
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said President Obama will address the Democrats' unexpected loss of the U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts during his State of the Union address next week.
Gibbs said Obama believes the White House shares the responsibility for Democrat Martha Coakley's loss last night, adding "there's no doubt we are frustrated by that."
"I don't want to get into the blame game. I won't do the percentages as tempting as that might be," Gibbs said.
Obama won't ignore the message the election sent to Washington, he said.
"He will undoubtedly address the results and what they mean in the State of the Union," Gibbs said.
Gibbs said the focus of the address to Congress on Wednesday night will be the 2010 direction for the administration: jobs and fiscal responsibility. As we have reported, he also will address the failed terrorist attack on Christmas Day.
CT Voter
January 20, 2010 2:44 PM
Hey, mentioning the loss of Ted Kennedy's seat is just the thing to do! What a great idea! It will remind people that a) healthcare reform is dead in the water and b) give the Republicans a great opportunity for a standing ovation for Scott Brown!
Wow! I can't WAIT.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rstephen
January 20, 2010 4:35 PM in reply to CT Voter
Have no doubt that the lesson Obama has learned will be the wrong one. He will undoubtedly strive to become even more of a doormat for Republican obstruction.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
freaktown
January 20, 2010 2:44 PM
should be one hell of a speech what with no legislative accomplishments, despite controlling EVERYTHING, to boast about in his first year...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hewhohasnoname
January 20, 2010 4:55 PM in reply to freaktown
"No legislative accomplishments" is a bit hyperbolic, no?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
freaktown
January 20, 2010 5:46 PM in reply to freaktown
okay name one.
you can't, can you?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DA in LA
January 20, 2010 7:44 PM in reply to freaktown
Stem cell.
Okay.
That's all I got.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Why oh why
January 20, 2010 2:47 PM
Huh.
Why?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
felix
January 20, 2010 2:50 PM
Pathetic. Will he also repeat Clinton's infamous "the president is still relevant" comment from 1994?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Progressive Party
January 20, 2010 2:51 PM
Wow...is this story from Fireside Theater or what? I agree w/ CT voter's view...let's give the GOP the opportunity to rise from their seats and cheer Senator Brown, the guy who beat the dems! Amazingly stupid!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
January 20, 2010 2:54 PM in reply to Progressive Party
that does sound like a bad idea.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
January 20, 2010 3:06 PM in reply to Progressive Party
it's true. he's become quite the softie.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 20, 2010 2:58 PM
Why is anyone surprised by this? It's what he always does. His speech always contains matters that people think make him uncomfortable. Just like the Nobel prize speech where he mentioned how people were saying he didn't deserve it or it was too soon.
If you all claim that Mass. was a sign that he isn't listening to the people then what's the big deal about acknowledging what happened?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
felix
January 20, 2010 3:01 PM in reply to Viva!America!
It depends on the lesson he's taken from it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 20, 2010 3:13 PM in reply to felix
So why call this move pathetic before you hear what he has to say?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DA in LA
January 20, 2010 7:45 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Because we know longer believe he will do anything that shows he might actually have one testicle, let alone two.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 20, 2010 3:11 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Um, this is providing Republicans with a beautiful PR opportunity.
And if there's some idiot out there who still believes that Republicans play by the rules, and won't turn this into a circus, well, enjoy fantasy-land.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
January 20, 2010 3:17 PM in reply to CT Voter
He's the only one on the big stage who ever takes any responsibility. I just wish he had some wins to go with all the "mea culpas" he's been giving the past year.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 20, 2010 3:24 PM in reply to CT Voter
You guys contradict yourselves way too much. We lost in Mass. the Left claims the Dems are out of touch, Obama won't listen, etc. Now Gibbs says he's going to address the lessons learned from the race and people call him pathetic. And since the very beginning you've all been telling him to do what he wants, the GOP is going to act stupid anyway, now you are concerned that what he says will cause the GOP to act up. Let them act up. Let them clap or cheer, let them get the PR - can't be any better than what they get on FOX News.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 20, 2010 3:31 PM in reply to Viva!America!
This is validation for the Brown win. For a Republican winning the seat left open by the death of Ted Kennedy, of all people. Jesus. Talk about throwing salt in a wound.
And there's no up side to this. Republicans will be just as trashy and mean-spirited, plus with a boatload of publicity thrown in, to boot.
