
Next week when President Obama marks the one-year anniversary of signing the stimulus bill into law, Democrats will showcase the Republicans who were against the Recovery Act funds, before they were for them being funneled to their home states.
TPMDC has learned the party will mount an orchestrated effort from the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee to go after Republicans who voted against the$787 billion economic stimulus plan but take credit for its spending back home.
Obama signed the measure Feb. 17, 2009 with votes from just three Republicans (one of those GOPers, Sen. Arlen Specter, became a Democrat) but members of the opposing party have campaigned on stimulus projects.
A Democratic source told me the party will force both incumbents up for reelection in the fall and Republican challengers to say on the record if they support the stimulus plan, which the White House in tandem will showcase as having created jobs.
"Look for us to be all over this story," the source said.
The Democrats collected new ammunition thanks to a damning report in Tuesday's editions of The Washington Times.
The Times' Jim McElhatton found that Sen. Kit Bond and more than a dozen other Republicans lambasted the stimulus but "privately sent letters to just one of the federal government's many agencies seeking stimulus money for home-state pork projects."
McElhatton reported:
The letters to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, expose the gulf between lawmakers' public criticism of the overall stimulus package and their private lobbying for projects close to home.
The DCCC is using the Times report as a jumping off point for inducting a total of 71 GOPers into a "Republican Hypocrisy Hall of Fame," just one effort among several expected in the coming week from Democrats eager to expose their rivals.
The "Hall of Fame" push will be sent to local media in the 71 districts of Republicans who "have been caught trying to celebrate the benefits of projects they opposed in President Obama's recovery bill, the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations bill, and the Omnibus Public Land Management Act," according to a template of the release obtained by TPMDC.
"It's bad enough House Republicans want to turn back the clock to the same failed Bush policies that created the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, but now these same House Republicans including _____ are taking credit for the economic benefits of the Recovery policies they voted against," DCCC spokesman Ryan Rudominer will say in the releases.
"As we approach the one year anniversary of the Recovery package, House Republicans including _____ need to tell their constituents the truth: either the Recovery package is working or admit their shameless 'do as I say not as I do' hypocrisy," Rudominer says.
The DNC has collected mountains of examples obtained by TPMDC showing, for example, Rep. Phil Gingery (R-GA) presenting a giant $625,000 check to the city of Cedartown for new sidewalks and landscaping funded by the stimulus.
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) was one of the chief critics of the plan but said the high-speed rail created by the stimulus plan could create as many as 185,000 jobs, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch. Cantor also hosted a jobs fair last fall that included firms hiring thanks to the stimulus.
There are copious other examples from Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) lauding $1.5 million in neighborhood funds to Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) boasting on Twitter of the "very generous" stimulus incentive for first-time homebuyers.
(MSNBC's Rachel Maddow tackled this topic last night. Watch that clip here.)
While most senators up for reelection have not been as bold, the DSCC will go after Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Senate candidate Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE). They each have touted projects that were funded with stimulus cash.
WKYT in Kentucky reported that over the summer Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell boasted about a "source of significant employment" at a construction site at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. The funds, of course, came from the stimulus.
Governors also won't be spared, since Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-LA), Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN), Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) and Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) declined the money and then either asked for it later or showcased its positive effects.
shooter242
February 10, 2010 12:51 PM
First I'd be interested in hearing about how one distinguishes stimulus pork, versus regular pork. Then I'd be interested in hearing why one should eschew pork after the effort to curtail it fails. EIther no one gets pork or everyone gets pork. Equal treatment under the law and all that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hunter
February 10, 2010 1:26 PM in reply to shooter242
I think the bigger issue is that these people, before and after the stimulus was passed, have all claimed that it didn't create any jobs. Then they turn around and talk about how many jobs were created in their districts or states. It's a tacit admission that the stimulus has worked and is working, and Democrats should take them to the mat over it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
February 10, 2010 1:54 PM in reply to hunter
I entirely understand the hypocrisy charge, but taking credit for money sent to one's district is the essential function of politicians. Whether it works as advertised or not.
THAT is the central fraud of the entire system, and if the Dems want to hold that fraud up to the light, I'm all for it. Right now though, they are in charge of the fraud and will have some 'splainin of their own to do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
February 10, 2010 3:02 PM in reply to shooter242
I have to disagree with you and agree with Hunter. It isn't that they took the money and the credit, it's that they asked for stimulus money on the grounds that their proposed project would create jobs, and then they turn around and claim no jobs were created. It's as if they were so dumb as to think no one would check their projects, or they're so brazen they think no one at home will notice their contradictory statements.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
February 10, 2010 3:48 PM in reply to ericf
And such is why politicians are generally reviled. Also why the Tea Party has erupted.
But my point remains, everyone wants to cut spending, except in their district. The Dems can try and make this an issue but it's going to be a snoozer, and eventually backfire.
There's also the issue of whether or not Republicans said the stimulus wouldn't create ANY jobs. If not, taking the money makes perfect sense to the voters.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 10, 2010 3:50 PM in reply to ericf
Yeah, I hope their constituents do check their statements. The Republicans claimed that the stimulus would keep unemployment under 8% and that hasn't happened, so their constituents should definitely get on them for that. Oh, wait, it wasn't the Republicans who made that promise. My bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
February 10, 2010 3:11 PM in reply to shooter242
Getting money for your state and constituents is not fraud if done through the normal budgeting process...as the stimulus bill was. Voting against that money and taking credit for it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
February 10, 2010 1:27 PM in reply to shooter242
There was no stimulus pork...none of the items in the bill bypassed the budgeting process. But you are fact challenged.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
just the facts
February 16, 2010 10:07 AM in reply to hey norm
Not sure how any of these jobs help ME, average American ... OR how putting the country into debt for these kinds of projects is somehow supposed to have me stand and cheer the Mr President ... regardless of who wears that name at the given moment. As soon as the office switches its all gonna be O'Bama's fault, just like now its Bush's and before that it was Clinton's and before that ... etc etc ... blame the other guy ... I am waiting for the person who will stand up and say THE BUCK STOPS HERE!! REGARDLESS OF HOW IT HAPPENED, I AM IN CHARGE AND ITS TIME TO QUIT BLAMING AND FIX IT!!
JOBS CREATED:
– $233,000 to the University of California at San Diego to study why Africans vote. Jobs created: 12, but seven of those are Africans in Africa.
– In Nevada, $2 million in stimulus money built a new fire station, but because of budget cuts, the county can’t afford to hire firefighters to work there.
– Penn State University got $1.5 million to study plant fossils in Argentina. Of 5 jobs created, 2 belong to Argentines.
– Researchers the State University of New York at Buffalo got $389,000 to pay 100 Buffalonians $45 each to record how much malt liquor they drink — and how much pot smoke each day. Consumption is then reported via an automated phone hotline. Cost per job: almost $200,000.
– Two Arizona universities got almost $1 million dollars so 3 grad students can study how ants work. That’s more than $300,000 per job.
– North Carolina public schools received $4.4 million to hire math and literacy coaches, not for students, but teachers. That’s 64 people paid $70,000 each to teach teachers how to teach reading and math.
Not sure how many of these jobs qualify for the Administration’s promises that 95,000 job a month will be created this year. It is clear that President Obama plans on having most of those employment opportunities are government jobs. This year the federal government plans on hiring 1.4 million to help with the census (not sure how many of those go to ACORN.)
The federal government is proving to be the biggest winner in this economic downturn. Department of Labor reports released last week show that “federal employment expanded by 33,000 in January, including the addition of 9,000 census workers.” As Rich Lowry reports at National Review Online such jobs can be very profitable:
The percentage of federal civil servants making more than $100,000 a year jumped from 14 percent to 19 percent during the first year and a half of the recession, according to USA Today. At the beginning of the downturn, the Transportation Department had one person making $170,000 or more a year; now it has 1,690 making that.
The New York Times reports that state and local governments have added a net 110,000 jobs since the beginning of the recession, while the private sector has lost 6.9 million. The gap between total compensation of public and private workers has only widened during the downturn, according to USA Today. In 2008, benefits for public employees grew at a rate three times that of private employees.
