not easy or quick. It's plodding, two steps forward one step back.

Small changes matter. Bush vetoed SCHIP several times. I know people who have their kids in it. Kids get to go to the doctors. Stuff like that. Fewer people maimed by the GOP and more people helped.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:01 PM    in reply to kash79

Kash,

I've been reading your posts here for a while.

I am impressed by your political evolution from all-out supporter to more discerning political observer.

I know you're worried, but I think you're going to do fine in that job search. You think for yourself, you're not just a follower, and you're well-spoken. Maybe you'll start your own business?

Good luck and best wishes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 5:14 AM    in reply to kash79

I, for one, feel you completely. You gave it all to get these bastards elected. They actually DID get elected. And you expected results. Proof of Life, so to speak. And now you feel betrayed on a fundamental level.

Betrayed, demoralized, screwed. What was it all for?

All I can offer you is this.

Your efforts have, at the very least, insured the progressive initiatives we have in place already, will stay in place. At least for the foreseeable future.

Things like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Roe v. Wade, Unemployment compensation, a whole host of social safety net infrastruture.

It was very, very difficult to get these things in place. And they have been under attack, over and over, recently by the right.

You helped stop that. And at least gave us a slim chance to try to move forward.

SCHIPS expansion, would never have happened, without your efforts. The Ledbetter Fair Pay act, would never have happened without your efforts. Sotomayor, would never have happened, without your efforts. The Stimulus, would never have happened, without your efforts. Healthcare Reform would never have gotten even on the agenda, without your efforts.

You are to be commended. We ALL thank you.

At least, I do.

Thank you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:00 PM   

Gawds, spare me 48 hours of DC Villager 'wisdom' on what this election really means.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:07 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

48 hours? We should be so lucky.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:21 PM    in reply to Duck Stab

I give it two weeks or until hcr passes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:20 PM   

My analysis is that the country is reverting to its conservative self, now that the financial crisis has dissipated somewhat.

I think historians will consider Obama's election as an anomaly, largely driven by extraordinary set of circumstances.

Once in office, and no longer supported by public fear of financial meltdown, Obama has been successfully targeted by the republican smear machine, as has every democratic president before him. This time, however, it was also aided by the always present American racialism, which went dormant during the presidential election, but is now back to normal.

Given today's results in my state, I would expect ever more tea party attacks, now fully embraced by republican leadership, tearing Obama to pieces as a terrorist-loving, white hating, income redistributionist, working to empty the white middle class wallets to give its money to you know who.

The good times are over, people. The next three years are going to be a never ending parade of ugly from an never ending supply of stupid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:40 PM   

The gloating 'baggers, FNC/RNC and other righties are going to be insufferable now. What a coup. Ted Kennedy's barely cold in the grave and the GOP takes his Senate seat and is promising to dismantle his life's work. They'll soon be measuring the drapes for Palin in the WH.
God help us with leadership like this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 10:42 PM   

Remember TPM readers and Josh in particular: cowboys don't cry.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:30 PM   

Big Scott Brown
Drive pickup down
To Washingtown.
Got shovel in truck
To clean the muck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 19, 2010 11:53 PM   

By attempting bipartisanship and compromise with the GOP, Obama managed to triangulate himself into a lame duck after only one year in office! This is a remarkable achievement - there have been many one-term presidents, but NOT one has managed to become a lame duck during his very first year in office. So, congratulations Barry - you are a remarkable weasel!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:18 AM   

Shame on the people of Mass. Cutting off their noses to spite the rest of america. Shame on them . What a disgusting lot of hypocrites lives there. I would never have suspected but then again some of the worst rioting over bussing took place in the in Boston. What a very very sad day for America. All of my fears about Obama have been realized a great campaigner but not a very good politician. He got the ball to one yard line, very slowly I might add and now we have to give the ball over to the greedy self serving self centered throw backs in Mass. What a disgrace what an absolute disgrace! A state full of Liebermans just what the country needs at a very difficult time. Absolutely disgusting!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:48 AM    in reply to IMNOTBITTER

Though obviously disappointed with the outcome, I have to defend my state. First, Coakley ran an atrocious campaign. Second, the Rassmussen national poll of this senate race revealed a FAR greater advantage for Brown nationally (something like 20 points), than the 5% he managed here.

