TPMDC

White House Asks GOP To Come To Health Care Summit With A Plan

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

President Barack Obama and Rahm Emmanuel

Read More

Health Care

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius this afternoon invited key Congressional leaders to the Feb. 25 health care summit, an event that will be broadcast live in its entirety.

"The President will offer opening remarks at the beginning of the meeting, followed by remarks from a Republican leader chosen by the Republican leadership and a Democratic leader chosen by the Democratic leadership," Emanuel and Sebelius wrote in their letter, which you can read in full here.

"The President will then open and moderate discussion on four critical topics: insurance reforms, cost containment, expanding coverage, and the impact health reform legislation will have on deficit reduction," they added.

The administration will post online the text of a proposed health insurance reform package, Emanuel and Sebelius wrote.

The invitees - leadership from both parties - were asked to attend the all-day summit at the Blair House, which has been used for Cabinet retreats.

The White House says they expect real results from the meeting, and President Obama will ask Republicans to present their own comprehensive plan.

"In the last year, there has been an extraordinary effort to craft effective legislation. There have been hundreds of hours of committee hearings and mark-ups in both the House of Representatives and Senate, with nearly all of those sessions televised on C-SPAN," Emanuel and Sebelius wrote. "The Senate spent over 160 hours on the Senate floor considering health insurance reform legislation and, for the first time in history, both the House of Representatives and Senate have approved comprehensive health reform legislation. This is the closest our Nation has been to resolving this issue in the nearly 100 years that it has been debated."

Also in the letter, which the White House posted on its blog, was a note to members that they could each designate four more lawmakers to attend and participate in the meeting, along with health care policy staffers.

Emanuel and Sebelius say that Vice President Joe Biden, and Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director of the Office of Health Reform, and staffers from the Office of Management and Budget will be on hand. They also "hope" aides from the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation will attend.

Comments (73) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (3)

S1

user-pic

February 12, 2010 5:12 PM   

Are all the invitees expected to come without aides? If so, that would be very interesting -- most of them can't even blow their noses without prior briefing by an aide, and even then they need an aide to remind them halfway through how it's done, and to clean up afterwards.

Let's face it, the GOP Congresscritters can't say anything but "no," and the Dems can't say anything but "uncle." So Obama will probably be talking to himself (unless he invites his daughters in to get a few more adult brains in the room).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:47 PM    in reply to S1

Bernie sanders wasnt invited, neither was Alan grayson, or Anthony Weiner. its obvious this will be a republican stroke fest

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:13 PM    in reply to 3star2nr

Yeah not a single liberal is invited. What a joke. Rahm may think we are retarded, but he is making a huge mistake.

He is running a 1 term presidency, not a 2 term.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:24 PM    in reply to rbeats

They invited folks based on their position in the leadership, not on their political bona fides.

Besides, there's

Senator Tom Harkin, D-IA, Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee

and

Representative James Clyburn, D-SC, Majority Whip

and

Representative Henry Waxman, D-CA, Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee

and

Representative John Dingell, D-MI, Chair Emeritus of the Energy and Commerce Committee

who are all pretty liberal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 10:24 PM    in reply to rbeats

rahm? what is with you guys and rahm emanuel anyway?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:00 PM    in reply to elle a

Rahm has served in Congress. His critics here haven't. So they know better than he.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 12:24 PM    in reply to JNagarya

A lot of people who are doing and saying very stupid things are serving or have served in congress. What's your point ?
Rahm Emanuel comes across as a guy who thinks most other people are too dumb to understand what he's doing, as a very arrogant guy. I don't know if Obama picked him because they're alike or not, but if that was the case, then I believe that the two of them are equally to blame for this fucking health insurance reform fiasco. This is no longer a campaign. This is now supposed to be about governing, and governing involves making hard decisions, not fucking around with bipartisan dog and pony shows.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 5:01 AM    in reply to rbe1

"A lot of people who are doing and saying very stupid things are serving or have served in congress."

"A lot of people who are doing and saying very stupid things" are not and have not served in Congress. So yoour question back at ya:

"What's your point ?"

