
Anthem Blue Cross' proposed 39 percent rate increases in California have become a new rallying point for the Obama administration and Democrats eager to get health care reform across the finish line.
The issue gives President Obama and Democrats a new enemy that can help drive home the need to fix the health care system, and they won't be letting up any time soon, administration and Congressional sources tell TPMDC.
There will be Congressional hearings this month and Obama has held it up as an example.
Already they have seen results, with Anthem agreeing to delay the hikes until May.
MoveOn.org and Americans United for Change have flagged the rate hikes for members and Democrats are trumpeting a Los Angeles Times editorial that says the increases are a new boost for reform efforts.
On a conference call Friday afternoon to announce major government funding for electronic medical workers, I asked Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius about WellPoint's response to questions about the increases, which you can read here.
She told me she has "some degree of skepticism" about a company with profits of $2.7 billion in the fourth quarter alone needing to impose rate hikes on 800,000 customers "so they can keep their profit margins going."
She added that WellPoint's two top executives were paid just under $10 million each in salary.
"There are a number of underlying questions about what is going on," Sebelius said.
She said both health care reform measures passed by the House and Senate would enhance the federal government's authority to investigate such increases, as well as require more justification of how much money from premiums goes toward health care compared with overhead, advertising and salaries.
The White House even used it to underscore the urgency of passing the final bill in its invitation for members of Congress to attend a Feb. 25 health care summit.
WellPoint defended the increases in a detailed letter to Sebelius by blaming rising medical costs and the economic recession.
WellPoint said in their response to Sebelius that most of Anthem's customers will not see such a dramatic increase, with the average price hike being 24 percent starting next month.
According to the Associated Press, based on the size of its membership, WellPoint is the largest publicly traded health insurer. The company operates Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in 14 states and Unicare insurance plans in several others.
"Reform will end the worst insurance company practices and put doctors and patients -- not insurance companies -- in charge of medical decisions. If we fail to implement reform, insurance companies will continue to prosper while families will continue to struggle," Sebelius said in response to WellPoint's letter.
"[I]t's time to turn up the heat," MoveOn told members in an email, calling the rate hikes "yet another powerful example of how badly broken our health care system is and how desperately we need to hold Big Insurance accountable for exploiting their customers."
MoveOn used the issue to collect signatures on a petition to push reform.
Tom McMahon, acting executive director of Americans United for Change said the hikes make it "gut check time for Members of Congress who are still reluctant to support health insurance reform or are actively trying to kill it."
AUC sent emails into wavering Democrats' districts and said it is time to end the politicking on health care reform.
"Congress needs to act very quickly before other insurance companies follow suit and start demanding massive rate increases - taking full advantage of their virtual monopoly status and shaking down working families for every dime they can get," McMahon said.
An AP investigation showed that several states are expecting similar hikes.
As we have reported, the Energy and Commerce Committee has asked CEO Angela Braly to submit internal communications, including email, about the rate hike. They also request internal presentations relating to the California increases. They want the documents by Friday.
The committee also asked Braly to submit in advance of the Feb. 24 hearing a table detailing WellPoint revenue, insurance claims, sales, general and administrative expenses and profits from 2005 through 2008. Also requested were the detailed rates and increases proposed in California from Jan. 1, 2009 through the end of 2010.
shooter242
February 15, 2010 9:13 AM
A 39% rate hike is beyond belief. The back story should be interesting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
February 15, 2010 9:44 AM in reply to shooter242
That's what happens in a rigged marketplace, bub.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jah627
February 15, 2010 10:10 AM in reply to Dorn76
I can't wait to see what they'll do when they're all incorporated in South Dakota and Delaware -- how about health insurance credit cards for a start? Earn bonus miles while you pay off your appendectomy at 30%!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
February 15, 2010 10:21 AM in reply to jah627
Yeah, this is going to create a problem for the Flaccidcrats: Now it will be harder for them to pretend to try to reform health care without actually getting anything done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 9:45 AM in reply to shooter242
Who are you and what have you done with shooter242?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
February 15, 2010 8:47 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
It's him. He's just back on his medication.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
February 15, 2010 9:48 AM in reply to shooter242
More like back-lie.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 15, 2010 10:45 AM in reply to shooter242
I guess I should feel lucky my premium increase this year was "only" 20 percent. I also buy insurance on the open market, being self-employed, and my provider is Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
The difference between Anthem and CareFirst (my BCBS provider in MD)?
It might have something to do with the fact that Anthem is part of a for-profit empire, while eight years ago, the Maryland legislature, in its great wisdom, rejected CareFirst's planned conversion to for-profit status and sale too (IIRC) WellPoint.
