TPMDC

Fiorina Suggests California File Bankruptcy: 'This State Can't Pay Its Bills'

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

CA Senate candidate Carly Fiorina

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, a former Hewlett Packard chief executive, is under fire for suggesting bankruptcy should be a possibility for the cash-strapped state.

Fiorina's rivals jumped on comments she made to local business leaders in the Southern California city of Colton as quoted by the Riverside Press-Enterprise: "Whether that is the right approach now, I don't know. I think bankruptcy, as a possibility, at the very least focuses the mind on what has to be done to salvage a situation." They attacked her as unprepared since states under federal law cannot declare bankruptcy.

She told the Sacramento Bee that she understands that "technicality."

"Sure, I knew, but what cold comfort is that to all these California voters who may not know that technicality but who are sitting here knowing that by any common-sense definition, this state can't pay its bills," Fiorina told The Bee.

Rivals say because she's never held political office and has only been in the business world, she's unqualified. Similar critiques have been leveled at former eBay chief Meg Whitman (R-CA), who is running for governor.

In her comments to The Bee, Fiorina added:

And in fact, the media has described California as bankrupt for months. So I find it interesting that the Democrats are saying legally, it's not possible. Legally, it's not possible. But the reality of where we are ought to be focusing people's minds on what needs to be done.

Republican candidate Chuck DeVore went on the attack, with a spokesman telling the Los Angeles Times the comments are an example of Fiorina's "unreadiness" to serve in elected office.

California Democratic Party Chairman John Burton said the candidate's remarks "display her ignorance of California and the issues our state faces [and] also sends a message to voters that she's giving up on the people of California."

Fiorina made headlines earlier this month for her demon sheep ad attacking Republican candidate Tom Campbell as a false fiscal conservative.

The Republicans are competing to win the June primary nomination to challenge Sen. Barbara Boxer.

Late Update: Fiorina spokeswoman Julie Soderlund sends in her response:

It is unfortunate that Carly's political opponents are trying to distort her comments about something as serious and consequential as California's dire financial situation. Carly knows that that legally declaring bankruptcy isn't an option for the state of California like it is for local governments. Her point is that the concept of the state not being able to pay its bills and meet its obligations - and the fact that people are using the word 'bankrupt' to describe California's financial situation - should focus the mind on just how bad the state's financial situation really is.

Comments (68) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

February 11, 2010 9:57 AM   

Apparently her economic 'skills' regarding government abilities and rights is on a par with her economic 'ability' in running private sector businesses.........

Into the ground.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:44 AM    in reply to GayIthacan

remember Carly's "Carlyfornia" campaign website?

To think this woman was CEO of HP...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:31 PM    in reply to rynato

I am very glad to see her edge ever closer to the dotted line that separates self-absorbed, wealthy Republican trash from outright lunatics.

She has has even given herself a psycho haircut.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:53 PM    in reply to Model271

No, it may look home-cut but it probably cost more than a John Edwards do.

BTW, Why aren't more economists talking LOUDLY about reversing the anti-progressive tax structure that started this mess in the first place?

Lets make a 5-year deal with the wealthy: pay off this mess over the next 5 years with increased taxes, and we'll give them back their big tax breaks if the economy recovers and there's enough growth to replace their tax money with across-the-board taxes.

Just thinkin' out loud.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 6:21 PM    in reply to JEP07

Her explanation makes absolutely no sense. If she knew states can't declare bankruptcy, then why did she suggest doing something that's impossible?

She got stuck either way looking dumb b/c by doubling down and claiming she knew, it makes her look stupid for suggesting something impossible.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 2:26 PM    in reply to Model271

Hey dickhead, she's recovering from chemo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 2:54 PM    in reply to shooter242

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,574852,00.html

She's had 15 months to grow it out, but it is hardly any longer now than it was in the 11/09 post-chemo pic. My guess is she is keeping it that way to remind people of what she's been thru if they can't (and they won't) find any other reason to vote for her.

"If you had chemotherapy, here's a typical timetable:

* two to three weeks after chemotherapy ends: soft fuzz
* one month after: real hair starts to grow at its normal rate
* two months after: an inch of hair"

http://www.breastcancer.org/tips/hair_skin_nails/regrowth.jsp

She had the inch 15 months ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 3:09 PM    in reply to Model271

Well done! Methinks Shooter is running away with his tail between his legs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 2:57 PM    in reply to shooter242

A pit bull, or a pit-bull lookalike, and "shooter"?

What are you, her ex-Blackwater bodyguard?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 3:12 PM    in reply to shooter242

shooter's a bleeding heart all of the sudden, defender of the downtrodden. er, only when it suits him of course

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 6:58 PM    in reply to twirling fartknocker

"shooter's a bleeding heart all of the sudden,"

he's what I call a wannabe neocon...

