TPMDC

Americans Don't Know Much About The Tea Party Movement, But They Like It Anyway

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

At a tea party in Kerrville, Texas

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Americans don't claim to be experts on the Tea Party movement, but that hasn't stopped them from getting behind what they think the movement is about. That's according to a new poll from Republican pollster McLaughlin conducted for National Review.

About 65% of likely voters said they know just "some" or "not too much" about the Tea Party when asked. Nevertheless, the Tea Party seems to be winning the message war, capturing the voice of populist anger in the country -- the majority of respondents expressed support for the goals of the movement and the people in it.

Though the numbers would seem to bode well for the GOP, which is more closely aligned with Tea Party than the Democrats are, the poll could actually cause heartburn for Republicans hoping for big victories this fall. When lined up against a Democrat and a Republican on a generic congressional ballot, 8% said they'd pull the lever for a third, Tea Party candidate enough to give the Democrats the win in a three-way race. The Democrats won the hypothetical matchup 31-26-8, with 35% undecided.

On the message front, the poll showed that Americans are behind the movement as they understand it. Less than 20% of respondents to the poll said the Tea Party is an "anti-government fringe organization driven by anger." Around 60% said tea partiers are "concerned citizens."

The poll shows that 52% were sympathetic to the Tea Party's goals of, as the pollster described it, "protesting deficit spending and Washington's expanded role in the private sector." About 6% said they had personally participated in protests. Around 30% said they "did not agree" with the aims of the movement.

The GOP is doing a better job riding the movement's coattails, according to polling. Late last year, 23% of respondents to a Rasmussen poll said they'd support a Tea Party candidate for Congress. That was enough to beat the generic Republican outright. The McLaughlin poll suggests that efforts by Republican candidates and the Michael Steele-led RNC to embrace the movement have closed that gap, but not enough to prevent Tea Party insurgents from threatening to rain on the GOP's 2010 victory parade.

National Republicans continue to reach out to the movement, and warn that unless they embrace it, the GOP could be in trouble. In New Hampshire over the weekend, Newt Gingrich told a university crowd that a new "Contract With America" is likely to emerge from the Tea Party movement, and he was excited by the possibilities.

"I see a real sense of community, a very different mood," he told the Manchester Union-Leader when asked about the Tea Party movement. Gingrich urged Republicans to speak with Tea Partiers and win them over, lest they take their seemingly (according to the McLaughlin poll at least) attractive brand of populism outside the GOP. He told the paper that "if there is any hope" of Republicans knocking off Obama or securing big wins in Congress this year, conservatives will have to "coalesce around" a single candidate.

And last week, newly-minted Fox News political pundit Sarah Palin called on the GOP and the Tea Party movement to "merge," saying that if Republicans don't embrace the protesters, tea partiers will not vote with them.

The McLaughlin poll might make that merger easier. The finding that big majorities of Americans are behind what they perceive to be the goals of the Tea Party movement makes the call for Republicans to put the Tea Party in the driver's seat this year much louder and harder to ignore. As for Democrats, the populist furor makes their election messaging easier, too, as seen by the fiery anti-bank rhetoric in President Obama's State of the Union Speech last week.

For progressives, the strong support for the tea party movement is less easy to read. Left-leaning groups have long tried to paint the tea parties as essentially an anti-Obama surge with undertones of racism and even McCarthyism. The McLaughlin poll suggests that picture isn't the same ones the majority of Americans have when they see the tea party faithful marching on Washington.

Comments (52) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 1, 2010 2:00 PM   

A National Review poll?

Surprise! Surprise!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 2, 2010 12:24 AM    in reply to Solomon Drek

Americans don't claim to be experts on Tea Bagging, but that hasn't stopped them from getting behind what they think it's about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:18 PM   

Likely Voters ... of what election?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:19 PM   

Wow, we should get the Tea Party on the ballot in every state!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 8:18 PM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

PLEASE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:21 PM   

And we are supposed to take this as legitimate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:30 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Well, even if it's illegitimate, we should probably ignore that fact. We should be acting absolutely petrified of the tea partiers; it would be an honest godsend for the GOP to run even further to the nuthouse fringe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:44 PM    in reply to hunter

Agreed. The GOP could turn their 2010 victory party into a NY-23 humiliation if they follow the Tea Party path. I'm all for that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:57 PM    in reply to jenesq

yeah, keep kidding yourself. That was NOTHING to us but a victory. We shook the entire Republican party. We are running the show now. Such a small fringe insignificant group with a dozen or so people who showed up in DC in Sept. Bwaaahaahaaha

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:06 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

yeah, keep kidding yourself. That was NOTHING to us but a victory.

