
President Obama will renominate Dawn Johnsen to serve as one of the Justice Department's top officials, TPMDC has learned.
A White House official confirms that Obama will renominate Johnsen, along with a handful of others whose nominations expired at the end of the year, when the Senate reconvenes later this month.
"President Obama made an excellent choice in Professor Johnsen to lead OLC, and today he's shown his willingness to stand on principle and call the Republicans on their attack and delay tactics," said Marge Baker, Executive Vice President of People For the American Way, and a Johnsen supporter. "President Obama's statement today is a refutation of the GOP's efforts to spin this eminently qualified nominee as a controversial choice, and he should be applauded. Professor Johnsen's legal scholarship, her integrity, her substantive knowledge, and her commitment to this nation's security and to the rule of law will serve this country well once she's confirmed."
When the Senate adjourned for winter recess, Majority Leader Harry Reid sent the White House a list of executive branch nominees who could not be confirmed before year's end, and who, because of the objections of Senate Republicans, could also not be carried over into the second session. Johnsen--Obama's pick to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel--was among them.
The White House informed outside groups that have rallied for Johnsen earlier this week, and it became clear yesterday that her nomination would be revived.
Obama nominated Johnsen to the post shortly after he took office last year. Months passed, though, and she never received a confirmation vote. Many critics--progressives and civil libertarians who hailed the nomination--ultimately placed the blame for Johnsen's languishing nomination at Obama's feet.
Now she'll have another shot. The question is, how soon will she receive a vote? Or will she?
romanxp47
January 7, 2010 5:32 PM
Let's get her confirmed and put her to work.
Can't wait to learn what she discovers about Cheney & c.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
January 7, 2010 5:43 PM
And the Firebaggers were just telling us how she was only nominated in the first place so Obama could spitefully withdraw the nomination!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 7, 2010 6:54 PM in reply to Stroszek
Are you saying you don't believe that theory? It makes perfect sense that Obama would make a high profile nomination and then put pressure on the Senate to stall it so that it could go down in flames.
I haven't figured out what he would gain by doing this but I'm sure those geniuses will enlighten us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jyrinx
January 7, 2010 7:12 PM in reply to FreeRider
It makes sense because of exactly the reaction it's getting here: They don't actually have to get her confirmed to make liberals happy, they just have to nominate her. If they don't actually want her to head the OLC, this is the best of both worlds: They get credit for doing the right thing without actually having to do the right thing.
The story's not over yet; if she gets confirmed once the dust settles from HCR, I'll be happy. But as is, this is indistinguishable from kabuki theater.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
January 7, 2010 7:38 PM in reply to Jyrinx
Still? What the heck does he have to do to show he's serious? He's nominated her, not once but TWICE, and this is still "kabuki theater". Look, Greenwald wrote an excellent column on personality, but this is probably the most obvious example of lack of REALITY, that I've ever seen.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
January 7, 2010 9:20 PM in reply to Jyrinx
LMAO! Shouldn't you be with the teabaggers and/or birthers?
So, let me get this straight. Liberals will give the president credit for saying he wants something even if it never comes to fruition? You mean the way liberals were thrilled because the democrats talked about a public option, even though it got ditched in the end?
Keep twisting yourself into a pretzel to make that logic work.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dtOZONE
January 7, 2010 11:27 PM in reply to Jyrinx
and I'm sure Dawn is just going along for the ride to tease liberals too?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
political_observer
January 7, 2010 7:53 PM in reply to Stroszek
LMAO @ Firebaggers. I hope you won't mind if I steal that one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
January 8, 2010 7:55 AM in reply to political_observer
Not mine, thieve away.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
January 7, 2010 6:22 PM
Very heartening news, indeed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
January 7, 2010 6:41 PM
As much as the Anti-Obama wing of the Progressive movement howls over the Senate Health Care Bill (with just cause), I'd like to see the same level of feeling vented when Obama does right by them, which this is an example of.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
January 7, 2010 6:58 PM
Count me as one formerly-passionate Obama supporter who's been feeling less than fired-up and ready-to-go of late. Yes, this is very heartening news, and I'm glad the president has decided to push ahead with this nomination. I'm curious to know who else on the Democratic side besides Ben Nelson is threatening to block it; Richard Lugar, Republican senator from Indiana, has already signaled that he will vote to confirm Johnsen (I'm guessing because of the Hoosier connection, as Johnsen currently teaches at Indiana University). That gives us 60 votes, even without Nelson. Who else on our side is trying to block her?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
calchala
January 7, 2010 7:00 PM in reply to ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
That would be Arlen Specter. He still, even after the switch from Republican to Democrat, hasn't backed her. I thought one of the Maine ladies would, but to no avail thus far.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
January 7, 2010 7:47 PM in reply to calchala
Get Rep. Sestak on it. Have him remark about how Dawn Johnson should have been confirmed last year and was held up by Arlen Specter and Specter will find reason to change his mind in a NY second.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
January 7, 2010 8:53 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Word.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
January 7, 2010 8:20 PM in reply to calchala
What the hell? Specter's relatively pro-choice, isn't he? Is Johnsen his token issue to take a non-flip-flop "stand" on?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
January 7, 2010 8:52 PM in reply to ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
I thought it was a matter of a hold. The one rule in the Senate that's actually more odious than the damn filibuster.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
January 8, 2010 12:37 AM
Nice....Clinton was quick to throw challenged candidates overboard. Good to see Obama stick with his picks.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?