
Indiana Democrats are on the verge of having a new candidate for the Senate seat of retiring Dem Evan Bayh, with Rep. Brad Ellsworth about to jump in -- though they won't be able to officially have a nominee in legal terms for a little while.
Chris Cillizza and Politico report that sources say Ellsworth is definitely in the race. A high-level Democratic source has also confirmed the news to TPMDC. (Late Update: Ellsworth himself has confirmed it to the local NBC station in Evansville.)
The Indianapolis Star also reports that Democratic state Rep. Trent Van Haaften has filed to run for Ellsworth's House seat. However the Star reports, it turns out that state law will prevent the Dems from being able to select the Senate candidate until after the May 4 primary.
From the Star's report:
Indiana Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker, who had said he wanted a candidate quickly, said Thursday that "the sooner rather than later has now become later."
Parker had hoped to call a meeting of the Democratic Party's state central committee's 32 voting members as early as next week. But after party attorneys researched state law, they discovered they could not fill the ballot vacancy until after the primary.
mwfolsom
February 19, 2010 12:44 PM
Just lovely all we need is to run another homophobic Dem for the Senate - from an article at HuffPo:
Ellsworth is just another BlueDog Corporate Dem that votes with Republicans - why bother to elect him?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 19, 2010 2:19 PM in reply to mwfolsom
Because the only other choice is Dan Coates. That's why?
But if everyone here wants me too, I'll vote for Coates.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mwfolsom
February 19, 2010 2:49 PM in reply to LeaningLeft
There has to be somebody less odious than Ellsworth.
This attitude of "take the lesser of two evils" is why the Dems are where they are. Its the ultimate race to the bottom -
By to by, this YouTube video captures the state of the Democratic Party really well -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkDQN0j2Oys&feature=player_embedded
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 19, 2010 3:11 PM in reply to mwfolsom
"There has to be somebody less odious than Ellsworth."
There is. However, less odious = not electable in the state of Indiana.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 19, 2010 3:18 PM in reply to LeaningLeft
Actually, I don't know that much about Ellsworth. My initial reaction has just been that any Democrat has got to be better than Dan Coates. But, I was just thinking. A couple of the complaints on here have painted Ellsworth as a social conservative and an economic conservative. We know Coates will be both of those just to a greater degree. What about the Libertarian candidate (whoever that ends up being)? That person will probably be an economic conservative but a social liberal. Would he or she be a better choice?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mwfolsom
February 20, 2010 10:53 AM in reply to LeaningLeft
The Democratic Party has a big problem - it no longer believes in anything and ultimately that will destroy it. That's why it can't govern. Since they have everything from true liberals to Corporate owned conservatives under the same "tent" and just about any one of them in the Senate can kill anything it can't govern. The tent can only be so big. We need to say by-by to Blance Lincoln, Landreau, Bayh, & and a few others but to have a functional party that's what needs to happen.
Frankly the American people are gonna look at the parties and choose the Republicans because they believe in something - it may be stupid - but they believe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
February 19, 2010 12:50 PM
He's a C-Streeter. Voted against Matt Shepard Hate Crime Bill, voted against embryonic stem cell research, voted with Stupek for his anti-choice amendment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
njlib
February 19, 2010 1:05 PM
dems are toast, no-one should send a cent to any group other than progressive candidates directly. Starve the beast
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 19, 2010 1:44 PM
Green Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ClintonObamaFan12
February 19, 2010 2:12 PM
Good, he will be a good candidate, he may be a blue dog but they are far better than Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 19, 2010 2:26 PM in reply to ClintonObamaFan12
Maybe he won't be as negative towards the Democratic Party in public as Bayh has been and still is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 19, 2010 2:17 PM
Right. Since there is no progressive candidate and probably won't be (the only 3 parties that are "automatically" on the ballot in IN are Democrat, Republican, and Libertarian), I'd say Ellsworth is a much better choice to be my Senator than Coates.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeaningLeft
February 19, 2010 2:21 PM in reply to LeaningLeft
Supposed to be a reply to ClintonObamaFan12's comment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
February 21, 2010 8:34 AM
Dems have got to start fielding...Dems. The problem is they keep condescending to independent voters, who aren't centrists and are willing to listen to policy, simply framed and explained. Independents are sick of both parties. Most Americans are sick of both parties. So the Dems need to get behind some bold policy initiatives instead of constantly splitting the difference between progressive and barbaric legislation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?