
Obama To Announce Bank Fee Proposal Tomorrow
President Obama will reportedly announce tomorrow that he is proposing a new fee on bailed-out financial firms, with the goal of recovering $120 billion in taxpayers' money used to prop up the corporations during the economic crisis. The proposal comes as banks that were rescued by the government a year ago are now enjoying profits and about to pay heavy bonuses to their executives.
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama will receive the presidential daily briefing at 9 a.m. ET. He will meet at 9:30 a.m. ET with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), and with other members of the Democratic leadership in the House and Senate at 10 a.m. ET. At 2:30 p.m. ET, he will tour the Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee Center in Lanham, Maryland, and he will deliver remarks at 2:55 p.m. ET on clean energy jobs. He will meet with senior advisers at 4 p.m. ET, and receive the economic daily briefing at 4:30 p.m. ET.
Biden's Day Ahead
Vice President Biden will be in Washington, D.C. At 9 a.m. ET, he will attend President Obama's daily briefing. He will then participate in Obama's meetings with the Democratic Congressional leadership, listed above. He will spend the remainder of the day in meetings with senior staff at the White House.
Bipartisan Panel To Grill Wall Street CEOs
The bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a panel set up by Congress to investigate the causes of the 2008 financial collapse, is holding its first public hearing today. The chief executive officers of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America will be testifying today, and event that could have a serious impact on public perceptions of those companies and the government.
Obama To Appear At Both Dem And GOP House Retreats
President Obama will appear at separate retreats next week for both the House Democrats and the House Republicans, as he also did last year. House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) challenged Obama in a statement: "It is important to ask whether the President plans to meet WITH Republicans, or speak TO them."
Dorgan Invited To White House
The Hill reports that Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who announced last week that he will retire from the Senate, has been invited to the White House for a meeting in the coming weeks. The meeting should boost speculation that he could be in line for a Cabinet post.
Abortion Debate Still Lurking Under Health Care Bill
Roll Call reports that the issue of abortion remains an area of contention in the health care bill negotiations. "I don't think there's any way to get the votes for what I want or what Bart Stupak wants," said the staunchly pro-choice Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO). "What I want is a bill that doesn't talk about abortion. What Bart Stupak wants is a bill that goes far beyond current law."
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 9:28 AM
Why do I get the feeling that the abortion debate is still largely a smoke-screen by the "pro-lifers"? Maybe it was Ben Nelson's shaninagin's that won him a "free Medicaid 4 life" deal in Nebraska? As it is, none of these proposals actually expands access to abortion. And it is still illegal under federal law to use federal funds for abortion procedures.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 10:00 AM
50 million Americans killed in abortions since Roe is not a smoke screen. Abortion is a modern-day holocaust, not HCR.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
January 13, 2010 10:27 AM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
Wow, you certainly know how to flaunt your scientific ignorance! You have no clue when life starts. And you have no right to tell a woman how to live her life.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clavis
January 13, 2010 10:34 AM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
A fertilized egg that fails to implant because of artifical intervention is not an "American killed". That kind of dishonest language is evil and stupid, and you should be ashamed of yourself for using it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 11:07 AM in reply to Clavis
You are describing a natural death, not an intentional one due to abortion.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clavis
January 13, 2010 12:50 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
I'm not describing a death at all. "Death" means that a normally self-sustaining independent organism ceases to maintain homeostatic processes, leading to organ failure, loss of nutrient and water circulation and finally brain and nervous system failure and degradation. The removal of a cluster of 10 or 100 cells from a woman's body is not killing an organism. Stop playing word games.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 3:02 PM in reply to Clavis
Beginning with birth, watch a time-lapsed video of human development backwards from a baby’s birth to its conception and then I ask, at what frame in the sequence are you going to kill the unborn person? At birth, no. One frame before birth, no. Two, Three...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 10:19 AM
"It is still illegal under federal law to use federal funds for abortions". Um, what part of that sentence did you not understand? And HCR would do nothing to change that sentence.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 10:46 AM in reply to CityGuy
I respectfully beg to differ.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5862.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 1:07 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
Uh-huh this is NRLC's take on the proposed legislation. Their intrepertation of what it could/might do for abortion. The NRLC is a rightwing mouthpiece for (mostly) GOP causes, including but not limited to their anti-abortion stand. Face it, they would be against HCR no matter what. This is just a way to get the fevered "pro-lifers" on their bandwagon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 5:54 PM in reply to CityGuy
Again, my friend, I respectfully disagree. Fix the abortion language, pass HCR, and move on to care for Haiti and jobs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 10:37 AM
Modern medical technologies show human life begins at conception. Watch a time-lapse video.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Larry Geater
January 13, 2010 12:34 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
So, the Bible is wrong in treating the unborn differently before the quickening?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 1:13 PM in reply to Larry Geater
Well Jesus himself treated the unborn differently than living, breathing humans. When confronted with a man who had caused a miscarriage in a woman by beating her, Christ advised that the man should pay a fine, and move on. But of course, "modern medical technologies" must know a lot more than Jesus did about human life, so just ignore his teachings......
