
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) will not seek reelection this year. Dorgan has been trailing Gov. John Hoeven (R) in polls, even though Hoeven has not yet formally decided to run for the seat.
In a statement published on his website this evening, Dorgan said the potential for a tough race was not behind his decision.
From the statement:
"After a lot of thought I have made the very difficult decision that I will not be seeking reelection in 2010. This decision is not a reflection of any dissatisfaction with my work in the Senate, nor is it connected to a potential election contest next fall. Frankly, I believe if I were to run for another term I would be reelected."
Asked about the retirement, a Democratic strategist told TPMDC, "It wasn't expected and comes as a bit of a surprise, but it's not shocking. Senator Dorgan has served for a long time and it's not surprising if he wanted to move on to a new venture or to no venture at all."
But the loss of Dorgan leaves Democrats without a deep bench in North Dakota in a year when every loss counts if the party wants to maintain its 60-vote supermajority. Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D), the state's lone member of congress, is an obvious choice but with Hoeven as popular as he is, Pomeroy would likely enter the race as the underdog.
For their part, Republicans are happy to see Dorgan go, and expect to add his North Dakota seat to the GOP column. Check out their take here.
Dorgan battled the White House during the health care debate, accusing the Obama administration of forcing the FDA to help kill his amendment to the health care bill legalizing prescription drug reimportation into the U.S.. The White House denied the charge.
He was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1992 after serving as North Dakota's congressman from 1980 through his election to the Senate.
Late Update: President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reacted by thanking Dorgan for his service. Read their statements here and here.
i said GOOD DAY sir
January 5, 2010 6:28 PM
Yeah, right. He was going to get creamed by Hoeven. That's why he quit.
But I think it could mean that he has already decided or is now more persuadable on climate and the financial regulation package. From a policy perspective, this could be a good break for the Dems.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 5, 2010 6:41 PM in reply to i said GOOD DAY sir
STFU! Dorgan was always a reliable Democrat and not conservative. He didn't need to be persuaded. He was one of only 7 senators who voted against repealing Glass Stegall. He was way more liberal than his state and always voted that way with no backlash.
And Hoven isn't even in the race.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
drubs
January 5, 2010 6:31 PM
When Republicans ask "What's the hurry with health care?"
You can say this was the last chance. Nothing will be do able after November.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FebM
January 5, 2010 6:32 PM
You betcha! and the Dems can get a real rep while the teabaggers cream the GnOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
January 5, 2010 6:46 PM
Too bad it couldn't have been Conrad :/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 5, 2010 6:49 PM
This is a very sad day. Dorgan is one of the good ones. This is a loss for sure.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
January 6, 2010 1:00 AM in reply to Maritza
Make lemonade out of these sour lemons; we need find popular, non-traditonal Progressive Democrats who are marginal if not total party outsiders to fill these vacancies, organize our progressive majority into street-level action, and start taking some of these moderate seats away for more progressive candidates.
And anyone who doesnt believe there are worthy and quite colorful non-partican progressives avaiable for the election should give up prognosticating about politics, it is a new and vibrant world of political activism out there on the mean streets these days, thanks in big part to Obama's historic canpaign..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
datora
January 6, 2010 2:22 AM in reply to JEP07
On that "prognosticating about politics" thingie, Shirley, you could have listed the names of two or three viable candidates to fill the seat? "We" could then get behind them and help throw the ND Senatorial election in "our" favor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
January 5, 2010 6:49 PM
Almost all incumbents are generally trailing in the polls on off year elections. Yet almost all are reelected.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RhodaA
January 5, 2010 6:55 PM
Dorgan was working on drug-reimportation for many years. My first thought was that he's retiring because of the way his amendment was systematically and unfairly defeated in the Senate. While Ben Nelson was able to force his insidious demands, Dorgan's righteous amendment was hijacked by his fellow demoncrats. I imagine he felt very betrayed.
I always thought that Martinez, too, retired because he felt betrayed by his fellow republicans - the way they treated Sotomayor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 5, 2010 7:17 PM in reply to RhodaA
That's a dumb reason to retire. Instead you just keep on fighting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gharlane
January 6, 2010 4:08 PM in reply to Maritza
Dorgan was one of the few to warn against the repeal of Glass-Steagall, predicting correctly that it would help lead to financial collapse. With Team Summers-Geithner and the rest of the Rubinites in the Obama economic inner circle and pulling the levers of power, serious financial reform is not in the cards. (Like heath care, there will be a show bill with a band-aid or three, but it's a band-aid on a compound fracture with massive internal bleeding. Good luck with that.)
The WH helped deep-six the drug reimportation measure, despite having campaigned against it.
It's one thing to fight against Republicans. When your own party and your own President start to fight you, many a reasonable person would think it might be time to move on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gharlane
January 6, 2010 9:57 PM in reply to gharlane
The WH helped deep-six the drug reimportation measure, despite having campaigned against it.
