
So what exactly is going on with former Rep. Harold Ford (D-TN)? Ford ran unsuccessfully for Senator from Tennessee in 2006, and is now getting ready to challenge appointed Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, in the Democratic primary in Ford's new home state of New York. The attacks between the two camps have already begun.
As Ben Smith reports, Ford has started staffing up for a run, signing up campaign aides that worked for New York's Republican-turned-independent Mayor Mike Bloomberg. "Harold is not going to be bullied or intimidated. It's good for New York to have a dialogue. It's good to have credible candidates exploring this race. So what are they so afraid of?" said a statement from Ford spokesman Davidson Goldin. "Let's be clear: New York needs a senator who will fight for jobs fight to improve our economy, fight for small business and have the independence to stand up and do what's right for our state, regardless of what the party bosses in Albany or Washington want."
Gillibrand's campaign has just responded this evening with its own statement, from Gillibrand adviser Jefrey Pollock: "It's not bullying, it's common sense. When a New Yorker as respected as Congressman Nadler calls someone's record a disaster, and local organizations like NARAL-NY, Empire State Pride Agenda, state labor unions characterize someone's record as wrong for New York, they aren't 'bullying', they're informing New Yorkers about someone who has embraced an anti-choice, anti-LGBT rights, and anti-immigrant record."
Gillibrand certainly appeared vulnerable when she was first appointed last year by Gov. David Paterson -- but this was because some liberals in New York City felt that the Upstater Gillibrand wasn't progressive enough, mainly on gun control. However, prospective challenger after prospective challenger took their hats out of the ring, int he face of official White House support for Gillibrand. For example, Rep. Steve Israel famously received a phone call from President Obama himself, telling him not to run.
So is Ford, a former member of the Blue Dog caucus whose record in politics has been far more conservative than Gillibrand's, the right person to challenge Gillibrand? During his 2006 Senate campaign in Tennessee, he said he was voting "yes" on the referendum to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage. He has identified as pro-life and pro-gun (the latter being the issue where Gillibrand was supposed to have the biggest problem with New York City liberals, when she was first appointed).
A Democratic source in Washington signaled to us earlier today that Ford would face a very tough climb, and would face serious opposition from all the leaders of the Democratic Party.
"First of all it doesn't make any sense, because Harold Ford would have to run to the right of Kirsten in a Democratic primary in New York," said the source. "There are a number of problems for Harold Ford if he wanted to do this. Number one, he's got zero name recognition in a city he's inhabited for a few years as a Merrill executive. Two, he's a pro-life Democrat, which he's been unequivocal about. Three, he's against gay marriage. Four, he has a 100 percent rating form the NRA. And five, he would have to buck the senior Senator from New York, Chuck Schumer, and the President of the United States, President Barack Obama."
bvd
January 8, 2010 6:49 PM
It's one thing for Hillary Clinton to be ASKED (if not begged) to move to NY to run for the Senate, especially at a time when there was no viable candidate. It's another thing for a jackass like Ford to try the same stunt. I'm no fan of Gliibrand's but this is just ego running
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 8, 2010 7:04 PM
Ford will wally Democratic support for Gillibrand, which is probably good for her. However she needs to make sure she doesn't tack too left because she'll have the general to worry about.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
January 8, 2010 7:11 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Against a right-wing opponent, she wouldn't have to tack left at all. Anyway, she can just let this buffoon's proto-campaign implode.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 9:17 PM in reply to Why oh why
The last thing we need is another Conservadem.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
January 9, 2010 2:24 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Harold Ford:
Wrong for the Democratic Party.
Wrong for New York.
Wrong for America.
Just plain wrong.
Who does this joker think he is? And why does he think he stands a snowball's chance in Hades in NY?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
January 8, 2010 7:08 PM
"It doesn't make any sense"
That says it all. I guess Bloomberg and other Wall Street barons are just trying to scare Gillibrand, for unknown reasons.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 8, 2010 7:13 PM
It doesn't have to make sense. Politics is becoming farce. Teabaggers. Palin. Bachmann. Lieberaman. Ford. It's theater. Bread and circuses. Meanwhile, all the deals are done in the backroom with the cameras off.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
terje
January 8, 2010 7:42 PM
Of course given that we're talking about Mike Bloomberg pulling the strings here, can anyone be absolutely sure that they aren't talking about Harold Ford running as a Republican or an independent? Those are far more politically realistic options than running as a Democrat -- and they're pretty damn unrealistic too.
There is absolutely no way Ford can gain traction challenging Gillibrand in a primary. A politician who tried to build a career as a southern conservative isn't going to be viable in a northeast Democratic primary - especially against a candidate like Gillibrand who has a base in the most moderate/conservative part of the Democratic base.
If he wanted to be in the Senate so badly, 2 years ago Democrats in Tennessee desperately needed a credible candidate to take on Lamar Alexander -- he refused to even entertain that race. Who knows if he might have been able to win in 2008 -- but he sure as hell can't in 2010, certainly not in New York.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
terje
January 8, 2010 7:43 PM
Of course given that we're talking about Mike Bloomberg pulling the strings here, can anyone be absolutely sure that they aren't talking about Harold Ford running as a Republican or an independent? Those are far more politically realistic options than running as a Democrat -- and they're pretty damn unrealistic too.
There is absolutely no way Ford can gain traction challenging Gillibrand in a primary. A politician who tried to build a career as a southern conservative isn't going to be viable in a northeast Democratic primary - especially against a candidate like Gillibrand who has a base in the most moderate/conservative part of the Democratic base.
