
"We can't wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side -- a belief that if you lose, I win," President Obama said last night in his State of the Union address.
But 14 minutes before Obama's speech ended, the Democratic National Committee had clipped some reaction video from the Republican side of the chamber and sent it to reporters with an embarrassing headline.
"Republicans Sit on Hands as POTUS Calls for Banks to Pay Back Bailout Funds," was the subject line on a 10:06 p.m. press release from the DNC, along with the first of several Web videos showcasing Republican reactions during the speech.
When Obama talked about the health care bill bringing down the deficit "by as much as $1 trillion," Democrats applauded. The Republicans looked around at each other, and especially to Minority Leader John Boehner and Minority Whip Eric Cantor, to see if they were applauding.
There were several potential GOP traps in the speech, and the DNC somehow caught each, and clipped them into Web videos like this one: "No Republicans Stand for Passing a Jobs Bill."
And this one: "No Republicans Stand for Small Business Tax Cut."
You get the idea.
The ads are on the Web - for now - and officials suggest we might see them on television before the fall elections.
Obama even noticed the lack of applause for popular ideas himself, quipping after a line about tax cuts for 8 million people paying for college, "I thought I'd get some applause on that one."
Here's the first of the DNC's Web ads:
dswx
January 28, 2010 11:37 AM
Wow, this article could have been written by the RNC and posted on Drudge. TPM hits a new low.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
January 28, 2010 12:33 PM in reply to dswx
Agree. This is terrible.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenzinoh
January 28, 2010 12:38 PM in reply to SchrodingersCat
Sorry, but I agree with SunnySteve... this is the DNC's job! Usually we decry them for being wimpy... I say gut the suckers. The GOP has one agenda, defeat Obama... if they defeat the country while they are at it, eh... c'est la guerre.
To Hell with them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
January 28, 2010 2:30 PM in reply to jenzinoh
No, I think you misunderstood my comment. I agree with dswx in that this is a terrible post by TPM. It reads like something you'd find at Politico (and that was not meant as a compliment).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenzinoh
January 28, 2010 12:35 PM in reply to dswx
????
Care to explain?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
January 28, 2010 2:42 PM in reply to dswx
Perhaps, if the repubs would have gotten off their thumbs and not been anti-American-sadistic, liars and been at least for tax cuts for small business, student loan relief, $30 B for small business---some thing anything for the American people it might not happen!
When the leader tells the truth even the orgs get it that they should1 It is about time!
Congressional dems are acting like 'battered women'....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
roxsteady
January 28, 2010 11:38 AM
Good! They should hammer them every chance they get for their faux populisim.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sunnysteve
January 28, 2010 11:48 AM
It's politics. That's what the DNC is supposed to do. I'm glad to see they are doing their job.
It's different when a single senator ( Jim DeMint, to be exact) states publicly that the GOP strategy should be to oppose any and all health care legislation with the express political goal of "breaking Obama's presidency". That's what they stand for. That's who they are.
Do you not particularly like Lieberman and Nelson right now? Well, keep counting up from 59 and 60. It just keeps getting worse. The more we move to the right, the more craven they get. I am happy to make Olympia Snowe the first example. Her Senate committee negotiated interminably to get a health care bill that she could support. But she voted against cloture, because she wanted more time to consider the issues? What a crock! She is Jim DeMint in a bipartisan costume.
The closer we get to a bare majority, the better legislation gets for the American public, because we move away from the few in the middle, especially so-called moderate Democrats, who simply use the leverage to serve special interests (lobbyists) or to exact sweet deals for their state. Bipartisan work starts with the right attitude. The Dems on the cusp and most Republicans do not have a bipartisan attitude right now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
January 28, 2010 2:33 PM in reply to sunnysteve
Agree wholeheartedly. Why should Democrats feel shy about pointing out some truths of bad or revealing behavior on the part of Republicans, when the Republicans are not at all shy about pointing out things that do not exist, never happened, or that they concocted, a la that Acorn dude turned criminal trespasser.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mike from Arlington
January 28, 2010 11:56 AM
Christina would rather see Dems not make the public aware of the Republicans lack of desire to get our tax dollars back from Wall Street.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
January 28, 2010 12:21 PM in reply to mike from Arlington
Except the banks of course. They've (all or most) already paid theirs with interests. You'd be better off worrying about Fannie and Freddie. They have an unlimited credit card, $400 billion and beyond.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
January 28, 2010 11:59 AM
I have to say, watching the speech, I made of list of who the R's hate: college students, sick people, old people, poor people and gay people (not that any of that is a surprise, but I have no trouble with the DNC getting the jump on the RNC.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lalo35adm
January 28, 2010 12:07 PM
Thanks for pointing out the difference between beautiful oratory that everyone knows not to take seriously and the reality that keeps going on despite the verbiage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 28, 2010 12:17 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
Shorter: "Thanks for being superfluous and irrelevent!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonnyb
January 28, 2010 12:15 PM
So what. Your assumption is that an ad = campaigning. How about getting republicans to stop the filibustering on almost every issue?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jenzinoh
January 28, 2010 12:41 PM in reply to tonnyb
HOW?
The Dems could offer to cut the estate tax to nothing and the GOP would vote against it at this point.
The only people that can end the filibustering are the filibusterers. And they seem to have no interest in it.
Reconciliation votes across the board.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonnyb
January 28, 2010 1:12 PM in reply to jenzinoh
I'll tell you, if the public got wind of republican antics(7 republicans sponsoring a bill and subsequently voting against it), it might move a few senators to start negotiating in earnest. The point I was making was the ad could do that.
I'm fine with reconciliation as a option. Unfortunately there are limits to what you can do with it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonnyb
January 28, 2010 12:20 PM
"There were several potential GOP traps in the speech, and the DNC somehow caught each, "
Somehow? Probably a highly coordinated conspiracy.
They used a several recorder to record the SOTU. They had a copy of the speech on hand, and knew the potential traps. They had live people watching as the SOTU was being given. They cut and snipped the ones they needed. Genius!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 28, 2010 12:39 PM
So the DNC is doing its job and staying on top of and calling out GOP lies? And the problem there is what exactly?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bdh
January 28, 2010 12:50 PM
I'm sorry, did the American people elect the DNC to govern something? How is this relevant to what Obama said about elected public servants not forgetting their priorities?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
January 28, 2010 12:50 PM
i see nothing inconsistent...the president called out the grand obstructionist party for doing nothing and the dnc illustrated the point.
the so-called conservatives need to grow up and start contributing. imagine the history books talking about the four year period when the right side of the aisle voted no to everything. it's really embarassing to see adults pout.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonnyb
January 28, 2010 1:17 PM in reply to hey norm
If that were the only fallout then fine. The problem is Democrats in congress are now put in a compromised position for 2010 elections because they haven't delivered on key issues.
The President had lots of ideas going forward but Republicans have calculated that so far obstruction is helping them more than hurting them. It's looks like Democrats in power can't govern.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
darkrhyme
January 28, 2010 12:51 PM
What...the DNC is doing its job and people complain???
Really?
NOT using those clips would be political malpractice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 28, 2010 12:57 PM
Hey Christina. Go back to the Wall Street Journal. You are far better suited there. How dare you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Xantar
January 28, 2010 1:18 PM in reply to lousgirl84
Christina isn't from the Wall Street Journal. I believe her previous job was at the Washington Times. Not that that's any better.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
January 28, 2010 1:58 PM in reply to Xantar
That is the epitome of damning with faint praise...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
January 28, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to ClosetLuddite
OK maybe not the epitome, but it's kinda like that
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClosetLuddite
January 28, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to ClosetLuddite
A little...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Xantar
January 28, 2010 2:29 PM in reply to ClosetLuddite
Maybe it's a reverse backhanded criticism?
...yeah, I got nothing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
January 28, 2010 1:11 PM
The DNC is a political party. All they do is campaign. I believe the POTUS was talking about our elected representatives.
Come on TPM, wise up a bit before spouting off with this gotcha crap.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 28, 2010 1:13 PM
DNC Slams GOP Even As Obama Calls For End To 'Perpetual Campaigning'
TPM fails to distinguish between campaign organizations doing their jobs and politicians failing to do theirs (as a result of "perpetual campaigning") even while posturing as a journalistic organization with perception and intelligence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ottis
January 28, 2010 1:20 PM
CNN said he lied.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
January 28, 2010 1:27 PM in reply to ottis
You know, I had Comcast come to my house three times last week to fix our cable service just so that I could continue to deliberately surf right on by CNN.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ihatebeets
January 28, 2010 1:28 PM
Why do the Republicans hate America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
judyinnm
January 28, 2010 1:31 PM
The idea that Obama's daydream of a "United States" of America is going to come true is what's been holding back progressive legislation for the past 3 years. Good for the DNC, fighting back.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ally
January 28, 2010 2:21 PM
Good. Get the Repulsive Party of No Ads out ASAP.
Can We Use this to get rid of Ben Nelson - who sat on his hands too? I can only dream of that I guess.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
itsallaboutthemoney
January 28, 2010 5:00 PM
How amazing would it have been for him to call them out right then and there? Yes, it flies in the face of non-partisanship, but we all know that’s just mouth magic anyway.
POTUS: “What’s this, you didn’t applaud for a jobs bill and now you’re not standing and applauding a small-business tax cut? There you sit while ordinary Americans suffer. I guess we know where you stand, or rather, where you don’t stand.”
If only in my dreams…
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
des
January 28, 2010 7:11 PM
"Perpetual campaigning" - that's what the Republicans have developed so they don't have to actually "Govern" (whether they can or not).
All the clips mentioned in the article concern items that Republicans SAY they favor: support for small businesses, college educations to provide well-trained workers, banks repaying the public money loaned to prevent their collapse, deficit reduction (via HCIR), etc. If the Republicans AREN'T supporting those policies and, in fact, are attempting to prevent them from being enacted into law; then it becomes very clear that their opposition is based solely on what they perceive will have an advantage during the next election.
Now there's some "perpetual campaigning"!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 7, 2010 12:41 AM
It's different when a single senator ( Jim DeMint, to be exact) states publicly that the GOP strategy should be to oppose any and all health care legislation with the express political goal of "breaking Obama's presidency". That's what they stand for. That's who they are.
Do you not particularly like Lieberman and Nelson right now? Well, keep counting up from 59 and 60. It just keeps getting worse. The more we move to the right, the more craven they get. I am happy to make Olympia Snowe the first example. Her Senate committee negotiated interminably to get a health care bill that she could support. But she voted against cloture, because she wanted more time to consider the issues? What a crock! She is Jim DeMint in a bipartisan costume.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?