TPMDC

McCain Rewrites Own History On Bailout Vote


Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's no secret that in seeking to fend off a conservative primary challenger, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has been scrambling to his right faster than you can say "cap-and-trade." But now, in a bid to explain his vote for the bailout, the Arizona senator is flat out rewriting history.

McCain said recently that he only voted for the $700 billion package because Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke misled him, by assuring him it would focus on the housing meltdown, rather than on Wall Street. But that appears to be directly contradicted by the record.

McCain sat down recently with the Arizona Republic editorial board. Reports the paper:

[T]he four-term senator says he was misled by then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. McCain said the pair assured him that the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program would focus on what was seen as the cause of the financial crisis, the housing meltdown.

"Obviously, that didn't happen," McCain said ... "They decided to stabilize the Wall Street institutions, bail out (insurance giant) AIG, bail out Chrysler, bail out General Motors ... What they figured was that if they stabilized Wall Street -- I guess it was trickle-down economics -- that therefore Main Street would be fine."

It's true that the AIG, Chrysler, and G.M. bailouts weren't part of the original TARP legislation. But everyone understood that TARP was focused on stabilizing Wall Street, in order to prevent a collapse of the financial system, not directly on the housing market. Including John McCain.

Here's how McCain explained the bailout plan in a September 22, 2008 interview: "'We're going to take over these bad loans. And we're going to have the taxpayer help you out. But when the time comes and the economy recovers, then anything that's gained back is going to go to the taxpayers first." As the Chicago Sun-Times explained in reporting McCain's comments: "The plan would dole out huge sums of money to financial firms to purchase bad mortgage-backed securities so the firms can resume normal lending operations."

In a speech the following day about improvements he was seeking to what became the TARP legislation, McCain made clear that he knew the measure was targeted at Wall Street, declaring: "No Wall Street executives should profit from taxpayer dollars ... The senior leaders of any firm that is bailed out should not be making more than the highest paid government official."

And in a speech the following week, McCain added: "We cannot dedicate more than a trillion dollars to rescue failing institutions, and then go right back to business as usual in Washington." Which failing institutions was he referring to, if not the banks?

McCain's effort during his Arizona Republic interview to distance himself from the bailout didn't stop there. He also appears to have presented his decision to return to Washington as being prompted in part by a phone call from President Bush.

The paper reported:

McCain said Bush called him in off the campaign trail, saying a worldwide economic catastrophe was imminent and that he needed his help. "I don't know of any American, when the president of the United States calls you and tells you something like that, who wouldn't respond," McCain said. "And I came back and tried to sit down and work with Republicans and say, 'What can we do?' "

The idea that Bush "called [McCain] in off the campaign trail" is also contradicted by the record, which clearly shows that McCain himself voluntarily chose to suspend his campaign.

Brooke Buchanan, a spokeswoman for McCain, acknowledged as much to TPMmuckraker, and said the Republic had mischaracterized McCain's comments in the interview. She said that McCain had in fact told the Republic only that President Bush had called McCain while the senator was campaigning, to inform him about the crisis -- not that Bush had "called him in off the campaign trail."

Comments (70) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

February 23, 2010 6:29 PM   

In "Game Change" McCain is ridiculed by Paulson, Bernanke and even Bush as so out-of-touch on the financial issues that he was scary.

Paulson's chief of staff (an anti-choice, pro-gun, lifelong republican) asked McCain for his $500 back and then voted for Obama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:43 PM    in reply to FreeRider

McCain's much-vaunted integrity is not threatened, not at least on this count.

He has been genuine in his complete macroeconomic and financial markets cluelessness from day one -- accordingly, his "position" on TARP is not a backtrack as TPM suggests.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:21 PM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

Well put!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 2:33 AM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

That's only true if you ignore the evidence in this article. I mean it's fun to call him 'clueless' but he is clearly misleading and hoping nobody notices.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

May 11, 2010 4:49 PM    in reply to FreeRider

When even Bush knows more about an important subject than you, that's just sad.