And the neocons deride shooter much more than any of us progressives, because he's their pawn.

The are much more derisive of their tools than they are of their adversaries.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:00 PM    in reply to JEP07

but shooter's a loyal pawn, at least.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:04 AM   

"Technicality." Jesus.

So, you're using the term "bankruptcy" to focus the voters minds on "what has to be done?" If I thought for a moment this was anything other than empty blather by an empty-headed fool, I'd have to conclude that she's suggesting that state disenfranchise the voters, default on its debt and turn control of the state and ownership of it's assets over to the holders of the defaulted debt. 'Cause that's how bankruptcy works in the private sector Carly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:32 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Out here in SoCal, I'm going to try my best to make sure Jerry Brown (believe it or not) is elected Governor, but bear in mind, given the choice between an experienced (if unpopular) Public Servant and the guy who starred in "Junior" and "Jingle All The Way", WE CHOSE THE GUY FROM "JUNIOR", AN AUSTRIAN BODYBUILDER as our states Chief Executive. You should expect Carly's kind of Political IQ as a regular occurrence in Cali.

P.S. "Terminator 3" was a damn money grab, and he actually filmed a half a day for "Terminator 4" while Governor. How's that for takin' your job seriously???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 2:54 PM    in reply to admiralmpj

Back during the recall mess, I was training up on some software with a bunch of other people, including a couple of ladies from California. I remember them talking about how enthusiastic they were about the whole recall and how much they were looking forward to voting out Davis because he was "so boring." Which is when I kind of got the feeling that politics in California just isn't like it is in other states.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 5:32 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Some States require a two-thirds majority to pass a budget.

Some States require a two-thirds majority to raise taxes.

California is the only one to require both.

Libertarians, Conservatives...welcome to the 27 Billion Dollar hole you wished for!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:46 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

She was obviously unaware of that technicality, just as Gingrich was unaware that Reid was a UK citizen AND that Miranda applies to citizens and non-citizens alike.

These gargoyles really believe that Republican PR hack from a few years ago who said they (the Bush hitters) were creating their own reality and it was up to every one else to follow along.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:05 AM   

If you think the financial crisis past was bad, wait until either a CA bond issuance fail or default.
Oh, these are truly interesting times.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:05 AM    in reply to shooter242

Only you would find the prospect of bread lines of State Employees "interesting".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 5:53 PM    in reply to Dorn76

The only joy some conservatives can look forward to is the suffering of others.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:06 PM    in reply to JEP07

California's total bond debt is around $65 Billion.

That is a fraction of the wealth the upper crust in that state controls.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:11 AM   

Fiorina certainly does know about not being able to pay bills, after having driven Hewlett Packard to insolvency. She's my favorite type of Republican - fails miserably in the private sector, and is rewarded for it in the public sector. You know, like the previous occupant of the White House. I'm sure there's a place for her in the Senate, among 99 other failures who haven't enacted a major piece of legislation since 1965.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 4:05 PM    in reply to newyorkjoe

Aren't you forgetting the half a trillion dollar upaid-for donut hole?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:24 AM   

inancial pressure continues to increase in california

sooner or later the political stalemate on taxes will end

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:25 AM   

Tom Campbell is the Republican threat, not Carly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:33 AM   

As as been touched on above, Carly has probably cost the taxpayers of CA many millions in increased interest costs by her stupidity. The municipal (and state) tax exempt bond/debt market (nationally) has just settled down the past few months as investors have regained confidence in most of the garden variety bonds and the riskiest have been identified. All governments have to borrow on a routine basis because taxes are received on a irregular basis. Real prpoerty taxes, for example, are collected in most jurisdictions once or twice a year. Governments will issue what are known as tax anticipation notes for a certain percentage of anticipated taxes to keep them operating until the proceeds are collected. Prudently designed tax anticipation notes have traditionally received a very low interest rate because they are, correctly in my opinion, perceived as having an extremely low ridk of default. Beginning in the fall 2008, the interest rates for prudently designed tax anticipation notes radically increased far beyond the risk. Interest rates for other state/municipal tax exempt debt also radically increased far beyond any increased risk. [Good time for a prudent investor who examined the offerings to buy.] The interest rates/yields got so high that state and local government stopped issuing long term debt instruments and limited their borrowing to what they had to do.