Edit: The WH helped deep-six the drug reimportation measure, despite having campaigned for it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ben_nelsons_hair
January 5, 2010 7:53 PM in reply to RhodaA
I don't blame him. The corporate dems are ruining everything.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sailormarlowe
January 5, 2010 7:12 PM
Democrats down the drain in Dakota. SarahPac put some money in right places, get the right people. Keep hope alive!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
January 5, 2010 8:26 PM in reply to Sailormarlowe
Yeah! Maybe they can duplicate their NY-23 victory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bloggin
January 5, 2010 7:13 PM
Emotional polls have no meaning this early in the game.
Dems should do very well again this year as voters will stream to the polls to vote for more selfish concerns, like their own healthcare that republicans want to take away. Companies will have started hiring again, and minorities will come out in droves, because immigration reform will also be at stake, that republicans want to kill.
Meanwhile, the republicans will still be screaming 'socialism', having tea party wars, being exposed in more sex/bribery scandals, and praying to GOD for something bad to happen to other people.
The 2010 Elections should provide quite a bit of entertainment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
justicia
January 6, 2010 1:06 AM in reply to Bloggin
Wishful thinking, Bloggin. If unemployment (real unemployment, not the cooked numbers the government publishes) is still in the double digits, the Dems will get trounced.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 5, 2010 7:28 PM
Why can't it be Chris Dodd retiring?
Chris Dodd is going to lose his seat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 5, 2010 7:38 PM in reply to Maritza
And it would be safe with Blumenthal
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 5, 2010 7:47 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I agree. It is time for Dodd to retire.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
xargaw
January 5, 2010 7:41 PM
Regardless of his comments, you have to wonder if he isn't just fed up with the DEMs. He was one of the really good ones that probably just got sick of being betrayed by his own.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
January 5, 2010 8:16 PM
The storm clouds are gathering.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
January 5, 2010 11:24 PM in reply to Silence
Number of Retiring Democratic Senators in 2010: 3
Number of Retiring Republican Senators in 2010: 7
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
January 6, 2010 7:34 AM in reply to Stroszek
You folks still buy this Republican - Dem thing, don't you?
"The power of the constitution will always be in the people. It is entrusted for certain defined purposes, and for a certain limited period, to representatives of their own choosing; and whenever it is executed contrary to their interest, or not agreeable to their wishes, their servants can and undoubtedly will, be recalled." - George Washington
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
January 5, 2010 8:24 PM
PPP poll for the Connecticut Senate seat will be out tomorrow and they are tweeting that if Blumenthal ran instead of Dodd than the Connecticut seat would remain in the Democratic fold.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
aikbay
January 5, 2010 10:05 PM
He probably figured nothing was going to be done with Rahmbo and his Banksta Gangstas so why even bother. Especially after they kiss Landrieu's and Nelson's asses but defeat Dorgan's amendment. Like I said, if not now then when?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lamonth
January 5, 2010 11:22 PM
i am sorry, i know the seat may go to a repug but i am tired of baby boomers. i hope its time to get some new ideas into the political system.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
justicia
January 6, 2010 1:03 AM
Josh says:
I must confess that while I know the stuff about Countrywide and the larger political climate, I never completely understood just how Dodd -- a seemingly untouchable figure in the Connecticut political firmament for decades -- sort of out of the blue became unelectable.
Well, Josh, maybe it's because CT voter are disgusted by the fact the Dodd was for Gramm-Leach-Bliley before he was against it. That Dodd chaired the Banking Committee while the banksters were running amok and Greenspan was asleep at the switch. That he, and all the other go-along-to-get-along Dumbocrat enablers of the kleptocracy should be retired ASAP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Weitberg
January 6, 2010 1:46 AM
Well, at the end of the day, where's North Dakota?
TheWeekinRebuke.com
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Prefabfan
January 6, 2010 7:52 AM
This many Dems leaving without explanation, with surprise announcements??
I just want to see the Republican's honeypot. She must be hot. I'll bet its "Hot Mike"'s blond lobbyist\whore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 6, 2010 8:46 AM
Hey maybe it's because he's 68 and will be 70 in 2012 and is plain fricking tired of working. It's a possibility you know. It doesn't have to be because he's pissed off at the dems. Personally I doubt he is pissed off with them and is retiring for other reasons. Good for him. We will find someone to replace him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
monet768
January 6, 2010 9:30 AM
MAYBE NOT GOOD FOR THE DEMS OR MAY SO...BUT ANOTHER KLANS MEMBER DOWN
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 6, 2010 10:28 AM
Ed Shultz was just on MSNBC and he said he spoke with Dorgan last night and he said the decision had to do with another term committment where he would be 74 that he didn't want. I think I was right in my earlier post even though it was before I saw Ed.
He also hinted that there may be a place in the Obama cabinet for Dorgan because to quote Ed "he's not done"!. Also, Ed announced that the state's party chairman asked him (Ed) to consider running for U.S. Senator. Stay tuned!!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?