
Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) just officially announced his retirement from the Senate, with a clear message: He doesn't like Congress.
"For some time I've had a growing conviction that Congress is not working as it should," said Bayh. As a prime example, he referred to the recent filibustering of legislation to create a bipartisan fiscal commission. What particularly bothered Bayh was that it was defeated by Senators who had previously been co-sponsors of the measure itself, but then blocked it for what he described as political reasons.
"To put it in words I think most people can understand, I love working for the people of Indiana, I love helping our citizens make the most of their lives," said Bayh. "But I do not love Congress."
Bayh's full prepared remarks are available after the jump.
Thank you all for coming today. I know how busy you are, and I appreciate you taking the time to be with us. I would like to begin by acknowledging some people to whom I owe a great debt of gratitude.
First, my wife Susan, who for 25 years has stood by my side and without whose love and support so much I have been privileged to do would never have been possible. As my father told me the day we were married: "Son, you definitely married up."
Second, my wonderful children, Beau and Nick, who I love so much and of whom I am so proud. Being their father is the most important job I will ever have.
Next, my staff members--past and present--who have worked so hard and sacrificed so much for the people of our state. There is not one that couldn't have made more money and worked fewer hours doing something else. They have always managed to make me look much better than I deserve.
Most importantly, the people of Indiana, who for almost a quarter century have placed their trust and welfare in my hands. No one could ask for a better boss or a greater honor.
I was raised in a family that believes public service is the highest calling in the church, that what matters is not what you take from life, but what you give back. I believe that still.
For almost all of my adult life, I have been privileged to serve the people of Indiana in elective office.
As Secretary of State, I worked to reform our election laws to ensure that every vote counts. I cast the deciding vote in the closest congressional race in the nation for a member of the other political party, because I believed he had legitimately won the election.
As Governor, I worked with an outstanding team to balance the budget, cut taxes, leave the largest surplus in state history, create the most new jobs in any eight-year period, increase funding for schools every year, make college more affordable, and reform welfare to emphasize work. We raised water quality standards, created more new state parks than any time since the 1930s, and raised the penalties for violent crime.
In the Senate, I have continued to fight for the best interests of our state. I have worked with Hoosier workers and businesses, large and small, in the defense sector, the life sciences, the medical device industry, autos, steel, recreational vehicle manufacturing, and many, many more, to save and create jobs.
Since 9/11, I have fought to make our nation safe with a national security approach that is both tough and smart. I have championed the cause of our soldiers to make sure they have the equipment they need in battle and the health care they deserve when they get home.
I have often been a lonely voice for balancing the budget and restraining spending. I have worked with Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike to do the nation's business in a way that is civil and constructive.
I am fortunate to have good friends on both sides of the aisle, something that is much too rare in Washington today.
After all these years, my passion for service to my fellow citizens is undiminished, but my desire to do so by serving in Congress has waned. For some time, I have had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should. There is too much partisanship and not enough progress -- too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem-solving. Even at a time of enormous challenge, the peoples' business is not being done.
Examples of this are legion, but two recent ones will suffice.
Two weeks ago, the Senate voted down a bipartisan commission to deal with one of the greatest threats facing our nation: our exploding deficits and debt. The measure would have passed, but seven members who had endorsed the idea instead voted "no" for short-term political reasons.
Just last week, a major piece of legislation to create jobs -- the public's top priority -- fell apart amid complaints from both the left and right.
All of this and much more has led me to believe that there are better ways to serve my fellow citizens, my beloved state, and our nation than continued service in Congress.
To put it in words most people can understand: I love working for the people of Indiana, I love helping our citizens make the most of their lives, but I do not love Congress. I will not, therefore, be a candidate for election to the Senate this November.
My decision should not be interpreted for more than it is: a very difficult, deeply personal one. I am an executive at heart. I value my independence. I am not motivated by strident partisanship or ideology. These traits may be useful in many walks of life, but they are not highly valued in Congress.
My decision should not reflect adversely upon my colleagues who continue to serve in the Senate. While the institution is in need of significant reform, there are many wonderful people there. The public would be surprised and pleased to know that those who serve them in the Senate, despite their policy and political differences, are unfailingly hard-working and devoted to the public good as they see it. I will miss them.
I particularly value my relationship with Senator Dick Lugar and have often felt that if all Senators could have the cooperative relationship we enjoy, the institution would be a better place.
My decision should not reflect adversely upon the President. I look forward to working with him during the next 11 months to get our deficit under control, get the economy moving again, regulate Wall Street to avoid future financial crises, and reform education so that all children can fulfill their God-given potential. This is the right agenda for America.
