TPMDC

TPMDC Morning Roundup

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Obama To Announce 'Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee'
President Obama will formally unveil today his proposed "Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee," a fee on 50 of the largest financial firms, in order to recoup taxpayers' money from the TARP bailout. The proposal is aimed at raising $90 billion over the next ten years, and will bring the total cost to the government of the bailout down to $117 billion, including both the fee and money that has been paid back..

Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama and Vice President Biden will receive the presidential daily briefing at 10 a.m. ET. Obama will meet at 10:30 a.m. ET with senior advisers, and at 11:05 a.m. ET with Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki. At 11:50 a.m. ET, he will deliver remarks to announce the new financial crisis responsibility fee, to be levied on large financial institutions. He will have lunch at 12:05 p.m. ET with Vice President Biden. At 1:45 p.m. Et, he will deliver remarks at the opening session of the Forum on Modernizing Government. He will receive the economic daily briefing at 2:15 p.m. ET, and meet at 3 p.m. ET with Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner. At 5:05 p.m. ET, he will deliver remarks at the House Democratic Caucus retreat.

Biden's Day Ahead
Vice President Biden will attend President Obama's morning briefing at 10 a.m. ET. He will meet at 11:30 a.m. ET with Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, to discuss the stimulus program. He will have lunch at 12:05 p.m. ET with President Obama. At 1 p.m. ET, he will meet with Iraqi Vice President Adil Abd al-Mahdi. At 2:15 p.m. ET, he will meet with Earl Devaney, chairman of the Recovery Act Transparency and Accountability Board.

Clinton Cuts Asia Trip To Address Haiti Disaster
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cut short her Asian tour to help address the earthquake in Haiti. "We have a full court press going on here at the president's direction," said Clinton. "This is a devastating catastrophe, just to figure out what steps to take so we don't make the situation worse ... This is incredibly complex work. We have some of the best people in the world from the United States down there and we're just going to do everything we can to be helpful."

Cornyn Spreading The Wealth From His Leadership PAC
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, gave more than $100,000 from his personal leadership PAC in late 2009 to GOP candidates -- including some in contested primaries. Donations include $10,000 to Kelly Ayotte in the New Hampshire Senate race, $10,000 to Trey Grayson in the Kentucky Senate race, and $5,000 to incumbent GOP Sen. Robert Bennett in Utah.

Perry Takes Texas Out Of Federal Grant Program
Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) has announced that Texas will not participate in the federal "Race to the Top" program, which gives grant money to states in exchange for school reform efforts and encouraging charter schools, shutting Texas off from up to $700 million. "We would be foolish and irresponsible to place our children's future in the hands of unelected bureaucrats and special-interest groups thousands of miles away in Washington," said Perry.

Pelosi: Google 'An Example To Businesses And Governments' In China Dispute
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is praising Google in its current dispute with the Chinese government. "Google is to be commended for taking action in response to cyber attacks originating from China targeting Chinese human rights advocates, and the intellectual property and corporate data of Google and more than 30 other companies," said Pelosi, in a statement. "The announcement that Google will fully review its business operations in China and will no longer tolerate censorship of its search engine should serve as an example to businesses and governments."

Comments (30) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

January 14, 2010 9:26 AM   

Perry is such a tool! So turnong down $700 million is good for your re-election huh? Maybe the wingnuts will like it, not so much the general election voter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:38 AM    in reply to CityGuy

He's an inconsistent tool. According to the official site for the Texas governor, back in 2002 Gov. Perry was more than happy to accept funds from distant bureaucrats, so long as those bureaucrats were Republican:

http://governor.state.tx.us/news/press-release/4392/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:44 AM    in reply to cole_dranx

Good link! But yeah, those were Republican bureaucrats after all. Must be something special in their water "thousands of miles away" that makes their money better!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:11 AM    in reply to CityGuy

See I have no problem with someone being conservative. I have a problem with someone being a low down dirty Hypocrit though and Perry fits that to the tee.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:36 AM   

"Obama To Announce 'Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee'"

Let's see how the GOP will manage to oppose this and yet pretend to be populist anti-bailoutists.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:46 AM    in reply to AnswerFrog

I have a certain uncomfortableness with your use of the term "anti-bailoutists".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:11 AM    in reply to AnswerFrog

That's easy. The first thing they'll do is rename it to 'The Bailout Tax'. Then they'll insist that the middle class will be paying for it.

Assume that the Republican party's preferred weapon is to define reality on their terms -- regardless of the truth -- and you can always predict what they're going to do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:25 AM    in reply to Remus Shepherd

Oh crap Remus, I think you just gave them their nickname for it: the Bailout Tax! But you're right, they define (or create?) reality on their own terms.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:29 AM    in reply to Remus Shepherd

If the Repubs claim that the middle class will end up paying for this "fee," well, they'd be right.