Was McCain always so clueless on financial issues, or is it just Alzheimer's taking its toll?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:30 PM   

Who knew a terrible pilot who cut corners would be a terrible law maker. He helped crash the economy as effeciently as he helped crash a couple million dollars worth of us military jets.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:12 PM    in reply to rbeats

LOL.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:32 PM   

I used to troll around some conservative sites during the election with the question "Can ANYBODY name one important policy position that McCain has held for longer than the period that started when he decided to run for the presidency?" There were several lame takers who were shot down way too easily. This man stands for nothing

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:55 PM    in reply to davcbr

Wait...you found a conservative blog that doesn't immediately delete any and all comments that don't completely hew to the winger party line?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:36 PM   

Maybe he will go all mavericky.

What on earth happened to this guy? Did rambo do some wacky voodoo/laying of hands crap on him during the campaign? He has completely gone off the deep end.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:43 PM    in reply to Michael A

Nothing has happened to McCain. He has always been an opportunistic, self-serving asshole.

Democrats liked him because he was always going up against Bush. They thought he did it out of principle when he was just angry that Bush beat him. Now, he's doing it to Obama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:49 PM    in reply to FreeRider

You beat me to it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:50 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Spot on my friend. So much for the straight talk express. LOL

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 8:01 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Let's check the record. Shot down bombing peasants in Vietnam. Called his wife a "whore" in public. Huggy kissy with Bush after Bush spread a racist lie about him. Gave us Princess Palin. He has no integrity. Never did.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:39 PM    in reply to Brownbagger

Actually, I believe he called her a cunt.

Even classier.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:02 AM    in reply to jcricket

You wouldn't believe how classy:

"At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt."

yeah, that's one happy couple there. Sounds to me like he got cut off from the va-jay-jay a long, long time ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 7:38 AM    in reply to rynato

Ah, yes. How sweet of him. I stand corrected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 10:38 AM    in reply to rynato

Va-jay-jay, lol now that's funny. Thanks for the smile.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 5:12 AM    in reply to lousgirl84

But the Straight-jacket Express rolls merrily along.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

February 23, 2010 8:36 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Democrats liked him because he was always going up against Bush. They thought he did it out of principle when he was just angry that Bush beat him. Now, he's doing it to Obama.

Under this theory of McCain's behavior, if J.D. Hayworth somehow beats McCain in the primary then McCain will immediately switch to being angry at Hayworth and spend his last six months in office voting for gays in the military and a public option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 8:26 AM    in reply to FreeRider

Great point about his Bush vendetta.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 9:31 AM    in reply to FreeRider

Remember, McCain graduated from the Naval Academy at the bottom of his class. Not very bright, didn't study, broke the rules, and got by with it because his daddy was an Admiral. He's lived his whole life that way and has felt entitled to anything he wanted - women, a rich wife, political office, undeserved admiration. A true American hero.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

March 1, 2010 11:05 AM    in reply to Rick Jones

And McCain knew it all along. I have read how he took care to tell other Midshipmen not to do the shit he was able to get away with, the son and grandson of Admirals also named John McCain could do all kinds of things guys named Pete Smith couldn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

February 23, 2010 6:42 PM   

McCain was too busy suspending his campaign to learn about TARP?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:44 PM   

After Obama's State of the Union speech, McCain mocked it as part of a BIOB (Blame it on Bush) strategy.

So what's all this now? Johnny Mac is blaming it on Bush? Check six, Maverick, Hayworth has missle lock!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:48 PM   

People with long memories (or the ability to google) may recall that McCain was involved in the savings and loan debacle of the 80's, as one of the Keating Five. So, this is a guy who has always been lacking in integrity. Only because his media pimps (like Dana Milbank) pushed the bullshit "maverick" story did people have the idea that he was anything other than a typical corrupt, conservative Republican.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:51 PM    in reply to commie atheist

I remember well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:57 PM    in reply to lousgirl84

Yep, the only reason he's still in Congress is because the Democrats traded his war-hero scalp for a Democratic space-hero one (John Glenn).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:48 PM   

THAT's not change we can believe in....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:50 PM   