My decision was not motivated by political concern. Even in the current challenging environment, I am confident in my prospects for re-election. Five times over the last 24 years, I have been honored by the people of Indiana with electoral success. But running for the sake of winning an election, just to remain in public office, is not good enough. And it has never been what motivates me.
At this time, I simply believe I can best contribute to society in another way: creating jobs by helping grow a business, helping guide an institution of higher learning, or helping run a worthy charitable endeavor.
In closing, let me say this: Words cannot convey nor can I adequately express my gratitude to the great people of Indiana.
I will never forget those I have been privileged to serve and those who have so kindly supported me. I have always tried to remember that my job is to work for Hoosiers, not the other way around.
I am constantly reminded that if Washington, D.C., could be more like Indiana, Washington would be a better place.
Lastly, let me reiterate my deep and abiding love for our nation and my optimism for our future. These are difficult times for America. But we have seen difficult days before, and we will see better days again. With all our faults, we are an exceptional people.
I look forward to continuing to do my part to meet the challenges we face as a private citizen, to work for solutions not slogans, progress not politics, so that our generation can do what Americans have always done: convey to our children, and our children's children, an America that is stronger, more prosperous, more decent, and more just.
Thank you again. May God bless you all.
mcc
February 15, 2010 2:41 PM
"...and to fix this problem, I'm going to walk away from it." Thank you, Sarah Palin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
human
February 15, 2010 2:53 PM
good riddance, although he's apparently doing the Dems a favor by announcing this so late--they can choose a candidate and avoid a primary like the Repubs will have.
hopefully Lincoln is next.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
February 15, 2010 2:56 PM
Good riddance, we have to purge the party of people like Bayh, Ben Nelson, Feinstein, Pryor etc. and replace them with Liberals....somehow.
And no more majority leaders from Red States.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 15, 2010 6:03 PM in reply to JohnW1141
Pretty sure they call what your talking about the Green Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
February 15, 2010 6:23 PM in reply to Max Thrax
Max,
maybe the Liberals in Congress, in the party, and in Labor SHOULD join the Greens.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
February 15, 2010 3:02 PM
SO who are the seven he didn't name?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 15, 2010 3:28 PM in reply to AJM
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/currents/20100207_Editorial__Deficit_duet.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
February 15, 2010 11:36 PM in reply to nova voter
Bayh gets disillusioned with the Republicans blocking everything, so he resigns in a way likely to give them more power. Uh... thanks?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kJCUWzUl
February 15, 2010 3:03 PM
it is fascinating how the media covers the Senate as if it is a functioning institution.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
February 15, 2010 3:13 PM
There's got to be more to this story than what Evan Bayh's saying--"I don't like all the Senate partisanship and I'm going to help more people by owning a business, run a charity or be president of a college"--because it smells of bullshit.
Maybe he was hiking the Appalachian Trail?
Oh, well, good riddance to bad Democrats.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
February 15, 2010 3:14 PM
"I am constantly reminded that if Washington, D.C., could be more like Indiana, Washington would be a better place."
Median income in Indiana is 29,400 while in the US as a whole it is 31,400. Income nationwide is increasing very slightly faster for the US as a whole than for Indiana.
Why is Indiana behind?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 15, 2010 3:19 PM
People like Bayh and Dodd for that matter, have tarnished their fathers reputations by trading on their accomplishments and proving to be self-important asses!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 15, 2010 4:08 PM in reply to GTFOOH
Dodd is nothing like Bayh - Dodd actually did things to help the regular guy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DoubleFelix
February 15, 2010 5:31 PM in reply to VictorLH
Good point. Bayh was absolutely worthless. He wouldn't take any position on anything. Absolutely no convictions. I don't remember his dad being nearly that bad. In fact, I think his dad was known as an honest progressive.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rockridge
February 15, 2010 4:48 PM in reply to GTFOOH
Kvatsch. Dodd was a fine senator in many ways.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
February 15, 2010 3:20 PM
So he's upset the Republicans didn't sign on to the catfood commission? Oh, my, how will it ever succeed in slashing our Social Security and Medicare without you? I wish.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
February 15, 2010 3:24 PM
Ticktock, ticktock.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
loudprogressive
February 15, 2010 3:31 PM
One less DINO the Dems have to compromise signature legislation to cater to. His only function was selling votes to the highest bidder and making Democratic bills more favorable to rethuglicans. Now that the rethugs won't even take his gifts he sees no point. On to the private sector with his lobbyist pals, I'm sure he's already got several cushy positions lined up. Good riddance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Silence
February 15, 2010 3:33 PM
$ 1 2 , 3 6 4 , 5 0 7 , 6 0 8 , 6 2 5 . 8 5
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
schrockage
February 15, 2010 3:48 PM
Let me preface by saying I'm from Indiana and supported Senator Bayh in recent elections.
