
President Obama, hammered for taking a hands-off approach on health care to begin with, has all but disappeared from the discussions as Congressional leaders attempt to figure out a way to finalize a health care plan now that they have just 59 Senate seats.
Our sources suggest to us the White House has been hands-off since the fate of the health care bill went from nearly done to unbelievably uncertain this week.
Obama's health care message has been to say he hopes Congress tries to "move quickly to coalesce around those elements of the package that people agree on," a signal many took as backing away to let leaders do what they think is most politically viable.
A White House aide insisted Obama is "engaged" on health care and that "active" discussions are happening in an around the Oval Office.
Obama has been speaking with Congressional leadership including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and Majority Leader Harry Reid.
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel also is talking to members, though aides say he's not advocating for one position, but is listening to their thoughts on health care.
Administration officials said the White House view is to let the results of Tuesday's elections play themselves out so members can "digest" the political implications and figure out a way ahead.
The White House views it as a fluid situation and aides warned against jumping to conclusions based on what members say is the president's level of involvement.
The White House also is reluctant to come in and demand Congress take a certain path toward finishing health care in the aftermath of the Senate election in Massachusetts. Aides believe it makes more sense to allow some time to pass and give leadership breathing room to convince their caucus to support the more conservative Senate bill - a plan the administration began advocating for before the polls had even closed Tuesday.
But White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs admitted today that Obama agrees with leadership taking a breather to let the "dust settle," adding that the president has a "full plate" he can concentrate on in the meantime.
Aides privately concede there are consequences to inaction and said the White House is firmly aware of that. They fervently pushed back on any suggestions that the fight has ended.
But pollsters close to the White House say officials there also are well aware they have lost the country's support on the two bills. Voters like individual elements of the bills but are far more concerned about unemployment.
That's one reason you've seen Obama pivot to a populist push this week, and tomorrow he'll be talking about jobs during an Ohio town hall.
Even opponents of the current bills aren't sure where to focus their attention. The Chamber of Commerce is still running ads against the plan, but keeping a close watch on Congress to see if health care will die and they can move on to other issues.
"Like everybody else we're still trying to figure out what policy makers are going to decide to do," said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans.
Republicans are enjoying the Democratic scramble to figure out a plan for action, but have actually eased off their health care criticism.
Lanny Davis, a former Clinton White House special counsel who now writes a political column for The Hill, told TPMDC the fight among Democrats about the public option allowed Republicans to define the bill this summer.
Now the only option for Obama is to reach out to Republicans, he said. "He has a good excuse now that we lost. We have to decide is something better than nothing," Davis said.
bluebell
January 21, 2010 7:35 PM
What's the title of his next book? Profiles in Cowardice?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
January 21, 2010 7:46 PM in reply to bluebell
Audacity of Inaction
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
January 21, 2010 10:11 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
You very well could be right.
I talked to a senate staffer today and I left it feeling very discouraged about everything. Inaction sums it all up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
January 21, 2010 10:42 PM in reply to Chris
When he told us he wasn't afraid to be a one term President. I didn't think he meant this way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chris
January 21, 2010 11:40 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
I think he really meant it but I thought it was because he was willing to push things and not because he was willing to do nothing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
January 22, 2010 10:23 AM in reply to Chris
I don't believe Obama ever wanted health care reform to pass.
He gave away key bargaining chips before negotiations even started, he supported pointless attempts at bipartisonship that were never going to get a single Republican vote, but further damaged the bill, and now he is shrugging his shoulders.
Actions speak louder than words, and his actions say, "Do not want!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rstephen
January 21, 2010 10:20 PM in reply to bluebell
This is precisely the moment when a real leader would get out in front and say, "this is how we're going to do it." It's precisely in times of crisis when everything seems to be falling apart - that's when you find out who the real leaders are. Obama is NOT a leader. He's the guy who panics and tries to save himself. And that's exactly what Obama is doing right now politically.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
January 21, 2010 10:32 PM in reply to rstephen
My thoughts exactly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
January 22, 2010 8:22 AM in reply to bluebell
He's being smart. You know, that quality liberals prize so much.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seeryer
January 22, 2010 9:20 AM in reply to bluebell
"Dreams of the guy I campaigned as"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
January 22, 2010 10:30 AM in reply to bluebell
He is even weaker than anyone, including the Republicans, imagined. He delights them with his cowardice and timidity. How pitiful. Remember during the campaign when he said he wasn't going to bring a knife to a gunfight and then did absolutely nothng to respond to the endless attacks and vitriol against him? People didn't realize he was actually saying he wouldn't bother bringing any sort of weapon to a gunfight. Now, instead of showing strength in the midst of advsersity he runs and hides. It is disgraceful.
