
Insurance executives will be in the hot seat today as Congress probes scheduled health insurance rate increases for Anthem Blue Cross customers in California.
Democrats are putting the spotlight on Californians hurt by the rate hikes as witnesses today to put a real face on why health care reform is necessary. The Energy and Commerce panel's Oversight subcommittee hearing examining the rate increases was put together fairly quickly. From a political perspective, it's nicely timed to coincided with President Obama's health care summit tomorrow at the White House.
An executive from Anthem's parent company WellPoint told a California state Assembly panel yesterday they will forge ahead with the increases of as much as 39 percent after May 1, according to the Los Angeles Times. Earlier this month, Anthem was ordered to delay the increases to that spring date by the state's insurance commissioner.
We've been closely following this issue, which Democrats have held up as an example of what would change under their health care plan. Service Employees International Union today released a new ad with Anthem as its target and sources tell us that Democratic-leaning interest groups won't let up until health care legislation is passed.
The hearing will stream live here.
The invited witnesses from California are Jeremy Arnold of Los Angeles, Julie Henriksen of Westchester and Lauren Meister of West Hollywood. The panel also invited WellPoint executives Angela Braly and Cynthia Miller.
From the LA Times' writeup of yesterday's California hearing:
James Oatman, vice president of WellPoint Inc.'s consumer division, told the state Assembly's health committee that the premium increases, and the profit they generate, are appropriate despite wide criticism from consumers, regulators, members of Congress and the Obama administration."Are you planning to go forward with the rate increases?" Assemblyman Dave Jones (D-Sacramento), the committee's chairman, asked Oatman, who testified alongside Anthem's president, Leslie Margolin.
"We believe the rate increase we have applied for is consistent with all the laws of the state of California," Oatman said. "We are advocating that those rates are appropriate rates."
Oatman and Margolin defended Anthem's profit margin during an often-testy hearing, saying it was 2.5% to 5%, a figure that put it in line with other insurers, they said. A Times analysis of Anthem's financial reports to regulators showed Anthem has transferred more than $4.2 billion to WellPoint since 2004.
How much profit is enough?" Jones asked the two executives.
Late Update: At the opening of today's hearing, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) cited WellPoint profits and said such problems are going to continue until reform passes.
FreeRider
February 24, 2010 10:12 AM
Fuck Stupak's posturing. He announced yesterday that he's going to vote against the healthcare bill because of the Nelson language which he says provides government money for abortion.
Lying scumbag.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 24, 2010 10:21 AM in reply to FreeRider
It's a pleasure to find something on which I can agree 100% with FreeRide. Plus, did TPM really need to turn everybody's stomachs with a great big picture of this C-street perv's ugly mug?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lycurgus
February 24, 2010 10:47 AM in reply to Steve LaBonne
Is he really a C- Streeter? That is a whole other problem.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cwnidog
February 24, 2010 11:00 AM in reply to FreeRider
Co-sign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hewhohasnoname
February 24, 2010 11:18 AM in reply to FreeRider
"Late Update: At the opening of today's hearing, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) cited WellPoint profits and said such problems are going to continue until reform passes."
What exactly did Stupak say?
Is he just posturing here to save face -- an "I feel your pain, but I still can't vote for the Senate bill because of how it handles abortion" kind of statement?
Or, is he walking back his opposition -- an "I oppose the abortion language in the Senate bill, but these excessive premium increases will continue unless we pass comprehensive healthcare reform, so I'll support the bill anyway" kind of language?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 24, 2010 11:55 AM in reply to FreeRider
Co-sign!! Good morning FreeRider
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
February 24, 2010 10:31 AM
If they're going to use reconciliation, I wish they'd use it for Medicare expansion. Just as soon hang for a horse as for a mule. As far as the public went, it'd sell itself. Companies like Anthem would be forced into the luxury corners of the market.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 24, 2010 11:23 AM in reply to Tanjaoui
I've thought all along that that's what they should have done from the beginning instead of messing around with variations on Romneycare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rawresolve
February 24, 2010 10:37 AM
This guy has sabotaged health care reform for his personal agenda to undermine reproductive rights. Perhaps he should review that separation of church and state principal. After that he should get out of the way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 24, 2010 10:52 AM
Stupak wins the Narcissist Award along with Nelson and DeMint.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
February 24, 2010 11:25 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
Not so fast- Kent Conrad just put in a strong bid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marinus van der Lubbe
February 24, 2010 11:36 AM in reply to Steve LaBonne
Oh, and I forgot you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 24, 2010 11:52 AM in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe
Oh oh!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewster73
February 24, 2010 1:43 PM
Why is Anthem raising rates in CA? Is it perhaps to help pay for the rising cost of healthcare for the escalating illegal immigrant population in the state? One reaps what one sows. Time to wake up CA.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
February 24, 2010 5:19 PM in reply to brewster73
Fuck you - you worthless troll. I live in California and I spoke with a friend last night who has Lupus. She and her husband and child have a family policy with Anthem Blue Cross. They just raised their rates 6 months ago and they are now paying $3,700 a month for insurance - i.e. $45,000 a year - more than their mortgage. Now Anthem is raising it again. Her husband is an architect and made good money but the housing in California is at a standstill and they are scraping to make ends meet. They have depleted their savings.
It has noting to do with illegal immigrants - it has to do with greedy fucking insurance companies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
February 24, 2010 4:51 PM
This ass has to go, I wouldn't have a problem with a Republican getting his seat. This ass is willing to see 1000's die for a superstition and deny women the constitutional right of choice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?