(Not-so-BTW: there isn't properly a space before terminal punctuation -- ".", "!", "?". If you don't want others to suspect you are barely literate, then don't present as being barely literate.)

"Rahm Emanuel comes across as a guy who thinks most other people are too dumb to understand what he's doing, as a very arrogant guy."

Do you base that on having met him? No, you do not. You base it upon what others have said, and that you prefer to believe that than anything positive that might be said about him.

You could learn from some here that it is better to stick to facts and truth instead of simpy adopting the hate-speech others proffer in place of facts and truth.

"I don't know if Obama picked him because they're alike or not, but if that was the case, then I believe that the two of them are equally to blame for this fucking health insurance reform fiasco."

Get it through your fucking ignorance: our gov'ts consists of three

SEPARATE

branches.

One is the Executive -- at the head of which is President Obama, and in which works Rahm Emanuel -- NEITHER of whom has jursidiction in or over Congress, or the decisions made there.

In view of your "need" to whine, how about basing it on accuracy -- fact, law, Constitution -- instead of what you WANT to be the reality? You hate Obama? -- say so. But STOP blaming HIM for the actions of CONGRESS -- HE HAS NO VOTE THERE; HE DOES NOT SET ITS AGENDA; HE DOES NOT AND CANNOT CONTROL WHAT IT DOES.

"This is no longer a campaign."

ONE journalist, ALLEGEDLY based upon an unknown number of UNIDENTIFIED/ANONYMOUS sources says something you can latch onto as excuse to bash President Obama, and or Emanual, and that's all you need. You could instead, wake up and grow up and concern yourself with KNOWN TRUTHS -- try "Separation of powers" as example -- instead of that which is essentially RUMOR.

But who gives a fuck,
right? If one wants to hate, one will use anything to that end, even if in the absence of which one must make it up out of thin air.

Everyone has an "opinion"; and, yes, everyone has the right to express their "opinion," even if it's nonsense, and even without being required to think first. But everyone has an asshole too.

"This is now supposed to be about governing, and governing involves making hard decisions, not fucking around with bipartisan dog and pony shows."

You've shown how much you know about "governing": ZILCH. Blaming the Executive for Congress is illiterate in the basics.

You've also shown how easy it is to swallow and regurgitate phrases, cliches, and buzzwords, without bothering first to determine WHETHER THEY ARE SUBSTANTIATED AS BEING TRUE, or are instead nothing more than RUMOR.

What do you need, for Christ's sake, to BEGIN to determine whether to blame Obama/Emanuel for CONGRESS' actions? Start with knowing that they are SEPARATE branches, and that NEITHER has control over the decision-making of the other.

And STOP DEMANDING we get a fucking "Strong Leader" every fucking 4 or 8 years: that's the sort of narrow, stupid, "might makes right" brainwashing that got us BUSHIT/CHENEY. Get used to balance and REASON in place of "strongman" BULLYING.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 12:50 PM    in reply to rbeats

Yes, I believe that too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 9:39 PM    in reply to 3star2nr

Inviting Sanders and Weiner would make sense since they are on Committees that have jurisdiction over the health bill. Too bad they weren't.

Greyson, as a freshman on the Financial Services Committee, would never get an invite.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 11:19 PM    in reply to jmnyc

No they aren't. There's three committees in the House that went through the Health bill. That's Energy and Commerce (Waxman), Education and Labor (Miller) and Finance (Rangel). That's it. Do you remember the health bill going through three committees before put together? That's what happened and that's why only these three were invited.

Remember though, dems can invite 4 others and republicans can as well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:15 PM   

"The President will then open and moderate discussion on four critical topics: insurance reforms, cost containment, expanding coverage, and the impact health reform legislation will have on deficit reduction," Emanuel and Sebelius wrote in their letter, which you can read in full here."

GAWD!!! Let's see, when Bill Clinton went to the hospital yesterday did it have anything to do with insurance reform, coverage cost containemnt, or the deficit? No, I think we were talking about his healthCARE.

