
Once it becomes law, President Obama will campaign on the health care reform measure, detailing for everyday Americans how they would see improvements to their system and painting the Republicans as blocking meaningful change.
Though health care hangs on the outcome of tomorrow's vote in Massachusetts, the sales pitch will be critical from here on out.
Superstitious White House officials were reluctant to discuss how Obama would sell the plan given that it hasn't passed Congress and especially in light of the Senate race other than saying the campaign would be "energetic and aggressive." But past is prologue, and to get a sense of how Obama would play salesman-in-chief you only need to look back to the economic stimulus plan.
Showcasing real people and their stories has long been a favorite method for Obama as a candidate and a president. The administration also has deployed technology to help explain how legislation works and to prove transparency, even though the stimulus Web site also had some problems.
Democratic officials say that despite a gloomy political landscape, Obama remains an incredibly popular figure who can raise money for the party and help Congressional candidates in their reelection battles. They will send him out over the summer and this fall across the country, and health care will surely be on the speaking agenda.
Obama told House Democrats last week he'd be "waging a great campaign from one end of the country to the other," to detail the bill for Americans and "the long-awaited stability that they're going to begin to experience."
He also told members they would be "proud" to campaign on the bill in November.
White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer says Obama "has no intention of relaxing and will undertake an aggressive effort to explain to the American people how reform provides stability and security for people with insurance, affordable options to those without and cuts costs for families and small businesses."
"If Republicans want to campaign against what we've done by standing up for the status quo and for insurance companies over American families and businesses, that is a fight I want to have," Obama told Democrats last week at their House caucus retreat.
He said Republicans would fail at campaigning on wanting to go back to the George W. Bush era while his team would detail improvements to the health care system.
"It's not going to be very appealing to Americans who for the first time are going to find out that they can provide coverage to their children, their dependents, all the way up to the age of 26 or 2," Obama said.
Pfeiffer said Obama will lump Republicans in with the insurance industry as wanting to roll back the provisions in the bill that forbid the denial of coverage to people with preexisting conditions.
Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) said on MSNBC last week that Obama promised to help members win the political battle over health care.
"He is going to give us a bill that we can sell and that he will do his best to sell all over the nation," Moran said. "The problem is it needs to be finalized before we can get out and market it."
White House political adviser David Axelrod told reporters last week that Obama is "highly, highly literate and fluent in the details" of health care, according to Politico.
Axelrod also said the Obama campaign message this year would be one of comparison - the administration's record "rooted in advocacy for people" versus what role Republicans have played in the president's first year.
Walter Mitty
January 18, 2010 6:50 PM
Would have been better if he did this months ago. You know so it wouldn't matter that Scott Brown will be elected and could throw the years worth of work into chaos.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 18, 2010 6:58 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I used to think that, but the bill kept changing, and the score kept changing, the number of people it would help kept changing and on and on. There is only so much you can say about a bill that is still evolving.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
January 18, 2010 7:09 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Obama allowed the Republicans to define what the bill would do: be a government takeover of health care, given billions to illegal aliens, establish death panels, blah, blah, blah, lie, lie, lie.
The president may not have known exactly what the final legislation would look like, but he still should have worked harder convince the public that reform was in their best interest.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 18, 2010 8:10 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Honestly, I actually blame the media for those lies getting out of control. Exposing lies, calling out liars (on the spot) is their job. No matter who the facts favor, the media has a responsibility to its viewers/readers to call bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
again
January 18, 2010 11:43 PM in reply to Viva!America!
you fool no one
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
January 19, 2010 2:20 AM in reply to eratosthenes8
What complete bullshit. Honestly if the left really believes the "people only oppose it because they have been lied to" bullshit narrative, the Democrats are in more trouble than I could have possibly imagined come November.
The public has had months and months to find out what is in this bill, and it has only grown less and less popular with the passage of time. I guess the public is being lied to about the unfairness of exempting unions from a tax to which everyone else would be potentially subjected. The corruption is so naked, it is amazing that it is being perpetrated so openly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 19, 2010 8:52 AM in reply to masanf
No, the people oppose it because it's a lukewarm hunk of neo-Conservative shit. Put the public option back in and see what happens. Better yet, expand Medicare. Best: single payer. Enact it and implement it immediately. The public will LOVE it and the No-Nothings will stay in the wilderness where they belong for 50 years.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 18, 2010 6:51 PM
Good. And don't start with, "this is not a perfect bill...." anymore. Not a good way to convince someone to buy your product. Once it is signed, every Dem in congress needs to own it and talk about it like its the greatest thing since the iPod.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tytester
January 18, 2010 6:55 PM in reply to Viva!America!
Should the Dems in Congress do this even if the actual bill is a POS?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
snowbird42
January 18, 2010 8:56 PM in reply to tytester
Not all of it is a POS
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
again
January 18, 2010 11:43 PM in reply to snowbird42
Only MOST of it!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eratosthenes8
January 18, 2010 6:55 PM
Kinda putting the horse after the cart, isn't he?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 18, 2010 7:14 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Yeah, I see we get the transparency AFTER they pass the bill as well!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 18, 2010 8:09 PM in reply to eratosthenes8
Bush took the opposite approach to sell the privatization of social security. Campaigned all across the country to convince the people. It was a complete waste of time because he couldn't convince the only people who mattered--Congress.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 18, 2010 8:15 PM in reply to FreeRider
Unlike Democrats who have advanced the insurance reform bill in order to privatize insurance for 30 million additional private insurance policy holders. Wow! And we think the Democrats can't accomplish conservative change. Yes they can!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 18, 2010 8:31 PM in reply to bluebell
Bluebell are you schizo? One moment you claim the Democrats can't find their asses with both hands. The next you claim they've pulled off the biggest coup on the American people by privatizing healthcare.
I know you like playing the contrarian but you're too stupid to be any good at it. Retire.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
January 18, 2010 7:09 PM
Historically this has worked. The GOP got hit for years for opposing medicare and social security. But it sometimes takes time for the program to become popular. With it starting 2014, not sure this will work yet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 18, 2010 7:16 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
Which is of course why the Dems chose not to expand the popular Medicare program and to invent something totally incomprehensible and inexplicable instead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CN
January 18, 2010 7:16 PM
Obama plans to campaign on his accomplishments? And this is news because...?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Juble
January 18, 2010 7:16 PM
Seems way out of touch.Selling a shit sandwhich as a "whopper" ain't good politics.
The HCR bill sucks and Democrats who pretend that mandating you buy insurance from Insurance companies are even more out of touch.
People do not want to give their paychecks to wealthy insurance scam artist.
Why the heck the Prez and the rest of the Dem leadership can't seem to get it,tells you exactly how far they are cozying up to Corporations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
again
January 18, 2010 11:48 PM in reply to Juble
"Seems way out of touch.Selling a shit sandwhich as a "whopper" ain't good politics."
Thanks for the laugh. It was bitter, but I'll take any laughs I can get. And I completely agree with you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
smartone
January 18, 2010 7:40 PM
bluebell i agree 100%
expanding medicare program to 55-65 was an incredible winner
It was simple to understand
benefit a huge block of people who actually vote.
I am baffled why this was taken off the table so quickly
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 18, 2010 8:05 PM in reply to smartone
>> am baffled why this was taken off the table so quickly>>
Lieberman. Remember him? The guy who vowed to kill the whole healthcare bill if it included that provision? Did you miss that chapter?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
January 18, 2010 10:50 PM in reply to FreeRider
Aren't there ways around that? Reconciliation? Nuclear option (whatever that is)?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 18, 2010 8:09 PM
Honestly, I actually blame the media for those lies getting out of control. Exposing lies, calling out liars (on the spot) is their job. No matter who the facts favor, the media has a responsibility to its viewers/readers to call bullshit.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Viva!America!
January 18, 2010 8:11 PM in reply to Viva!America!
oops meant as a response to someone's comment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
again
January 18, 2010 11:51 PM in reply to Viva!America!
You know what? I don't hate the President. Not yet. I am mad at him, but I don't hate him.
But every time I see his poor face linked to your posts, it makes me start to feel like I hate him.
Could you... change your avatar back to the geisha putting her lipstick on? Because not only did that superficial picture match your superficial comments perfectly, but it didn't make me hate our President.
There's a good chance we'll lose tomorrow, and that will be awful. But for the love of God, please remove President Obama's face from your... comments. Such as they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
January 18, 2010 10:37 PM
Since the Senate bill it pretty much the Baucus bill, which Obama wrote with Pharma and the insurance industry I bet he's been working on a jingle and ad campaign since back then. No truth in the coming hard sell, I bet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
January 18, 2010 10:54 PM in reply to Indie Pro
Increasingly, it seems like Presidents get a honeymoon of a few months to a year, then they're back on the campaign trail. I don't know if there are ways around this; maybe campaign finance reform, but I don't see members of either party stumbling over themselves to sign on to that. All these jerks leave office loaded.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 19, 2010 8:23 AM in reply to Indie Pro
Isn't this the stupidest thing you ever heard: now that the legislation has been ruined and the Dems humiliated themselves and pissed off the entire country, NOW they are going to send Obama out to own the failure. For god's sake: Fire Rahm Emanuel!!!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
S Green
January 19, 2010 12:33 AM
Wake up ! Real liberals, real Democrats, the base, we the Dean people have to defeat the DLC and its candidate Coakley and fail its president Barry. It is necessary first to free the party of the soft conservatives and win the party back for the people. Once we do that, we will deal with Repugs. Workers and the oppressed of the USA unite !
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
January 19, 2010 2:17 AM
Yeah, you go ahead and campaign on health care Barack. Just get ready to hear the words "Speaker of the House Boehner" if you do. It is amazing after all the overwhelming data demonstrating conclusively that the American public despises the current "reform" proposals (imagine that, people oppose giving 10% of the population, union members, an exemption from a tax from which no one else is exempt)this incompetent boob still has it in his mind that people will "come around" by November. Nevermind the fact that the vast majority of "benefits" don't kick in for years, whereas the tax bill goes up immediately.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 19, 2010 8:17 AM in reply to masanf
It's curious how little you Teabaggers cared about polls while the public option was in the bill and it polled at 60%. But the craven Dems jettisoned the most important and popular feature of health care refrom and the country rightfully turend on them. And since The Dems are committing suicide so you Know-Nothings may well get another chance to destroy the country. Congratulations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
January 19, 2010 2:22 AM
"But past is prologue, and to get a sense of how Obama would play salesman-in-chief you only need to look back to the economic stimulus plan."
And how popular is the stimulus with the American public again? It is amazing how fucking tone-deaf this "president" has become in the past year. Of course in the eyes of this "administration" three months of double-digit unemployment is a sign of success.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wbgonne
January 19, 2010 8:20 AM in reply to masanf
The fact that the stimulus is unpopular is due to the political malpractice of the Dems. But that doesn't obscure the fact that it was your Boy Bush and his Know-Nothing Party that wrecked the economy then dumped it on Obama and blamed him for saving it. You can fool some of the people . . . But eventually, you will get bitten in the ass.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
January 19, 2010 12:18 PM
When it becomes law?
Hilarious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?