Wait wait wait. Turning a reliably conservative house district over to a Democrat was a victory to you people?

Well here's to more victories for you in November!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:28 PM    in reply to Boidster

Repubs already got the message, it's all good now. You're only fooling yourself. In the real world, just because you really really want it to be true, doesn't make it true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:09 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

In the real world, just because you really really want it to be true, doesn't make it true.

Truer words were never spoken, my good man (or woman, as the case may be).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:13 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

"In the real world, just because you really really want it to be true, doesn't make it true."

Right. Like when you wish that Glenn Beck would give you a reach around.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:24 PM   

And why is anyone taking as poll from National Review seriously? Every mainstream poll has voters distancing themselves from the methods used by Tea Partiers.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:26 PM   

This is what the establishment GOP gets for cozying with fringe right wing elements.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:32 PM   

If Americans see them marching in Washington, they've seen their offensive, racist, white power signs with mispelled racial slurs that would be funny if these people weren't serious. The fact that this poll was taken by a Republican pollster pretty much sums up the results. They keep trying to convince us that the tea party is popular but, the truth is that it's not and the media is to blame for the misperception. Anyone who reads the blogs knows exactly what these loons stand for and that's removing the Negro from office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:43 PM   

Ok,
"The pollster described it, "protesting deficit spending and Washington's expanded role in the private sector."

Now, of all the people we've seen at these rallys, why didn't they protest "deficit spending" during Bush's 8 years or, even when Regan trippled the deficit?

None of the people at these rallys appear to be heads of Corporations who fly around in their private jets so, why are they concerned about "Washington's expanded role in the private sector"? Don't tea baggers hate the bankers for using our tax dollars unwisely?

Each time these unhinged lunatics appears on tv, I cheer. It's important to see these people in action. What even moderate or independent could look at this group and say to themselves "yeah, I'm with them"? These people are Republicans who lost the elections big time and then, lost their minds!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:04 PM    in reply to roxsteady

I think you answered your own question in your first post. They don't want the Negro in office. And IOKIYAR.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:55 PM    in reply to jeffgee

We don't mind a light skinned negro who can turn his negro dialect on and off at will. Heck, I forgot he was black for like an hour the other night during his state of the union. You guys are too funny. Like if we had John Edwards in office, we'd be begging for more Socialism. :) Ahh, this is going to be fun watching the cockroaches scatter for the darkness. EVERYTHING you people have predicted about this movement has been wrong... how long are we supposed to take you seriously... please, tell us... you tell us everything else we are supposed to do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:51 PM    in reply to roxsteady

Right, Americans definitely identify with a 23 yr old chick with a purple faux-hawk and nose ring with an Anarchy t-shirt and a sign that reads Save America, Kill Capitalism. America identifies with hippies and other Socialists like Rev. Jeremiah Wright! Keep fooling yourselves!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:49 PM   

Even if the poll could be trusted, I think the fact that only the people who can't be assed to do a little basic research support this "party" says it all. Stupid people may be dangerous, but not all of them are completely lost.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 2:50 PM    in reply to Kuyleh

>.

Anyway, if something is done to show these people what exactly they support, and how hypocritical the politicians behind it are, we might manage to save a few.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:16 PM   

I think this speaks to the poll, and the polling organization:

In a poll commissioned by National Review Institute, McLaughlin & Associates found that Fox News was the top response from likely voters who were asked what source of news about politics and government they most trusted.

or that the Washington Times is the blurb on the site, saying the polling putfit is "Truly trustworthy".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:17 PM   