Lord deliver us from centrists selling right-wing dogma.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:18 PM    in reply to bluebell

Italian Pasta Salad

1/2 teaspoon salt, plus more for seasoning
1 pound bow tie pasta
1 cup store-bought balsamic vinaigrette dressing
1/4 cup mayonnaise
1 tablespoon sugar
2 cups halved cherry tomatoes
1 (4-ounce) can sliced mushrooms, drained
2/3 cup pitted kalamata olives
1/2 diced green bell pepper
1/2 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
Grated Parmesan, for topping

Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil over medium heat. Add the pasta cook it according to package directions.

While the pasta is cooking, in a small bowl, whisk together the balsamic vinaigrette, mayonnaise, and sugar.

Drain the pasta well, transfer to a large serving bowl, and let cool. Add the tomatoes, mushrooms, olives, green pepper, salt, to taste, and the black pepper. Pour the dressing over the salad and toss to combine. Sprinkle with the cheese, toss lightly, and serve.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:20 PM    in reply to FreeRider

You're going to have to stop recommending unhealthy foods. It's not like we have access to Bill Clinton's cardiologist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:25 PM    in reply to bluebell

CREMA
2 cups heavy cream
1/4 cup buttermilk

Whisk the cream and the buttermilk together in a bowl. Cover and set in a warm place (a gas oven with just the heat from the pilot light is fine) for 8 hours. Crema may be kept in the refrigerator for as long as a week.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:59 PM    in reply to FreeRider

How do you know about Crema? That is a very old italian dessert

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:18 PM   

And can anyone explain to me why these incompetents who've had a week off because of snow need to have a vacation too?

I mean it's not like they passed a jobs bill after they punted on healthcare.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:21 PM    in reply to bluebell

Sauteed Spinach

2 tablespoons unsalted butter
2 tablespoons finely chopped shallots
1 pound spinach, washed, tough stems removed
Salt and freshly grated white pepper
Pinch grated nutmeg

Melt the butter in a large skillet over medium-high heat. Add the shallots and saute for 1 minute. Add the spinach and saute, stirring to wilt and combine with the shallots. Season with salt and freshly ground pepper and a pinch freshly ground nutmeg, to taste.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:21 PM    in reply to bluebell

Go ask your republican friends. How did you like your job working for Tim Pawlenty?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:42 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Even Pawlenty understands that you have to plow the snow. Talk is not enough.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:49 PM    in reply to bluebell

amazing no republicans showed up at the capital t do work. This was obviously some socialist plot..

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:00 PM    in reply to bluebell

YEAH RIGHT. He's done such a great job as governor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:24 PM   

So the R's will have to bring a plan? No problem. Theirs can fit on a post-it note.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 11:51 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

Well clearly, the answer is:

a) More tax cuts for rich people,
b) Military force,
c) More prisons (secret or otherwise) with more brutal conditions,
d) Deregulation, and,
e) Privatization of government services and distribution of government property to rich people for free.

Absolutely no problem in the world that can't be fixed by some combination of those five things.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 5:43 PM   

It's a trap! Obama wants to show the Republicans his ancient tar pit in the rose garden. Many a dinosaur has been trapped there and I expect it could claim a few more if lightly covered with straw and leaves. If that doesn't work, I am still a strong believer in the dropping trap door. Damn I want to see that! Great TV!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:02 PM   

The administration will post online the text of a proposed health insurance reform package, Emanuel and Sebelius wrote.

Huh? Something new?

Would this be --- starting from scratch?

...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:14 PM    in reply to McMia

Saw that, not from scratch so much perhaps as just taking it out of the congress' hands and getting something substantive done without abortion provisions, and sweetheart deals for Nebraska
No Joe, Blanche, Max, etc.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:30 PM   

It IS a trap. They are going to be trapped into actually working for the American people. How awful!

The usual Republican obstruction is going to look awful on the camera. Basically the Republicans will have to agree to some compromise or expose themselves as unreasonable obstructionists. My bet is on the latter.

