
Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) hasn't been what some might call a "model Democrat" this Congress. Behind every vote she casts and word she utters in public is a simple--and for her terrifying--political reality. Up for reelection in an extremely unfriendly electoral climate, and deeply unpopular among her constituents, Lincoln has been guarding her right flank for a year, putting her at odds with the bulk of her colleagues on issue after issue, and requiring considerable arm-twisting (and concessions) from leadership to win her support for major initiatives, including health care reform back in December.
But in just the past few weeks, Lincoln's MO has changed. When health care reform was the issue driving national politics, and Democrats were in "must do" mode, Lincoln laid low. Almost comically so--dodging reporters via privileged exits, and through the Capitol's labyrinthine hallways. Now, with Washington preparing for what could be a watershed mid-term election in November, Lincoln has found her voice...and it's an increasingly conservative one!
On health care, she took a more substantive turn right. After voting for the Senate bill in December, she probably hoped she could put the controversial issue behind her, or at least have something to run on. But when Democrats lost their supermajority in the Senate, and suddenly needed to find a clever way around a final filibuster, Lincoln was first out of the gate saying she wouldn't help.
"I am opposed to and will fight against any attempts to push through changes to the Senate health insurance reform legislation by using budget reconciliation tactics that would allow the Senate to pass a package of changes to our original bill with 51 votes," she said in a statement. "I will not accept any last-minute efforts to force changes to health insurance reform issues through budget reconciliation, and neither will Arkansans."
And just this week, when President Obama addressed Senate Democrats, Lincoln used the opportunity to ally herself with the GOP and distance herself from the "extremes"...sitting in the room with her.
"Are we willing as Democrats not only to reach out to Republicans but to push back in our own party for people who want extremes, and look for the common ground that's going to get us the success that we need not only for our constituents but for our country in this global community, in this global economy?" she asked Obama. "Are we willing as Democrats to also push back on our own party and look for that common ground that we need to work with Republicans and to get the answers? And it's really the results that are going to count to our constituents. And we appreciate the hard work that you put into it."
When the League of Conservation Voters--a far cry from Greenpeace--put Lincoln on its "Dirty Dozen" list of environmentally unfriendly legislators, Lincoln took umbrage. But instead of letting it slide, she blasted the influential interest group.
"Threats from extremist groups from outside our state tell me I'm doing something right for Arkansas," she said.
Much of this is posturing--signaling to voters back home that she's not like other Dems. But each episode confirmed what many liberals and political observers already knew: That Lincoln has responded to the political maelstrom she faces back home not by standing tall with her party and running as a populist (think Sherrod Brown), but by transparently obstructing her own party's agenda.
Has it worked? Not in the slightest. A recent survey by the firm Public Policy Polling finds Lincoln dramatically behind her likely Republican challenger John Boozman by a staggering 56%-33%.
Schmed
February 5, 2010 10:30 AM
Not much of a political strategist here, but what's the down side to primarying Lincoln? She's gonna lose anyway.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
February 5, 2010 10:43 AM in reply to Schmed
There is a grassroots effort afoot to get Lt. Gov. Bill Halter to mount a primary challenge.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pacific NW Mark
February 5, 2010 10:49 AM in reply to Schmed
Agreed. One liberating effect of Mr. Brown's Massachusetts victory is that we need no longer be beholden to the likes of Ms. Lincoln (or similarly, Mr. Nelson). Tacking to the right is suicidally stupid. Does she think the GOP and their ilk will now support her? Game over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 10:57 AM in reply to Pacific NW Mark
If anything, she'll piss of the MO Dems when she hamstrings the Democratic national agenda even more. If she's gonna lose, why not get someone in there who can actually enunciate and promote the authentic Democratic agenda? He/she might lose, but at least the voters will have an actual choice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FlownOver
February 5, 2010 11:43 AM in reply to Schmed
Arkansas Dems, but yeah.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 12:51 PM in reply to FlownOver
Can't seem to get Nelson out of my mind....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Numbersguy
February 5, 2010 4:25 PM in reply to Schmed
What does Nelson have to do with MO? That would be McCaskill, who is a light lavender dem, not a true Blue Turd like Lincoln.
