
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) just hosted a conference call with liberal bloggers, and we used the opportunity to further question him about an allegation he made a few weeks ago against his former compatriots in the Republican Party -- that the GOP caucus decided early on to entirely obstruct President Obama, rather than work in a bipartisan manner.
"Well, the pressure was tremendous on everybody not to participate, and the pressure was on me not to participate, and you know what I did," said Specter, who switched to the Democratic Party last April, in the face of a right-wing primary challenge. "We had six Republicans who were negotiating. Besides Collins and Snowe, we also had Mel Martinez, we had Voinovich involved, we had Lisa Murkowski. And one by one, those three dropped off. There was a concerted plan in the Republican caucus to stonewall the stimulus package. And when I voted for it, and it took me to get the necessary votes, all hell broke loose politically, which I've commented on extensively."
I asked Specter whether there were explicit discussions in this former party caucus about blocking Obama entirely for political considerations, independent of policy concerns, as seemed to be implied in his remarks a few weeks ago. Specter declined to discuss specific conversations in a closed-door caucus. He referred back to Sen. Jim DeMint's (R-SC) comments that the health care debate could be President Obama's "Waterloo." "Well, nobody said it as bluntly as DeMint did. But that was the clear implication of the stonewalling," said Specter.
"There was no effort made to find any answer to the economic problems of the country, and it was just a no, no, no, and no discussion. I'm not gonna quote what happened inside closed doors. I cite DeMint because it's in the public domain. But I feel free to tell you that I felt under tremendous pressure. I know that, and my conclusion is there was a decision from the start to stonewall."
Specter also singled out Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) as being particularly intransigent on the health care bill. "For a time, Snowe comes forward on voting in committee and says that she won't vote for a bill that has the public option," Specter explained. The public option was ultimately dropped, but Snowe then complained that the process was going too fast. Specter's response: "That's hardly a reason. She's had plenty of time to read the bill now."
mans_best_friend
January 14, 2010 5:48 PM
Wow. What a blockbuster. I, for one, am totally surprised at this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
January 14, 2010 5:52 PM
Now, Arlen put your money where your mouth is and go out and campaign for Democrats, telling voters what your former party did.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
January 14, 2010 7:36 PM in reply to Powkat
He'd probably do so if he weren't having to focus on his own political survival this year. It's kind of hard to go around the country bemoaning the GOP's obstructionism to save fellow Democrats' jobs when you have to do it to keep your own job.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bloggin
January 14, 2010 9:03 PM in reply to Powkat
Exactly. He needs to talk about how the ongoing GOP terrorist plot to put 'fear' in the minds of Americans about our current president and our government, for their own political gain.
How ALL Republicans were in the plot together to 'not' work for the American people, but to bring down our current government.
Wouldn't this be Treason???
Webster's Dictionary defines treason as:
1 : the betrayal of a trust : treachery
2 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Damage
January 15, 2010 12:46 AM in reply to Bloggin
Unfortunately, we're using the Constitution, not the dictionary:
Article III, Sxn 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
January 14, 2010 9:12 PM in reply to Powkat
Yes, and hope the MSM report it too! It's great that Josh reports this stuff. But let's see thi on ABC, CNN, etc. also.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
January 14, 2010 5:57 PM
I think he's decided the only way to win the hearts of Democrats in Pennsylvania is to start dishing on the nastiness of the GOP. Hopefully we can expect more of this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Acewrap
January 14, 2010 6:13 PM in reply to Jim H
He can keep dishing. I'm still voting for Sestak.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ramboorider
January 15, 2010 1:25 AM in reply to Acewrap
I'm voting for Sestak in the primary too. But if Arlen beats him, I'm damn straight voting for Arlen in the general. As I did in '98 when the Dems put up a gun loving and choice hating conservative from Western PA. Arlen isn't great but he knows his constituents.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
condew
January 14, 2010 6:12 PM
Unanimity is as unnatural for Democrats as independant thought is unnatural to Republicans.
You bet the Republican obstructionism made health care reform nearly impossible.
The way around is to attach bits of health care reform to every war-funding bill. Either we get the reform, or we can honestly say Republicans and blue-dogs refused to vote to fund our soldiers in a war.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim H
January 14, 2010 7:12 PM in reply to condew
Republicans are also immune to letting a little thing like hypocrisy stop them from being obstructionists. They've already voted against funding the wars.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Isepick
January 14, 2010 8:13 PM
I am shocked, shocked I tell you!...ok maybe not. Although what they should have done was call them on the whole filibuster thing, and let the Right's obstructionist tactics be seen as the reason the government shut down completely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fsudirectory
January 15, 2010 7:07 AM in reply to Isepick
If only that were possible. Because, at the end if the year, if nothing is done it's the democrats it's gonna rest on. People aren't going to get nuanced enough or do more than watch a commercial to learn the republican held everything up, people will just see democrats + nothing accomplished
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Armchair Firebrand
January 14, 2010 9:15 PM
The only way to break the Republican stranglehold on our legislature is to revise the Senate procedural rules. Read more @ http://armchairfirebrand.wordpress.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
January 14, 2010 9:16 PM
I'm just glad he dumped on Snowe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RocketEngineer
January 14, 2010 9:27 PM in reply to Moose49
She caved under pressure. Does that make her yellow snowe?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
January 14, 2010 9:34 PM in reply to RocketEngineer
Well, you certainly wouldn't want to eat it. (With apologies to the late Frank Zappa.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
January 15, 2010 9:17 AM in reply to Moose49
what's the difference between snowe and a bowling ball? if you absolutely had to you could eat the bowling ball.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
January 15, 2010 9:16 AM
this is nothing new...we saw in the bush administration that the republicans are only interested in political power...not actually governing. what many saw as total incompetence was actually total disinterest. why do the hard work of governing the country when you can go for a bike ride?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brendancalling
January 15, 2010 9:26 AM
with all due respect eric, i call bullshit. This is nothing more than specter polishing his image, especially with regard to the stimulus.
As a pennsylvania voter, let me tell you the TRUTH about Arlen Specter and the stimulus. Arlen insisted on massive cuts to the package before he voted for it, cuts that robbed PA of almost 100% of the money needed to fill its budget gap: http://youngphillypolitics.com/arlen_specter039s_responsibility_pennsylvania_budget_crisis
As the link details, with a citation, "Specter in fact lamented that we couldn’t have slashed all spending from the Recovery Act."
The guy is a phony and doesn't deserve the credit he's getting. he would have slashed ALL spending from the stimulus if he could have. Several non-profits and human services orgs took a major hit, and he hurt the citizens of PA, including the handicapped, adult learners, and the elderly.
THAT is what Specter did.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dem4life
January 15, 2010 9:48 AM
Better come out in vote because if one of Rush Limbo's peps wins, then Mass loses.
40 yrs of dem control the republipigs will stop life.
They don't care if you die, as Alan Grayson stated "The GOP plan for health care is die, die quickly"
Mit Romney ucked up the mandatory mess in MA and this slob willdo more.
Maybe cut you folks welfare bebefits or unemployment.
COME OUT AND VOTE your future depends on this.
The grande ole party will not bring $$$$$$$$$$$$ back to the state or much less fight for money for the middleclass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?