TPMDC

TPMDC Sunday Roundup

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Steele: Reid Should Resign As Leader Over Obama Comments
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, RNC chairman Michael Steele said that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) should have to resign as leader because of his private comments about Barack Obama and race during the 2008 presidential race. "There is this standard where Democrats feel that they can say these things and they can apologize when it comes from the mouths of their own. But if it comes from anyone else, it is racism," said Steele, also adding: "If (Senate Minority Leader) Mitch McConnell had said those very words that this chairman and this president would be calling for his head, and they would be labeling every Republican in the country as a racist for saying exactly what this chairman has just said."

Kaine: 'No Comparison' Between Reid And Trent Lott
Appearing on Meet The Press, DNC chairman Time Kaine rejected any comparison between the Reid controversy and Trent Lott's fall from the Republican leadership in 2002: "But I will say, anybody looking at Trent Lott's statements praising somebody who had been a pro-segregation candidate for president will see that there is no comparison between those comments and those of Senator Reid's. Now, the senator did make comments that were wrong and insensitive, and he's apologized. But he made them in the context of promoting the candidacy, the historic candidacy of Senator Obama."

Steele: 'The Book Was Written In 2008,' Updated During 2009
Also during his Fox News Sunday appearance, RNC chairman Michael Steele continued to insist that his new book was written before he became chairman (despite the fact that the book is based around events in 2009), saying he'd updated the book throughout 2009. Steele said that the book "was written in 2008," and explained: "The book was updated because of the delay. It was supposed to come out in early 2008, you know, March or April of 2008. It was delayed. And as it was delayed, I updated the book because of relevant things that were going on. Sarah Palin 's book hit. It was pushed back further."

Lieberman: 'I Don't Agree' With McCain's Radio Ad Attacking Obama
Appearing on State of the Union, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) disagreed with the new radio ad from Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) -- who Lieberman supported for president in 2008 -- accusing President Obama of "leading an extreme, left-wing crusade to bankrupt America." "I don't agree with that," said Lieberman. "I think that the president understands the importance of bringing our government back into balance. Look, he came in at a most difficult economic time, inheriting a national debt that had doubled in the preceding eight years."

Feinstein: Gitmo Leads to Recidivism, Al Qaida Recruitment
Appearing on Face The Nation, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) discussed the recidivism rate from Guantanamo. "They come out of Gitmo and they are heroes in this world. This world is the only world that's going to really be accepting of them. Therefore, the tendency is to go back. And I think the Gitmo experience is not one that leads itself to rehabilitation, candidly," said Feinstein, also adding: "Well, I agree with those that have said that Guantanamo has really been a recruiting tool for Al Qaida, that it has not been helpful to us."

Romer: Big Bonus Season 'Offends The American People. It Offends Me'
Appearing on State of the Union, White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer expressed outrage at the expected large bank bonuses. "It does seem really ridiculous. We have had to take extraordinary actions to rescue the financial system. We always did it because that's what had to be done for the American people. No one wanted to bail out the banks just for the banks' sake. It's because we know that credit is the lifeblood of a modern economy," said Romer, also adding: "This big bonus season - of course it offends the American people. It offends me."

Romer: Obama Convinced That Cadillac Tax Is Important, Can Work On 'Design Issues'
Appearing on This Week, White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer stood by the proposed excise tax on high-end health plans. "All right, so the -- the important thing the president has said that he thinks that this excise tax on Cadillac plans is important. He's been convinced by experts across the ideological spectrum that say this is one of those things that genuinely slows the growth rate of costs, and anybody that's worried about the budget deficit knows that we've got to -- to do that," said Romer. "You know, what the president has said is, you know, he's always open to -- you know, there are design issues here. He's going to be continuing to -- to work with the Congress to say, are there ways to -- to make it work better? But we want to maintain that -- that crucial focus on cost containment."

Schwarzenegger: Democrats 'Get The Rap' On National Security, Obama Doing All He Can
Appearing on Meet The Press, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA) defended President Obama on national security: "I think that he's doing everything that he can. I think that, you know, Democrats a lot of times get the rap, you know, they're not strong on security and all of those kinds of things. I think that he has talked about the issues, I think that he's been fighting for the issues."

