
When comments he thought were off the record to two reporters surfaced in the new book "Game Change," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid knew it wasn't going to be good. Reid (D-NV) already was facing a tough political climate back home and the added fallout from remarks about President Obama's race could pose a big problem if his fellow Democrats turned against him.
Reid quickly went about locking down support, initiating a phone tree first to apologize to key black leaders in and out of Congress and also to make sure they wouldn't be speaking out against him.
One of the first calls was to Rep Barbara Lee (D-CA), who leads the Congressional Black Caucus. She issued a supportive statement as the news sped around the Internet.
He issued a statement apologizing just before 1 p.m. and sources tell us that by 1:30 p.m. Reid had spoken with several Congressional leaders, Obama and civil rights leaders.
Obama's statement came in at 3:55 p.m. ordering the book closed.
In remarks yesterday, Reid said he phoned "everyone within the sound of my voice" to apologize.
A Politico tick-tock said Reid's staff first learned the comments were in the book at 10 p.m. Friday. By midnight the Atlatnic's Marc Ambinder had posted them online and the staff got to work.
From the Politico piece:
[Reid spokesman Jim] Manley and other aides worked until 2 a.m. Saturday to draft Reid's carefully written apology, which emphasized his record on African-American issues....
Later on Saturday, Manley helped lead a counteroffensive, calling White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, a friend from his days as communications director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, to set up an apology call between Reid, at home in Searchlight, Nev., and Obama back in Washington.
...
Aides say their boss quickly understood the danger and spent much of Saturday working a call list of about 30 prominent African-Americans across the country. On the calls, he apologized for his words and argued that the book's main takeaway should be that he had quietly supported Obama over Clinton, long before those made his feelings public.
Among those he called were the Rev. Al Sharpton; longtime civil rights leader Julian Bond; Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus; political consultant and talk-show fixture Donna Brazile; House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.); Wade Henderson, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights; and Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington office.
Several House Democratic leadership aides told TPMDC the phone calls were a smart move but in some cases not needed.
"Reid has a level of credibility that Trent Lott never had that helped him quickly navigate these choppy waters," one aide said.
Several House sources said Reid has such an established relationship with black leaders and a civil rights record that diffused the situation before he even picked up the phone.
When assuming the majority leader position, Reid hired a diversity consultant to help young black men get Senate jobs, sources noted.
Obama on Monday told CNN's Roland Martin the language was "inartful" but said making "hay out of that makes absolutely no sense."
"He's always been on the right side of the issues," Obama said.
Reading the Politico piece, it's still not clear how the remarks ended up in the book given the conditions of the interview and the rules the authors outlined of "deep background" given to all sources.
Late Update: Gov. David Patterson (D-NY) and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) seem to be the only Democrats publicly questioning Reid's comments. Meanwhile, some Republicans say it's time to move on.
jana47
January 12, 2010 11:31 AM
Republicans have been supporting the Tea Party who have carried RACISTS SIGNS PHOTOS and other items of the President and when asked
REPUBLICANS INSIST THAT ALL THIS RACIST JUNK IS NOT RACISM!
JOHN BOEHNER AND ERIC CANTOR
STOOD IN FRONT OF A HUGE SIGN OF THE DYING HALACAUST VICTIMS ON THE STEPS OF THE CAPITAL AND DELIVEREY A SPEECH TO THE TEA BAGGERS
THEY BOTH DENIED THAT THOSE VICTIMS SIGNS WERE NOT ONLY HORRIBLE BUT RACIST
REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN DISPLAYING RACIST SIGNS IN THEIR TEA PARTIES OF OUR PRESIDENT FOR MONTHS AND THE MEDIA ABSOLUTELY REFUSES TO ADDRESSES IT
BUT WHEN SEN. REID WHO UNFORTUNATELY USES THE WRONG LANGUAGE THE IDIOT MICHEAL STEEL WHO WAS ELECTED SIMPLY TO COMPLIMENT THE ELECTION OF A BLACK PRESIDENT, LITTLE DID THE REPUBLICANS KNOW THAT STEEL WAS AN ABSOLUTE DISASTER
MICHEAL IS IN NO POSITION IN HIS OWN COMMUNITY TO REPRESENT THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY, HIS ACTIONS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES
NOW THE REPUBLICANS AFTER IGNORING PROBABLY THOUSANDS OF RACIST SIGN OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. WANT TO CALL FOR SEN. REID RESIGNATION, A MAN WHO'S CONGRESSIONAL RECORD SPEAKS FOR IT SELF
EVEN FUNNIER THEY WANT TO COMPARE THIS INCIDENT TO WHEN THEY FORCED OUT TRENT LOTT, THEIR OWN TO REPLACE HIM WITH BILL FRISK, THE DEMS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
MORE LIES, IT'S VERY SAD WHEN REPUBLICANS THINK THE AMERICAN PUBLIC DON'T READ OR KNOW OUR AMERICAN HISTORY.
