TPMDC

Dems Laud Obama's Speech As Health Care Breakthrough--But To What Avail? (Video)

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Democrats in both the House and Senate and beyond hailed President Obama's State of the Union address tonight as a major step forward on health care reform. But when the speech ended, and members filed out of the House chamber, one thing was abundantly clear: no matter how good tonight's speech was, it did not break the congressional health care logjam.

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) said the President sent "exactly the right message."

"He made it very clear that he isn't walking away from health care with his tail between his legs," Wiener added.

That view was echoed by members in both chambers, and at least one powerful Democratic ally.

"This was an important message to get it done," Anna Burger, president of the labor federation Change to Win, told me in a brief interview. "They can do reconciliation...I think it's perfectly doable."

But for all the plaudits Obama's words won tonight, it appears that neither the House nor the Senate--stuck in a health care face-off since Democrats lost a Senate seat in Massachusetts last week--is prepared to blink.

I asked House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) whether Obama had helped ease the gridlock.

"Four different occasions tonight the President says, 'I'm calling upon the Senate to act on what the House has done,'" Clyburn said.

Did the President make your job on health care easier?

"It's in the Senate's court," Clyburn insisted. "These things that the President talked about tonight, 90 percent of them have already been done by the House. So I don't have a job to do. He made that very clear."

But his colleagues in the other chamber have the exact opposite view.

"At this point I think the ball is in the House's court on health care," Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) told me. "They have to decide whether to accept the Senate bill. If they don't then that complicates matters over here.... The problem at this point is how to get the votes in the House."

Bayh and others said that the President couldn't have undone what he referred to as the "gordian knot" tying up health care reform--but that his insistence that they regain composure and finish the job will go a long way toward getting legislators to act.

"I believe it will bring them together," Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told me. "We have two bills--one is better than the other--but there is good parts in both and there's no reason on earth that we can't make that turn out alright."

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) had a somewhat different take. He said that the gridlock on all issues will continue until Republicans adopt a new posture.

"The only thing that's ultimately going to break the gridlock is for the Republicans to conclude that it's not in their political interest to be the party of obstruction and distortion," Whitehouse said. "And when that happens things will start to move."

Was Obama's message to Republicans tonight effective in that regard?

"I think it helped."

Comments (15) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

January 28, 2010 12:03 AM   

Hey Sheldon -- come back to our planet. Hey Brian -- did you expect Congress to rush out of the hall and back to their offices to quickly work on the bill? "No matter how good tonight's speech was, it did not break the congressional health care logjam." A shocker. I know you have space to fill and all, but come on.

Weeferdog

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 12:20 AM   

I guess if you try to tell half truths rather than straight out falsehoods, that is grouth. Unfortunately he has not started doing that on this occasion.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 12:21 AM   

I thought the frequent invocation of the House's leadership on other issues -- pointing out that they had already taken risks and done things where the Senate needed to catch up -- was not, at all, accidental.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 2:41 AM    in reply to Alex39

I agree, but doesn't the House have to essentially pass the Senate's bill for this to get anywhere? Or, is it that the Senate ought to take the House's lead and cowboy up?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 3:36 AM   

The best State of the Union address I have seen in my life. Glad to see Obama is hitting his stride. More to come.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 3:55 AM   

Nancy Pelosi looked great. I can't see the media turning around from Barack Obama getting featured every day. It's an exciting time for liberals, especially of the Obama variety. Please, check the website Barack Obama dot com. Goes there very radically.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 5:48 AM   

Obama speech a breakthrough, true enough; like garbage breaking through the bottom of a paper sack.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 6:39 AM   

I will keep all of this in mind while I struggle to cope and breath. Yes indeedy - I can recall all the happy hopey pink fuzzy thoughts while shelling out well over $200.00 for my monthly doc appoints and meds.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 8:13 AM    in reply to EvilPoet

You might want to consider getting a job to feed, clothe and care for yourself. Just a thought.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 8:29 AM    in reply to Silence

I'm disabled I can't work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 9:09 AM    in reply to EvilPoet

Paying for health care is no different than paying for food, clothing and shelter.

Yet, you only mention health care? Why?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 11:06 AM    in reply to Silence

Thanks for your icy cold compassion. Did you miss the part about me being disabled? Did you read my profile? It says what I'm disabled with. You know what - nevermind - I'm not doing this anymore. Please see this post: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/dadt-gets-a-mention-in-state-of-the-union-and-thats-about-it.php#comment-3765868

/fade to black *click*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 7:06 AM   

From the Editor's blog:

BEST LINE OF THE EVENING Chris Matthews: He did so well "I forgot he was black tonight."

Late Update: This was actually one of those great Chris Matthews moments. And I don't mean that snarkily or critically. It's one of the reasons I've come to like him a lot -- something I couldn't say in the Clinton years. He's just so honest and genuine, sometimes painfully so. And for someone of Matthews generation, talking about race, it often leads him into some rather awkward and cringey quotes. Here's Matthews clarifying the statement a bit later in the evening.

Yes, Tweetie Matthews forgetting Obama was black for an hour is a great demonstration of ... whatever. Almost as great as a bit earlier in his show where Tweetie lambasted Obama for denying lobbyists Administration jobs, bemoaning the loss of talent that Obama from said lobbyists, and concluding with this gem: "Doesn't Obama know that when he is talking to Senators he is taking to future lobbyists." Josh may consider that "honest and genuine." I think it's disgusting.

Nice speech. The proof is in the pudding, however. Obama understands, that surely isn't the problem. But does Obama know how to impose his will? Until he shows that -- unfortunately -- it's just more pretty words which you could practically see in the smirking Republican faces (including Justice Alito, in a display more revolting than "You Lie" Wilson).

Sigh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 28, 2010 8:58 AM   

He said the right things on health care. His remarks were stronger than what I expected, if perhaps not as strong as I wanted. The one thing I would have liked to have heard was a clear statement that the House should pass the Senate bill and both houses should pass a measure improving it at the same time, but that may have been too much in the weeds for a SOTU. What really matters, I think, is what he does now -- both behind the scenes and with the bully pulpit -- to get both the House and Senate act like grown-ups, take responsibility for finishing the job, and get two good bills on his desk.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 6, 2010 9:49 AM   

Nancy Pelosi looked great. I can't see the media turning around from Barack Obama getting featured every day. It's an exciting time for liberals, especially of the Obama variety. Please, check the website Barack Obama dot com. Goes there very radically.

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on