Comments (23) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

January 10, 2010 1:34 PM   

The Democrats are ramming penis down the throats of rivals.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 1:56 PM   

If making idiotic statements requiring apology were the standard for resignation, Steele would be back in Maryland whoring his book - instead of providing comic relief.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 2:31 PM   

Lieberman & Schwarzenegger actually sticking up for Obama.... Especially Lieberman? I guess he deserves a short reprieve. Then again I can see how jackassery which is the mainstay of the Republican party can get kind of old for those with an inkling of sensibility.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

January 10, 2010 2:47 PM   

Also during his Fox News Sunday appearance, RNC chairman Michael Steele continued to insist that his new book was written before he became chairman (despite the fact that the book is based around events in 2009), saying he'd updated the book throughout 2009. Steele said that the book "was written in 2008," and explained: "The book was updated because of the delay. It was supposed to come out in early 2008, you know, March or April of 2008. It was delayed. And as it was delayed, I updated the book because of relevant things that were going on. Sarah Palin 's book hit. It was pushed back further."

Alright. Using my AMAZING PSYCHIC POWERS and a lot of CYNICISM, I think I can explain this one.

- In late 2008, Steele writes a series of notes for a book with the intent of handing them over to a ghostwriter. He can't find a buyer for the book and/or it falls through at that time.

- In late 2009, Regnery becomes interested in publishing a book from now-chairman Steele, and/or decides the time is right to release a book they've been negotiating with him on for the last year.

- At this point a ghostwriter is brought in and handed Steele's notes from 2008, maybe does some interviews over the phone. Since the ghostwriter is writing in late 2009 and any interviews were done in 2009, the ghostwriter writes targeting current events and thus everything except the basic skeleton pervasively reads like a late 2009 book.

- Steele then, without thinking out the problems with this statement, goes on tv and says he wrote the book "in 2008", because from his perspective in the sense that political figures write books at all he "wrote" it in 2008.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 3:07 PM   

Darth vader's spawn is a joke. Why is she on every weekend? She is really absurd and lives in an alternate reality. The garbage spewing from her pie hole is really disgusting. She dominates the conversation and just won't shut up. At least today stepho shot her down a bit. I wish she would just go away.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 3:07 PM   

I love hangin with my black friends. I can talk like one of them and they let me use words that are not allowed on TV or you are called racist. And the word is not "light skin" or "negro". But I tell you what, when Harry is around his frenids in Navada he uses words that would make him a bigot at the Sen. Byrd level. If he is the leader of the Democrats Senate this is what they all think. Or they would give him the "Bums Rush".
Poor President Obama and his family, they have to deal with this guy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 3:20 PM    in reply to inokeah

Gee, that's the same thing darth vader's spawn said on tv today. Either you are projecting or you are her. Wait a minute, you can't be her. You sound more intelligent.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 4:04 PM   

When is Michael Steele going to step down for his "honest injun" remarks? has he apologized for those offensive words?

And who do you think you are fooling, Steele? Ever since you became RNC Chairman you have stayed silent or defended your party, its members and its supporters, whenever they made racist remarks against the president or any minority group. You have zero credibility.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 4:26 PM    in reply to Viva!America!

Steele is the the Republican's cover for being a party of racists doing and saying racist things. If they chose a black man to be the face of their party, then maybe the black man won't notice when they act racist and say racist things.

Its all about the intentions really. If you are racist and say anything at all and if you aren't racist and you say something that sounds racist, its two entirely different things.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 5:44 PM    in reply to M Miller

Oh they notice all right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 6:58 PM   

Sorry, but I have to agree with the Repubs on this one. They may be hypocritical and grandstanding -- which is anoying as hell -- but where is OUR intellectual honesty/consistency? If any Republican elected official said the EXACT SAME THING as Reid, we would (rightfully) be calling for his/her head, or some other significant repercussion. While the Republicans' annoying attempt to exploit the comments is farcical, any failure by progressives to repudiate the comments is indefensible. Principles don't wax and wane depending on who violates them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 7:16 PM    in reply to wilsonjm2003

Reid was being factually but crudely accurate. If Obama were darker and spoke like Jesse Jackson, he wouldn't have had an ice cube's chance in hell of being elected president.