I still think CareFirst operates too much like a for-profit entity, and 20 percent is awfully hard to swallow. But I guess everything is relative these days.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JHM
February 15, 2010 9:33 AM
Good thing that preserving the HealthCo's inherent benefits to society are protected from the threat of socialized medicine.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rhallnj
February 15, 2010 9:41 AM
It probably would be good to start the WH conference with a televised discussion of these rate hikes, with Boehner, et. al., required to chip in.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
714Day
February 15, 2010 11:44 AM in reply to rhallnj
Have you seen the FP of TPM? Boehner may be a no show for the "trap" HCR pow-wow. Surely, you aren't surprised.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
whiterosebuddy
February 15, 2010 9:48 AM
Hey Bellatoni,
Your last link on the AP Investigation is not working.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwp
February 15, 2010 9:55 AM
Should have been called "Insurance reform" from day 1 and maybe it wouldnt have gotten away from them so quickly.. Its amazing that the insurance companies feel so entitled they can do anything without worrying..just buy another senator and their problems go away..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 15, 2010 9:59 AM in reply to rwp
Senators are cheap between the coasts. Couple hundred k and you own them. No wonder nothing ever gets done in the senate, ever. Greed and corruption rule the day.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 15, 2010 9:55 AM
I've worked in the HB industry, internationally for the last 35 years. California, Anthem Blue Cross is the worse organization I have ever encountered. Their tone deafness in proposing rate hikes at this time, is typical of their ineptness!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Maritza
February 15, 2010 10:03 AM in reply to GTFOOH
Well it may be the one thing that the Democrats need to stiffen their spine to finally get health care reform done this year.
If Democrats can't pass HCR reform with the reconciliation sidecar after Anthem Blue Cross has proposed a 39% rate increase, I just don't know when they will.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 10:21 AM
Given that Wellpoint could easily afford to delay these hikes until after it's sure HCR is dead, it seems like there are four theories that explain the timing of this hike equally well:
a) The executives are clueless, arrogant bastards whose arrogance and cluelessness turns the bend all the way back around to naivete, like French aristiocrats c. 1780 and Big Finance people c. 2009 such that they totally blind to the possibility that this hike is a godsend to the PTDB movement;
b) They think HCR is already dead with a DNR directive and so they can do any damn thing they please again;
c) The lefties who insist that the Democrats' bill is a "gift" and a "givaway" to the insurance industry and the hundreds of millions AHIP and the insurers' have spent trying to kill it are actually a smokescreen are right and this is part of a diabolical plot by Wellpoint to get it back on track;
d) They know it's going to pass and this is just a last cash-grab before the regulation of the income to claims payment ratio goes into effect.
Really not seeing any other possibilities.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NobleCommentDecider
February 15, 2010 11:06 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I go with the arrogance and cluelessness. There has been a lot of that goin' around in recent years in this country.
Its not like they are so dumb they thought they could start a war, have it pay for itself, or have a War Hero birthday party while Americans are serving as MRE's for alligators.
But it is pretty high-handed for a company that purports to rescue us from the horrors of...Obamacare.
Your tab is up 39% a month, but, hey, its not Obamacare!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 15, 2010 10:23 AM
Heard an interesting story on NPR today about how in '93 or '94, congressional Republicans actually offered an alternative to Clinton's health care reform plan (somehow, I had completely forgotten that they did anything other than just say no). Turns out the centerpiece of their plan was an individual mandate and the something akin to health insurance exchanges -- in other words, it looked remarkably like the Obama plan. Sponsors included Hatch and Grassley.
Why is this the first time I'm hearing this? Why haven't the White House and congressional Dems been bashing these hypocrites over the head with this?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 10:35 AM in reply to Moose49
1. In his Q&A with Republicans, the president pointed this very thing out.
2. This proves one thing: the longer HCR is delayed the more conservative it will become. Now, Republicans are fighting tooth & nail against the very things they proposed 20 years ago.