What he should do is present a plan of action that responds to the public's desires instead of kowtowing to the special interests. If that loses then at least Democrats would have something to campaign on and the ability to paint Republicans as the whores to the insurance industry that they are. Oh, but I forgot, he's all kissy face with the Republicans hoping for "bipartisanship" so we can't go on the attack and point out that they are responsible for the multiple debacles going on in the country. So he's not only a coward, but a supremely bad strategist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
January 21, 2010 7:37 PM
Slowing down worked wonders for the health care bill last summer. I'm sure it will be even more effective now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PeninsulaMatt
January 21, 2010 8:54 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Obviously the problem was that it didn't go slow enough!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jollyroger
January 21, 2010 9:30 PM in reply to PeninsulaMatt
it didn't go slow enough!
Olympia Snowe weighs in!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
IndyLinda
January 21, 2010 7:39 PM
And where does Lanny Davis get the idea that Republicans will vote for anything? They've got their foot on the Democrats' throat. Why would they lift it off? Just to be nice?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aikbay
January 22, 2010 1:33 AM in reply to IndyLinda
Lanny "lieberman's BFF" Davis is like a liberal democrat like Lieberman and Ben Nelson are. IOW, gimme some of that money and STFU.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
January 21, 2010 7:41 PM
By "we" does Lanny Davis mean "we Democrats"? That's funny. I didn't know I had enough money to hire him to be on my side.
Actually, now that I think of it, was Lanny the only person TPMDC could call? Come on, Christina.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
January 21, 2010 7:53 PM in reply to fbacon2
If nothing else has come from my visits here, I have detected a distinct pattern to the comments. And that is this: anyone who doesn't tack to the left on absolutely everything is not a real Democrat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 21, 2010 9:42 PM in reply to masanf
The true analog of the GOP, n'est pas? our lovely two party system, two sides of the same coin. And as the SC just rule, it's all about the coin, ain't it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Seeryer
January 22, 2010 9:35 AM in reply to masanf
What it really is, is that Dems felt like they were bludgeoned to death politically by Bush and the Republicans. So we dust ourselves off and finally after the '08 election, those same folks who felt like they were near death, again politcally speaking, were ready to return the favor. And the people they elected didn't like being called Commie so they scaled back the Stimulus and despite putting in hundreds of billions in tax cuts, only one Republican supported it and that was becasue he was from NO and they need all the help they can get. So now the economy is still in the crapper and the Republicans can say despite all that money, the Stimulus hadn't worked because we are still over 10% unemployment. And then Obama is MIA during the Health Care debate. He just leaves it to politicians that have a third of the popularity he had and they can only pass some water down piece of legislation that the DEMS are now running from. So after a year of what should have been progressive victories has once again turned into a political bludgeoning on the left.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
January 21, 2010 7:42 PM
Now the only option for Obama is to reach out to Republicans, he said.
Isn't that what got us into this mess in the first place? Trying to please Republicans?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
January 22, 2010 10:36 AM in reply to slb
You are correct, but he doesn't really mean "reach out". What he means is capitulate to every Republican demand. My guess is that Obama, our timid dhief executive, is inclined to do just that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Zell
January 21, 2010 7:44 PM
What exactly is an example of an "element of the package that people agree on"?
The idea that a Republican Senator will vote for cloture on anything even vaguely related to health care is absurd. And in the utterly unbelievable case that something related to health care makes it out of the Senate, it will be worse than the current Senate bill, which the progressive House caucus isn't voting for. Why would the progressive House caucus vote for something worse?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:07 PM in reply to Zell
Pre-existing conditions. The right to drop a a policyholder who gets seriously ill.