This market settled down to something approaching rationality last summer. Carly, for reasons I have never understood, is given credibility for public fiscal issues. The danger is that her ignorance will increase the cost of borrowing not just for CA state and local government but for all the rest of the US. This is a fragile market.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 5:55 PM    in reply to david46

California's upper crust has the resources to fix all of this, in short order, if they weren't so greedy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:34 AM   

Hey nice leather leopard print jacket Carly! That's some nice gold jewelry too. It must be expensive to fly all the way from California to Long Island to buy your clothes and accessories.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:49 AM    in reply to quickerevolver

Maybe Carly could swap hair-dos with Ben Nelson. They'd both look a lot less venal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:04 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Remaining problem: they wouldn't be any less venal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:35 AM   

Reublicans are like a business that is going broke selling widgets for $10 each, after using $12 each to manufacture them, but can't even consider trying to sell them for $12.50 each. They say a price increase is off the table, and we have pledged to never raise the price. I could say they are nothing but money grubbing assholes, but that would be out of place here, so I will remain too polite to say that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:35 AM   

Someone quick wake that woman up. She is having a nightmare...she thinks she is mark sanford in Argentina.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:26 PM    in reply to inniss326

No, she thinks she's with Mark in Argentina, except he's wearing the Barbie outfit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:43 AM   

Is this a recent photo of her? She needs a new makeover. God she looks scareeeeee

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:51 AM   

Maybe she should quit campaigning and donate all that money to the state treasury. It would help the state more that way.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:12 AM   

Is that what she looks like? Seriously? I remember an interview with her on 60 Minutes about the HP spying affair, she looked VERY different. This... creature in the photo looks like she just flew in from Manhattan or Scottsdale.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:23 PM    in reply to rynato

Bea Arthur for Governor?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:15 AM   

I've no idea what the CA revenue pie looks like but I'd guess the biggest stakeholders would be individual CA taxpayers and anyone who pays CA sales tax. Assume for a moment that CA or any state or even the feds could realistically declare bankruptcy. Can you just imagine the pissing contest that would follow trying to figure out who gets to be at the head of the line to get paid. It'd probably be like the banks where we give them all our money for safekeeping, they lose it all, we bail them out and then they charge us up the ass for all they've done for us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:39 AM   

She's awful, but making fun of her hair or appearance is pretty puerile. Mean-spirited, even, when you consider the fact that she's growing back her hair from cancer treatment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

eve

user-pic

February 11, 2010 1:15 PM    in reply to BCLance

I was wondering if the hair was from cancer treatment.

When I saw this picture one of my first thoughts was whether or not a woman could get elected with that hair. It's not fair, of course, but she will be judged on looks. Men and women running for office have to pay attention to this stuff. Her outfit is horrible.

But that nonsense aside, what a dope.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:40 AM   

You know, all those California voters blamed Gray Davis and elected the big shot movie star who was going to fix everything that those dumbass politicians 'screwed up'.

Well, guess what Ahnuld did? He kicked the can down the road and now the bill has come due. But hey, at least they have an exciting, glamourous First Couple rather than that boring-ass Gray Davis.

Maybe what we need to do is fire the voters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:58 AM   

California is bankrupt. Just like America thanks to Republican policies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:01 PM   

California has been governed by Republicans for 25 of the last 30 years. Funny none of the Republicans running ever mention THAT salient fact.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:05 PM   

That idea is as horrendous as her new hair-do.

I thought that was a middle aged drag queen upon first viewing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:09 PM   

"I knew, but what cold comfort is that to all these California voters who may not know that"

In other words, 'sure I know, but the rubes I'm trying to bamboozle into voting for me don't, so get out of the way.'

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:15 PM   

Well, at least she is an expert on unlawful surveillance . . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:21 PM   

Bankruptcy. Interesting idea to bring to politics. We could try to find a merger partner. Mexico might go for it, Canada wouldn't. Or she could take the approach she took at HP. Layoff the california and outsource what's left to India.

Watch out, CA. she'll do to you what she did to HP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:32 PM   

She kind of reminds me of Cristopher Eccleston playing doctor who.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:35 PM   

Technicality? What?

It seems what she's talking about is insolvency, i.e., an inability to pay obligations or a negative balance sheet (that's a meaningful distinction in a bankruptcy proceeding, obviously).

But to have been a CEO and not understand these points and be unable to talk with insight about them . . . jeebus, that's pretty fucked. At least Sarah Palin has the excuse of congenital idiocy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:36 PM   

The State should consider banning that "trannie" look she has adopted!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:45 PM   

I wonder if she thinks states that go bankrupt have to give their senators multi-million dollar severance packages.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 12:46 PM   

Hell, she was unqualified in the business world, too!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 1:18 PM   

Standards of decency require that no one this frightening in appearance should be qualified for public office, period. Just as burkhas are outlawed in some European schools to prevent children from being frightened to death, there need to be limits on what the public is required to look at.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 2:18 PM   

Back off the hair remarks guys -

http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-11-07/news/17182231_1_cancer-voting-campaign

I thought she trashed HP and is not qualifed to been a senator - even a republican one - but that is a chemo cut and I wouldn't wish that suffering on anyone.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 5:56 PM   

California's upper crust has the resources to fix all of this, in short order, if they weren't so greedy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 5:57 PM    in reply to JEP07

Its all deposited "in a bank in the middle of Beverly Hills, in some greedy neocon's name"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 6:01 PM    in reply to JEP07

If each of California's multi-billionaires gave up part of their personal fortunes, it would bail them out permanently.