Again, this is what happens to democratic politicians if they let republicans smear them uninterrupted for a year. Obama spend a year being "presidential" and not fighting back - like he behaved during the campaign, oftentimes. So here is the result - the low-information voter (which is most of America) believes him to be a radical commie, terrorist sympathizer. And guess what - they realized he is black, too! Now that the financial crisis has dissipated somewhat, and joe the plumber doesn't feel like his double wide is going to get repossessed, he no loger feel scared shitless enough to support Obama.

That's the bottom line on this story. A short period of enlightenment has ended, and America is back to "normal" again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 12:23 AM   

"Incumbency is a powerful tool, and in 2 years Brown will have that, and possibly a Republican governor to help him in that race. Who can take him on?"

More likely is that he is a one-term senator. Or half-term, really, since he's only going to serve 3 years. He needed (and got) tens of thousands of votes from Democrats and left-leaning independents, who voted way outside their usual pattern*s. They won't be there for him in 2012 (unless Obama keeps fucking up). And Brown is already getting shit -- from the local Fox affiliate, of all places -- for offering up his daughters Bachelorette-style during his victory speech. Seriously, of his 30 minute speech, that's what they focused on.

*Yes, they've voted for Republican governors, but two of them left before serving a full term and Romney opted not to run for reelection and left office with a 34% approval rating. And part of that is explained by the state legislature, which has 195 members, less than 30 of which are Republican.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:11 AM   

What a sad sad group of selfish self serving creeps live in Mass. For democrats to align themselves with the likes of tea bagger is an absolute disgrace and I am sure that there are three no make that four very sad souls in heaven tonight Joe, John, Bobby, and Ted. Four gentlemen who essentially gave their lives for the betterment of all Americans and to have that legacy replaced by the likes of this fool Brown well it just shows how far the mighty voters of Mass. have fallen what a sad sad day for all of America.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bw

user-pic

January 20, 2010 1:23 AM   

One needs to ask who’s responsible for the failure of Health Care Reform and now the lost of the Super Majority the sixtieth vote. The people responsible besides President Obama are a handful of Conservative Democratic Senators. These Senators are Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, Kent Conrad, Mary Landrieu, and Max Baucus and let’s not forget traitor Joe Lieberman. These Senators need to pay a price both politically and stature within the Democratic Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:31 AM    in reply to bw


You are right about that but no real left of center candidate would never get elected in any of the states represented by the senators you mention. If you try to take them down they will only be replaced by a right of center republican. There in lies the dilemma and all the more reason to be calling the dems and "Independents" of Mass. exactly what they are "FOOLS" and selfish creeps who cut off their noses to spite the rest of America. Shame on them one and all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:34 AM   

Obama has proved a complete disaster for the Democratic Party. In one short year, he's squashed an energized base anxious for reform and completely demoralized the soul of the party. He's a weak, he's inexperienced, he's a preening premadonna. He never should have been the Democratic nominee. He was nominated by big money and he's bowed to their every wish ever since. If I had to do it over again, I would have voted for John McCain. And the voters of Massachusetts have just reached the same conclusion. At least with McCain, there was a chance that he would have been a strong president who challenged entrenched special interests in Washington. But with this president, there is absolutely no chance of that ever happening.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:42 AM    in reply to rstephen

Anyone who thinks that John McCain had an ounce of sense after picking that twit Palin for a running mate...... well take anything he/she says with a grain of salt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 1:36 AM   

What a disgrace what a shameful episode for all of America.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 2:41 AM   

The Dems damn well better suck it up and get back to work, but make it meaningful heath care reform this time okay guys? Hell I didn't invest my time and money on this issue only to see it go in the toilet over an upset by Mr. Critical Mass.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 5:21 AM   

I needed a good reason to finally give up completely on DC, and Brown's victory was it. I'm tired of hoping that the Dems will stop behaving like Dems. We effectively have NO representation in DC -- "we" being people who actually give a rat's ass about American principles and values (and health). DC is a money-making conduit for the rich and corporate -- period. The Dems spent the last 12 months securing themselves lucrative lobbying and consulting gigs and making concessions to Baucus, Lieberman and Snowe, and now they're acting like a 59-vote majority, which never slowed Republicans down, is the end of everything. Well, it is for me. Fuck this, I'm outta here. Maybe if I'd spent the last 12 months trying to get laid instead of trying to get Obama to do his job, I'd be less frustrated. Frankly, at this point, trying to find someone with whom to have meaningless casual sex seems like a step up from sending unread emails to the White House... and less ultimately frustrating. See ya, y'all.

