TPMDC

Does The Public Distrust Majority Rule? A New Poll Says No


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Recent polling suggests that a small majority of Americans don't want Democrats to invoke the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process to fix and finish health care reform. But is it the majority-rule vote they oppose? Or is it the underlying health care bill?

A new poll by the firm Research 2000--commissioned by the advocacy groups Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy for America, and Credo--suggests it's the latter. After describing what reconciliation is, the survey asked "If the Senate passes a health care reform bill that you consider to be beneficial to your family, would you object to the Senate's use of 'reconciliation' rules to pass that bill with a majority vote, or not?"

Unsurprisingly, people are all for a majority-rule vote when they approve of the underlying legislation. The subtext here, of course, is that the public option is wildly popular--more popular than the rest of health care reform--and progressives are pushing Congress to include it in the reconciliation package they pass as part of the final push on health care reform.

Here are the results in the states of a handful of key senators:

  • NV - Reid: 55% favor reconciliation to 36% oppose (Independents 64% favor to 23% oppose)
  • IL - Durbin: 67% to 26% (Independents 81% to 17%)
  • WA - Murray/Cantwell: 65% to 25% (Independents 76% to 15%)
  • MO - McCaskill: 58% to 35% (Independents 73% to 20%)
  • IA - Harkin: 66% to 29% (Independents 83% to 14%)
  • ND - Dorgan/Conrad: 53% to 36% (Independents 66% to 20%)
  • VA - Webb/Warner: 60% to 32% (Independents 74% to 17%)

And in all of those states, voters who say their senators should push to pass a public option during the reconciliation outnumber those who say they shouldn't.

  • NV - Reid: 52% yes to 41% no. (Independents 58% yes to 33% no)
  • IL - Durbin: 42% to 7% (Independents 44% to 6%)
  • WA - Murray/Cantwell: 44% to 9% (Independents 48% to 7%)
  • MO - McCaskill: 37% yes to 15% (Independents 38% to 12%)
  • IA - Harkin: 39% yes to 12% (Independents 40% to 12%)
  • ND - Dorgan/Conrad 34% to 21% (Independents 33% to 20%)
  • VA - Webb/Warner: 43% to 14% (Independents 45% to 11%)

Comments (10) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

February 26, 2010 10:57 AM   

Any voter who says they oppose the "public option" should then be ask to explain what it is (as formerly proposed by the White House).

I think we'd see that an overwhelming majority of those who oppose it ... don't know what it actually is. What they opposed is the demonized version of it that the far right has saturated the media with.

Sad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 11:46 AM    in reply to justaJ0e

excellent point

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 11:50 AM    in reply to justaJ0e

precisely how can anyone be against having more choices. makes no sense whatsoever

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 1:50 PM    in reply to justaJ0e

BINGO. Dems are truly idiots if they don't put the MOST popular part of reform into the bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 2:44 PM    in reply to theone718

Sadly, looking at the reverse; we know that many of them are idiots.... and they have in fact done as you might therefore predict.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 10:58 AM   

Sounds about right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 11:06 AM   

i don't trust these polls mainly because of the wording. the wording realy does depend on how people feel about a particular issue. i knew mcconnell was lying yesterday when he said he majority of amricans were against reconcilliation. it depends on how the question is phrased

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 12:53 PM   

I still can't follow the Republican argument on this - it seems pretty clear that the "founding fathers" (whom the Repubs defer to on everything else) intended the Senate to be able to pass legislation with a simple majority. Why else would the Vice President get a tie-breaking vote? If everything was supposed to require more votes, it wouldn't be needed.

I guess they're only strict constructionists when that supports their position...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 1:40 PM   

Even if the majority of the public distrusts majority, then then minority should ignore the majority's wishes and force majority rule on them anyway.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 26, 2010 1:54 PM    in reply to Darrius

Yet another "softball" the Dems have failed to even make a swing at. The fact that THEY were the elected majority. The MAJORITY of voting Americans chose these Dems to govern based on their ideas and fully expect them to follow through on this "implied contract".

Therefor, everytime the Republican MINORITY stands in the way and insists the MAJORITY must do as THEY say ... they are attacking the very foundation blocks of our democracy.

... at least this is what the Republicans cried when THEY were in charge. The Republicans are giving every opportunity for the Dems to play the "Why do you hate Democracy?" card and they haven't even TRIED to use it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on