So apparently the federal government can create jobs. Especially for malt liquor drinkers, ACORN, themselves and foreign workers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 10, 2010 1:29 PM in reply to shooter242
you highlight a great point: money spent in these congressmen's districts from the stimulus isn't really "pork," because that's the entire point of a big part of the stimulus bill: to fund local projects.
so you're right, this isn't pork they're getting. it's not tangentially related to the bill -- it's the ENTIRE point of a great chunk of the bill they voted against.
so in your mind, that makes it better for these republicans? i'd think it would make it worse. they're not just getting their districts the money as funds unrelated to the objective of this terrible bill. instead, they're actually implementing one of the primary objectives of this terrible, no-good, very bad bill.
so ... WTF was your point?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
February 10, 2010 1:39 PM in reply to nova voter
Shooters trying to make the excuse that once the bill passed no politician could be expected to then not take the $$$. Which is valid... The hypocrisy is in taking credit for something you were against. Ie Cantor taking credit for 165,000 jobs he voted against. Yes the money should still go for those jobs, and Cantor should stand by his vote and tell those 165,000 people that they shouldn't be working.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 10, 2010 1:43 PM in reply to hey norm
well, that's fine, and if the money was just sent to those districts, i'd buy it. but watch the maddow clip, with these guys' quotes. as they're giving out the money, it's all, "this is going to help save and create jobs;" "this money was desperately needed and is really going to help this area;" etc.
so that argument fails miserably.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hey norm
February 10, 2010 1:50 PM in reply to nova voter
Agreed...they are hypocrite and ideologues. They are interested only in political games and not the hard work of governing a nation. And the dems should yell it ou loud.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
grimshizzle
February 10, 2010 1:34 PM in reply to shooter242
First, as others have mentioned, the hypocrisy is not just in opposing the bill but them claiming a piece of the pie, but in touting their piece of the pie as stimulating job growth while criticizing the stimulus as a whole for being a waste of money. If you're claiming the stimulus will not spur job growth, but then you take the money, you're saying that you just want to keep a big pile of cash for nothing.
Second: how many of these conservative congressmen and governors come from states that already take in more federal dollars than they contribute in federal taxes?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick
February 10, 2010 8:53 PM in reply to shooter242
I think you're lost in jargon. Your problem is the usage of the word "pork.".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
superking
February 10, 2010 1:07 PM
Democrats should focus on DOING SOMETHING rather than their latest rhetorical line of attack.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 10, 2010 1:31 PM in reply to superking
But, but, they can't because of the 41-50 Thug majority in the Senate! Honest!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 10, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to Steve LaBonne
41-59
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 10, 2010 1:57 PM in reply to nova voter
I wish this site had comment editing so one could fix stupid typos!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 10, 2010 6:39 PM in reply to Steve LaBonne
you and me both. it's especially annoying after i re-read it 5 times, preview it 10 times, and click submit, only to then immediately see three mistakes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 10, 2010 1:11 PM
'Bout damn time. They've spent most of the last year on their heels. Time to go on the offensive. It's not as if they don't have the ammunition.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
February 10, 2010 1:12 PM
"Just tell the truth on them (the GOP) and it feels like hell!" _Harry Truman
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 10, 2010 1:20 PM
I thought the House was gonna force the GOP to vote on Ryan's SS proposals to get them on record....whatever happened to that?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JefferyK
February 10, 2010 1:34 PM
Ooh -- Dems on the offensive makes me all verklempt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
February 10, 2010 1:37 PM
Hypocrisy is not a good word for what they have done. Plus, I bet most voters don't even know what that word means. They are liars and cheaters, and that's what the DNC et al should be calling them. You can bet if the show were on the other foot the Republicans would not hesitate to use that language and worse.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
February 10, 2010 2:00 PM
the best is Repug leaders like Boner and Cantor and that prick from Georgia who have been beating the anti-stimulus drum for the entire last year taking credit for the stimulus and/or noting how it's been beneficial to their districts
I think this type of thing, if called out loud and clear over and over, stands to prevent any large repug tide this fall and potentially increase majorities over the next few cycles
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 10, 2010 2:38 PM
They won't do it. Dems are all talk. Just like they're not having that vote to get Republicans on record regarding Social Security. Pussies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
February 10, 2010 3:48 PM
And the Republicans should respond by pointing out the complete failure of the "stimulus" to keep unemployment under 8% or even 10% for that matter. It is hilarous that the Dems think they can win this battle.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
southsidered
February 10, 2010 4:01 PM in reply to masanf
Yeah, maybe the Repugs can do it while they're waving around one of those big checks for the TV cameras. "Hey, look at all this stimulus money I brought to our district - which won't help create any jobs!"