I applaud the president for insisting on treating voters (and Republicans) like adults. However, it's also starting to appear as if the president doesn't recognize just how bad things actually are. Mentioning the devastating defeat in Massachusetts during the SOTU isn't (in my opinion) the way to go about proving that you "get it", as he once famously said.
I'd love to be proven flat-out wrong on this, but after today, and the Democrats "we can't mathematically pass legislation on our own" statement, I have no faith that this will be anything other than a fucked up event.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 20, 2010 6:31 PM in reply to Viva!America!
My defense of Obama has been stopped in its tracks. He is leader of the party and now is the time to knock heads and pass healthcare with a House vote on the Senate bill. Period.
The only thing I want to hear next week is the scratch of a pen as he signs his name to the house-passed Senate bill.
I join CT in this. I am outraged and enraged. And it has for the first time spilled over to Obama.
Apparently my country is going to have to go completely into the sewer for years before the voters will "get" it and elect folks with just a smidgen of courage from the liberal side of things. So be it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 20, 2010 4:54 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Agreed and agree with all you posts. Unfortunately other than mine and a few others, it is falling on deaf ears.
I must relay this story of what happened with a friend of mine last night. This is a guy with no health insurance. He had to give it up because he couldn't afford it. He also has many many health issues. He is a musical composer - so his work is very sporadic but for quite a few years he was doing well, writing scores for movies and plays. However, as most musicians know, there are lulls in work but my friend loved living on his credit cards and buying musical equipment and taking trips with his daughters. Then all of a sudden not so much work and the bills were piling up so something had to go and he chose to stop paying his health insurance premiums which were about $600 a month. That was a couple of years ago when he stopped paying his premiums.
Fast forward to today.
He pissed and moaned about the health care bill that came out of the senate and how lousy it was and it shouldn't pass, yet today he is pissed because he feels now that no health reform will pass. Unfortunately, it was because of his carelessness with credit cards that got him in the mess so he had to cut something out and he chose to not pay his premiums - but now he claims this is a fucked up country because we don't offer health care for everyone. I don't disagree but reality is medicare for all wasn't going to happen.
I tried to explain that he was probably one of the people who could buy into the health care plan being proposed but that's not good enough because he can't afford to buy health insurance period = but it's everyone's fault but his. I told him if he was looking for free health care he needs to move out of the country at which point he hung up on me. He's a friend and I feel sorry for him but a lot of this was brought on by choices he made.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DA in LA
January 20, 2010 7:53 PM in reply to lousgirl84
You make a good point. People who make financial mistakes should die of cancer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
January 20, 2010 3:04 PM
I don't really think it matters whether he mentions this in the SOTU or not.
All I want to know is whether he addresses DADT.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 20, 2010 3:16 PM
I think he should wear a teabagger hat as well. That's the ticket.
What a nightmare. I thought it was over last november, but it just continues. An absolute nightmare. When will it be over?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 20, 2010 3:19 PM in reply to Michael A
Thanks for the laugh, Michael (about the teabagger hat).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
January 20, 2010 3:30 PM in reply to Michael A
The Teabaggers have most definitely arrived, and theirs will be 100% of the GOP platform in 2012.
As recently as a few months ago we knew this to be true, and we were laughing about watching the GOP's self destruction, and their transformation into a radical, rump Party.
Ahh, those were the days.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 20, 2010 4:55 PM in reply to Michael A
Oh please it is not a nightmare. The real nightmare would be if Sarah Palin and John McCain were in office right now. You want nightmare, that's nightmare.
All is not lost here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cube3u
January 20, 2010 6:35 PM in reply to lousgirl84
It's not up to us, is it? We're relying on a group of people who are proving to be cowards. And what I want as a voter, citizen and supporter of this cowards is a better country for my grandchildren. That hope is evaporating.
And my rage is rising. It is spilling over to Obama for the first time. I am really, really ticked off.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
January 21, 2010 8:05 AM in reply to lousgirl84
My guess is that we'll see a Brown/Palin ticket or something very similar. McCain, although respected for his survival skills, is just too old. It didn't work with him.
Yup. We're heading into the era of the 'rugged individual'. Entitlements, except for the old folks, will be looked upon very unfavorably by the populous.
Women with rifles and men in trucks, the new darlings of Madison avenue. It's very Americana and certainly a lot more fun than the stuffy, judgmental, political correctness of recent years.