Nelson - NE
Lincoln - AR
You should get a cheat sheet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 5, 2010 10:31 AM
Yeah, convictionlessness, craven, cringing cowardice and attempting to turn yourself into a Bizzaro copy of your opponent as election day approaches type phoniness. That'll work. Voters love that.
S'long, Blanche. Good riddance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
February 5, 2010 11:04 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Co-sign. God, how I've grown to hate her, and all the other spineless Democrats who think that marketing themselves as GOP-lite will save their sorry selves. (Hell, sometimes it's not even Lite.) We have GOT to have a Democratic Party that aggressively fights for its point of view, instead of this cowering and hoping that somehow acting like Republicans and agreeing that conservatism is ultimately the right POV--but please vote for us anyway, folks--will somehow result in magical election wins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 11:07 AM in reply to ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
If that's the case, then the wrong Dem (or Dems) should be catching the flack. The ones who enable ConservaDems as a way to keep a super majority are the ones who are shooting the party in the foot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
February 5, 2010 12:34 PM in reply to Schmed
I really think we screw ourselves if we let ourselves get into the kind of Revolutionary Guards urge to purge mentality the GOP's gotten itself into. That mentality is the means by which the Jim DeMints and Michelle Bachmanns of the world become the intellectual lights of their party instead of fringe actors.
But I'm also against the any Dem is better than no Dem mentality because it enables the kind of contemptable disloyalty we've seen way too much of this Congress.
You have to take it on a case by case basis. There may be Democrats who are too far right for their districts who definitely need to be primaried. Lieberman, for example. There may be Democrats who are so far right, they might as well be primaried. Heath Schuler from my state comes to mind. There may be Democrats who are such complete cringing cowards, so lacking in character, and so utterly inept politically, that we're better off without them, even if it means losing the seat.
But there are also going to be cases where the oppostion is so awful, we're better off with the disloyal, corrupt, halfwitted, pain in the balls we've got now. Bayh's race is shaping up that way. And, of course, if we're talking about the difference between controlling Congress or losing control, it would be insane to act like that's not a relevant consideration in an age when the other party has gone so completely off the deep end.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 12:58 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
And, of course, if we're talking about the difference between controlling Congress or losing control, it would be insane to act like that's not a relevant consideration in an age when the other party has gone so completely off the deep end.
I fear that we're close to that now and all a super majority really does is act as a governor on the lunacy. Nothing is getting done as one party devolves into its constituent nutters while the other party dithers about not doing anything too audacious lest they be painted as big spending liberals. If all the Dems are is a brake on madness without any control of the vehicle, the game is over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
admiralmpj
February 5, 2010 1:17 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
First, No. 5 (Shuler) holds out and screws the Redskins.
Now, No. 5 is holding out (at C Street and screwing his party.
Nothing's changed with that guy.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 5, 2010 11:43 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Yes, about as much help to the party as tits on a boar hog.
I hope the door hits her ass on the way out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
February 5, 2010 12:04 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
Stupid.
Stupid stupid stupid.
The only thing that could get her re-elected is to become an actual Democrat. So this moron is doing exactly the opposite.
Stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 5, 2010 10:39 AM
Of course not. When the voters see you as an unprincipled opportunist bending to the slightest political breeze in a desperate effort to win reelection at any cost, you're toast.
If you stand up and fight for what you believe in (presuming you actually do believe in something) then at least the voters will respect your integrity even if they disagree with you. And given that Arkansas is a relatively poor state, running as an economic populist is as good as any approach a Democrat could take. Plus, if you lose running this way, at least you can leave office with honor, a clear conscience, and your principles intact.
But the path that Lincoln has chosen means losing with shame.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
midnight rambler
February 5, 2010 12:57 PM in reply to Moose49
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 5, 2010 1:48 PM in reply to midnight rambler
Yup. I was thinking the same thing. Though at least in his case, it's produced better votes than usual from him, albeit temporarily.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Sam Wise Gingy
February 6, 2010 7:26 PM in reply to Moose49
As Harry Truman observed, a real Republican will beat a fake Republican every time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 5, 2010 10:41 AM
I'm gonna wash that gal right outa my hair
And send her on her way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
February 5, 2010 10:44 AM
Nothing is more worse than a Republican - - unless it's a Phony Republican.