Oh, and to you sociopathic hypertribalist Republicanite scumbags... don't you ever start spewing your shit to my face in person. Stay hidden behind your keyboards where you can pretend you're brave. My patience with you worthless fucks is at an end.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 5:44 AM   

I think people are reading too much into this.

Get a grip.

Coakley sucked as a candidate. And she lost because of it. She was a gaffe machine. She came across as complacent, entitled, and arrogant. A sleepwalker who origianally believed all you had to do to win in Mass, was be a Democrat.

The wrong tone for this economic environment. And the wrong candidate. By the time she realized she needed to actually get out there on the streets, and FIGHT, it was too late.

Brown, by contrast, came off fresh, energetic, and concerned.

So its no wonder he won.

And you can't link a Brown win nationally to HIR. Because they already have HIR in Mass. So what was in it, for them in Mass anyway?

No. This was lost, on the ground, due to local issues, by Coakley and the Mass dem party themselves. Not by national considerations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 9:06 AM    in reply to willia451

I agree. I haven't seen any polls that suggest Massachusetts voters are against health insurance reform (thanks for not calling it health care reform).

I think it's easy to kick Coakley when she's down, but really, what was she supposed to do. I think she should have been a little more visible -- maybe a lot more -- but I doubt any other candidate would have handled it much differently. I don't think this is about arrogance. She was running against an unknown. Her job wasn't to bring attention to him. In most cases, people like Scott Brown usually get no traction. Something happened in Massachusetts. We need to pay attention to it, now so we can stop it, but so we can take advantage of it.

Dems are not going to be able to run on a 2008 environment. Things change too quickly. One thing I do know is that the voter resentment that has built up is not exclusively beneficial to Republicans. We all have to be part of the discussion about what we want our country to be. Right now, that discussion doesn't seem to be happening in Washington.

As for Scott Brown, we should congratulate him and then we should put him to work (if you live in MA). Regardless of why he won, he's going to have to represent the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, who, by the way, are still liberal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 6:07 AM   


"Brown, by contrast, came off fresh, energetic, and concerned."

Gee, now of whom am I reminded by that?

--- "Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 6:35 AM    in reply to proximity1

Say what you want, but the vast majority have no interest in or clue about obscure orwellian quotes.

And its about the economy. Its always about the economy. Plus tone, energy, gravitas, and message.

Brown won the message battle. And won the election because of it.

Look. I'm not happy about it either.

But it is what it is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 8:21 AM   

Brown's win is not about thew need for Obama to "adjust" his agenda. It is a sign that the White House and Democrats need to do a better job of defining the GOP and in selling their own message.

A loss by a remarkably bad candidate who received historically bad advice (namely to not campaign for election) must be judged carefully.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 9:45 AM    in reply to jim43

I totally agree. I think the people of Mass were most angry at their own government, an unpopular governor and high taxes (which were just raised) and they were angry and took out their anger last night. Stupid I agree, but that's a good percentage of the american electorate who are uninformed and spoiled. Coakley was a terrible candidate but this was not a referendum on Obama or Obama care.

Amazing a state that is known for the best schools in the country and they turn out voters like this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 9:25 AM   

This will all die down just like the upstate New York race did. Obama definitely has some soul searching to do. Perhaps letters and calls to the White House are in order.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 20, 2010 10:25 AM   

Brown = male Sarah Palin. The tabloids are going to LOVE him. Get ready--affairs, secret (or not-so-secret) porn videos. Should be entertaining.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 21, 2010 10:09 AM   


"Brown won the message battle. And won the election because of it.Look. I'm not happy about it either.
But it is what it is."

Oh, _I'm_ happy about it! What's not to like? This is more bad news for Americans. And more bad news for Americans is good news for just about everybody else. My advice? Keep on saying moronic nonsense (borrowed from your two-term world-class idiot former president, "Dubya"!). Yes. Keep on dismissing things with that. Meanwhile, your country, culture--if that word can be applied to it--your vile and self-destructing economy, and so much else are on the fast-track to a well-deserved oblivion. Look on the bright side.

The more "Scott Browns" the better, the faster and the more completely your world disintegrates. Please hurry. And, give President "There-Must-Be-Some-Finer-Compromise-Position-Possible-Here-If-Only-We-Slice-It-Thinner" Obama a Wall Street hedge-fund-trader's Super-size bonus. He is really, really speeding the plow(ing) of everything into the ground.

PS: You're not watching enough television and other screen-media technology. Do more, and sooner.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on