11 Lawrence Ellison United States 62 21.5 United States
26 Sergey Brin United States 33 16.6 United States
26 Larry Page United States 34 16.6 United States
31 Kirk Kerkorian United States 89 15.0 United States
80 Donald Bren United States 74 8.5 United States
86 Sumner Redstone United States 83 8.0 United States
116 Eric Schmidt United States 51 6.2 United States
119 Eli Broad United States 73 6.0 United States
132 Steven Jobs United States 52 5.7 United States
137 Charles Johnson United States 74 5.6 United States
152 Bradley Hughes United States 73 5.3 United States
155 Charles Schwab United States 69 5.2 United States
167 David Geffen United States 64 4.7 United States
172 Rupert Johnson Jr United States 65 4.6 United States
204 David Murdock United States 83 4.2 United States
204 Jeffrey Skoll Canada 42 4.2 United States
243 George Lucas United States 62 3.6 United States
243 Gordon Moore United States 78 3.6 United States
249 Patrick Soon-Shiong United States 55 3.5 United States
273 Steven Udvar-Hazy United States 61 3.2 United States
287 A Jerrold Perenchio United States 76 3.0 United States
287 Steven Spielberg United States 60 3.0 United States
323 Haim Saban United States 62 2.8 United States
336 Riley Bechtel United States 55 2.7 United States
336 Stephen Bechtel Jr United States 81 2.7 United States

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 6:35 PM    in reply to JEP07

That's over 150 BILLION dollars, in the hands of 25 people.

Add the thousand or so multi-millionaires worth over 100 million, and California's debt is a fraction of their wealth.

I'd like to hear any of them claim they gained their wealth without the public being involved.

They are starving the middle class golden goose that lays their golden eggs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 6:56 PM    in reply to JEP07

...for political reasons.

(...not everyone on that list is terminally greedy, I know, but it is a graphic illustration of how wealth is framed)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:07 PM    in reply to JEP07

25 people could literally cover the public debt for 36 million people.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:08 PM    in reply to JEP07

frame THAT!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:15 PM    in reply to JEP07

Carly

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:20 PM    in reply to JEP07

"but what cold comfort is that to all these California voters who may not know that technicality"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 7:18 PM   

Wealthy Americans obviously aren't very patriotic. Their money matters more than their country.

OK, Zeke, I'll stop now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 10:08 PM   

Why can't she just be content with nearly destroying Hewlett-Packard?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 11, 2010 11:39 PM   

I suggested, somewhere else, that she drop the campaign and donate all that money to the state treasury instead. It would be a lot more useful that way.

(That's three-months-after-chemo hair. It's more than an inch long. It's also not bad looking.)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 13, 2010 8:54 AM   

I don't know whether foreigners are big buyers of California debt obligations, but if they are presumably this sort of talk should give them pause. If I were the Chinese or Saudi sovereign wealth funds I would be seeing a nation perhaps too unstable and too poorly lead to be investable.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

June 6, 2010 9:43 PM   

s as been touched on above, Carly has probably cost the taxpayers of CA many millions in increased interest costs by her stupidity. The municipal (and state) tax exempt bond/debt market (nationally) has just settled down the past few months as investors have regained confidence in most of the garden variety bonds and the riskiest have been identified. All governments have to borrow on a routine basis because taxes are received on a irregular basis. Real prpoerty taxes, for example, are collected in most jurisdictions once or twice a year. Governments will issue what are known as tax anticipation notes for a certain percentage of anticipated taxes to keep them operating until the proceeds are collected. Prudently designed tax anticipation notes have traditionally received a very low interest rate because they are, correctly in my opinion, perceived as having an extremely low ridk of default. Beginning in the fall 2008, the interest rates for prudently designed tax anticipation notes radically increased far beyond the risk. Interest rates for other state/municipal tax exempt debt also radically increased far beyond any increased risk. [Good time for a prudent investor who examined the offerings to buy.] The interest rates/yields got so high that state and local government stopped issuing long term debt instruments and limited their borrowing to what they had to do.

m65 kamagra

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on