My experience with people who support the Tea Parties, without actually attending them, is that the don't know much about the consequences of governing by the Tea Party principles (whatever they are). One Tea Party fan I know is also a Sarah Palin supporter, mostly because Sarah would "stick it to Washington", not because Palin has a plan to govern better. She talks about "our great nation" and other catchphrases, tax cuts and lower regulation.
The Tea Party movement seems to be the sorehead descendant of Ross Perot, with home-made placards replacing the charts and graphs. According to these polls, it would have the same effect as Perot had - to siphon votes away from Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:05 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Yeah, we're not as stupid as you all so desperately try to make every last one of us out to be (which is another huge mistake you Socialists make). Whatever we need to do to stop Socialism we will do. Then we'll concentrate on truly cleaning things up in whichever party decides they will follow the Constitution. We will not be supporting the party that is following the Hugo Chavez model of democracy, and you wonder why Americans identify with the tea party movement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:25 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

"Whatever we need to do to stop Socialism we will do. Then we'll concentrate on truly cleaning things up in whichever party decides they will follow the Constitution."

Hmmm...Brownshirt much?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:08 PM    in reply to Publishermike

Nope, teabagging Progressives is my game. How's it taste?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:18 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

Hey, if wasting your time posting nonsense on left-leaning websites gets you off, go for it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 8:34 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

Y'know, if the government was half as scary as you seem to think it is, wouldn't you be worried about them tracking you down? Or will your mighty gun collection save you?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:22 PM   

When people find out who and/or what is funding this so-called "movement"...I think these low information folks won't
take so kindly when and if they possibly can comprehend the fact that they have been duped.....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:38 PM   

Americans Don't Know Much About The Tea Party Movement, But They Like It Anyway

So the Tea Partiers are replicating the GOP's longstanding success formula, eh?

"You're pissed off? We are too! And since you don't have a clue about the things you claim to be protesting, if you give us money/elect us we'll do whatever we damn well please and tell you we're doing what you wanted us to! Yay!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:50 PM    in reply to Redshift

Funny. Also, sad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 3:49 PM   

If this poll is legitimate (National Review so I'm sure it's not) it basically means that most Americans don't realize the Tea Party Movement is largely rooted in racism. If that's true it's the MSM's fault for filtering out the racist signs and language prevalent at Teabagger rallies. Just sayin....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:16 PM    in reply to docrocktex

Yep, the race card... the last refuge of a Socialist losing an argument. If only John Edwards was the president... we would hand over our money without ever questioning why we are taking part in the largest transfer of wealth ever, or why we need to hand over our sovereignty to the UN in the name of the greatest hoax known to man, global warming. If John Edwards was president... I would gladly hand over the greatest health care the world has ever known to an entity that has never run anything efficiently, on budget and on schedule. Please, keep trying to perpetuate these myths in hopes to influence the politically ignorant to not investigate the political ideology that brought this Country the greatest prosperity the world has ever known. Keep them ignorant and they are sure to accept Socialism as a better way forward... cause you ain't foolin yourselves or anyone else. Peace.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:57 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

So I guess that means you haven't seen the photos of Dale Robertson holding a sign with "Niggar" (yes, it was spelled that way) at a tea party rally in plain sight. Which would also mean you haven't seen the photos of President Obama depicted as an African medicine man with a bone through his nose? Which would also mean that you're conveniently denying these realities to suit your narrative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:30 PM    in reply to docrocktex

Also, check for a study that James Carville did back in September. He went to Alabama of all places to study the tea party movement. He was specifically looking for racism and found NONE!!! Ha Ha Ha... He He HE... not even in Alabama! FAIL FAIL FAIL. Socialism is dead in America... Progressives, your ideology is a failure again!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:51 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

Oh come on! What you really wanted to say was ... nana, nana, naaaana.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 7:34 PM    in reply to fiddystorms

What socialism exactly? Define it and show how it is specific to the Obama Administration and to his supporters.

Anyone can endlessly repeat the hot word socialism to trigger the teabaggers like Pavlovian dogs, but I am looking for you to provide clearly and coherently what you mean when you use it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 2, 2010 2:32 AM    in reply to miraclelurker

Exactly - the powers-that-be, i.e. the Corporate plutocracy working through that hot air machine Dick Armey is pushing Pavolvian buttons like "big guvment" and "socialist" in these dim-witted tea-partiers brains, and they are reacting like Pavlov's salivating dogs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:23 PM   

Yes. Any group that tells ya you don't have to pay your bills, aka taxes, are going to be super popular.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:26 PM   

The takeaway isn't that anyone likes the Tea Partiers as a reality. They like (shockingly) the idea of opposing government intervention and deficit spending. First of all, that's way too broad of a statement to know what these people actually are agreeing with - individualism, the idea of less government spending, the idea of less deficit spending.