IMO, Reid wasn't being racist; he was acknowledging the prevalent view of race in this country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 9:29 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Agreed... Reid was right, just stupid and totally ham-fisted. There certainly would have been better ways to say it, but he wasn't wrong, just retarded

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 10:27 PM    in reply to holyhandgrenaid

True. And he also thought he was having a private conversation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 9:38 PM    in reply to FreeRider

So it's acceptable to suggest that there is a "Negro dialect"? Since when? Jimmy the Greek -- also a person with no history of racial insensitivity -- was railroaded for saying black people are better athletes. Limbaugh -- by contrast, a person with such a history -- was railroaded for suggesting a black QB was coddled by the media. Do you really think supporters of both those people could not have articulated some "factual accuracy" to support each of their comments? Let's be serious...it may not be equivalent to Lott, and losing the leadership may be too severe of a punishment (though, frankly, I wouldn't necesarily agree), but he certainly should not be entitled to escape with a mere apologetic statement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 10:26 PM    in reply to wilsonjm2003

Jimmy the Greek talked about how blacks were bred for slavery that made them better athletes, essentially equating them with animals. Rush Limbaugh lied when he said the media was propping up McNabb, who had top-tier stats and had earned the accolades. And BOTH said it on the air for broadcast. Reid made his statements in what he thought was a private conversation. Big difference.

Reid was speaking as a political analyst. It's reality: a dark-skinned black man who spoke like Al Sharton wouldn't have a prayer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 9:37 PM    in reply to wilsonjm2003

Well, it depends. A person that is racist saying something is different then a person that isn't racist saying the same thing. If you were black and your (black) mom told you that you will get beat up for being a black man at your new job, you might take it differently than the KKK telling you that.

Kind of an extreme example but it falls under the same concept.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 9:49 PM    in reply to wilsonjm2003

Oh, and may I add that if you were not apart of the KKK but you were friends with many members of it, and if you were to be around black people some too, you might want to watch what you say.... Especially if people know you are a good friend of the Klan.

When it comes to politics, its about the bonus points. If your constituents are n****r-hating racists, just use it to your advantage by saying something racist or make racist jokes.

I live in a DEEP red area and I have a decent knowledge about the mentality, but I'm not an expert on it. Greed, ignorance, apathy, and follow-the-leader is very DEEP in this crowd. EVERYTHING comes down to those 4 things.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 7:57 PM   

Okay, wTF was that guy and what did he do with Traitor Joe? Not that I particularly care, I was just hoping it was unpleasant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 10, 2010 10:36 PM   

The GOP really isn't in a very good place to be accusing Harry Reid of racism, considering many of its elected officials are the last line against expansion of civil rights and immigration reform. It's not even a case of the pot calling the kettle black; it's a case of the pot calling the measuring cup black.

White people may be offended by Reid's, but I doubt it would change their underlying opinions of Reid. White Democrats would accept his apology. White Republicans don't like him either way. Blacks might be more inclined to re-evaluate their opinion of Reid personally, but given that anywherre from 90% to 95% of Blacks are Democrats, I don't think it will affect partisan dynamics much.

And given that the Blacks that vote are generally aware that the GOP's strategy in many parts of the country is built on disenfranchising minorities and blocking civil rights legislation, I don't expect the latter detail to change.

In Steele's defense, though, he did say one thing right here. Harry Reid probably won't be Majority Leader in 2011. His polling position is awful, with forecasted losses to every notable Republican on the primary ballot. His racially-tinged remarks aren't really a factor there, because he was way behind in the polls long before these remarks came out.

The Dems won't lose control, but Harry Reid, personally, may lose his Senate seat. And he can't remain Majority Leader if he can't remain a Senator.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 12:03 AM   

President Obama is tied to Harry Ried and Nancy Peloci and no matter what they think of him he has to work with them.
Harry and Nancy will never know what it is like to get in an elevator and have a family not get in because I am a black man and they think I am going to do something. So when Harry's racism shows it ugly face it has to be highlighted and not just forgiven and passed on.
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallar quotes Martin Luther King on his Poster and now we have to eather treat people of color like humans or bow to Harry Ried.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 1:36 AM   

I think it's time Harry Reid stepped aside and let Dick Durban take the reigns.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

January 11, 2010 7:07 AM   

Runk shows up and you know the nuclear radiation went off.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on