In a room full of professionals the Repubs won't be able to hide behind the usual BS talking points that really are not practical.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:05 PM    in reply to Darrius

It's shit or get off the pot for the Republicans. Perhaps they should ask former Senator "Toe-Tapper" Craig how to do that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:45 PM   

There's only one thing that could go wrong here: congressional Dems are participating. Hopefully, Rahm will have made it clear to them that their role is to sit down, shut up, and follow the President's lead.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 6:51 PM    in reply to Ken Riley

SURELY they already know that.

In fact, the Democratic House, Senate and White House should already have their course of action coordinated and rehearsed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:04 PM    in reply to Darrius

Rehearsal, you betcha. They have to be able to act like they give a damn and that is going to take an Oscar winning performances.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:16 PM   


It can be inconvenient to replace batteries in devices that need to work over long periods of time. Doctors might have to get beneath a patient’s skin to replace batteries for implanted biomedical monitoring or treatment systems. Batteries used in devices that monitor machinery, infrastructure or industrial installations may be crammed into hard-to-reach nooks or distributed over wide areas that are often difficult to access.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:35 PM   

What a disaster for the Republicans if they actually boycott this necessary meeting. Americans already blame them for the partisanship taking over Washington.

There is no good reason - other than partisanship - for any Republican not to attend this important discussion. I thought the GOP loved C-SPAN cameras?

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:08 PM    in reply to jim43

Exactly. They have to be watching the polls -- which favor President Obama on the important points. Congress isn't faring well as a whole, but the Republicans are graded lower than the Democrats -- and are even low-graded by a significant percentage of Republicans.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:39 PM   

Sure sounds like a trap to me.
I wonder how Boehner and his Republican buddies will look, hanging upside down snared by their ankles in Pres. Obama's trap ?
Is it then he will turn the tigers loose on them ?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:51 PM   

asking them to bring a healthcare plan to the meeting? is that a setup? lol

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 7:53 PM   

We should be talking about the most significant domestic legislation in 45 years and instead we have Kabuki theater to arrange a compromise to fall somewhere between Blue Cross and Blue Shield.

"The President will then open and moderate discussion on four critical topics: insurance reforms, cost containment, expanding coverage, and the impact health reform legislation will have on deficit reduction,"

Well, at least they aren't pretending healthCARE is part of the discussion. CARE isn't even among the four critical topics.

And you wonder why the American people KNOW they are being sold down the river.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 8:51 PM    in reply to bluebell

Sorry Bluebell. American people know who sold them down the river

By Jon Taplin - February 12, 2010, 11:14AM

A couple of months ago, I went out on a limb and predicted that a 2010 Republican election victory was a mirage. The New York Times/CBS News Poll this morning reinforces my confidence that President Obama and the Democrats can keep their majorities in November.

Americans blame former President George W. Bush, Wall Street and Congress much more than they do Mr. Obama for the nation's economic problems and the budget deficit, the poll found.

They credit Mr. Obama more than Republicans with making an effort at bipartisanship, and they back the White House's policies on a variety of disputed issues, including allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly in the military and repealing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.


Every successful campaign has a narrative. Obama's narrative for 2010 is "I inherited this mess caused by eight years of Republican misrule. I kept the economy out of a second great depression, but despite my efforts at compromise, the Republican party will block my every effort in a desperate attempt to return to power. Do you really want to go back to the ruling ideology that got us into this mess in the first place?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 10:37 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

Great. Now when is that fact going to translate into legislation, and support from the public?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:14 PM    in reply to acf_ma

Did you READ that post, and the poll results? Those results are from polling the people you're talking agbout.

Those results mean that We the people are not only paying attention, but know what in fact is going on. Those poll results are exactly right. And President Obama's patient -- and good faith -- effort at bipartisnship is having the results it should have.

What is especially remarkable, and surprising, is that the percentage wanting "DADT" overturned is overwhelming.

The Republicans -- much as they loathe doing it -- don't dare say no to the summit. I mean, they DID make a huge issue of the health insurance reform deliberations being televised. Well, welcome aboard, Republicans -- you're getting exactly that you demanded in pseudo-good faith!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:20 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

There ya go! :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 11:03 PM   

It is much easier to scare people than it is to educate them. The whole idea of a Democracy is to have a hopefully educated populace vote. The GOP plan is to scare everybody, which is much easier.