Any other questions?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 9:30 PM in reply to anna am
Is it expected that insurance premiums would be higher for these two benefits in the absence of requiring everyone to have insurance?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 21, 2010 7:44 PM
Republicans did everything in their power to delay proceedings and it paid off for them with Massachusetts electing Brown. now the House Dems want to reward them for their shenanigans by not casting one more vote to do what Democratic Presidents could do in decades and moving on. Folks are tired of hearing about HCR and each and every day the House drags it out they make the Dems look more and more ridiculous and unable to legislate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 21, 2010 7:50 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
So on to pretending to do financial reform or is it pretending they care about jobs? We know they won't even pretend to end any wars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 21, 2010 7:46 PM
Lanny Davis is the last person in Washington I'd listen to or look to for a quote.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 8:00 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
I learned long ago that anything Lanny Davis shills for is dirty. I take a shower every time I see him on television.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
January 21, 2010 7:47 PM
I think I remember this one: "That's not change! It's more of the same!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 21, 2010 7:47 PM
So you're all going to come here to this article and say the same shit you all said on a very similar article written earlier?
Go write, fax, call or e-mail your reps, senators, Pelosi, Reid, and the WH. You hanging around here driving yourself up a wall with non-news. getting upset over stupid things like comments that the president has a full plate or that he's going to let the dust settle. Never mind that that comment fits with Nancy Pelosi's 'we hear you, don't rush us' statement from earlier.
Do something constructive.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 21, 2010 7:53 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Are you still under the delusion that they give a damn when we call, write, fax? The last time I got carried away and called Senator Amy her staffer wasn't allowed to tell me her position on healthcare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JZ
January 22, 2010 9:42 AM in reply to bluebell
Just look at the Teabaggers. By doing calling, faxing and staging ridiculous protests, they're managing to turn the GOP into a carbon-copy of themselves. If anything, liberals give up too easy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Davran
January 21, 2010 7:57 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Did that already today. Also sent out emails to like-minded friends asking them to do the same.
Unfortunately, I have a feeling it'll do about as much good as bitching about things here. Will Rogers was right in his description of the Democratic Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acamus
January 21, 2010 8:05 PM in reply to Davran
If they get enough it will effect their behavior. But there hasn't been the groundswell of support for progressive reform to make them think that to resist it might hurt their chances.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:14 PM in reply to acamus
I think that's because there isn't widespread support for progressive initiatives.
The fact that the rank and file voters got pissed off at Wall Street and Geithner has given the progressives the idea that they're one with the people, that they speak for the people.
I buy into that as much as I buy into the premise that the Tea Partiers represent the real America.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 7:58 AM in reply to anna am
There is enormous support for POPULIST measures, however. ANd progressive policies by and large ARE populist. The sales-and-marketing wouldn't be difficult.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 8:03 PM in reply to Viva!America!
You're hanging out here too.
I've done the e-mails and I suggested to moveon that they organize a WDC rally for healthcare by plain ole Democrats like me. If that happens, I'll be driving to WDC for it--from St. Louis.
I think it's more like picking at a scab. You know better, but you do it anyway.
Best....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acamus
January 21, 2010 8:10 PM in reply to cube3u
And I doubt it would be that successful. Despite all the claims that 60% or more support the public option, etc. There just doesn't seem to be much energy for progressive reform. A lot are for it, just don't ask for a sacrifice in order to make a reality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 9:41 PM in reply to acamus
Call it what you will--progressive, liberal or my favorite non-label.....Democratic. If my fellow Democrats of whatever niche decline to pass healthcare reform, then there will be Democratic carnage in November. Voters will only look at the (D) after the name and not ponder on progressive versus liberal versus whatever other label is convenient. It won't matter one iota.
Republicans don't have to do any more on this issue. If another issue is attempted, then Republicans in the Senate will be aided and abetted by the spirit of comraderie that Democrats have embodied in their sacred process and we can expect delay after delay in every committee and on the floor. This will play to the Republicans' complete advantage in November as they point out that Democratic control of both chambers and the presidency meant, well, nothing.
Think back to Joe Leiberman's committee handling the bill to create a new Homeland Security Department. Negotiations were proceeding with the unions and Republican Senators when the Republicans suddenly abandoned all attempts at negotiations on the bill--leaving the unions lobbying for their changes.
Fast forward to the midterm campaigns and every Democrat was hammered with the inability to crank security legislation out of the Senate. They didn't care, it was cried. And the voters listened to this crap. Result? Midterm where the president's party lost zero Congress critters--instead they gained.
