
Rep. Joe Sestak may want to join Harry Reid in the United States Senate, but he thinks the majority leader could demonstrate, well, better leadership. He also was not bashful about sharply criticizing Sen. Ben Nelson and the rest of the Senate Democrats as lacking courage.
Sestak (D-PA) is battling Sen. Arlen Specter for the Democratic primary nomination in the Keystone State, going into rebel mode with calls to "fix the leadership problem" in the Senate.
TPMDC spent about 30 minutes interviewing Sestak Friday about health care and the political landscape in Pennsylvania. After hearing his pointed critique of the process, I asked him who in the Senate would make a better majority leader than Harry Reid.
After a long silence, Sestak offered, "I don't know them all well enough. I like Jack Reed. ... No one jumps to mind."
Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) is highly regarded but not currently a member of the party's leadership team.
"We don't have any titans over there. [Harry] Reid needs to lead," Sestak said.
Sestak spent most of our interview going after Specter, but also portrayed himself as recognizing early that the August town halls were a sign of deep discontent with the establishment from both parties.
He said the lesson from Massachusetts should have been learned last summer. "There's such an unease about the establishment. There's lots of anxiety," he said.
Sestak also said Massachusetts saw "Ben Nelson's hand in the cookie jar," a stinging reference to the Medicaid deal Nelson secured in the Senate health care bill before agreeing he would vote for it.
He said he'd be willing to lose his job over health care, though admitted he would vote for the Senate bill if necessary rather than get no bill at all.
"If we fail shame on us," Sestak said. "The Democrats were given an opportunity to lead, not a mandate."
Sestak did not reserve his criticism for the upper chamber alone, saying that House Democrats are missing leadership skills as well.
He complained that Democrats are briefing members on polls during caucus meetings.
He also said that tax incentives he wanted to see in a jobs will were never included, and said members were given the bill the night before the vote with "no transparency to what really happened" or how the bill was written.
tommyo
January 25, 2010 12:33 PM
Sestak is the kind of leader the Democrats need.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
blz88
January 25, 2010 12:53 PM in reply to tommyo
I believe Sestak can get the nomination and can win the seat and I sure hope he does. By the time he enters the Senate I wouldn't count on Reid still being there, so who cares if he is unloading on the current "leader". As he mentions Jack Reed from RI is good but junior Senator from RI, Whitehouse, shows great promise, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jana47
January 25, 2010 12:36 PM
ditto get rid of spector he's more of the same for year and years he mc cain and others
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The BBQ Chicken Madness
January 25, 2010 12:42 PM
He's smart.
The best thing any non-incumbant Dem can do right now is say "vote me in, because the Dems that are there are failing in giving you the change you wanted", while still supporting all the Democratic policy positions.
That allows you to play the outsider/populist message, capturing disaffected Dems (see: The Base), without losing Indies.
A great move for Sestak would be to constantly attack Dems in Congress as "Pulling a Specter" by trying to find the path of least political resistance, as opposed to fighting for what you believe in. This reinforces the idea that not only reinforce the narrative that Specter isn't a real Democrat, but it also introduces the idea that just having him there makes the rest of the Dems most willing to act like him, thus weakening the party as a whole.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 25, 2010 1:09 PM in reply to The BBQ Chicken Madness
I agree. I hope it gains traction. And considering he's running against the Rendell and Obama machines who tried to clear the primary deck for Seatak he can't be smeared by Toomey as the insider candidate.
Specter is finished - either by Sestak or by Toomey. The choice is up to the primary voters in Pa.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dick c
January 25, 2010 1:08 PM
I think most Democrats share his concerns. It seems like Dems want to deliver for corporations, but, at the same time, retain their populist support. That's got to be hard to do without looking like a bit of a fool.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BlueinColorado
January 25, 2010 1:34 PM
He complained that Democrats are briefing members on polls during caucus meetings.
Jesus. Well, Sestak just opened my wallet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
January 25, 2010 2:24 PM
As a Pennsylvanian I like Sestak, his problem is name recognition across the State. Being an Admiral who commanded a carrier battle group is a plus, especially in this day and age.
By that name recognition thing has to be overcome. I also think western Pa would resent another Senator from eastern Pa. Sestak represents a district just south of Philly.
Christ, I hope we dn't elect that Club for Growth cretin Pat Toomey who is running on the Repug ticket. It would be like
re-electing Rick Sanitorium
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
January 25, 2010 2:33 PM
WOW!! You mean the Senate Democrats would FINALLY have a Senator with the B's to tell the other Democratic Senators to either get into line with the legislation and stop making waves OR ELSE??
Time to support Rep Sestak right now for his Senate bid, so we would finally have a real leader!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bw
January 25, 2010 3:41 PM
It's time for Reid to go. We need someone will Balls to lead the Senate, not wimpy old Harry Reid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
January 25, 2010 5:30 PM
Delivering a rant about fixing leadership to the press and then not having an answer to the "who would you want to put in leadership?" question = Epic Fail that ought to give people some pause about his bluster to action ratio. The man's in Congress, for Christ's sake, embedded in the middle of Village life. He couldn't come up with a couple of names? Whitehouse? Sherrod Brown? Feingold?
Takes more than just identifying the problems and bitching about them, buddy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tytester
January 25, 2010 7:24 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I agree - even though normally I don't share NCSteve's viewpoints. The guy comes across as a kook. In fact, he comes across in exactly the same way as a former military guy would - brainwashed but with an unmatched sense of superiority. I hope Specter kicks his sorry military ass...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
anna am
January 25, 2010 9:35 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Thank you. This guy wins, a year from now, the same people who are now high fiving him will be throwing him on the trash heap.
New brooms aren't always able to sweep clean. It depends on the amount of dirt on the floor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Munguza
January 26, 2010 12:03 AM
Wrong. Those town halls were tactics organized exclusively by a minority of desperate, hate-filled, "You Lie" Republicans to disrupt the Democratic majority.
Correct. And Landrieu's hand, too. After 9 months of sacrificing health care reform and other urgent priorities to please so-called "centrist" Democrats like these, MA voters either A) didn't vote, because they believed Democrats would just continue selling out to the "centrists" or B) Voted for Brown because they wanted to send a "f-you."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 26, 2010 5:24 AM in reply to Munguza
I agree with you strongly on the "Wrong" part.
This "anti-incumbent fever" meme is way-overstated. The Republican strategy was to leave Obama with massive economic problems and do nothing to help him either (1) out of that mess or (2) with his agenda. Then send corporate-funded crazies/stooges and "desperate, hate-filled, "You Lie" Republicans" to the town hall meetings to intimidate and embarrass.
Then claim nothing's been done.
The strategy has worked perfectly, strongly aided by the Dems pathetic fumbling in Mass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MNPundit
January 27, 2010 2:50 PM
Why is this story written as if Sestak is doing something wrong? The bias and lack of awareness to the damage they do the Cause of the TPM staff sometimes is breathtaking.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 6, 2010 11:17 PM
I agree. I hope it gains traction. And considering he's running against the Rendell and Obama machines who tried to clear the primary deck for Seatak he can't be smeared by Toomey as the insider candidate.
Specter is finished - either by Sestak or by Toomey. The choice is up to the primary voters in Pa.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?