Death panels. Death taxes. It is pretty obvious; the GOP plan is to scare people so that the rich people can stay rich.

Times are really bad, so we can't afford to risk trying something different than what got us here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 2:39 PM    in reply to billpaustin

Don't forget Death Cheney.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 12, 2010 11:10 PM   

I'd actually like to see Sherrod Brown participate. He's been a real strong advocate for hcr on the help committee. He's practical and informed and I think he'd be a real asset.

Why aren't the dems screaming about the recently released report showing that the major health insurers pulled in $12 BILLION in profits all while covering 2.7 million less people than the year before? (See Rachel Maddow - Friday) That tidbit of info should be splashed throughout the print media, and be running on all news broadcasts. If that doesn't help the cause, I don't know what will. Perhaps then even the slowest learners would realize that the insurance companies are just as bad, if not worse than wall street - and that hcr is our only hope to stop the bleeding. Based on what I've seen from the dems, I doubt they'll take that ball and run with it...god only knows why not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:19 PM    in reply to NotFooledByDistractions

Why aren't the dems screaming about the recently released report showing that the major health insurers pulled in $12 BILLION in profits all while covering 2.7 million less people than the year before?
_____

Those facts -- along with the 39 per cent increase in premiums in California -- will doubtless come up during the summit in order to two-by-four the Republicans upside the head when they drift off into bullshitting.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 12:42 AM   

"President Obama will ask Republicans to present their own comprehensive plan"

That's great, it blows their excuse for not showing up. They want to start from scratch. OK, knock yourself out. Knowing they won't have any new ideas, dems can be armed with the facts why their plan won't work. Then they will be forced to tell the President to his face that he wants to pull the plug on grandma. Yes, it is a trap, It's a trap that the GOP built and set. They wanted their plan and they wanted TV cameras for the American people to see, they just didn't want anyone to dispute them. They prefer dictatorship rather than democracy. This will show the Party of No has nothing to offer voters.

I hope Obama makes the point how many lives are lost without insurance and the uninsured is twice as likely to die in the ER. He needs to put the real human factor on this legislation. He then needs to highlight the recent premium hikes and insurance companies record profits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:39 AM   

The GOP won't agree to anything, and the existing bills aren't going anywhere. Not only is nothing going to get done, but also political advisers are going to warn their clients off healthcare reform for the foreseeable future.

That this could happen in the context of Democratic control of all three branches of the federal government, with a supermajority in the Senate demonstrates clearly that our government is completely broken.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:05 AM    in reply to DancingBananas

Cosign. Spot on analysis.

The government is clearly broken beyond repair. Time for a constitutional convention to make some major changes. Dems have had control of the legislature and executive branches and have gotten nothing done for over a year. The king had nowhere near the control the dems have and he ran the country into the ground. How is that possible? Time for some major changes. If the dems aren't going to do sh*t, it's time for the people to get things done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:44 AM    in reply to Michael A

Apparently you don't know the difference between analysis and predictions. DancingBananas was doing his Miss Cleo routine. You think it's analysis because you hope he's right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:49 AM    in reply to FreeRider

Shrimp Scampi

Ingredients
1 pound linguini
4 tablespoons butter
4 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil, plus more for drizzling
2 shallots, finely diced
2 cloves garlic, minced
Pinch red pepper flakes, optional
1 pound shrimp, peeled and deveined
Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper
1/2 cup dry white wine
Juice of 1 lemon
1/4 cup finely chopped parsley leaves
Directions
For the pasta, put a large pot of water on the stove to boil. When it has come to the boil, add a couple of tablespoons of salt and the linguini. Stir to make sure the pasta separates; cover. When the water returns to a boil, cook for about 6 to 8 minutes or until the pasta is not quite done. Drain the pasta.