After the election, the Republicans enacted the legislation creating the Homeland Security Department.
This is the same damned play, isn't it? But the stakes are much,much higher now. The Democratic base will be LIVID if healthcare reforms are abandoned. The voters will avoid anything with a (D).
See how that works? Doing nothing on this issue is simply NOT an option if our Democratic Congress critters want to keep their jobs. Because that carnage will continue into 2012 and perhaps beyond as the Democrats are forced into a role they are comfortable with--collaborators with the Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Consumatopia
January 21, 2010 9:25 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Never mind that that comment fits with Nancy Pelosi's 'we hear you, don't rush us' statement from earlier.
Why is it okay for Obama to be an idiot just because Pelosi is an idiot?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Homefries
January 21, 2010 7:50 PM
The sky is falling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 8:07 AM in reply to Homefries
Again?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
January 21, 2010 7:58 PM
Strategery!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
McMia
January 21, 2010 8:01 PM
This really is all they know:
Senate - We count, you don't, pass our bill and shut the fuck up.
This is what Rhambama has wanted all along, the clean Senate bill he negotiated in secret with AHIP and PhRMA. This is apparently what they will fight for until the bitter end. They really don't care if they lose half the base. They figure they get enough money from their corporate partners. And votes?
Well they just figure where else are the dirty fucking hippies going to go.
to convince their caucus to support the more conservative Senate bill
We count, you don't, do what I tell you and shut the fuck up.
Whatever...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matt in so dak
January 21, 2010 8:05 PM
I have spent the entire last two days hassling my wife and father for being so stooooooopid as to have voted for Obama in the primaries. I told them then he was a conservadem in liberal's clothing. I feel vindicated and am enjoying it.
None of the Above in 2012
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acamus
January 21, 2010 8:13 PM in reply to matt in so dak
Just super. Looking at today's SC ruling on corp donations to campaigns shows what at stake in elections. Idiots like you that will allow repubs like Brown get in control in order to "protest" make me ill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
McMia
January 21, 2010 8:20 PM in reply to acamus
I wonder how much money Rahmbama took from the health care industry in the past couple years.
Zero no doubt...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matt in so dak
January 22, 2010 1:53 AM in reply to McMia
Democrats...Republicans...They're all the same any more. Just different groups of corporations running the show.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
henk
January 21, 2010 8:22 PM in reply to matt in so dak
Ah, so you know both the people in South Dakota who voted for Obama. Small world, eh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mgmonklewis
January 21, 2010 8:52 PM in reply to henk
Hahaha. Or something.
BTW, although South Dakota unfortunately voted for McCain, it was only 54% to 46% -- closer than a lot of other states. So yeah, at least two of us here in South Dakota voted for Obama.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
January 21, 2010 8:05 PM
El Predicto
Year Two: Congress works on job stimulus. Obama takes hands-off approach. After 12 months of Republican obstruction no effective jobs legislation is passed.
Year Three: Congress works on Climate Control Legislation. Obama takes hands-off approach. After 12 months of Republican obstruction no comprehensive Climate Control legislation is passed.
Year Four: Obama spends most of the year on vacation and traveling abroad.
2012: Sarah Palin is elected first woman President.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
McMia
January 21, 2010 8:14 PM in reply to theWalrus
This is truly bizarro world. I am gob-smacked by how the Democrats are allowing the Republicans to carry the populist banner.
Of course it's pretty hard to show the people the pitchfork when up till now you've just been using it to shovel $1,000 bills into Lloyd Blankfein's trough...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billpaustin
January 21, 2010 8:46 PM in reply to McMia
Talk about a rudderless boat, I love this quote:
"Even opponents of the current bills aren't sure where to focus their attention. "
Nobody knows what is going on, even our opponents LOL
Perhaps the Rube Goldberg machine the Democrats use will eventually plop out ... something. We can only watch and hope.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acamus
January 21, 2010 8:16 PM in reply to theWalrus
Yeah. Right. Nothing happening behind scenes. No phone calls. No blackberries going off. No one-on-one meetings. The simplicity of the analysis here is mind-blowing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
January 21, 2010 8:32 PM in reply to acamus
If something of substance were really going on behind the scene we would see results.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:24 PM in reply to theWalrus
Oh right. Brilliant. And if the results didn't come right away, Spiderman would've come in and fixed things. Just like in a movie.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
January 21, 2010 9:55 PM in reply to anna am
One year is "right away"? Are you serious?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:18 PM in reply to acamus
Thank you so much for that comment. I am so sick of these comments that seem to take it at face value that, if Keith O and Rachel Maddow aren't talking about it, it doesn't exist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 9:50 PM in reply to acamus
Are you and anna really serious? Think about Frank and Webb saying healthcare is dead. The Senate putting out a piece of garbage on how the Republicans needed to less obstructive since they needed a majority or some such nonsense. The the Prez with a fumbling nonsense about full plate of other things and letting the dust settle or things cool down.