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 3:27 PM in reply to Larry Geater
http://www.catholic.com/library/Abortion.asp
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
solomonj
January 13, 2010 10:38 AM
How many abortions were there before Roe? What's the magic number that qualified it to become a "holocaust"? Was it immediately a holocaust or did it take a few years to qualify? Why wasn't it a holocaust before Roe?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 10:58 AM in reply to solomonj
The majic number is one innocent person.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 10:47 AM
Modern medical technologies show human life begins at conception. Watch a time-lapse video of human development.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
January 13, 2010 11:41 AM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
At least a third of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. Doesn't that make God the ultimate abortion provider?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 12:54 PM in reply to Jim H
Fertility and pregnancy, which sadly results in miscarriage at times, are natural. People of goodwill are called to comfort parents, particularly mothers, suffering from the death of an unborn child in miscarriage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clavis
January 13, 2010 1:28 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
You're right. I remember how much I had to console my sister when she took the morning-after pill the day after having sex with her boyfriend and the condom broke. She had already picked out a name for her "pregnancy" and bought furniture for the baby room, even though she wasn't even 100% sure that any of her eggs had been fertilized, or if implantation was going to take place.
Your fantasy stereotyping of reality is not useful. It is, however, lame.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
January 13, 2010 2:18 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
You can call it "natural", but it's God spontaneously aborting a "life" AFTER conception.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 2:55 PM in reply to Jim H
A natural miscarriage is not the intentional death of an innocent person.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Clavis
January 13, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
"Conception" refers to the fertilization of an egg, yes? So we're talking about an egg that has a sperm melding with it? Two haploid cells fusing and undergoing a metamorphosis? How exactly is it accurate to describe that as "life"? You are obviously using such a broad definition of the word deliberately so as to lump adult humans and fertilized eggs into a single category. But that's just begging the question. Stop playing word games and come live with the rest of us in reality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 1:58 PM in reply to Clavis
If things unborn have no right to life then why is it illegal to even touch an eagle, condor, or tortoise egg?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 3:46 PM in reply to SocialJusticeForAll
Apples and oranges my friend. Eagles and condors are endangered species. They warrent special protection under federal law (a law entirely of man) to prevent the species disappearing forever from planet Earth. The same law does not attempt to define when the birds "life" actually begins. Humans are definitely NOT an endangered species! Most other species also require no such special protection.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 13, 2010 3:48 PM in reply to CityGuy
Ditto for the tortoises.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SocialJusticeForAll
January 13, 2010 4:29 PM in reply to CityGuy
My friend: The right to life is fundamental and more important than HCR or endangered species protection, both of which have mostly good intentions.
In HCR, the unborn should be protected like all other people and at minimum given the higher level of respect than a turtle egg.
An equal application of law to every condition of man is fundamental. --Thomas Jefferson
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
January 13, 2010 11:42 AM
Dorgan for Treasury! That would be sweet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?