Meanwhile, in a large skillet, melt 2 tablespoons butter in 2 tablespoons olive oil over medium-high heat. Saute the shallots, garlic, and red pepper flakes (if using) until the shallots are translucent, about 3 to 4 minutes. Season the shrimp with salt and pepper; add them to the pan and cook until they have turned pink, about 2 to 3 minutes. Remove the shrimp from the pan; set aside and keep warm. Add wine and lemon juice and bring to a boil. Add 2 tablespoons butter and 2 tablespoons oil. When the butter has melted, return the shrimp to the pan along with the parsley and cooked pasta. Stir well and season with salt and pepper. Drizzle over a bit more olive oil and serve immediately.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 1:54 PM    in reply to Michael A

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Sorry.You're not my type.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 1:14 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Most of the possibilities for reform appear closed off: the House is pretty clearly not going to pass the Senate bill as-is; the WH is not coming at this from the perspective of starting from scratch; and if there were the votes in the Senate for reconciliation it would have happened by now. Reform looks unlikely at this point. I personally would like to have seen single payer, but I thought the House bill was a net positive, so this is a disappointing outcome from my perspective. And in any event, given where we are today and why, the point on the need to fix the process stands.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 1:56 PM    in reply to DancingBananas

>>the WH is not coming at this from the perspective of starting from scratch;>>

YOU LIE! The White House has said repeatedly that they are NOT gonna start over.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:23 PM    in reply to Michael A

"Dems have had control of the legislature and executive branches and have gotten nothing done for over a year."

That isn't true, Troll.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 7:03 PM    in reply to JNagarya

Really? The last major thing passed was the stimulus, which was passed more than a year ago.

What else meaningful has been passed within the last year and signed into law? Enlighten me. Troll

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 15, 2010 3:15 AM    in reply to Michael A

Others have posted blogs listing the numerous laws enacted by the Democratically-controlled Congress, and signed into law by President Obama.

Others have noted that this has been the most productive Congress since that of 1966.

If you were REALLY attentive, instead of jabbering around the edges, you'd know that. Instead you focus solely on the "major" things you hear about at fifth hand.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:27 AM   

Item 1:
 “A mere seven months ago (that would be around June 2009), The New York Times/CBS poll found that 72% of Americans ‘supported a government-administered insurance plan—something like Medicare for those under 65—that would compete for customers with private insurers.’”

Item 2: As of February 2010, Mandated premium payments to private sector insurers, tax money to private sector insurers, stipulations making it legal for insurers to spend only 80 cents of every 100 cents on actual health care while spending 20 cents of every 100 cents on lobbying, 'sympathetic' candidates, CEO bonuses, 'administration' and fighting your claim for treatment, no single payer health care reform, no 'government option',

Item 3: Other than Pharma and the insurance industry - those who created the sop for themselves - no one (say 72%) supports this charade.

Question: What is likely to be accomplished at the 'summit'?

Answer: Complete vassalage of the middle class to the insurance industry by limiting all malpractice suits and awards - completing the picture by mandating us to pay insurance companies, fining us if we dont, allowing companies to spend 20% of our money on 'administration' (i.e. fighting our claims, lobbying, donating to candidates who support them, etc), and then protecting insurers from any malpractice claims, thereby baring us from protecting ourselves in court from insurers' errors, omissions, mistakes and malfeasance.

So, you want and health care 'summit' to finish off any rights you may have remaining ?
Do not suport the 'summit charade'!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:41 AM    in reply to bill

Ignore the repukes. They will not cooperate. If they are going to pass something, pass something and stop this absurdity. It has gone on way, way tooooooooooo long. What more is there to talk about?

No mandates if no public option, get rid of preexisting conditions and regulate the sh*t out of the industry. Make it short and simple. This is nuts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 12:04 PM    in reply to Michael A

Another opening, another show....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 9:56 PM    in reply to bill

Every Democratic health plan contained subsidies to private insurance companies. The public option was in addition to that. Problem with a public option with no insurance regulation is that insurance companies dump their expensive patients onto public option. This would allow them to undercut public option prices and keep the healthy people.

Republicans will never vote for HCR in exchange for tort reform.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:35 AM   

The reason citizens and the public interest have not been served by the Democrats over the last year is that the Democrats are controlled by the same interests that controlled Bush.

The interests in control remain in control (witness the last 12 months) whether the Republicans or the Democrats are in the majority , whether there is a Republican or Democratic President (witness the last 12 months).

This is the condition of our country and there appears to be nothing that can be done about it.

We mistook Obama for a leader, but that was obvious our own self-delusion. We thought the Democrats would govern in the public interest - delusion or wishful thinking.

The last year has confirmed the assertions of the most cynical: Of our Democracy, only a charade remains.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 12:18 PM    in reply to bill

Bill I must agree with your optimistic judgement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 11:37 AM   

The reason citizens and the public interest have not been served by the Democrats over the last year is that the Democrats are controlled by the same interests that controlled Bush.

The interests in control remain in control (witness the last 12 months) whether the Republicans or the Democrats are in the majority , whether there is a Republican or Democratic President (witness the last 12 months).

This is the condition of our country and there appears to be nothing that can be done about it.

We mistook Obama for a leader, but that was obvious our own self-delusion. We thought the Democrats would govern in the public interest - delusion or wishful thinking.

The last year has confirmed the assertions of the most cynical: Of our Democracy, only a charade remains.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 1:45 PM   

Here we are again.

All discussion about HCR will be reduced to rants about Rahm.

I wonder if the Right has not figured out the utterly predictable arguments and hyperbolic language of the "nothing if not change in one, fell swoop" FDL contingent - and comment so that people get distracted (is any of this about one person - r. emanuel???).

But wait: Don't need mimicry from the Right. We've got the ever helpful HuffPost.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 9:48 PM    in reply to mphillip

I wondered whether Rahm Emmanuel is hurting Obama's image. Hard to find any polling data, but Fox News has a poll that puts him at Favorable 14%, Unfavorable 24%. I've never noticed Fox polling to have a conservative bias (oddly enough), but while you could say he's unpopular, mostly he's just unknown. Probably only political active people have an opinion of Rahm Emmanuel but true swing voters have no idea who he is.

He still has a lot of friends in the House of Reps.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 4:20 PM   

The health care bill could be wrote in one paragraph, signed off on and put into law.

Give the country the same health care as Congress has...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 5:05 PM   

I agree with Jeronimo Dan and, to that end, I think that one of: Tom Daschle, Jeanne M. Lambrew, Scott S. Greenberger (who wrote the outstanding book Critical: What We Can Do About the Health Care Crisis) should be invited to attend, if not speak. We need a Federal Health Care Board, comparable to the Federal Reserve. Plucky though they may be, the Congress is ill-equipped to handle health care. At best - and I think history bears this out - they get rolled by lobbyists for various constituencies. Health care needs to be removed from the political process.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:04 PM   

It's kind of funny that the White House has to ask them to come with a plan in the first place. Like if they wouldn't have asked, the GOOP would have brought Yo-Yo's or Swastikas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 6:30 PM   

Excellent game plan

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 7:57 PM   

Don;'t get your knickers in a twist over who was invited or who wasn't. This is just another flaccid weary display by a limp and narcissistic President. This sort of political theater saves him the embarrassment of trying to be a real leader.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 10:10 PM   

Republicans are probably wise to be wary. Keep in mind that Obama will be the most popular person in the room by a long shot. Look at the approval ratings for Congress and individual Congressional leaders. They are truly abysmal, particularly on the Republican side. Obama has set up the debate so he both leads, moderates, and pontificates as much as he wants.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 14, 2010 10:01 PM   

I think the summit is more intended to educate the public as to what HCR is. It will clearly state what will be in the final bill and what won't be in the bill (death panels). Hopefully it will be a public axing of most of the crap that has worked its way in. And it will give dems an opportunity to take the frightwingers to task on misinformation. Republican's pathetic excuse of a plan will be disseminated as worthless talking points. This is to prove to the American people that Republicans have done nothing and offer nothing to help the thousands of lives in the balance. This will also make the case of reconciliation to overcome record obstruction. It gets out in front of the process that the frightwingers will call a "ramming through" of policy. And it will allow the people to make their own judgments rather than being told what to believe. I just hope they make the human case for HCR and finally demonize the insurance companies as out of control profiteers. Good Luck dems, your future depends on it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on