I GUESS REPUBLICANS BELIEVE IF YOU SAY SOMETHING LONG ENOUGH EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT TRUE AMERICANS WILL BELIEVE IT
YOU HAVE TO LOVE EVERY THIME THEY INVOKE "THE AMERICAN PEOPLE" INTO THEIR MISCHIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR CAUSES
WE JUST SIT AND LAUGH AND SHOW UP AT THE POLLS AS WE WILL IN 2012
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
January 12, 2010 11:42 AM in reply to jana47
I agree with your point, but please release the caps lock key. The caps seem like shouting and make your comment hard to read.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 12, 2010 11:41 AM
Just goes to show.... Progressives are tech saavy, and internet friendly. The internet is to the Left, what AM Talk Radio is to the Right. How's that been working out for the GOP in the last 2 elections? (Yeah I know, massive incompentence doomed them also.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shortstop
January 12, 2010 11:42 AM
Wow, Harry Reid knows something about damage control. Who knew? Too bad he and the other Democratic leadership were helpless in controlling the carnage of the GOP's grab of healthcare messaging.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dick c
January 12, 2010 2:36 PM in reply to shortstop
Damage control? What if this whole thing is just to polish Reid's cred with conservative leaning and independents in Nevada? Even down to the Republican support he's getting. When I look at the things Reid's done as majority leader I have to think Republicans should love the guy. I'd like to see Reid's polling before and after this incident. This issue is such a manufactured farce it has to be a means to some end other than getting Reid to resign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 12, 2010 3:31 PM in reply to dick c
I'd like to see Reid's polling before and after this incident.
I would too. However, I suspect that the only one who's cheering Reid on is Ensign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sunnysteve
January 12, 2010 12:17 PM
You say it is not clear how the remarks ended up in the book, given the conditions of the interview........Reid was speaking off the record and on deep background.
It is clear to me that the two 'reporters' saw an opportunity to make big bucks. They have written a compendium of gossip, quoting anonymous sources with no attempt to verify, plus direct comments received in trust that they were spoken off the record.
When a public figure speaks off the record, the words are not parsed carefully, the comments are extemporaneous at best. The reporter is being extended a great courtesy; in the case of Reid's remarks, they were allowed to hear the frank political insight of one of the Democratic Party's key leaders. Moreover, Reid revealed his private support and encouragement of Obama's daring candidacy. Betrayal of this privilege and trust should bring shame and embarrassment onto the reporters, not Reid. This is because by 'headlining' the choice of words, rather than the message, they chose to pull 'gotcha journalism' on Reid, rather than inform the public of Reid's early support and his insight into political reality. I have no quarrel with a focus on Reid's analysis of the election at that time and his support of Obama. My quarrel is with the emphasis on his 'inartful' and 'unfortunate' word choice. I sense that the 'reporters' knew that this would be trouble for Reid, and that the firestorm would sell books.
Plain and simple.
That's not the Fourth Estate we need. Any public figure asked to talk with these two in the future should simply tell them to "Go f--- yourselves. And please quote me."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jward
January 12, 2010 12:25 PM in reply to sunnysteve
Very artfully put.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 12, 2010 12:46 PM in reply to jward
It's not all that surprising, to me, that Halperin's fingerprints are all over this. What is surprising is John Heileman.
And I think both of them have nicely burned some bridges to sources at this point.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
monet768
January 12, 2010 1:30 PM
THE GRANDE OLE KLANSMEN PARTY AND THE RUSH LIMBO CLOWNS SUCK!
NOO IF'S ANDS, OR BUT'S
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
teabagger
January 14, 2010 12:44 PM
Clinton also called Obama to apologize, but ended up asking him to bring everybody some coffee.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?