
The new Rasmussen poll of Pennsylvania gives Republican former Rep. Pat Toomey a lead in this state's U.S. Senate race, against either Democratic incumbent (and former Republican) Sen. Arlen Specter or Specter's primary challenger, Rep. Joe Sestak.
Toomey leads Specter by 49%-40%, and he leads Sestak by 43%-35%. A month ago Toomey led Specter by 46%-42%, and led Sestak by 44%-38%. Toomey and Specter have quite a lot of history. Toomey challenged Specter in the 2004 Republican Senate primary, with Specter just barely surviving by 51%-49%. Last year, Specter switched parties because Toomey was running again, and polling showed that Toomey would win the rematch decisively because of Specter's work with Democrats to pass the stimulus bill.
From the pollster's analysis: "Just 41% of Pennsylvania voters favor the health care legislation currently before Congress while 57% are opposed. Those figures include 22% who Strongly Favor the legislation and 47% who are Strongly Opposed. Those who Strongly Oppose the health care plan overwhelmingly prefer Toomey over either Democrat. Those who Strongly Favor the plan prefer the Democrats."
Acewrap
January 21, 2010 1:04 PM
Just wait until all that corporate money gets dumped behind Toomey after today's SCOTUS ruling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TomH in PA
January 21, 2010 1:15 PM
This story hasn't changed much. On the favorable/unfavorables for each candidate, a key data point is the number who answered 'unsure.' Specter=3%, Toomey= 16%, and Sestak = a whopping 27%.
That Specter is over 50% unfavorable (33% VERY) and only 3% unsure probably means that he isn't going to do any better than this. Neither Sestak nor Toomey has a significant VERY, either favorable or unfavorable. With 27% not sure about Sestak, it would seem he has the best chance to move his number, or, have one of the others move it for him with negative advertising.
We always have a late primary in PA, this year May 18, so there is time, but not a lot. This race is just getting going. And, what the heck is a 'likely' voter in January??
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
January 21, 2010 1:19 PM
And yet again Mr. Kleefeld and TPM continue their love-fest with Rasmussen ***(R)*** polls. The continual arrogance (and ignorance) is simply astounding.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
This is Hilarious!
January 21, 2010 3:17 PM in reply to dswx
Sure, real ignorance, Rasmussen just nailed the MA election...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 21, 2010 2:26 PM
Toomey is a Club for Growth right wing capitalist, as bad as Santorum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Campesino
January 21, 2010 4:51 PM
oops!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Darrius
January 21, 2010 5:03 PM
It's going to get much, much worse than this.
I am amazed that Democrats seem to be willing to commit political mass suicide by letting health care reform die after talking about it for a year and making Democratic Senators from red states stick their neck out.
They have to know something that we don't know. Politicians just don't commit political suicide for their principles.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matt in so dak
January 22, 2010 2:13 AM
Dump the damn HC bill.
Medicare for all, passed under reconciliation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 8, 2010 4:54 AM
That Specter is over 50% unfavorable (33% VERY) and only 3% unsure probably means that he isn't going to do any better than this. Neither Sestak nor Toomey has a significant VERY, either favorable or unfavorable. With 27% not sure about Sestak, it would seem he has the best chance to move his number, or, have one of the others move it for him with negative advertising.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?