
On Tuesday, the Senate GOP--with the support of Democrats Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)--successfully filibustered the nomination of Craig Becker to serve a term on the National Labor Relations Board. All told, because of snow-related absences, 33 senators were able to block the confirmation of a nominee who had the support of a significant majority of members. That has many in Washington asking: Will President Obama offer Becker a recess appointment? Obama has thus far been reluctant to exploit that tool--but if he does, he can point to the record of his predecessor, President George W. Bush, who recess appointed seven of his nine NLRB nominees.
Some of Bush's NLRB nominees were Senate confirmed, including Peter Hurtgen and Peter Schaumber who each served multiple terms, including one under a recess appointment. But the vast majority were able to circumvent the standard process.
According to records kept by NLRB, the list of Bush's NLRB appointees--including both recess appointments and confirmations--is as follows.
- Peter J. Hurtgen (R) served under recess appointment by President Bush from 8/31/01 - 8/1/02.
Michael J. Bartlett (R) served entire term under recess appointment by President Bush. 01/22/02 - 11/22/02 William B. Cowen (R) served entire term under recess appointment by President Bush. 01/22/02 - 11/22/02 R. Alexander Acosta (R) was confirmed 11/22/02 and served from 12/17/02 - 08/21/03 Robert J. Battista (R) was confirmed by the Senate on 11/22/02 and served from 12/17/02 - 12/16/07 Peter C. Schaumber (R) served under recess appointment by President Bush from 9/1/05 - 8/3/06 Ronald E. Meisburg (R) served under recess appointment by President Bush from 01/12/04 - 12/08/04. Peter N. Kirsanow (R) served under recess appointment by President Bush from 01/04/06 - 12/31/07 Dennis P. Walsh (D) serving under recess appointment by President Bush from 01/17/06 - present.
The GOP's stated objection to Becker is that he's too pro-labor, but many of Bush's NLRB picks were corporate lawyers who represented firms in labor disputes.
Nevertheless, after a small minority blocked Becker's confirmation, trumping the 52 vote majority, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said "I sincerely hope the White House does not circumvent the will of the Senate by appointing him when the Senate is out of session."
However, with dozens of executive branch nominees backlogged by Republican obstruction, Obama has threatened to go there, and he has the backing of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka to do so. Will he go there?
Powkat
February 11, 2010 12:23 PM
Oh, please, circumvent the role of the Senate. If Shrub can appoint John Bolton as UN Ambassador, surely Obama can appoint one guy to the NLRB.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AhTrini1
February 11, 2010 3:41 PM in reply to Powkat
President Obama acts like a wuss when it comes to this stuff, so my bet is he throws the guy under the bus!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Coebul
February 11, 2010 4:09 PM in reply to Powkat
What a bunch of whinners. So far your guy is 0 for 5.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
February 11, 2010 12:35 PM
Just fucking do it. Show you've got cojones.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 11, 2010 12:46 PM
This is a no-brainer. There's no reason not to give a recess appointment. It doesn't make sense, even with regard to decorum, to avoid it, because past presidents have been so casual in using it.
And, even if Obama takes a pass on giving recess appointments for the sake of appearing to be bi-partisan, nobody will care and nobody will remember that. All they'll remember is 'weak and ineffectual' because he wouldn't give Congress a shove when it needed one.
Pull the goddam trigger!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 11, 2010 12:48 PM
Oh, and did I mention that the base is eroding? We won't be going to rallies, we're not going to phonebank, we're not going to knock on doors if you won't do anything for us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
breakspear
February 11, 2010 12:51 PM
I'm sorry, Orrin old boy, the Constitution allows the President to make these sorts of appointments. so he's not circumventing anything, old boy, he's merely following the law. again, old boy, the Constitution. you remember that fabulous document which protects ALL Americans, not just Republicans? you do dont you? i have to ask several times because at your age perhaps your memory fails you some times, or is it your partisanship. not sure as they are interchangeable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RhodaA
February 11, 2010 1:16 PM
Well Said (and pathetic that it needs to be said):
Frank Askin, professor of law at Rutgers University, said:
"Nothing demonstrates Republican cynicism and obstructionism than the comment of Sen. Orrin Hatch warning the President not to "circumvent the will of the Senate" by making a recess appointment after the Senate had rejected the President's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board by a vote of 33 to 52. How out of touch with reality are people who believe the "will of the Senate" is expressed by a vote of 33 to 52!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
February 11, 2010 4:35 PM in reply to RhodaA
Eexcept here is the headline from the "liberal' Boston Globe: "President’s labor pick blocked by wide margin"
There was also another headline about how our new Sen. Brown joined a "majority" in preventing a vote on the appointment.
There was one line in the middle of the story talking about needing 60 votes to kill a GOP filibuster, but the rest of the 20 inch story would have fooled you into believing the majority was against the appointment.