I know. GI JOE is one of my so-called Senators!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BlueinColorado
February 5, 2010 10:44 AM
I take some comfort from Lincoln's upcoming loss, a bit less from the thought of her high-paying lobbyist gig and still less from her inevitable emergence as the media's go-to Disappointed Democrat ("Senator, did Obama's over-reaching cost you your seat, and is that a message to other Democrats?" "Well, Joe/Mika/Candy/David/Jake/Sean, I'm sorry to have to say....")
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
February 5, 2010 10:44 AM
She will be missed... not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
geofu54
February 5, 2010 10:46 AM
Give it up already, Blanche.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
madmatt
February 5, 2010 10:47 AM
Hey you worthless hack, how many times did rethugs reach out to us! You won't be missed in the least!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Ragin
February 5, 2010 10:47 AM
I need to be reminded again that it's the progressive wing of the Democratic party that is preventing the enactment of the Democratic agenda.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 11:04 AM in reply to Barry Ragin
As they say about not liking the weather in Frisco, "just wait a minute."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 5, 2010 1:01 PM in reply to Barry Ragin
here you go: the house could pass the fucking senate bill TODAY. why don't they? tomorrow, a guy with cancer is going to lose his job, and with it, his employer-provided health insurance. and he's not going to be able to get another policy because of his preexisting condition. letting that happen because of pride or because the bill only meets 70 or 80 percent of what you'd like, is no better than filibustering the bill just because obama wants it passed.
there. feel better?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 1:44 PM in reply to nova voter
And because of all of this, we need to make sure Blance Lincoln gets re-elect, right? Cuz she's worked out so well for HIR, after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 1:45 PM in reply to Schmed
re-elected
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
February 7, 2010 7:49 AM in reply to Schmed
of course not. neither lincoln nor landrieu nor nelson should get a dime from the DNC for reelection, and they should be primaried. obstruction and extortion have consequences.
but that has nothing to do with getting it passed NOW. their betrayal to their party is in the past, and they will hopefully be punished for it. NOW, it's up to the house to pass it, and 50 senators who aren't traitors to their leadership to clean it up in reconciliation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
freaktown
February 5, 2010 10:49 AM
if chris dodd can retire to save his seat, why can't lincoln do the same? it's not like she's going to win no matter what she does or how she votes...
and seriously. why doesn't she just become a republican? she talks like one, acts like one and votes like one. i don't understand why these "conservative democrats" are even democrats at all when they don't share the values of or even agree with large parts of the party's platform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Africanlivedit
February 5, 2010 10:49 AM
Great example of a politician being a self-absorbed douchebag. Believing the world can't go on without her ... so she compromises her stances and beliefs all for the sake of self-preservation. Sad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BlueinColorado
February 5, 2010 10:49 AM
Adding: any chance the DSCC has the brains to save its money in AR and send it to Paul Hodes and the Ohio candidate? even Robin Carnahan. Probably not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
February 5, 2010 11:57 AM in reply to BlueinColorado
Nope, DSCC only cares about protecting incumbents, regardless of how shitty they are.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expatjourno2
February 5, 2010 10:50 AM
She's such a whore.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Andreams
February 5, 2010 10:52 AM
Has she booked herself on Fox yet? Maybe Sarapoo can interview her. They'd make quite a team.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
February 5, 2010 10:58 AM
Republicans will NEVER vote for you Blanche. They'll vote for the Republican in the race. And Democrats will not hold their nose and vote for you Blanche, because you've gone way too far this time. Addition by subtraction. I'd rather have 58 seats if you were the 59th.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jim43
February 5, 2010 11:01 AM
Lincoln is typical of the Democrats in red states that are feeling a disconnect with the White House right now. The push on jobs and the economy from Obama is a help, but health care is still out there as a real sore spot.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ETSpoon
February 5, 2010 11:02 AM
Blanche Lincoln thinks she can get re-elected by proving everybody who says there isn't a dime's worth of difference between the two establishment parties right. What a dope. If she can't see that isn't working from her poll numbers she deserves a line on the unemployment line.