3. This also proves that liberals who want to ditch this bill and try again later are, as Rahm said, fucking retarded. In five years, Republicans will be opposed to banning preexisting conditions and lifetime caps.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 15, 2010 10:41 AM in reply to FreeRider
Could agree more -- especially with point #3. The fact is that it will be a hell of a lot easier to improve a health care reform already in place than it will be to start from scratch in five or 10 or 15 years time. Of course, by then, we'll probably be seeing 39 percent annual rate hikes every year and we'll have 70 or 80 million uninsured.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CranialRectalLoopback
February 15, 2010 10:46 AM in reply to Moose49
Stoopid is as Stoopid does. Basically what you are saying is if we defecate now we can wipe the rectum later.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 15, 2010 10:54 AM in reply to CranialRectalLoopback
If you consider getting 30+ million people health insurance, removing the threat of medical bankruptcy for tens of millions, banning the use of preexisting conditions and other egregious health insurance company abuses, and creating the largest new government entitlement in years (via premium subsidies) to be the equivalent of defecation, so be it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 15, 2010 11:17 AM in reply to Moose49
Dude, problem is people are greedy and only care about themselves, by and large. The 270 million who have it do not give a sh*t about the 30 million who don't. They are buying into repuke lies, big time.
It's "morning in america" all over again. Greed and me, me, me, rule the day. Throw in the b-movie actor's war on education and right-wing ownership of all media and you have the current absurd situation.
What a nightmare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 11:24 AM in reply to Michael A
Says the person who has been arguing to kill the bill that will cover 30+ million people.
But, of course, you're not arguing from a selfish POV; you're arguing that those 30 million people would be better off with nothing than to have insurance from the private sector.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 15, 2010 12:39 PM in reply to FreeRider
I told you before that I do not have insurance, can't afford it, so how is that selfish? I couldn't afford the mandate either, so how is that selfish?
Problem is you assume that it will "cover" 30 million people and you assume that people will be all over the mandate. Two big assumptions and you know what they say about the word assume.
Why give the insurance and pharma industries such a huge welfare check from the american people? That's just nuts. You would think repukes would be all over this "reform", but they are too busy playing politics to f*ck the dems and they are doing a wonderful job at it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 2:22 PM in reply to Michael A
If you really can't afford it, you will have a huge subsidy to help you. But if you'd rather go skiing and out to dinner then clog up the ER when you get sick, then yeah . . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
February 15, 2010 3:29 PM in reply to FreeRider
Here's another fact to consider: Moose says why hasn't he heard about these facts before and why aren't the Dems pounding the GOP hypocrites?
It's because even though Obama has pointed it out, it has to be repeated a few hundred times to sink in, which is exactly what the Repugs do with their lies. I guarantee you, no more than 10 or 15% of the public has any inkling of this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 15, 2010 4:14 PM in reply to FreeRider
I can't afford to go sking or out to dinner either. I have been completely wiped out in this meltdown. I basically have to start over from scratch and I am old.
I don't want to have to go beg for a subsidy to pay my tax dollars to go to a criminal industry. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever and I am not interested in doing that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 5:37 PM in reply to Michael A
OK. Keep standing on "principle". See how far that gets you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Liberal Democrat
February 15, 2010 11:13 PM in reply to Michael A
I agree. Some people who are "all set" do care enough about the 30 million and favor the reform bill; however, I am convinced the majority who are "all set" want to see no change---at least not for now. I am 74 years old and have great insurance through Medicare and veteran coverage. For 40 years I worked for large Aerospace firms and was provided excellent group medical coverage as an employee at very little cost to me. There was no discrimination due to age, health, pre-existing conditions or cost to the insurer (up to $1 million) for claims. I was fortunate. I never had to worry about shopping for a private health insurance plan. How many of the people who are "all set" have similar coverage? We may have to wait for the situation to get worse still before public opinion will favor any meaningful change. Why does public opinion matter? Obviously, because politicians must first be voted in before they can serve.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 11:24 AM in reply to CranialRectalLoopback
Uh, yeah. As opposed to all of "progressives" who were insisting that we absolutely had to do it in the other order and make sure everything was perfectly clean and pure before the shit came down the pipe, yeah, that's precisely the order in which we think it should be done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
February 15, 2010 11:26 AM in reply to CranialRectalLoopback
Tequila Lime Chicken
1/2 cup gold tequila
1 cup freshly squeezed lime juice (5 to 6 limes)
1/2 cup freshly squeezed orange juice (2 oranges)
1 tablespoon chili powder
1 tablespoon minced fresh jalapeno pepper (1 pepper seeded)
1 tablespoon minced fresh garlic (3 cloves)
2 teaspoons kosher salt
1 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
3 whole (6 split) boneless chicken breasts, skin on
Directions
Combine the tequila, lime juice, orange juice, chili powder, jalapeno pepper, garlic, salt, and pepper in a large bowl. Add the chicken breasts. Refrigerate overnight.