In other words, pat the heads of long-time supporters like me who made their majorities possible and say now, now.
I certainly didn't ring the bell signaling that healthcare was dead--it was done by Congressional Democrats.
And here's a heads up for ya, I am thoroughly pissed off that any of these folks said anything other than we're working on it 24/7. Everything else "no comment". That would have been about 1000 times more comforting and understandble than the ridiculous statements I've been hit with in the past couple of days.
If either of you don't understand that, then you're simply politically tone deaf.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 22, 2010 8:49 AM in reply to acamus
Because they are all trolls. There is no having a conversation with these idiots - their posts are ignorant and simple minded.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Schwartz
January 21, 2010 8:21 PM
In a way this is just as well. It is sickening to me to hear members whine about how the president isn’t helping them do a job that they are supposed to be able to do on their own. Russ Feingold and Jim Webb, for instance, a little while back. Do your freaking job, Congress.
It’s ludicrous to watch these babies beg for help.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
January 22, 2010 10:42 AM in reply to Barry Schwartz
Congressional Democrats, with only one or two notable exceptions, are nothing more than a collection of wealkings and cowards who just want to be members of Congress for life and feed their egos with their status. They elect other weaklings to lead them like Reid and Pelosi. They back other weaklings like Obama for President and then when he wins we have no real leadership at all. Every legislature needs strong leadership in order to get anything done. Since our party is completely lacking in strong leadership nothing every gets done unless it happens to get the approval of the party that has strong leadership but lacks honorable intentions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billpaustin
January 21, 2010 8:22 PM
So it is official, there is nobody in charge of getting Health Care passed. President Obama has moved on, presumably to banking reform. The biggest power of the Presidency is the "bully pulpit", and Obama is too squeamish to use that, it seems.
The R's and billions in cash are opposed to any reforms, so again, banking reform efforts will stall, and eventually fail.
I used to laugh at how nobody knew who the leader of the R's was, was it Limbaugh? Palin? But now, I see that there is no leader of the Democrats either. The Democrats are "in power", but apparently leaderless. Sigh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Outraged
January 21, 2010 8:27 PM
I just don't get it. Really, I don't. With all the blue dog Dems in the senate WHEN did they EVER really have a majority??? How is today any different than last Monday as far as the fillibuster-proof super majority goes? There never was one!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
billpaustin
January 21, 2010 8:30 PM in reply to Outraged
Well, there were some 60-40 votes in the Senate to get the Senate version of the Bill passed. It required giving up the farm, almost, to get that many Democrats and Independents, but it was done.
Now with 41 votes, the R's will continue to refuse to compromise AT ALL, and so any modifications to the Senate Bill will never pass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
January 21, 2010 8:28 PM
Ezra Klein: Dems Rule Governing Out of Order
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:27 PM in reply to JohnMcCSF
Thanks for bringing in Ezra, the best voice on this issue since the beginning.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
January 21, 2010 8:29 PM
In the picture"The Oval Office", It looks like Rachel Maddow has got a side job cleaning carpets, I hope someone told her not to go for pizza if the boss looks frisky.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jollyroger
January 21, 2010 9:43 PM in reply to inokeah
if the boss looks frisky
I have no doubt that Rachel would give it up for Michelle--or do you mean that Prez could turn her? (I did with my third wife, but she went back to women after me, so that may not count)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mgmonklewis
January 21, 2010 8:56 PM
As with Guantanamo, I suppose we need to Look Forward, Not Backward now. Nothing to see here on health care reform. Just pretend the president is still "leading," that the last nine months of wrangling didn't happen, and that congress isn't a great big bucket of Suck.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ibc
January 21, 2010 8:57 PM
"Lanny Davis, a former Clinton White House special counsel who now writes a political column for The Hill, told TPMDC the fight among Democrats about the public option allowed Republicans to define the bill this summer."