This would be a good opportunity for the Greens, Arkansas after all has one Green state representative, and the tea baggers to field strong candidates against both establishment party candidates.
Unfortunately the Greens often run candidates who come off like a latter-day Randee of the Redwoods and the tea baggers...well there isn't a dime' worth of difference between them and what Establishment Republicans say but never deliver.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
February 5, 2010 11:02 AM
Lincoln is almost a textbook case of how to be a bad politician and a worse Senator.
If I had a dollar for every Democrat who would be sorry to see her lose, I'd still be broke.
I, along with many others, would rather see a 55 member majority of actual Democrats, than 60 Senators (which, by the way, thanks in part to dithering by folks like Lincoln we no longer have) that include her, Lieberman and Nelson. I actually believe with a more united caucus with a clearer message more would get done and R's would be less inclined to, and find it more difficult to, oppose.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
yellowdogfox1
February 5, 2010 11:06 AM
Well, I certainly don't like the way she has been voting, but I don't put her in the lowest circle of hell with Lieberman and Nelson, if only because in a poll -- was it Washington Monthly? -- of Congressional staffers she was rated as the nicest senator. That should still count for something -- maybe not much, but something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 11:10 AM in reply to yellowdogfox1
As my mom says, "the devil is the nicest guy you'll ever meet."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ShoelessJoeMcCarthy
February 5, 2010 11:07 AM
League of Conservation Voters is an "extremist" group? F*&% off, Lincoln. She sounds like Rush Limbaugh.
Mjshep, I completely agree with everything you just posted. Get rid of Nelson, Lieberman, and Lincoln. The Big Tent's no good if jerks like these keep trying to pull out the stakes and poles.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
martis
February 5, 2010 11:10 AM
I hope Walmart has her resume.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 11:11 AM in reply to martis
She's not already on the board? (just a quip, no need to research.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
whitenoise100
February 5, 2010 11:13 AM
She is exhibit A why I never give any $$ to the DSCC. Better to donate directly to true progressives who possess actual spines, like Sherrod Brown and Al Franken.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GenePoole
February 5, 2010 11:13 AM
Harry S Truman:
"Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time."
You go Blanche.
Go. Going. Gone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LarsThorwald
February 5, 2010 11:22 AM in reply to GenePoole
I came to post that very quote.
Exactly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 11:24 AM
Too late. The main problem isn't that Arkansans don't cotton to Blanche on a personal or a political level. It's that they don't like Washington incumbents
Take Texas - PLEASE
KBH was leading one of the most unpopular governors in Texas history by double digits until she entered the race and Perry started running against Washington
And KBH was the most popular politician in Texas until not very long ago
Throw the bums out time again...it's been that way for the past couple of election cycles and by all indications it will be so again - with a vengeance
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 11:49 AM in reply to JohnMcCSF
Left out most important part of the Kay Bailey saga - she's spent the last four weeks trying to move right too
Fallen even further behind and is almost fork ready
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scott in PacNW
February 5, 2010 12:29 PM in reply to JohnMcCSF
I don't think of Texas as a bellweather state.
Cornyn, Dubya, Delay: They sure know how to pick 'em.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sean
February 5, 2010 11:24 AM
Blanche needs to swerve into a hair salon and a smart clothes shop to ease her transition back into a more private ignomy...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
free2bme
February 5, 2010 11:24 AM
She's a DINO who openly called her fellow Democrats radicals. I will be glad when she is gone. Actually, a petition should be mounted for a Democratic primary challenger to compete for he party nomination.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 11:54 AM in reply to free2bme
Oh yeah like they're lining up out there in Arkansas!
Don't you true-believers get it yet?
Who wants to lose by 30 points?
"Primary the bastard!"
Gee I thought I'd heard the last of such nonsense
This is ARKANSAS fer cryin out loud
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WestRox
February 5, 2010 11:24 AM
Totally unrelated ... please call Scooter Brown's office 202-224-4543 & remind it to vote as it said it would during the election as an independent voice. Not like the typical Republican dumb asses that HATE science like Inhore & Demint.(202) 224-4543. Jesus did NOT bring the dinosaur bones !!! GO SCIENCE !! Republicans hate science.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
human
February 5, 2010 11:26 AM
She is a complete political moron and a worthless DINO. Compare to Chris Dodd, who recognized that for the good of his party and country, he had to bow out so that another Dem could hold the seat--which is exactly what will happen in Connecticut with Blumenthal.