Now, how did the Dems win over control of congress? They ran conservatives in conservative districts. Many people don't like the fact that ideologically the party isn't as pure as the republicans or as disciplined but we widened our base to include those disillusioned with republican control. For all the bashing the Bayh is getting people seem to forget that he fit the state. He's a moderate and if you're from or familiar with Indiana politics you see that a majority of our elected officials are moderate in rhetoric and policy. Rep. Mike Pence considered running for senate against Bayh but his poll numbers didn't give him a good chance. Why? Bayh did have statewide recognition and a nice campaign fund but he also was a moderate. Some people may not like this but I hope that the Dems in Indiana pick a moderate to fill his spot on the ballot. They candidate will stand a much better chance of winning.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
February 15, 2010 4:23 PM in reply to schrockage
Who cares if Democrats control Congress if they govern like Republicans? Voting should about more than a jobs program for Democratic staffers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
schrockage
February 15, 2010 5:23 PM in reply to bluebell
I find it hard to see how they are governing like republicans since republicans had an uncanny ability to force anything through Congress. I didn't like it then and I wouldn't want that now. Dems need to keep putting things up and to keep acting bipartisan. Obama needs to keep cornering them like he's going to with his healthcare summit. Let the Republicans try and run on the party of ideas when they refuse to bring them to the table.
The American public is already voicing their concern over how much Washington isn't working. They want bipartisan cooperation on the major issues. So force the Republicans to either work with Democrats or run as the party of "No."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
February 15, 2010 5:56 PM in reply to schrockage
Yeah, the only people being shut out of the healthcare summit are people who want Medicare for all/single-payer, no taxes on health benefits, Bernie Sanders, etc. We can have any kind of government as long as it is bipartisanly right-wing. No thanks.
The Republicans have you right and I do mean RIGHT where they want you - surrendering.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DoubleFelix
February 15, 2010 5:34 PM in reply to bluebell
Agreed. Plus the idea that a guy has to be conservative to win Indiana is pure BS. Hoosiers are no different than anybody else. A person who shows conviction, intelligence, compassion, and passion has a great chance of winning. Bayh had none of those things. He won by playing it safe and having powerful friends.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
February 15, 2010 6:01 PM in reply to DoubleFelix
So true, Paul Wellstone won statewide office in the same state that elected Tim Pawlenty. It's having a candidate who can convince people he is working for them and not just for himself. Why do the Republicans work harder on that than Democrats? All you have to do is look at the lastest fiasco in Massachusetts for another example.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dtOZONE
February 15, 2010 8:00 PM in reply to bluebell
Are you seriously comparing a state that hasn't voted for a Republican Presidential candidate since 1972 to fucking Indiana?
How dumb are you? Pawlenty never won 50% of the vote in Minnesota.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:37 PM in reply to bluebell
nader said there was no difference between bush and gore. how did that work for ya?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
February 15, 2010 6:05 PM in reply to scottsoperson
We escaped VP Lieberman. If Gore had worked to get out the vote on the left instead of picking a right-wing Democrat for VP he would have been elected. You want it both ways. You demand the left vote for your candidates and then sneer at them as "retarded" or whatever is the latest official administration frame for the left side of the party as soon as you get in office. I believe in the old-fashioned kind of politics. I vote for you and you deliver for me. If you don't, I look for someone else who will.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Catsy
February 15, 2010 4:34 PM in reply to schrockage
There's a huge difference between being a moderate and being a corporate whore.
Bayh falls far, far on the side of the latter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:38 PM in reply to Catsy
who is not corrupt?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barney
February 15, 2010 4:08 PM
Mr. Bayh realized that the extreme left wing is destroying the country and wants know part of it. He has been saying that the party had been hijacked by Reid and Pelosi neo-Marxist faction.
Others will follow. They realize it is going to be an absolute bloodbath come November. Word is that in the next few Barbara Mikulski will announce her decision to retire as well.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 15, 2010 4:10 PM in reply to Barney
Are you a cartoon character for Sesame street? You certainly sound like one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 15, 2010 6:10 PM in reply to VictorLH
Nah, just ignorant white trash.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rockridge
February 15, 2010 4:46 PM
This is excellent news! For Democrats!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rockridge
February 15, 2010 4:49 PM in reply to Rockridge
As we said at each pro-Obama turn during the campaign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:04 PM
myron ebell, a leading global warming skeptic, says humans do contribute to global warming.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:05 PM
palin is an earmarks marxist.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:14 PM
global warming skeptic says humans do contribute to global warming.
http://cei.org/gencon/019,04940.cfm
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 5:14 PM
Well Congress isn't that in to you, either, Evan.