Git yer authentic boots and hats now 'fore prices go up and China starts crankin' em' out for fer the city folk.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jpebcac
January 20, 2010 3:17 PM
Nothing says success like spending time in your one big speech to the nation by talking about failure, it's always worked to well in the past. He might also want to take time to discuss anything else emberrassing as a way to, you know, connect with the people. Those subtle reminders of lack of success have always worked.. oh wait, yeah, maybe not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
January 20, 2010 7:48 PM in reply to jpebcac
Oh come on. He'll apologize to the insurance companies and everything will be just fine.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
January 20, 2010 3:41 PM
Hey, I know, he could tell us we're suffering from a malaise! That one always works. Maybe he could wear a cardigan, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 20, 2010 3:48 PM in reply to Steve LaBonne
He doesn't need to. The Dems have already provided the soundbite that's going to haunt them forever. "We don't have the mathematical majority" one.
I kind of wish he would just turn on all of them: Democrats, Republicans, and whoever else is in the chamber.
What's going on now clearly isn't working.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 20, 2010 3:41 PM
I don't see the problem in the abstract. Of course, it depends on how Obama does it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
January 20, 2010 4:56 PM
Obama needs a dose of some Harry Truman who called out the thugs for who they were as did FDR.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
salame
January 20, 2010 5:39 PM
How will we be able to hear that shout out to Mass over the rethug heckling?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richard L. Adlof
January 20, 2010 5:41 PM
I do not understand why the Obama Administration wouldn't be all over this and tooting their horns about it . . .
Scott Brown rode the President and DLC's coattails straight into his Senate seat. The DLC slunk into the White House, put forth a fairly pro-Corporatist agenda for a whole year, abandoned pretense to Progressive roots THEN blamed the woman for losing . . . A week BEFORE the election.
SO in a very real way the President, NOW, has 41 Senators and Joementum on his side . . . That should be the story.
INQUIRY: Where were Harry Reid and the DSCC in this?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rstephen
January 20, 2010 7:11 PM
I already know what it means: It means that the seat held by Ted Kennedy, who wanted to pass health care reform more than anything, was given to the Republicans through the incompetence and weak leadership of Barach Obama, who used the opportunity to stab him in the back and kill his dream. That's what the history books will write, and to hell with how Obama spins it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LJG
January 20, 2010 11:23 PM
It makes no sense to criticize Obama for what he is going to say about losing a Senate and a super-majority when none of us know what he is going to say about the situation. If he doesn't mention it, it will be the elephant in the room.
It also makes no sense to blame the loss on Obama. He has made some mistakes, but the only other game in town is the Republicans. Here are the real problems: (1.) Bush left Obama with the country in an economic hole that it will take years to get out of. That's what voters are angry about, and there is no quick or easy fix. (2.) The Republicans in the Senate have found a way to stop everything: the 60-vote rule. Those who say all we have to do is use reconciliation and 50 votes are naive and ignorant of the way the senate actually works. Without this rule the Senate could have passed a far better health-care bill with a 56 to 44 vote and they could do it now with a 55-45 vote. It is not Obama's fault that Republicans are using a quirk in Senate rules to stop everything and anything.
It's time for progressives to stop whining and pointing fingers. All that matters is what we can do with what we have in the situation we are in. The way we are currently treating one another we don't need any enemies. We have become our own worst enemies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scottsdalian
January 21, 2010 9:20 AM
Here's my hopeful takeaway from this steaming pile of shite:
Obama is going to try to sabotage the fillibuster. He and the Dems have already started calling out the repubs:
'your anonymous sabotage (fillibuster) won't work anymore cause we don't have the 60 votes to override it. Nope - we now only have 59 (and that includes POS Lieberman, Nelson, Bayh, et al). So now when you fillibuster, you automatically shoot down legislation.....unless some of you repubs are willing to vote to overcome fillibuster. Short of that, we can now lay every single legislative failure directly into your repub laps. No more hiding behind Fox cameras and fillibusters - you repubs now directly own each and every legislative failure. Which we Dems are going to stick straight up your asses. Unless, of course, you are now willing to compromise and work in a truly bi-partisan manner to enact needed legislation. Fail not at ye peril.'
Sorry, folks, this is the best lipstick I can put on this pig!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scottsdalian
January 21, 2010 9:24 AM
And while we are (mostly) all deeply frustrated with the Dems and/or Obama, let's keep one thing in mind:
We could be discussing POTUS McCain and VPOTUS Palin.
Puts things into a different context, no?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?