I'm waiting for McCain to decide he needs to spend more time with his family. I doubt his ego can take another rejection - particularly from his own party. If polling doesn't improve soon, I look for him to retire.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:58 PM    in reply to jeaton

McCain's polling is fine. He's 20+ points ahead of Hayworth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:07 PM    in reply to FreeRider

And Crist was 40 pts ahead of Rubio at one point.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 12:55 PM    in reply to zonk

You are correct. A 20 point lead at the rate he's imploding is not a comfortable margin. I wonder if the Democrats have a Meeks waiting on the wings, or is there someone who has a decent shot of winning if Hayworth gets the nomination.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

February 24, 2010 5:09 PM    in reply to zonk

And Coakley was 30 points ahead of Brown...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:58 PM    in reply to jeaton

I think it will be a hoot! Love to see him driven out of the Senate!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 6:59 PM   

Wait a minute...didn't this vote go down during the '08 Presidential Campaign? Didn't this happen during the David Letterman debacle...when he "suspended" his campaign? Are peoples' memories so short that they can be fooled by...

...wait, don't answer that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:03 PM   

Shorter McCain: I am NOT a liar. I'm an idiot. Vote for me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

eve

user-pic

February 23, 2010 7:09 PM    in reply to phillygirl

Beat me to it and said it better than I had in mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 11:33 PM    in reply to phillygirl

Precisely right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:06 PM   

What is this, the Admiral Poindexter defense?

Who am I? Why am I here?

Jeebus, Johnny... if I'm not mistaken, you were running for President at the time. And whatever quarrels I might have with Bernanke and Paulson - they're both a fair bit more honest brokers than your probably Treasury Secretary (Phil "I heart UBS" Gramm).

Not to mention... It's absolutely asinine to think that TARP was caused by the "housing meltdown". It wasn't the sudden freeze in the housing market and a precipitous drop in home prices that necessitated TARP....

It was the @##@!$#@!$%!@@ hundreds of billions bet on worthless paper wrapped in bundled, re-bundled, and re-bundled again CDOs, CDSs, and other nonsense "financial services" vehicles.

The correction in the housing market would alone would have most certainly hurt both the economy and many Americans quite a bit - and I would/still do fully support legislative action to help them...

BUT - had it not been for the sand castles built on craps tables made up of worthless paper - we could have weathered it.

The entire banking system was in danger of collapsing because so many bank balance sheets were leveraged to the hilt on this worthless paper... not worthless mortgages, but worthless paper bet, bet again, then re-bet again on top of bad mortgages.

I don't know what I find more appalling... that McCain really thinks this is a viable excuse or that it IS a viable excuse and he was (and apparently still is) so stupid that he even believed it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:12 PM    in reply to zonk

Hilarious!

When the meltdown started, McCain called Bernanke and was trying to talk knowledgeable about it.

McCain: I understand what's going on. It's like when Home Depot had problems with its managers.

Bernanke: No, it's not. It's nothing at all like that, you moron!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:15 PM   

Good to see the GOP are going to be spending a lot of time attacking each other.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:34 PM   

McCain is a liar. End of story. There is nothing mavericky about him or any other sort of BS attributed to him. Hes a weak old man running for re-election and he'll say anything to keep his job. Simple as that. A disgrace.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:41 PM   

McCain needs to spend time with his family. I hear them calling.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:43 PM   

Didn't McCrashed Three Planes suspend his campaign to go to DC for the crucial talks on TARP? How does Gramps even dress himself in the morning?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 7:58 PM   

Ah, so he thinks it's not good for the president to "blame it on Bush", but it's ok for him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 8:02 PM   

Resign while you still have a shred of dignity sir.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

DP1

user-pic

February 23, 2010 8:11 PM   

Well if he's that effing senile, he needs to resign before he's voted out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 8:14 PM   

I'd like to send him something in the mail every day to remind him that he chose Sarah Palin. That pretty much says it all. He's lost his mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 8:21 PM   

Much as I would enjoy watching McCain lose his Senate seat, that would mean though, Senator J.D. