
Reports have come in of potential push-polling in the Massachusetts Senate race -- a practice in which the perpetrator pretends to be a pollster but isn't really gathering data, instead very quickly begins doing nothing but attacking an opposed candidate.
Boston-based blogger Dan Kennedy reports on the stories coming in. Liberal political caricaturist John Doherty said he received an automated phone call asking him whether he supported Republican Scott Brown or Democrat Martha Coakley. After he pushed the button for Coakley, he was asked whether it would change his vote if he knew Coakley supported taxpayer funding of abortions.
"I'm a poli-sci major, I know what a push poll is, and I knew this was one," Doherty told me.
An Internet message board that tracks telemarketing calls also shows other people have claimed to receive the call.
One report has linked this call to Americans In Contact PAC, a conservative group that supports Brown. A message left with AICPAC has not been returned at this time.
Another reported push-poll is out there, linking Brown to "hate groups." The call is allegedly linked to McGuire Research. I called there, but I was only able to reach someone in accounting who does not handle the main business operations, and I left a message.
Messages left with the Brown and Coakley campaigns have not been returned.
Late Update: Michael McGuire, owner of McGuire Research, just told me that he is not doing any push polls. He is conducting a tracking poll for an undisclosed client who is interested in the race, but McGuire said his poll is not asking any negative questions about the candidates. So if the anti-Brown push poll does exist, McGuire says that he is not the one doing it.
Michael A
January 12, 2010 2:30 PM
Push polling should be outlawed, as should ratsmussen. Something should be done about these tactics that crop up before every election. It really is outrageous.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheLievense
January 12, 2010 2:42 PM
My wife got this call as we were watching television. Apparently it just got worse and worse in terms of the unhinged anti-abortion, anti-tax talking points it kept spewing.
I also got a call to donate to Scott Brown (I'm a registered Republican) and was able to forcefully say no, Mr. Brown supports torturing and America should not be a country that does that and thus he won't be getting a dime from me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
January 12, 2010 2:51 PM in reply to TheLievense
Good for you. Bet you found Stewart's Yoo interview interesting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheLievense
January 12, 2010 4:36 PM in reply to ericf
Haven't watched it yet but it's on the Tivo and hopefully Jon presses him much harder than he does when he's had other chances (Barbara Johnson, Christopher Hitchens, Mike Huckabee, Bill Kristol, etc).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lucieann
January 12, 2010 2:46 PM
My friend who lives in Yarmouth on the Cape received the same call referred to in the article. These type of calls should be outlawed. No doubt about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Molly Miranda
January 12, 2010 2:55 PM
If I were to receive a call asking if my vote would change if I knew Coakley supported taxpayer funded abortions, I would immediately make a donation to Emily's List, NARAL, and Planned Parenthood.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
January 12, 2010 5:06 PM in reply to Molly Miranda
I think that can be arranged...what's your number?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
January 12, 2010 3:11 PM
But how can push polls be outlawed? Wouldn't the pusher claim it was a legitimate poll? Outlawing polling by phone stops legitimate polls too. A do not call list could stop them, but again would stop legitimate polling too. Outlawing lying in political ads, push polling included, would be nice, but how? And that's all with the admission that just exposing these things doesn't do it, because you can[t expose it until the calls are made, and then you inform only the people who pay close attention, and they're the least likely to be fooled.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
January 12, 2010 3:26 PM in reply to ericf
Well, one way to do it would be to have some type of polling oversight commission tied into the election commission. In order to poll, you need a license. You violate the terms of the license and your license gets pulled and you cannot poll. You poll without a license and you are subject to criminal charges.
What about that idea?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 12, 2010 10:49 PM in reply to Michael A
Unconstitutional.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
handycapt
January 12, 2010 3:42 PM in reply to ericf
Prosecute and FINE. Levy EXTRAORDINARY fines and prison sentences against those found guilty by a jury.
Next question?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapinbrim
January 12, 2010 3:40 PM
I received one of these calls. It was nothing but a smear against Coakley. I'm not a big fan of her's but would never support Scott Brown and his robo-calling scum.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mouse
January 12, 2010 3:45 PM
I got the AICPac call last night. I said I was voting for Coakley, but once it became clear this was a push poll I also told them I was a "Tea Party Republican" when given that option.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
larry
January 12, 2010 4:24 PM in reply to Mouse
Check out:
http://www.universalhub.com/2010/push_pollers_prowl
for some other Boston area reports. This includes phone numbers of the outfits doing the push-polls.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
January 12, 2010 4:31 PM
Is anybody really shocked by this? The RNC itself was doing the same thing back during the summer HCR silliness, implying that the bill would use voter rolls to deny care to Republican voters:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/28/politics/main5272000.shtml
Do we even need to bring up Willie Horton, or the "McCain had a black child" incidents? Typical Republican sleaze.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vertalio
January 12, 2010 6:04 PM
I got one too. If it'd been a human instead of ersatz, they'd have gotten an earful, but of course instead all they got was bad data.
By the way, the candidate (R) is from my town.
Let's just say: Phoney baloney. He'll tack hard right, and try to lead the War Party himself.
Mitt better watch his back.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
krisd
January 12, 2010 10:32 PM
We got two Scott Brown push polls at our house - first on my line asking if we still would vote Martha even though she wants to use taxpayer money to fund abortion. The second on my husband's line asking if he knew that Martha supports gay marriage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
January 12, 2010 10:48 PM
So how come the Dems are so Dem pure THEY can't push poll? HUH?
You want to vote for the Republican? Would it change your mind if you knew he thought the government should monitor you doctor's records about your most intimate health care needs?
Would it change your mind if you knew he thought the government should just spend and spend without providing any way to pay for it? [Republican practice of the past 8 years... logical conclusion from 'no new taxes' pledge they all take.]
Would it change your mind if you knew he does not think people deserve any help with their mortgages that may be pulling them under water?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joe
January 15, 2010 12:44 PM
My wife and I both received calls from McGuire Research this past weekend and they clearly were push polls against Brown. So that person in the article above from McGuire flat out lied to the writer. I have no problem with the polls, you have the right to hang up at anytime. McGuire pollsters were polite and courteous, but clearly were Coakley favored and anti Brown. I'm more concerned about the wide spread voter fraud that has occurred over the past decade....seems to be out of control. We need to put laws in place to keep our voting system fair and neutral....it is the greatest liberty we have and should be respected that way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?