Do you think the banks will take this expense out of executives' salaries? Just absorb it? Or make up for it by passing along 'cost-of-business' user fee hikes to their customers?

Hmm...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:34 AM    in reply to de TOQUEville

There are ways to ensure that doesn't happen - such as making it a profits tax that can't be recouped from consumers. Look for Blue Dogs and other so-called fiscal responsibility types to try and avoid that though on free market principles.

The reality is that if I'm a politician I'd much rather have the banks trying to justify screwing customers even more despite public outrage than not doing anything to ameliorate that outrage. That just gives me another opportunity to whack someone for the people's benefit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 2:12 PM    in reply to calbearinillinois

There is NO way to ensure that the banks won't mitigate these losses thru higher user fees – whether the losses are off the top or taken from profits. Banks can be pretty clever with math, don'cha know.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

January 14, 2010 5:22 PM    in reply to de TOQUEville

That's my concern, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:47 AM   

God, what a drag it must be to be an intelligent person living in Texas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 9:58 AM    in reply to rbe1

With the exception of one or two enlightened enclaves, wouldn't "intelligent person living in Texas" equal "null set?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:00 AM    in reply to rbe1

It's OK, I think she moved to Oregon.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:15 AM    in reply to rbe1

Oh, Texas isn't all bad for the intelligentsia- some world-class city centers there and the political entertainment is unending. See "Ivens, Molly".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:32 AM    in reply to cole_dranx

oops - Ivins*

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:50 AM    in reply to rbe1

God, what a drag it must be to be an intelligent person living in Texas.

Fortunately, it's a rare condition.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:05 AM   

Perry would rather turn the Texas education system to a bunch of theocrats. Y'know, like the creationist board member who vets all textbooks for sufficient praise of St. Reagan.
It's idiocracy in our time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:09 AM   

What was foolish and irresponsible was for Texans to elect such a self-serving individual who'd put his own political ambitions and thirst for the blessings of the most extreme base above what's best. For someone to jeopardize and disadvantage the children's future speaks volumes about him as politician.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:43 AM    in reply to Piscean02

It's a process. Dumb down each succeeding generation until finally we all come around to the conservative way of thinking.

But yes, Perry is totally pandering here. He doesn't have a problem with taking federal funds for highways, airports. Not to mention all money that flows in from the DOD, via all the military bases in Texas. But when it comes to money to educate children, we can't have our children and grandchildren growing up NOT thinking that Newt Gingrich is a genius.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:50 AM   

Thank you, thank you, thank you Texas! We in Colorado will now have a better shot at the dough. We think money spent on kids is...what do you call it? Oh yeah, a moral good.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:55 AM   

"We would be foolish and irresponsible to place our children's future in the hands of unelected bureaucrats.."

Do Perry's kids go to public school?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:35 AM    in reply to JEP07

Both his son and daughter went to Austin High School, a public school that serves one of the older, wealthier, neighborhoods in west Austin - Tarrytown and Pemberton Heights. It does, however, stretch into lower income neighborhoods in south Austin. Texas has a strange tax structure for paying for public schools called Robin Hood, in which property taxes are collected from all districts and then redistributed in an attempt to even the playing field. This often fails to equalize school, though, especially since so much of success rates are determined by home life and environment outside of school. All that being said, AHS is on of the better schools in Texas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

January 14, 2010 5:26 PM    in reply to CogInSystem

Austin -- ooooh, that enclave of liberals!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 10:56 AM   

"turn the Texas education system to a bunch of theocrats."

Kansas was such a successful role model for that transition, huh?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:01 AM   

Excellent job, Gov. Perry! Kudos to you!

Give this $700MM to other states who are actually TRYING to educate their kids. Or Haiti!

Money spent on trying to educate Texans is a waste of money. Remember, this is the state that wants to take science out of their curriculum and replace it with theology.

With all due apology to the educated libs in Austin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:31 AM   

I also note that Perry is apparently a product of an educational system that doesn't teach geography. "Thousands of miles" from Texas to DC sounded a bit off to me, and some quick googling reveals that there is no part of Texas that qualifies as meeting even the minimum standard of "thousands." I even gave credit for driving distance, instead of straight line. Far west Texas is close, but only if you have to follow the roads. Straight line doesn't even approach "thousands."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

January 14, 2010 5:28 PM    in reply to libdevil

Well, see, Texans think everything in their state is bigger than it actually is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 14, 2010 11:40 AM   

Perry's move, coupled with the pillaging of text books by the Texas review board, might have one benefit - Texas may stop poisoning the books everyone else has to read. Right now, Texas and California drive the market because of their size, but if Texas were to diverge sharply it would be hosed.

Plus, I wonder what the folks in, say, the 5th Ward of Houston think about the current system, where appointed theocrats and revisionist historians from as far away as GW University decide that their kids have to learn about great Americans like Newt, Phyllis Schafly, and that MLK should be de-emphasized/balanced with Reagan? And that evolution is optional?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on