I know this is irrational, but I'd rather have eight more years George W Bush than have this disingenuous piece of shit Davis anywhere near the halls of power.
Heads need to roll.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Decider
January 21, 2010 9:55 PM in reply to ibc
You are not alone. We'd all rather have 8 more years, but I have done my duty and now go to my retirement mansion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
geazer
January 21, 2010 9:09 PM
"A hands-off approach"??? Compared to WHAT???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
January 22, 2010 9:27 AM in reply to geazer
Thank you!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 9:21 PM
How much egg on his face do you want to see?
It can't get passed. It's over. Can't you understand that?
He'd make a jerk out of himself if he started grandstanding. The deal is dead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 9:59 PM in reply to anna am
Then Obama might as well face up to the very real possibility that he will be a one-term prez. That revolt may not happen in a general election, but in the primary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 21, 2010 11:29 PM in reply to cube3u
We're all facing up to that possibility.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MSNBCBrainWash
January 22, 2010 10:59 AM in reply to cube3u
Hilarious. The average voter will forget about this just like in 94.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tommyo
January 21, 2010 9:22 PM
Obama is hopelessly weak. After this latest pathetic display of timidity and quitting does this administration really expect to be taken seriously anymore? I'm sure the banks are really worried about making him mad and having to fight him.
They are not cool, they are impotent. Their refusal to lead is astounding. They simply get worse with each passing day. They are a joke, a sad joke on all of us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
January 22, 2010 4:54 AM in reply to tommyo
Some classic oxymorons:
Military intelligence.
Jumbo shrimp.
Larger half.
Original copy.
Democratic leadership.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
January 21, 2010 9:39 PM
I think many of us, myself included, were expecting Obama to have some kind of answer, to have a brilliant strategy to manuever Congress. They even tried to coopt the major players. We questioned many of their tactics but figured they had their eye on the prize.
Apparently they don't have a clue. Strategically, tactically, just so many stupid mistakes. Work for months and months to get Chuck "Death Panels" Grasshole on board just to give the impression of "bipartisanship". How many times do the Republicans have to vote "no" across the board until you get it? They reject you and want to obstruct everything you do. Just mindboggling.
It's so sad how they squandered a tremendous opportunity.
I'm furious with their failures, and with the lack of leadership right now. The "cooling off" period looks like withdrawing from a bad situation you can't fix.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 21, 2010 10:08 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
I was shocked by the defeatist wailing that was the initial response of Congressional Democrats. Shocked. One vote lost and the cave-in started and could have turned into a damned stampede. But it was enough to get the attention of activists and the circling media, especially Fox News. The only thing that will shut this up is a bold move.
Instead we're being told we're in the corner for an apparent timeout. And it's the supporters who are being told that.
Sad...disheartening....ridiculous....and enraging.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
January 22, 2010 10:46 AM in reply to cube3u
You saw that reaction from Congressional Democrats because the leader of the party, the President, is nowhere to be found. He's cowering in a corner somewhere refusing to lead... again.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rstephen
January 21, 2010 10:04 PM
You know, I really wanted to be wrong about Obama and give him a chance. But he's turned out to be even worse than I feared. The guy is NOT a leader. He's basically just a college professor/public speaker. He can say the right words, and probably even believes them, but he doesn't have the passion and force of personality to get done what needs to be done. Why he decided to run for president I'll never know. Mostly ego, no doubt. Now that he thinks the health care debate is hurting him politically, he's making a big noise about getting tough on the banks. But watch - he'll dither and dither and finally cave on that too. Pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Khyber900
January 21, 2010 10:48 PM
I hope the message that Obama looks excruciatingly weak is getting through to the White House. I would much rather try and lose and blame the GOP for obstruction and let the betrayers hang in the wind on their own then not show the voters that I did everything I could to enact legislation that I said was essential for the country. He looks insincere, untrustworthy and weak.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
January 21, 2010 11:21 PM in reply to Khyber900
Is it getting thru to the white house? I don't think so. Certainly they wouldn't feel like reading the blogs and hearing everyone yelling at them. All I know is that people are angry and it is not going to "blow over" as I'm sure some advisor is claiming.