Acting like a Repub while attacking your own party almost never works, and definitely won't work in Arkansas. She is the only person on earth who doesn't see this. Her opposition to party principles is bad enough, but someone so completely stupid and blind to reality deserves to go down in flames.
If she doesn't do the right thing and announce her retirement, then she deserves to lose by the largest margin ever. Hopefully the loss comes in a primary rather than a general. If we're going to lose the seat, let's at least lose with someone who stands for something other than Repub-lite.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
human
February 5, 2010 11:33 AM in reply to human
oh, and attacking other Democrats and asking how to "push back" against those who actually stand for progressive principles?
Just take an executive position with Walmart where you belong and STFU, loser.
You can be top greeter, since you're so nice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JZ
February 5, 2010 11:33 AM
Hooray for short-sightedness! While I am not a fan of hers, I have no doubt she's better than her GOP successor will be. She's with us on far more issues than against. Sure she pops off and has tacked right this year, but what is she supposed do? Copying Brown would not work simply because Arkansas is much more conservative than Ohio. Arkansas is quickly becoming one of the reddest states in the nation. Retiring like Dodd wouldn't help either, since Dodd is in a solidly blue state meaning his replacement is all but a shoe-in for the seat, while any Dem to take her place is an underdog from the start. If the Dems want to be a majority party it means electing candidates in places a "real Dem" wouldn't have much chance. Lincoln and Nelson and Landrieu and Bayh all make my skin crawl. But if we want to enact ANY real legislation in the face of a united and intractable opposition, we need all of these SOBs. Even Lieberman, who in my opinion is far worse than any of them since he's from a super blue state and has no pressure from home to be such a jagoff. Bottom line: Hate her all you want, but we'll all be missing her when the Senate swears in a GOP teabagger next year.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 11:38 AM in reply to JZ
If the Dems want to be a majority party....
....cuz being the majority party has been such a sweet ride so far.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 12:21 PM in reply to Schmed
It's so much better to be in the minority..
Easier at least....you can hold rump anti-war hearings in the basement of the Capitol, until the Republican Speaker throws you out
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
February 5, 2010 12:56 PM in reply to JZ
No, actually she's not.
Public option = against.
Card check = against.
Cap and trade = against.
Consumer financial protection agency = against.
Using reconciliation to get anything done = against.
She won't be missed by her caucus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 5, 2010 11:34 AM
So, if you're an Arkansas voter and you're not to the right of center, you don't have a candidate in this race.
It was interesting to hear what she had to say to Obama during the confab that the Dem Senators had with him this week. She whined about all the flak she's taking from the left. So, that's her only problem. It's those damn lefties who want health care reform, environmental protection, and consumer protection from unscrupulous lenders and irresponsible manufacturers. If they would just leave her alone...
Get rid of this jerk. She doesn't vote with the Dems anyway. She won't be missed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
February 5, 2010 11:39 AM
Lincoln should take in a play. Dems don't need her!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 11:50 AM in reply to GTFOOH
That assumes that the Dems actually need some body.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
February 5, 2010 11:40 AM
Worthless dumbass cracker commits political suicide brought on by acute cowardice and fundamentally corrupt values. Good riddance! A real Democrat needs to file and run her from office in the primary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
February 5, 2010 11:52 AM in reply to oleeb
No one dumb enough to do that.
A REAL Democrat?????
....get real
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
February 5, 2010 12:01 PM
What the craven Lincoln fails to understand is that voters don't need a fake Republican when they can elect a real one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dem4life
February 5, 2010 12:07 PM
Another turncoat
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shortstop
February 5, 2010 12:20 PM
She's the last person in America to realize that she's done no matter what she does.