Heat a grill with coals and brush the rack with oil to prevent the chicken from sticking. Remove the chicken breasts from the marinade, sprinkle well with salt and pepper, and grill them skin-side down for about 5 minutes, until nicely browned. Turn the chicken and cook for another 10 minutes, until just cooked through. Remove from the grill to a plate. Cover tightly and allow to rest for 5 minutes. Serve hot or at room temperature.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 11:18 AM in reply to Moose49
You think NPR dug that stuff up itself? It happened more than three months ago, so somebody must have told them about it.
As to why no one's been bashing them on this before now, how well do you think this comparison would have gone over with all the "progressives" who were howling drunk on "sellout" talk back before Brown's election sobered them up?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davcbr
February 15, 2010 10:25 AM
"WellPoint defended the increases in a detailed letter to Sebelius by blaming rising medical costs and the economic recession."
Of course we planned on reducing these rates right after the recession is over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 15, 2010 10:44 AM in reply to davcbr
The rising cost argument is such BS. Preferred provider organization all have scheduled benefit amounts they receive, regardless of the actual cost. Even non-network benefits have a usual and customary caps they will allow.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kali Star
February 15, 2010 10:27 AM
Too bad the drug companies are not on Obama's enemies list. There's always hope. Will someone make a stand against Big Pharma at this open meeting ?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CranialRectalLoopback
February 15, 2010 10:41 AM
Only a retard (in a satirical way) would need more evidence of the need for health care reform. Too bad Nobama and his fellow Dinos took single payer off the table on day one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
714Day
February 15, 2010 11:49 AM
I think it's sweet of Sebelius to ask what's up with Anthem, but really, they don't have to answer. There are no parameters for the industry and the administration can't force them to adhere to conscionable practices - they're in it for profit; plain and simple. They don't have to justify that as things stand now, nor as they may develop with any HCR "plan" we've seen to date. No provision for enforcement of guidelines has appeared. God, are we getting screwed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tropicgirl
February 15, 2010 12:44 PM
a RALLYING POINT? For who? I'm listening.... I don't hear anything except crickets.
The bogus steaming pile, called the health care reform bill, would do nothing to change these rate hikes, for preconceived conditions so stop lying. They would be ALLOWED to charge 3x OR MORE, whatever a "regular" rate would be.
Either the insurance companies are private, or they go public. ONe or the other. Or else... nothing with the taxpayer money. The health insurance companies have a HUGE business model problem. They want much more money. The only real problem is, they are in the wrong business...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tropicgirl
February 15, 2010 12:45 PM
a RALLYING POINT? For who? I'm listening.... I don't hear anything except crickets.
The bogus steaming pile, called the health care reform bill, would do nothing to change these rate hikes, for preconceived conditions so stop lying. They would be ALLOWED to charge 3x OR MORE, whatever a "regular" rate would be.
Either the insurance companies are private, or they go public. ONe or the other. Or else... nothing with the taxpayer money. The health insurance companies have a HUGE business model problem. They want much more money. The only real problem is, they are in the wrong business...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 15, 2010 5:28 PM in reply to tropicgirl
No. You're completely wrong. Under the actual bills, as opposed to the Firebagger Strawman bill, insurers would be allowed three rate pools: older people, smokers and everyone else. The older people risk pool could be charged up to 3X more than the "everyone else" pool. Having a preexisting condition (other than nicotine addiction) would have nothing to do with which of the three pools you're in or what you're charged.
Given that older people in the invidual insured market who aren't quite eligible for Medicare are now routinely charged 8 or even 12 times as much as younger insureds, that 3x premium would actually be quite an improvement, especially when the subsidies are taken into account.
But hey don't let any actual facts get in the way of your rightous anger. It's much easier to be all angry and againsty when you're working with garbled up half-truths rather than actual facts, so go with what works for you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
February 15, 2010 5:49 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I have a slightly better version of the question you kinda-sorta ask in your own reply:
Is this about making sure 30-40 Million more people get insured, or is it about punishing the Insurance Companies?
I know. I know. "Why can't we do both?" But...this being the real world, sometimes you gotta make a choice, sometimes you got to set priorities. It's kinda what Politics is about. So if you have to set a priority between those two choices, what's it gonna be?
I'm not saying you're a bad person for saying you want to punish the Insurance Industry, far from it. It's a reasonable desire...and yes, there is a better alternative out there (Single Payer). You just don't have the votes for it. If you were one of the people going to vote or sign Health Care Reform, and you had to make that choice, what do you really think is the best way to go?