This is simply infuriating. Waiting til the dust settles and then moving on to somethng else, hoping everyone forgets, or whatever. It's just stupid and cowardly. We didn't elect Dems to spend their entire term looking out for their own skin. If they can't deliver, it doesn't matter if they get re-elected since they won't deliver then either.
The options facing us is this:
* Support Democrats, get nothing. GOP dominates the scene. America fails.
* Don't support Democrats, get nothing. GOP dominates the scene. America fails.
Now with the Supreme Court ruling, and no hope of Congress or President doing anything whatsoever about it, basically the GOP and corporate sponsors can simply buy elections outright.
For Obama, Reid, Pelosi and all the Democrats: If you don't want to do your job, or can't, then go home. We didn't put you there so you can have a fancy office and look out for #1. If you only represent your polling numbers and your own relection, it's hard to see why any of us would support you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
January 22, 2010 4:58 AM in reply to Khyber900
I am beginning to think that may be because he is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gotalife
January 21, 2010 11:30 PM
The SC ruling changed everything today.
With unlimited corp. donations, do you really want him to pass health care or anything?
It's a radical right turn in American politics.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 8:06 AM in reply to gotalife
It is far worse than that. The Supreme Court has completely unleashed corporations to use their money to influence elections. If you think the American people were suckers and fools before, just wait until Madison Avenue sinks its jaws into us. We won't know which direction us up. Can you say: Brown-Palin 2012?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
January 22, 2010 8:20 AM in reply to gotalife
Oh yeah, free speech is just a horrible thing isn't it? The ACLU sure screwed up this time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 9:00 AM in reply to shooter242
Pretending that multi-national corporations with limited ties to the United States and no common interests with actual Americans is a VERY bad thing for this country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 9:02 AM in reply to wbgonne
OOPS:
Pretending that multi-national corporations with limited ties to the United States and no common interests with actual Americans [are human beings with First Amendment rights] is a VERY bad thing for this country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
January 22, 2010 9:15 AM in reply to wbgonne
What do you think would happen if corporations weren't considered as a single entity, a "person"? (I'm presuming that's your main objection.) What person would you single out to sue for whatever, out of thousands of employees? The CEO? You might get his house, but that's it. There are practical reasons for looking at a corporation as a person.
As for actual persons I believe anybody can buy ads, even Hugo Chavez for Citgo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 3:07 PM in reply to shooter242
Corporations are business entities and the law pretends they are "people" so that they can sue and be sued. That has nothing to do First Amendment rights which should belong only to real people. Corporations can't vote; they can't hold office (yet). Unfortunately, the Supreme Curt just decided the opposite and the entire country -- including you -- will rue that decision as long as it lasts. The only was out I can see at the moment is pure public financing for all federal elections. Even the legality of that, however, is now in question. It might take a Constitutional amendment to fix what the Supreme Court just did. It will, at minimum require replacing one of the four arch-Conservatives on the Court. WHich may take a long time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jmnyc
January 22, 2010 12:28 AM
Lanny Davis is an idiot. If the Repubs were not going to work with Obama when he was wildly popular and seemingly invincible why would they work with him now after they won a major victory.
The Dems either pass this bill on their own or they don't pass it at all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matt in so dak
January 22, 2010 2:00 AM
So.... if I photocopy my butt, mail it to the WH and then renounce my citizenship... where do I get deported to? Anywhere good? I might settle for Haiti... My luck I'd get sent to Gitmo or Bagram or some craphole prison in Poland.
Oh well, I'll put my head down and be a good little worker. Drink of water boss?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chipfire
January 22, 2010 2:02 AM
Hi Everyone!!
