TPMDC

TPMDC Sunday Roundup

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Vice President Joe Biden and former Vice President Dick Cheney

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Cheney: Obama Administration Should Thank Bush, Admit They Were 'Just Dead Wrong' On Iraq
Appearing on This Week, former Vice President Dick Cheney attacked the Obama administration's handling of Iraq and other national security issues. "They opposed the surge that was absolutely crucial to our getting to the point we're at now with respect to Iraq. And for them to try to take credit for what's happened in Iraq strikes me as a little strange," said Cheney. "I think if -- if they had had their way, if we'd followed the policies they'd pursued from the outset or advocated from the outset, Saddam Hussein would still be in power in Baghdad today. So if they're going to take credit for it, fair enough, for what they've done while they're there, but it ought to go with a healthy dose of 'Thank you, George Bush' up front and a recognition that some of their early recommendations, with respect to prosecuting that war, were just dead wrong."

Biden: Cheney 'Trying To Rewrite History'
Appearing on Meet The Press, Vice President Joe Biden fired back at his predecessor Dick Cheney's frequent criticism of the administration. "I'm not gonna guess about [Dick Cheney's] motive. All I know is he's factually, substantively wrong, on the major criticisms he is asserting. Why he's insisting on that - he either is misinformed or he is misinforming. But the facts are that his assertions are not accurate," said Biden, who also added: "It's almost like Dick is trying to rewrite history. I can understand where the-- why that would be, you know, an impulse."

Cheney: Reconsider Ban On Gays In The Military, 'I Think The Society Has Moved On'
Also during his appearance on This Week, former Vice President Dick Cheney said that it is time to reconsider "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and the ban on gays serving in the military: "I think the society has moved on. I think it's partly a generational question. I say, I'm reluctant to second-guess the military in this regard, because they're the ones that have got to make the judgment about how these policies affect the military capability of our -- of our units ... When the chiefs come forward and say, "We think we can do it," then it strikes me that it's -- it's time to reconsider the policy. And I think Admiral Mullen said that."

Biden: 'We Have No Doubt' Criminal Court Best Way To Try KSM, Get Information
Appearing on Face The Nation, Vice President Joe Biden stood by the Obama administration's decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian criminal court. "We have no doubt the best, most effective legal way to get his guy behind bars for the longest time and get the most information with the most certainty is in an Article Three court," said Biden, referring to the federal court system.

Jones: I Don't Know What Cheney's Information Is
Appearing on State of the Union, National Security Adviser James Jones suggested that former Vice President Dick Cheney is not informed of the facts, when he criticizes the Obama administration on national security. "I don't know what his information is. I just would ask people to consider the fact that these are very serious issues for our country and that when you take them on, you take them on in a respectful way," said Jones. "We consult and share with both sides equally of the political spectrum and we'll continue to do that. In the national security council, we can't do it any other way."

Jones: Recidivism Rate For Terror Detainees 'Never Going To Be Zero'
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, National Security Adviser James Jones stood by a statement from Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan, who said that the 20% recidivism rate for released terror detainees "isn't that bad." "It's never going to be zero," said Jones. "We have a long history of having convicted terrorist in federal courts, locking them up for many, many years and doing the best we can, but zero is not going to be the standard in which we try to achieve it."

Ford: I've Paid Taxes 'On All New York Income," My Wife And I Will File As State Resident For 2009
Appearing on Meet The Press, former Rep. Harold Ford (D-TN) defended his record of paying taxes in New York state, where he is considering a run for Senate. "Absolutely. Paid taxes on all New York income the last two years. And, for the first time, in '09 my wife and I will file as residents of New York," said Ford. "But this is politics. They've tried to distort my record on choice, my record on other social issues. But, at the end of the day, voters in New York are as unsettled and as worried about their futures as any other set of voters across the country. At the end of the day, many people in the state don't know Senator Gillibrand, don't know a whole lot about her. But there'll will be time, if I run, to litigate that line by line."

Schock Defends Getting Projects For His District, From Bills He Voted Against
Appearing on Meet The Press, Rep. Aaron Schock (R-IL) defended himself against attacks from Rachel Maddow, that he had touted projects in his district funded through the stimulus, and other bills he voted against. "I think that argument that liberals are making is absolutely ridiculous. With all due respect, Rachel, does that mean you're going to give back your Bush tax cuts that you continue to rail against?" said Schock, also adding: "At the end of the day, my constituents and their children and grandchildren will be on the hook for the debt that's being created by this majority...and they deserve to have their fair share of federal spending."