But that's kind of the point, isn't it? You thought you were going to rule the roost this Congress, didn't you? Thought you would be able to annoint yourself King of the Centrists and preside over a Bipartisan Gang of x that would hold the balance of power on all important legislation. Then it turned out that no one wanted to be in any of your gangs so you just ended up being lonely and alienated. Boo hoo. Go home and run for governor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
acf_ma
February 15, 2010 5:15 PM
Now, the big question is can Democrats put up someone who will be a Senator more faithful to the progressive hopes of the majority, or does the conservative Republican leaning of Indiana make electing that kind of person an impossibility?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:21 PM
this is the usa. it is not holland. in the usa we either compromise with repubs or we don't get anything done and then repubs will retake power.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:22 PM
i suspect that welfare helped to destroy the black family. sometimes repubs are correct.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DoubleFelix
February 15, 2010 5:28 PM
I'm sure there is no connection, but last week I wrote the Senator, saying essentially that if he wasn't willing to support the progressive changes that Obama was elected on that I wasn't prepared to support him for another term. I'd much rather have he lose to a real Republican whom we could hold accountable for the kind of crap that every Republican supports. And that would put us in a position to launch a real effort to get an honest Democrat into Lugar's seat in 2012.
I'm guessing that Lugar will be retiring then. With Obama running for reelection, we would have a good chance at this seat, and then we could go after the other seat in 2016. Win or lose, any of those scenarios are better than having this snake in our camp.
I doubt that he got my letter, and I doubt it would have any impact on him. These DLC-types are pretty darned disconnected from the grass roots.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:34 PM in reply to DoubleFelix
obama said some progressive things in the campaign. he also said some not so progressive things.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:36 PM in reply to scottsoperson
really, it doesn't matter what obama said during the campaign. the american people for the most part are not going to support a liberal or progressive agenda. i wish they would too but they won't. sorry. this is called reality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
drwu
February 15, 2010 5:28 PM
Let the (blue) dog go...
Corporate money will force the decline of our empire...
Read on--
News item--corporations own our politicians
News item—Senator Bayh, D, blue dog-Ind. Will not run for reelection.
Maybe this will start a landslide. I say, get rid of all the Senators. Who needs this house of lords?
England neutered them and manages just fine with one branch of government as does our own beloved state of Nebraska. Remember folks, Senators need 10 plus million to mount a campaign. Guess where the money comes from?
Sadly, we're heading into our endgame-- our moneyed class makes money off speculation not manufacturing (and they're not going to change their ways--the money is too easy)--in this we follow other former empires that went down the tubes for this reason --the Dutch, Britain , Spain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:40 PM
we allow corporations to buy our politicians. because we are fat and lazy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:40 PM
think about this for a second: what do politicians spend most of that corporate money on?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottsoperson
February 15, 2010 5:43 PM
yap, dems would not have won congress without the blue dogs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jward
February 15, 2010 5:45 PM
Interesting comment by rogerd at indystar.com:
Yes, he is running for Governor, and despite what the national media is saying, he is positioning his party to hold his senate seat. It is unlikely that any new candidates will have the required signatures by tommorrow, so the Dems won't have any candidates for the primary, which means the party can put in anyone they want. The Republicans however, have Coats, a somwhat damaged retread with a lot of negatives and Stutzman, a conservative with low name recognition and not much money. Whichever one of these wins the primary will be the candidate to face the hand picked Democrat. It will be an uphill climb, although if Stutzman is the red candidate, not as much of an uphill climb as Scott Brown had in Mass.
Having said that, the Democrat will start out with lower negatives, more money, and better name recognition. rogerd
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 15, 2010 6:09 PM
Are you ready for all the stories on teevee about the horrible left driving out good men like Bayh? Because of course, the left has held sway over this country and it's policies for soooooo many decades. The Enlightenment is over folks, and this thing can't be fixed. The US WILL default on it's debts, Republican rule and a center-right corporate media have dug this hole too deep. The best that we can hope for is an orderly breakup of the US into smaller sovereign nations. We would have been better off had McCain won, at least we'd be farther down that road.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jeff
February 15, 2010 7:43 PM in reply to Max Thrax
Max Thrax you have written best thing I have read all day. Before exclaiming the end is nigh, please read through your American history and mark how often it has been predicted the US was to crumble.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tduff
February 16, 2010 9:20 AM
Evne though it does put the Dems in a hole, I am glad to see Bayh leave. He was a horrible Senator and this gives us a chance to elect someone more progressive.
http://randomthoughtstd.blogspot.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?