The hypocrisy is so obvious even you can see it. But keep toeing that party line, champ!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
southsidered
February 10, 2010 4:03 PM in reply to masanf
Oh, and the Jan. unemployment rate was 9.7%. That's under 10%.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Numbersguy
February 10, 2010 5:15 PM in reply to masanf
Well, here's the deal, butthead. We just state the truth, over and over again. The republican policies caused the meltdown. Obama had to fix the screwups after 8 years of GOPturd destruction. And we say it over and over and over.
You say it three times, it's the truth.
About time the Dems went on offense.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 10, 2010 6:02 PM in reply to Numbersguy
Yeah....WE do, Democrat talking heads and strategists on the teevee not so much. If Dems had any clue, or more importantly, balls(they don't), they'd simply cut some ads showing these numbskulls talking out of both sides of their mouths. It will never happen
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Numbersguy
February 10, 2010 5:18 PM in reply to masanf
The other serious problem that you morons have is that it is a long time to November. You can say "unemployment is above 10%" and poof! It's at 9.7%. While Obama has not done everything I want, he is fixing unemployment. By September, unemployment will be down to 7%, and we will hear "the Bush redepression" a whole bunch. Because it's still Bush's fault, and it will be until 2016.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Brezzydee
February 10, 2010 8:35 PM
Laws should be passed on every bill. If you don't vote on the bill for funds for the American people, then your district or state don't get any federal money. And these ad's with names and pictures should run in all 50 states so all of America can see who is taking their money for not doing anything in congress. Now that is theft.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LauraNo
February 10, 2010 11:07 PM
I suggest that as soon as they're done with those 71 districts, they let everyone else know the same thing. All people need to know about some of what the stimulus has done and that the GOP didn't want to save the economy. And that they are hypocrites on top of it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nancy Irving
February 11, 2010 2:40 AM
I don't see any conflict between opposing the bill while asking for a piece of it for your own state or district. That's just dealing with things as they are.
What I *do* see as hypocritical is that most Republicans claimed, at the time the bill was passed, that it would *not* in fact create jobs; but in the letters quoted, they're now begging for their cut on the grounds that the money *will* create jobs.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
just the facts
February 16, 2010 9:46 AM
According to President Obama's stimulus website, the economic recovery bill made plenty of success stories possible.... Arizona's 15th congressional district ... 30 jobs have been saved or created there as a result of the stimulus package. There's just one problem. Arizona doesn't have a 15th congressional district. ABC News tracked down this problem--and dozens of others. Apparently, the Recovery Board that Washington created to track the stimulus needs more help keeping itself on track. Hundreds of millions of dollars are either missing or misidentified. Did you know that there are 99 congressional districts in the Virgin Islands? That's pretty amazing considering that America's biggest state, Texas, has 53!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tosh
June 6, 2010 10:40 PM
Not sure how any of these jobs help ME, average American ... OR how putting the country into debt for these kinds of projects is somehow supposed to have me stand and cheer the Mr President ... regardless of who wears that name at the given moment. As soon as the office switches its all gonna be O'Bama's fault, just like now its Bush's and before that it was Clinton's and before that ... etc etc ... blame the other guy ... I am waiting for the person who will stand up and say THE BUCK STOPS HERE!! REGARDLESS OF HOW IT HAPPENED, I AM IN CHARGE AND ITS TIME TO QUIT BLAMING AND FIX IT!!
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?