Plus, getting 52 percent of people to support ideas that broad is nothing. Ask the same group if they'd like to see government (without mentioning cost):

Expand Medicare
Make sure our Army is the best equipped in the world
Make sure our children have a world class education
Provide for people with special needs
Build high speed rail
Upgrade roads and highways

I guarantee you'd get more than 52 percent support, even though all of that requires expansion of government and deficit spending.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:39 PM   

I also would add that generic ballot ratings are just dumb, especially in a national sample with no differentiation for regions.

A true believer in the core Tea Party message (Hoffman) was unsuccessful in NY 23, and probably would have done worse if he hadn't slid in after the GOP primary. Scott Brown got Tea Partier support, but he never would have won if he'd had to rely on them/embrace their whole agenda (he claims to be in favor of Kerry's climate change bill, which is anethema to the movement). Illinois Republicans have rejected the claim by the Tea Party movement to bounce Mark Kirk as not right enough, because no one else has a hope in the general against Giannoulis. Marco Rubio may beat Crist in a closed primary, but it helps make Kendrick Meeks very competitive, someone Dems gave no chance against Charlie.

I'll believe the Tea Party really has widespread support if/when they knock Babs Boxer off (hint: not going to happen, no matter how much money the 2 yahoos in the primary lend themselves).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:47 PM   

This is the media making all things equal. It is in a sense the result of the media's "house effect."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 4:48 PM    in reply to tonnyb

It is also the result of tolerating, as Brooks put it, the "excesses of traders."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:01 PM   

I don't get it. For eight years, we had a conservative President, and for most of that time a compliant, complicit, conservative Republican majority in Congress. The result of that was a doubling of our national debt, no oversight in the fiscal marketplace, and an ill conceived war (Iraq), run off budget, that spent us into near oblivion. Fast forward one year, Republicans have lost their control of Congress, and we have a new, Democratic President with a mandate to do things differently. So, what do we get, a griping, obstructionist Republican minority, firing up their core of supporters, complaining that we have to change the direction the country is going in, and "take back America" to quote the sign above. For God's sake, the direction they want to change to is the same one that created the mess we found ourselves in last year. Where's the wisdom in that? Hell, advocating, much less doing that which was wrong, is the definition of stupidity. We have to continue correcting the excesses and failures of the Bush years, not return to them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:46 PM    in reply to acf_ma

Bush was no Conservative. He was a Progressive Republican. Democrats aren't the only party with a Progressive wing. John McCain... ditto.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:05 PM   

The Tea Partiers are former loyal Bushies, twenty-percenters who went all the way with Bush. Now they're against deficits? Hah.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 5:32 PM    in reply to rmwarnick

yeah, we really wanted amnesty for illegals and an expansion of Medicare. We were so happy when Campion and Ramos were locked up for protecting America as well. We were stoked when Bush signed TARP. Get a clue, you aren't fooling the average American, just the weak minded wannabe who is afraid of being ostracized by their peers. This technique is a FAIL! Just like Progressivism and Socialism. F-F-Failure. HAaahaaa heee hee hee

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 6:18 PM   

Duh - most of the *TEA PARTIERS* don't know much about what they stand for. Or much of anything else for that matter - nobody with a basic understanding of 20th century history could make a sign simultaneously accusing somebody of being a Nazi *and* a Communist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 9:34 PM   

News flash! Americans are ignorant fools. And now for the weather ...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 9:52 PM   

I dont trust this poll. but on the other hand Americans claim to "agree with" or even "believe in" all kinds of things they cant quantify. americans don't need nit picky things like "evidence" to convict and we never have. facts are much less important to americans than what they "believe in". americans have this notion that reality and the very physical laws of the universe are suspended because they "beleive in" something else.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 1, 2010 11:00 PM   

We should note that there was a significant oversampling of Evangelical/Born Again Christians in this poll (53%)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Follow us!