
Rep. Brad Ellsworth is considering throwing his hat in the ring to run for Sen. Evan Bayh's Senate seat, saying today he wants feedback from his family and his constituents.
Ellsworth (D-IN), elected in 2006 when the Democrats took over Congress, lauded Bayh in a statement just released from his office and says the senator will be missed.
He adds that he's already been encouraged to seek the seat.
"I heard about the news during my annual Open Door Listening Tour this morning, and I appreciate the support of those Hoosiers who have already encouraged me to run for Senator Bayh's seat," Ellsworth said.
"The next step will be taking a few days to talk to my wife and to folks in Indiana about where I can best serve our state," he said. "In the meanwhile, I will continue to travel throughout the 8th District this week listening to Hoosiers about the challenges they face and their ideas for getting our economy back on track."
Democratic sources have told us that Ellsworth and Rep. Baron Hill are possible choices for the Indiana Democrats, who will name a candidate June 30. Hill (D-IN) is on a military Congressional delegation abroad this week.
mcc
February 15, 2010 2:36 PM
Anyone who doesn't like Evan Bayh... it really looks like Brad Ellsworth is much, much worse:
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Titan1024
February 15, 2010 5:46 PM in reply to mcc
I met Rep. Ellsworth this weekend at a fundraiser, and I got to talk to him for a few minutes.
He really is a great guy. He's a little on the conservative side, yes, but his district is very red territory, so Ellsworth is about as liberal as one can get and still win in the area.
I really hope he runs. As a Hoosier, the thing I hated about Bayh was that he had no principles. He'd shift opinions all the time, depending on the political winds. Ellsworth doesn't do that, and won't kneecap us by threatening filibusters.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 16, 2010 5:04 PM in reply to mcc
Ellsworth voted for the stimulus and healthcare reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
February 15, 2010 2:40 PM
He would only be good so that the Democrats keep the Senate in their favor NOT because they can count on his vote for anything.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 15, 2010 2:48 PM
Politicians sometimes change on their trip from the House to the Senate (as the demographics of their constitutents change), but it's hard to have much hope in somebody who would vote against the Stimulus, which was the very first domestic priority of the new Democratic majority which was at that time overwhelmingly popular.
What's he going to do in the rough political storms ahead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 15, 2010 2:48 PM
Politicians sometimes change on their trip from the House to the Senate (as the demographics of their constitutents change), but it's hard to have much hope in somebody who would vote against the Stimulus, which was the very first domestic priority of the new Democratic majority which was at that time overwhelmingly popular.
What's he going to do in the rough political storms ahead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 15, 2010 2:49 PM
Politicians sometimes change on their trip from the House to the Senate (as the demographics of their constitutents change), but it's hard to have much hope in somebody who would vote against the Stimulus, which was the very first domestic priority of the new Democratic majority which was at that time overwhelmingly popular.
What's he going to do in the rough political storms ahead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 15, 2010 2:50 PM
Politicians sometimes change on their trip from the House to the Senate (as the demographics of their constitutents change), but it's hard to have much hope in somebody who would vote against the Stimulus, which was the very first domestic priority of the new Democratic majority which was at that time overwhelmingly popular.
What's he going to do in the rough political storms ahead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 15, 2010 3:15 PM
He says -> "The next step will be taking a few days to talk to my wife and to folks in Indiana about where I can best serve our state," he doesn't have a few days, he needs to get petitions signed within 24 hours. Unless he expects the State Party just to give him the nomination. Here we are all excited that Bayh the traitor is leaving to suckle at the Corporate tit and we could get someone far worse!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 3:55 PM in reply to VictorLH
Anybody with a brain knew that Bayh's leaving would result in electing someone who was much, much worse. Only the knee-jerk nutbags on the left were cheering this as a good thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 15, 2010 4:03 PM in reply to FreeRider
So speaks a Rahm Emanuel aid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
February 15, 2010 4:22 PM in reply to VictorLH
Is he wrong? Look at Ellsworth's voting record. Not at all promising. And yes, while running statewide, he would likely go slightly to the left, it won't be far. Hill is a better choice. Still a Blue Dog, but is soundly in the camp for Universal Healthcare and other Dem initiatives. IIRC (which I may not at all), hes mainly a social conservative, so not ideal, but we are talking about Indiana here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
February 15, 2010 5:00 PM in reply to VictorLH
Indiana is the home of the Klan. Another commenter is saying this is a good chance to get in a bluer Dem.
This is not a good anything, except a really good chance to lose this seat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 5:36 PM in reply to VictorLH
Preferable to being an RNC aid like you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
philogratis
February 15, 2010 3:54 PM
Sorry bout the repeated posts. Don't know what happened.
Ellsworth was part of the Dem strategy to run competitive races in conservative districts by nominating Purple Dogs. This strategy worked pretty well and by broadening the playing field they succeeded in stretching Republican resources. In 2006 he beat Hostetller, a very radical congressman who came in with Gingrich in 1994. Everybody was happy about that, but I think the DCCC got a little carried away in their triangulation and elected people who really are totally useless for the caucus like Bobby Bright and Ellsworth.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
terje
February 15, 2010 4:36 PM
It is a bit premature to say that the state committee will select a nominee in June (although that seems likely).
If someone decides by tomorrow to run, they have until Friday at noon to submit petitions with 500 Democratic signatures from each Congressional district. That would be a difficult, but not impossible, undertaking. In order to accomplish it, it would require a candidate with strong institutional support -- labour unions could mount the people needed to successfully gather the signatures, perhaps environmental groups, as might someone with strong ties to the Democratic party structure. Similarly, a self-funder could hire the folks required to gather the signatures.
Will anyone try to do it? Probably not, but if an ambitious candidate thought they couldn't get the nomination from the state committee, this would be their avenue to tie up the nomination without support from party leadership.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SPENCER ADAMS
February 15, 2010 4:41 PM
so the choice is:
2 BlueDogs
1 supposedly flaky progressive
1 popular unknown mayor
Not much time here to evaluate, but unless progressives organize again, the choice will go to a bunch of backroom politicos.
Shame, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?