Comments (31) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

February 14, 2010 1:25 PM   

I noticed that Darth didn't mention that the "success" of the surge was due to buying off the militias. They didn't need troops to do it, just a busload of banksters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:01 PM    in reply to tiowally

Agree, only thing is that was the surge and the means of success. They bought off the sunnis and hired them to take out al queda. Al queda killing sunnis helped also. And the extensive ethnic cleansing of mixed communities, which had already happened by the time of the "surge".

The extra-troops in the line of fire were more of a hindrance then a help. If they would have just bought everybody off and got the f*ck out of the way, the violence and deaths would have gone down sooner, until we pull out fully. Then the place will either completely blow the f*ck up or be broken up into three countries. It's up to the iraqis. These f*ckers just want to constantly rewrite history and pretend things didn't happen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 6:49 PM    in reply to Michael A

The increase in the number of troops had at best a marginal effect on the situation in Iraq. The primary reason for the turnaround in November 2006 was the outcome of the US midsessional election.

The principal demands made by the insurgents were an end to the US occupation and that there would be no permanent US bases on Iraqi soil. The election results made it clear that the US public was not going to support a perpetual occupation of the type that Cheney had clearly envisaged. The main purpose of the insurgency was eliminated.

Increasing the number of troops and employing standard military counter-insurgency tactics probably helped of course. But this is something that a competent administration would have planned to do before the invasion began. Again the main reason this switch was possible was the sacking of Donald Rumsfeld that occurred in the wake of the 2006 elections.

Cheny cannot take any credit for the improvement in Iraq, it was US voters who are responsible for the improvement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 8:37 AM    in reply to hallam

A competent administration would never have gone there in the first place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:43 PM    in reply to tiowally

So perhaps this is where Obama learned to pay off the banksters? On the other hand, paying off people is a longstanding Democrat tradition.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 4:02 PM    in reply to shooter242

Is GWB a Democrat? How else could you explain that he and his treasury secretary are the architects of the bank bailouts?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 4:02 PM    in reply to shooter242

Hmm, from fox entertainment no less:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090401185152.aspx

The king employed fear to get congress to go along with his plan and rammed tarp through congress. And, you were saying?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 4:08 PM    in reply to shooter242

My uncle always used to say that the Democrats would steal it from you but they would give you some of it back. Unfortunately, they've reached bipartisan agreement with Republicans to forget about that second part.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 4:16 PM    in reply to bluebell

Wind offers an important alternative to coal as a renewable source for power generation in China with potential for significant reduction of CO2 emissions. The present study investigates both onshore and offshore potentials for wind energy in China based on the winds from NASA.

The analysis assumes deployment of a network of 1.5-MW turbines and 3.6-MW turbines to capture the kinetic energy in onshore and offshore wind respectively in China. Forested areas, built up areas, ice-covered areas, and relative steep areas are considered unsuitable for installations of wind turbines and therefore excluded from the present analysis.

A GIS‐based financial model is established to evaluate the amount of land-based wind energy that could be harvested economically under the concession policy in China. Assuming a guaranteed price of 0.516 RMB/kWh over an initial fixed‐price period, the results suggest that wind could accommodate all of the demand for electricity projected for 2030, about twice current consumption. Electricity available at a concession price as low as 0.4 RMB per kilowatt-hour would be sufficient to displace 23% of electricity generated from coal.

While many existing technologies can change energy from one form to another, improved and innovative energy conversion systems will play a critical role in meeting future energy needs. The economic conversion of coal and biomass to "syngas" and further conversion to liquid fuels could significantly expand the world's energy options. Fuel cells and batteries, which convert chemical to electrical energy, represent another "family" of conversion technologies that could provide potential benefits ranging from reduced environmental impacts to higher efficiency to more secure and reliable infrastructures. However, the high costs of advanced materials, first-mover barriers, inadequate regulatory structures and a range of technical barriers must be addressed to realize the full potential of these and other promising conversion technologies.

There are substantial opportunities for reducing energy consumption in both new and existing buildings. Policies that affect the entire built environment are needed if such technologies are to enter the market rapidly. This is an important consideration, given that buildings designed and constructed today will last for much of the 21st century.

In addition to retrofitting existing buildings, we need to plan for the future. It is critical that urban form, from the buildings to the supporting networks of water, sewage, energy and transportation, be designed in an integrated manner that will minimize consumption of scarce resources, reduce impacts on the environment, optimize investments and meet consumer needs. Such design research must also take into consideration many non-technological aspects, including the economic and labor landscapes of the area, regional issues such as zoning and the preservation of green space and local factors such as impacts on crime, corruption and social equity.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 1:28 PM   

Just STFU already, Dick.

And media? Stop giving this sclerotic asshole attention.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:03 PM    in reply to CT Voter

ICAM!!

