TPMDC

Grijalva To White House: It's On You Now

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), a leading House progressive says if the White House can throw its weight behind a controversial tax in the Senate health care bill, it can stand up for some of the House's priorities, too.

In an interview with TPMDC moments after a conference call with over 175 members of the House Democratic caucus, Grijalva said he was encouraged by what he heard from members--strong support for the House bill--but the President needs to get involved if their concerns will be met.

"The president is having his listening sessions, right?" Grijalva asked rhetorically. "After all we've been through at some point the administration can not be neutral players in this process."

Noting that the President stands foursquare behind the Senate's proposal to tax so-called "Cadillac" insurance policies to raise money, Grijalva put it to him to weigh in on some of the House's priorities. "How do you weigh in on a national exchange? How do you weigh in on a public option? How do you weigh in on the anti-trust exemption?"

The public option is a non-starter at this point, and House leaders, progressives, and key chairmen are pushing the White House to support other priorities, including organizing insurance exchanges at a national level, moving the implementation date for major reforms forward by one year, and, at least, diminishing the impact of the Cadillac tax.

"Watching the fight is not enough," Grijalva said. "The pressure shifts to the White House now."

Grijalva says he's putting the finishing touches on a document contrasting the House, Senate, and Congressional Progressive Caucus positions on health care reform. Speaker Pelosi has been given the document, and it will soon be delivered to Senate Majority Leader harry Reid and the White House. We'll shoot it your way when we get it.

Comments (8) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

January 7, 2010 4:24 PM   

Good for Grijalva. Hold my president's feet to the fire.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 7, 2010 4:48 PM   

Grijalva is a bit late with his 'call to action'. The president has already stated now is the time in the process for him to 'roll up his sleeves' and work the final points to complete Healthcare Reform.

This seems like political grandstanding at the end of a very long process.

Clearly there needs to be:

1. Either the Public Option or the National Exchange, or a combination of both.
2. NO Anti-Trust Exemption
3. Faster Implementation: Immediate implementation of National Plans, ramping up to the full Exchange and then the Public Option by 2012.

Whether they tax tanning beds or the 'Caddie Plans' it really won't matter to most Americans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 7, 2010 7:44 PM    in reply to Bloggin

"By 2019...37 percent of family policies and 41 percent of individual policies would be affected" by the Cadillac Plans tax.

Employees who have to pay more out-of-pocket because their company switched to cheaper, worse insurance will care.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/health/policy/13plans.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 7, 2010 4:51 PM   

Why does anybody believe Obama has been "neutral"? It's nonsense. They have been the voice of the corporate beneficiaries all along. Now, this is not to say that there is not some merit in the approach of subsidizing private insurance. It's better than nothing. But, let's not kid ourselves. Obama is not interested in a government-run plan.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 7, 2010 5:32 PM    in reply to Mateo123

Mateo123:"Obama is not interested in a government-run plan".
If by your comment you are referring to new government-run health plans it is even worse because government-run health plans already exist. obama is even not supporting expanding existing government-run health plans that have proven to be popular and successful, specifically, Medicare and VA.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 7, 2010 6:52 PM    in reply to Mateo123

Yeah...how silly of me to have bought into all that 'Change we can believe in' stuff. What a schmuck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

bk

user-pic

January 8, 2010 2:50 AM   

Perhaps Obama understands the branches of government better than most. He can't pass this bill; the Senate a la lieberman and nelson, have killed what he really wants, so he's pragmatic enough to know that you have to push for what you can get, and continue to tweak the bill after. In this case, you can't sacrifice the good, for the perfect. Ted Kennedy regretted this all the rest of his Senate career when he refused to settle with Nixon. Obama is being smart about this. It's not just about what progressives want. I want single payer, or medicare for all. I think it's the only way to really bring down costs. But I think if we start with something now, over time, it may come to that as more and more Americans are covered; pre-existing conditions are gone; more children are insured...these all exist in the current bills. We have to be realistic here, not idealistic and then bash the president just because he isn't doing what we want. He isn't able to do what he wants!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:27 PM   

The MIDDLE CLASS should NOT be paying for this - more money needs to STAY in OUR paychecks so we can save, invest or spend to help bring the economy back. If these political weaklings tax our employee based healthcare to pay for this bill - that means a tax on the Middle Class and I will be furious.

Allegations of price-fixing, bid-rigging, exclusive sales contracts, local price cutting to freeze out competitors, and the dividing up of markets need to be fully explored through subpoenas and depositions (a law suit by all 50 States and joined by the Feds) so we can get rid of our dysfunctional corporate health care system that's choking the economy to death.

Federal workers and retirees can select plans at a cost range from $100 dollars a month for the cheapest individual coverage to $500 dollars for the most expensive family plan. That plan should be available to EVERYONE.

I’m voting “MY” pocket book - I want lower premiums and less money taken out of my paycheck - if they want to help spur on the economy they will make sure this happens for the majority.

The bottom line is that 90% of the wealth concentrated in 1% of the population is no way to run a country, but a heck of a way to establish a royalty ruling class. Yacht sales can not sustain 350 million people.

I'm for the public option, competition and a level playing field or break up the big insurers like we did AT&T.

A slavish focus on profit margin might be good for the individual or a business, but it is one helluva lousy way to "govern" a Country. The GOP being a wholly owned subsidiary of Corporate America has a hard time with that concept.

Paul Burke
Author-Journey Home

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on