I only say this because every time I read a criticism of the Senate Plan (for the record, House plan better), it always focuses in on the Insurance Companies "getting away with something". I rarely (if ever) hear well..."what about the other 17 Million people?" Or "Why can't the Senate Bill do more?" Or "Why can't the subsidies be more generous?" These are all criticisms I can deal with, but doesn't seem to ever be about that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
February 15, 2010 5:52 PM in reply to admiralmpj
And my bad for attaching this response the wrong way. This was really addressed to tropicgirl. My bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
February 15, 2010 9:39 PM in reply to admiralmpj
Insurance isn't health care. Just because people pay premiums to insurance companies doesn't mean they'll be able to afford health care. To the best of my reading bronze plans - the ones most working people will go for - will lead to bankruptcy just as surely as being uninsured now. Now, you go to an emergency room, you get treated. And you end up going into debt, possibly broke, to pay back the providers. Under Obamacare, you'll pay insurers who'll provide you with insurance, but if you get really sick or happen to have a chronic illness, forget it: you'll go broke anyway, in co-pays and deductibles. The difference is you'll have been paying premiums while waiting to go broke.
Anthem is raising rates now for only one reason: because they can. And they have every good reason to believe, health care reform or no health care reform, they'll be able to continue doing so for the foreseeable future.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
again
February 15, 2010 1:30 PM
Why is no one considering the resignation of Billy Tauzin, which was announced (buried) late Friday?
How will that affect the survival of this POS Senate bill, with of course, whatever gnarled scraps come out of reconciliation?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 15, 2010 4:08 PM in reply to again
That little back door toad Tauzin who had to quit congress due to his Pharma ties. Another head that needs to be on a pike for Bush's unfunded medicaid fuckstory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SleepinJeezus
February 15, 2010 4:07 PM
Hell, it's all good news for the Dems and Obama/Emanuel. What an incredible opportunity this presents to extort even more campaign finance funds out of Wellpoint in exchange for continuing to pull their punches on REAL health care reform.
I started out campaigning for health care reform. I'm left with nothing but only a hope that some day soon we get legitimate campaign finance reform - and perhaps elect officials who can in fact be our representatives rather than selling out to the highest bidders instead.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
February 15, 2010 5:48 PM
May be Obama thinks Anthem Blue Cross is full of 'savvy businessmen' !
Democrats 'leading out of the storm' vs 'creating the storm':
Item 1: “A mere seven months ago (that would be around June 2009), The New York Times/CBS poll found that 72% of Americans ‘supported a government-administered insurance plan—something like Medicare for those under 65—that would compete for customers with private insurers.’”
Item 2: As of February 2010, no single payer health care reform, no 'government option', mandated premium payments to private sector insurers, tax money to private sector insurers, stipulations making it legal for insurers to spend only 80 cents of every 100 cents on actual health care while spending 20 cents of every 100 cents on lobbying, 'sympathetic' candidates, CEO bonuses, 'administration' and fighting your claim for treatment.
Item 3: Obama has had chance after chance to do something other than talk, and has done nothing.
We made a mistake in electing this man. We believed him to be a leader and have found him to be a follower and apologizer for corporate interests at the expense of the middle class.. Anthem Blue Cross and others have found just the environment they wanted: a leaderless and toothless Executive and a fearful and cowardly Congress. Thanks Democrats ! for yet another 39% increase in insurance premiums for the middle class to pay, while you pay millions for someone to tell you where your support has gone. If you want to know why you have no more support, see above items #1, #2 and #3.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
February 15, 2010 8:59 PM in reply to bill
Co-sign that take.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
February 15, 2010 8:41 PM
Those in power want to do everything possible to come out on top as our once great nation crumbles....
Too bad "We the Voters" have helped them by continuing to support the two mobs (Dems and Reps) in Washington... IMHO
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnnydoughey
February 15, 2010 8:44 PM
Those in power want to do everything possible to come out on top as our once great nation crumbles....
Too bad "We the Voters" have helped them by continuing to support the two mobs (Dems and Reps) in Washington... IMHO
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pstamler
February 15, 2010 11:53 PM
It's really important to understand that this isn't just about California. Their hikes are getting all the press attention...but Anthem is doing the same thing other places. They've already pulled a 25% hike here in Missouri, effective January 1st -- my policy was slated to go up to $800+ per month (just me, no family). The claimed justification was identical to the one in Cal. I wouldn't be surprise to see them roll back California, get the smidgen of good publicity from that, but sock it to the rest of the country.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
yessicabanne
February 16, 2010 12:47 AM
Find instant medical insurance for you from http://bit.ly/atGzeD
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?