Why does our media perpetuate these obvious lies? It is awful. The headline should be BIDEN: Cheney Tries to Re-Write History

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 1:54 PM   

Ford says "Paid taxes on all New York income the last two years."

Notice how he doesn't say he's paid New York states taxes on his New York income. That's because he has not. He filed in Tennessee which has no state income tax so he has only paid federal taxes on that New York income.

The state of New York requires residents and non-residents alike to file a New York state income tax return.

Old shady Harold.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:11 PM   

There "…will be time, if I run, to litigate that line by line."

Seriously? Looking at the matter contextually, he must have intended to say—or, certainly should have said—mitigate. Not litigate. Not the optimal term, but at least applicable in the sense that he might have the opportunity to alleviate what he purports to be a lack of familiarity with Senator Gillibrand on the part of New Yorkers. Still, a significant stretch.

Representative Ford would do well to choose his words more carefully, as he not-so-artfully did in attempting to defend his record of paying taxes in New York.

Then again, maybe he is just not as 'smart' as he pretends to be.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:34 PM   

What a country we live in. MSM gives all that air time to a war criminal who should have been impeached, indicted, tried and executed on the White House Lawn.

What a country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:43 PM    in reply to dickday

I agree with everything except execution. These people need to be held for the rest of their lives in 6'x9' cells for the rest of their lives lest others be tempted to repeat their crimes. Unfortunately, thanks to people like Eric "Place" Holder, they have complete immunity. And so it goes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 9:10 AM    in reply to tiowally

There's not alot of precedent for a current Administration to investigate its predecessor. That's the job of Congress.

Just sayin'.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:35 PM   

folks like the Tea Partiers a fun battlecry that rolls nicely off the tongue and into unsuspecting ears.District of some 650,000 people http://usspost.com/aaron-schock-harold-ford-jr-wife-5749/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:38 PM   

Biden: 'We Have No Doubt' Criminal Court Best Way To Try KSM, Get Information

Appearing on Face The Nation, Vice President Joe Biden stood by the Obama administration's decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in a civilian criminal court.

Interesting how a reporters' perspective changes things. The headline on the AP story is "Biden: Military trial possible for 9/11 suspect".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:49 PM   

Top of the politician fear list should be bills containing state specific or district specific benefits--and then one votes against the bill. Next in line are state specific or district specific benefits and then one votes for it--particularly if it is controversial legislation like healthcare (heads up Nelson and Landrieu who are now representing two blackmail states--congrats to Neb and La). Third would be those voting against the bill and then bragging about the benefits they brought to their district or state...really, apply for it and forget the bragging because you're caught. Finally, anyone older than dirt no matter how they voted.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:01 PM   

Kleefield your headline here is the problem with our media.

Why did you do a headline with a lie as if that is the story?

The story is the TRUTH which Biden said, not Cheney.

Your headline should highlight what Biden said that was FACTUAL not what Cheney said that misrepresents and misinforms the public.

GoodGod!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:36 PM   

And for all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about Cheney, isn't it remarkable how much has remained the same even after the election?
And yet Biden congratulates himself...

"I am very optimistic about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration."

Afghanistan... not so much.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:57 PM    in reply to shooter242

Well, that was a dumb comment by biden, among many dumb comments. They really should consider taping his mouth shut.

The minute we are out of there that place will blow sky high and that bs comment will come back and bite the dems in the a**, once again. Stupid comment big time.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 4:48 PM    in reply to shooter242

Yes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 3:59 PM   

Something that hasn't changed: there's still a significant minority of people who fear the imminent suspension of civil liberties and the imposition of marital law by a power-crazed, pathologically cynical cabal that seized control of the government through less than legal means. One thing that's different: the minority who feared that during the Cheney Administration were the smart, well-informed, reality-based people. Now that belief is the province of the stupid, ill-informed, delusional people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 5:24 PM   

Dick Cheney's grasp of reality doesn't go nearly as far as his polling popularity.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 7:34 AM   

Meanwhile, the Oracle sailed seas of garbage to bring the Americas Cup to San Francisco.

Is that an appropriate metaphor?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 8:19 AM   

"Act of war"? Try "act of treason", Mr. Cheney:

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 8:31 AM   

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002441----000-.html

"(a) Offense.– Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death."

"(A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.

(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control."

---------------------------------

In case you missed this part, Mr. Cheney:

"and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death."

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/the-ceremony-of-innocence/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 8:41 AM    in reply to thecrow

Tell it to Eric "Place" Holder.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 9:42 AM    in reply to thecrow

Why would anyone beyond the "dead-enders" care what that washed up War Criminal has to say?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on