If he wanted to be in the Senate so badly, 2 years ago Democrats in Tennessee desperately needed a credible candidate to take on Lamar Alexander -- he refused to even entertain that race. Who knows if he might have been able to win in 2008 -- but he sure as hell can't in 2010, certainly not in New York.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marquis de SeaToShiningSea
January 8, 2010 7:54 PM
Well, that will zap all the strength out of the left's opposition to Gillibrand.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 9, 2010 10:41 AM in reply to Marquis de SeaToShiningSea
Must be the new DLC strategy - run two right wing Dems in the primaries so they win either way. Well, the sure worked in the Presidential primaries.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 9, 2010 11:51 AM in reply to bluebell
HINT: There were 8 Democrats in the primaries, not two, but you claim to have caucused for Obama (the one you call right-wing) instead of Kucinich or Gravel. And then you bragged about voting for this right winger in the general.
Either you were part of the plot to make sure a right-winger would get the nomination and be elected president or you were too stupid to realize Obama was a right-winger.
Both are bad options for the all-knowing, pure Bluebell.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 9, 2010 3:10 PM in reply to FreeRider
Hey, even I wasn't cynical enough to believe we'd get an escalation in our free wars and taxes collected on union health benefits. Nor did I really expect the total capitulation to big insurance, big pharma and Wall Street with IRS enforcement of mandated insurance while the insurance industry will get regulated by the states if at all (can you say Texas, Mississippi and Alabama).
No, even I wasn't that cynical. But I do believe it will get worse. After all, they haven't gotten to "reforming" entitlements yet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 9, 2010 3:44 PM in reply to bluebell
There were other liberals in the campaign and Obama campaigned on much of what you CLAIM to be offended about.
A. Bluebell was part of the vast DLC conspiracy to make sure a right-winger became president.
B. Bluebell was too stupid to know the positions of the candidates.
PICK ONE!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 8, 2010 8:29 PM
Well, one model that would explain all observed data and has strong predictive value would bet that he's an idiot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
January 9, 2010 2:26 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Or a fool.
Personally, I'm going with fool.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 8, 2010 8:35 PM
New Yorkers won't go for this guy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
January 8, 2010 8:59 PM
When the Obama/Holder Show Trial starts in the city what ever happens, all hell will be raining down. Racism will be in play, I think these two fools are counting on it. Rep. Ford will be a fool to think he can shuffel in on this semi- minstrel show.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 9:18 PM in reply to inokeah
Minstrel Show? Really? Keep bending over, one of these days you'll find some thug to give it to you in your butt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 8, 2010 9:19 PM
You really are a racist and particularly disgusting
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
January 8, 2010 10:04 PM
This guy is a total fraud, a DLC loser. I'd be surprised in New Yorkers fell for him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
January 8, 2010 10:08 PM
I voted Green in Ford vs. Corker precisely because I knew Ford would go beyond being just a Conservadem. The fact that he was the only Dem nominee in 2006 to embrace Bush told me he'd be Lieberman on steroids. This confirms it. I can't wait to see Gillibrand grind this carpet-bagging zombie into pulp.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
January 8, 2010 10:54 PM
lousgirl e girl, Guess what? US Dist. Judge Thomas Hogan toss most of the evidence on Musa'ab Omar Madhwani, guess why? After a 2 1/2 fire fight, he was treated badly.
War Harvard Style.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jg
January 9, 2010 12:33 AM
Just what NY needs. Another senator bought by Steve Rattner and Maureen White and their hedge fund friends, with the not so tacit endorsement of Mike Bloomberg. ENOUGH! Gillebrand may not be perfect, but she was a good Columbia County congresswoman and heads and shoulders above this guy. Looks like he'll have an uphill battle upstate as well as downstate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Vincent F
January 9, 2010 12:44 AM
She will clean Ford's clock if he runs
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oblio
January 9, 2010 1:25 AM
Ford loses this primary unless he positions himself as a NYC liberal. Good luck with that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
January 9, 2010 9:35 AM in reply to oblio
He will lie to everyone just as Obama did.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 9, 2010 2:54 AM
Perhaps a primary would be a good thing. It would give Gillibrand name recognition that she needs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 9, 2010 10:14 AM
As I said in another post, I sense Ford as the epitome of the self serving politician and he was the only Democrat to lose an election (Senate) which didn't leave me completely disappointed.
If Ford wins a primary over Gillibrand I'm bolting the Democratic Party.
By the way, she's not my Senator.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MiloNY
January 9, 2010 4:27 PM
She is my Senator, and Ford doesn't stand a chance.
What I can't understand, though, is why all the antagonism toward Gillibrand? I don't see it. Has she just not kissed enough of the NYC rings (yeah, I'm from upstate. What of it?). Her Senate voting record appears to be solidly liberal.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USgreentech
January 9, 2010 6:16 PM
Obama masonry in the hizoose.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 9, 2010 7:21 PM
Ford is always looking for the Pot of Gold.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dbl.r7711
January 10, 2010 1:35 AM
Harold Ford jr. needs to sit his ass down. He should take his ass back to the Faux Network(fox network)where he kissed ass, and still lost his senate bid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 10, 2010 12:37 PM
Did you ever look at someone and think to yourself; "Wow! this guy is a sleaze"? That's Harold Ford to me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?