I'm just a Conservative passing through and I thought I would tell you how much I'm enjoying the conversation. Toodle-do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matt in so dak
January 22, 2010 2:08 AM in reply to Chipfire
Don't worry, house slave is still a slave.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 22, 2010 8:11 AM in reply to Chipfire
Thanks for stopping by. Glad you enjoyed yourself. Tell Rush and the gang hi. Come back anytime. Oh, and feel free to contribute something next time: I'd love to hear your ideas so we can discuss them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Backcountry
January 22, 2010 6:42 AM
Maybe we should have elected somebody with a little backbone. Well, after yesterday's Supreme Court decision, corporate-funded Republicans will have total control of government soon. Obama probably will be the last Democrat elected president in U.S. history.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USgreentech
January 22, 2010 8:48 AM
Obama is about to reform the banking system in a revoluationary way. An unbelievable accomplishment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
am4
January 22, 2010 8:55 AM in reply to USgreentech
The Volcker proposals announced yesterday were truly encouraging--the best news out of the White House since inauguration. But we'll see if Obama actually supports them and gets then fleshed out and enacted. His performance on healthcare--including the public option, which he lied about never campaigning on--does not inspire confidence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
L0ngT0m
January 22, 2010 12:49 PM in reply to USgreentech
No, he's not. He won't do a thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The BBQ Chicken Madness
January 22, 2010 8:53 AM
Why the f*ck is TPM qouting Lanny "I'm Wrong About Everything" Davis?
Seriously, pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USgreentech
January 22, 2010 9:02 AM
Maybe he put the health care bill in motion and it's passing itself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USgreentech
January 22, 2010 9:06 AM
A surreal privelege Obama has to have legislation pass itself in a hands off fashion. More of this to arrive later from Barack Obama and Harry Reid. Harry Reid is the super hero people have been waiting for since the 1800's.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dem4life
January 22, 2010 9:08 AM
I think he should sit back and relax and wait until 2012!
Best approach......let the other ones run this
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
January 22, 2010 9:13 AM
Yeah, speaking of the 1800s, that's where the Supreme Court and the GOP are working very hard to send us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Douglas Watts
January 22, 2010 9:26 AM
Obama's aides have correctly realized that he only looks "Presidential" when he is announcing the next Glorious Move Forward in whichever Never Ending War we are conducting these days.
Domestic legislation is not fit for a Commander-In-Chief.
He wants to play with bombs cuz Congress will let him do that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluestatedon
January 22, 2010 9:41 AM
What we're witnessing is truly historic in American and perhaps world history: the wholesale and entirely voluntary abdication of a major political party from power in a democracy at a time when it holds a decided majority in the elected bodies of government. The Democratic Party, from Obama down to the lowliest Representative in the House, has completely collapsed in psychological terms. It is exactly the same thing as the loser in a springtime struggle for mating rights and position in a pack of wolves; the loser goes to the ground, belly up, tail tucked tightly between the legs, urinating submissively in a desperate attempt to ward off any further attacks from the dominant male. The Party will continue to exist for a good number of years yet, but as a force to be reckoned with in American life, it is spent, done, finished, and content to be so. There is absolutely no reason for anybody to work for or contribute to any Democrat, and the only reason to vote for a Democrat is to simply delay the inevitable transformation to single party rule by the kleptocracy known as the Republican Party, with The News Corporation as the propaganda arm.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
January 22, 2010 10:02 AM in reply to bluestatedon
"I know no safe depositary of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." --Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:278
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JZ
January 22, 2010 9:46 AM
I'm giving him until Tuesday's SOTU on this. I'd like to think he's letting things settle down and will come out strongly for getting a bill done quickly. If this is the strategy, it could work nicely since people will be wondering what his position is on HCR and might be more likely to tune in, thus giving his statement greater impact. He could use the speech as a chance to rally support at a key moment. It might be wishful thinking on my part, but it's only a few days away, so I'm comfortable indulging in the illusion. Still calling my Rep in the meantime...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jim43
January 22, 2010 10:15 AM
Reconciliation and single-payer is the only path to successful health care reform. Anything else is a cop-out to the dreaded "centrists"
http://www.sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rmiller
January 22, 2010 12:43 PM
The elephant in the room (economically speaking) is that the Health Care Industry is the country's most massive bubble--bigger even than the Real Estate bubble. Baucus knows that and crafted the bill to add an influx of taxpayer cash to the system. Without this bill, the old system of raising premiums on the shrinking number of those with insurance will finally hit a tipping point and the system will collapse. Where I live, a 10-minute visit with a pediatric doc theoretically costs $160. That's nearly a thousand dollars an hour--but the trick is, only uninsured pay that rate. Except they can't. Anyone familiar with a local housing bubble will see similarities. Folks, without a taxpayer influx it is all gonna collapse into itself--and all those physician-owned for-profit clinics going up will eventually become homes for Antique sellers and Flea Markets. Wait and see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?