Or she realizes it but is putting all her effort into building her lobbyist cred now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 5, 2010 12:48 PM
They're the Terrell Owens of the political world: Lincoln, Nelson, Reid....all would be addition by subtraction.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 5, 2010 12:55 PM
Listen, Blanche, the lesson of the 2006 and 2008 elections was that the Republican brand was dogshit. Nobody wanted Republicans running things anymore. And poll after poll said the same thing UNTIL you and your Conservadem pals succeeded in throwing a wrench in the works whenever some meaningful legislation came along that had the support of nearly all of the other Senate Democrats. You are every bit as much of an obstructionist as the GOP is to the kind of progress the majority of voters had been seeking when they elected Obama.
By obstructing Senate Democrats and aiding Senate Republicans, you've helped drag down the party all across the country. When you keep them from accomplishing their goals, you've screwed everyone--including your own constituents!
The Republicans will always say that the country is moving to the right. It doesn't matter how hard they've been beaten in an election, they'll still say it. Stop believing them.
But all this is academic, Blanche. Just get the hell out of the way and let someone run for that seat who actually wants to do right by the people of Arkansas and knows better than to block their own party from passing vitally important legislation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aunt Sam
February 5, 2010 1:01 PM
Gee, why do I think of Obama's SOTU text that references worrying more about reelection than positive governing?
The Dems need to run a progressive liberal with some cajones against her in primary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 1:47 PM in reply to Aunt Sam
The Dems need to run a progressive liberal with some cajones against her in primary.
First, you'd have to get one to move to AR.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Aunt Sam
February 5, 2010 1:59 PM in reply to Schmed
Ya know, I almost put that at end of comment!
Guess it'll have to be a statewide 'scavenger hunt' for such a person. And just to be clear - the meaning of cajones in context has nothing to do with gender!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
February 5, 2010 2:16 PM in reply to Aunt Sam
the meaning of cajones in context has nothing to do with gender!
Clearly! Hillary has some spares according to Terry McAuliffe!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Max Thrax
February 5, 2010 2:26 PM in reply to Aunt Sam
"The Dems need to run a progressive liberal with some cajones"
The DNC filters those candidates out from jump street.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bw
February 5, 2010 1:30 PM
[size=200][color=red][b]She Devil[/b][/color][/size]
Apparently Senator Blanche Lincoln fails to realize that she may be making points with the Republican Party in Arkansas by coming out against Obama’s agenda, but she is in a nose dive in losing Democrat support and will crash and burn if she stays in the race. Democrats need to put up a primary challenger if they still want to hold on to this Senate seat. Otherwise it is a gone conclusion that she will lose in the general election in November. Is it any wonder why things don’t get done in Washington when you have Democratic traitors in your own party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jana47
February 5, 2010 2:26 PM
Lincoln is gone, gone because she didn't stand for anything, she's a REPUBLICAN and should have run on their ticket
GOOD RIDDENCE>
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jsdc007
February 5, 2010 2:33 PM
From a substantive standpoint, she's utterly useless, an absolute political coward if there ever was one.
However, as a Democrat, she allows the Dems to be the majority party in the Senate. Yes, I know that hasn't amounted to a hill of beans, but the alternative would be nightmarish. At least with Dems, however conservative, you're not dealing with birthers, racists, homophobes, misogynists and the rabidly insane. And if that's what they are, at least they do a good job hiding it.
Face it folks, its either the do-nothing Dems or the slash and burn Republicans. Who would you choose if your life depended on it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
February 7, 2010 5:32 PM
Yes, she is probably better than a tea-bagging bozo or war loving wing-nut, but counting on her is close to a waste of time. It's also the reason why the good Dems must be able to function with the majority in hand. The super-majority was a false sense of power & the over abused fillibuster must not be allowed to control our future. The Bushies created the model for getting through legislation with less than 60. So it's really just about fighting fire with fire.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pmccoy
February 8, 2010 9:12 AM
Who are these extremists in the Democratic party? Oh yeah, Obama's a socialist. I forgot.
Bad enough that the Rs define socialism as one degree to the left of center, never mind Ds running for the hills. All a sick joke, really, but totally unfunny given that it's all part of a larger campaign to keep the administration from accomplishing anything that is like real reform on any of our major domestic problems.
As others are saying here, Ds gotta get 'er done, whatever it takes. If Lincoln doesn't want to join in, so what?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bibimimi
February 8, 2010 8:44 PM
Her whiny, mincing, obsequious speech at the Dem summit was the big spoiler.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?