
Republican leadership for days has been backing away from Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap" budget - which slashes Social Security and Medicare to end the deficit - but key GOP groups say it's both bold and brave.
"It's commendable and very true to his conservative beliefs," former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin told TPMDC in an interview.
"I think it's fabulous, it's a great template for everyone that's not just relying on smoke and mirrors," said Holtz-Eakin, who was an adviser to Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain.
He's not alone - the conservative Club for Growth and Republican Study Committee have lauded Ryan's roadmap, while stopping short of saying it should be the official Republican budget.
"You can't even talk seriously about the debt, deficit, or a balanced budget without fundamentally reforming entitlement programs," Club for Growth spokesman Mike Connolly told me this week after Rep. Jeb Hensarling said he supported the Ryan plan.
"Every candidate will have to decide for himself what issues to campaign on this year, but if Republicans want to show the American people they can be trusted with leadership again, attacking the Democrats isn't enough," Connolly added. "The times cry out for a bold agenda of conservative economic reform, and for politicians like Jeb Hensarling who can articulate one."
Democrats have seized on the Ryan roadmap to paint Republicans as returning to Social Security privatization plans, even though leaders insist this won't be in their 2010 playbook.
Holtz-Eakin told me that the politicking and fear of retribution at the polls is what's made entitlement reform so tough.
"Both sides have to find a way to move past demagoguing. Partisan legislation is never very good," he said.
Conservative commentators also are defending Ryan.
Viva!America!
February 5, 2010 11:45 AM
So these are "Key" GOPers who are not in Congress?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
February 5, 2010 11:46 AM
It increasingly looks like the people technically holding the Republican leadership positions have nothing to do with the crazy base that is running the show. You'd think there'd be some kind of downside to that at some point.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
February 5, 2010 12:38 PM
I'd love to see a clear explanation of how this setup is inefficient and bad:
taxpayer -> government (via Medicare taxes) -> service provider
But this is totally cool:
taxpayer -> government -> taxpayer (via vouchers) -> insurer -> service provider
Do the insurers run on pixie dust in this plan? 'Cause the ones in the real world eat 10%+ of the money as it passes through their hands...
The only way that the first can run up the deficit while the second somehow decreases it is if the vouchers don't cover the cost of the insurance.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 5, 2010 1:08 PM in reply to Matt Jones
"Do the insurers run on pixie dust in this plan? 'Cause the ones in the real world eat 10%+ of the money as it passes through their hands..."
TEN percent??? My, you're being generous. Remember, we're talking about insurers offering medical coverage to the elderly. We'll be lucky if the medical loss ratios clear 50%.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
DrToast
February 5, 2010 2:59 PM in reply to Matt Jones
It's easier to ignore that people don't have access to health care when it's not on the governments books.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
expat46
February 5, 2010 12:43 PM
Health Care Reform is entitlement reform. It would save $1 trillion over ten years. If you want to complete the corporate takeover of America go ahead and privatize SS and Medicare.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
February 5, 2010 1:06 PM
I think we should do everything we can to encourage Republicans to formally propose this as a budget amendment. And as soon as they do the Democratic leadership should immediately drop everything and bring it to the floor for a vote. A roll call vote. Televised.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
WaitWut?
February 5, 2010 3:26 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
Co-sign.
This'll be fun!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
libdevil
February 5, 2010 3:51 PM
Remember, this guy was running the 'non-partisan' CBO, which has basically life or death power over any spending or revenue bill. He's not insignificant, even if nobody (including me, until today) knows his name.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LeansDem
February 6, 2010 2:31 PM in reply to libdevil
That's the part I don't get. I thought the CBO was a nonpartisan group but every time I see former CBO director Holtz-Eakin speak, he comes off as clearly Republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Anonymous
February 6, 2010 8:01 AM
Hello, dear ladies and gentlemen, http://www.coolforsale.com
Buy now proposed a "New Year's gift '. A rare opportunity, what are you waiting for? Quickly move your mouse bar. commodity is credit guarantee, you can rest assured of purchase, coolforsale will provide service for you all, welcome to 1. sport shoes : Jordan ,Nike, adidas, Puma, Gucci, LV, UGG , etc. including women shoes and kids shoes.
2. T-Shirts : BBC T-Shirts, Bape T-Shirts, Armani T-Shirts, Polo T-Shirts,etc.
3. Hoodies : Bape hoody, hoody, AFF hoody, GGG hoody, ED hoody ,etc.
4. Jeans : Levis jeans , Gucci jeans, jeans,
Bape jeans , DG jeans ,etc. NHL Jersey Woman $ 40NFL Jersey $35 NBA Jersey $ 34MLB Jersey $ 35 Jordan Six Ring_m $36 Air Yeezy_m $ 45 T-Shirt_m $ 25Jacket_m $ 36,Hoody_m $ 50 Manicure Set $20
Free to pay freight, For details, please consult : http://www.coolforsale.com
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
June 12, 2010 5:27 PM
"Do the insurers run on pixie dust in this plan? 'Cause the ones in the real world eat 10%+ of the money as it passes through their hands..."
TEN percent??? My, you're being generous. Remember, we're talking about insurers offering medical coverage to the elderly. We'll be lucky if the medical loss ratios clear 50%.
m65 kamagra
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?