It was unbelievable, and judging from the hundreds of letters responding to the story, most people were fooled into believing, as one letter writer put it, "even a majority of Democrats are against him."
Polls show more than 3/4 of Americans haven't a clue about the filibuster, they just know Dems control Congress and nothing is getting done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RhodaA
February 11, 2010 5:20 PM in reply to rwc
I can't even find the words. I like to watch C-Span a lot. Now, whenever one of the Repub senators speaks, I just change the channel or put on the mute. Saw a "sad but true" comment yesterday:
"How do you know when a Republican senator is lying? His (her) hips are moving."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
February 11, 2010 1:20 PM
Obama would hardly be circumventing the "will of the Senate," Orrin, you little douchebag, it's a small minority in the Senate that is circumventing the will of the majority.
Obama should go ahead with a recess appointment, and not just for this nominee, but for others that are being held up even though they have majority support in the Senate. Once again, Republicans need to be made to pay a price for their obstruction, and the price for obstinate obstruction is to have the president go over your head.
Yes, Senators have the right to object to nominees, but along with that, they have an obligation to try to negotiate (in good faith) more acceptable candidates with the administration. If both sides work in good faith, differences can be resolved. But when that doesn't happen, the president has the last word, at least until the end of that Congressional session.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 11, 2010 1:56 PM
Oh, just appoint every single one during the recess. He can spin it as he is saving the senate time so that they can get on with more important things like trying to pass legislation that will help people for pete's sake.
Appoint all of them by recess appointment and move on. Unbelievable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 11, 2010 2:53 PM in reply to Michael A
The logic of that is just too good. We have two wars, an ailing economy, high unemployment, and many other things that urgently need attention. Clear this little stuff off of the Senate's plate with recess appointments. If they want to pick it up again after the appointments expire and after the more serious matters have been dealt with, fine. But, you're right. The president would be doing the Senate a huge favor by taking care of these appointments for them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dougom
February 11, 2010 2:58 PM
Spare me. "Senator Douglas Moran (P-Confusion) said, "I sincerely hope the Senate does not circumvent the will of the White House by holding up appointments that clearly have majority support."
At this point, I guess I'm not surprised by their hypocrisy, or even the level of blatantness of their hypocrisy, but rather the fact that the press--the mainstream press, that is--continues to allow them to get away with it. When is someone other than Stephen Colbert or Jon Stewart going to have the nerve to say, "Well, Senator, when the same situation obtained during the Bush Administration, you strongly advocated interim appointments of such candidates as John Bolton; how do you square that with your current position?" But I'm not holding my breath. Remember: they make their statements, the press copies them down, the newspapers print them.
Good Lord.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jthdane
February 11, 2010 3:53 PM
Since when do 33 members represent "the will of the Senate?"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rwc
February 11, 2010 4:44 PM in reply to jthdane
Except here is the headline from the "liberal' Boston Globe: "President’s labor pick blocked by wide margin"
There was also another headline about how our new Sen. Brown joined a "majority" in preventing a vote on the appointment.
There was one line in the middle of the story talking about needing 60 votes to kill a GOP filibuster, but the rest of the 20 inch story would have fooled you into believing the majority was against the appointment.
It was unbelievable, and judging from the hundreds of letters responding to the story, most people were fooled into believing, as one letter writer put it, "even a majority of Democrats are against him."
Polls show more than 3/4 of Americans haven't a clue about the filibuster, they just know Dems control Congress and nothing is getting done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dougom
February 11, 2010 5:07 PM in reply to jthdane
My point exactly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SFCWallace
February 11, 2010 4:28 PM
FLASHBACK: Bush Recess Appointed 7 of 9 NLRB Members...TPM posters immediately claim "Bush is circumventing the will of the Senate!!! Impeach King George!!!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
February 11, 2010 4:36 PM in reply to SFCWallace
Don't recall that one.
I do recall people wanting him him and darth vader impeached for war crimes and lying to the american public. Maybe that is what you are referring to.
By the way, can't wait until the king or darth vader vacation on the French Riviera, or any other country other than the UK and Canada. Then we will see some justice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SFCWallace
February 11, 2010 4:41 PM in reply to Michael A
Republican's don't vacation in France...you can't get "Freedom Fries" there...lol
http://www.instantrimshot.com/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
February 11, 2010 5:23 PM in reply to SFCWallace
No. They just put a blanket hold on all of Obama's nominations when they want a big DoD contract to go to a French company. Ask Sen. Shelby (R-Airbus).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Chisholm
February 11, 2010 8:52 PM
"Obama has thus far been reluctant to exploit that tool [recess appointments]"
I am baffled by Barack Obama. He sought the presidency and all the powers at the office's disposal -- and yet is unwilling to use them. I'm honestly beginning to think he places bipartisanship over the fate of the nation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?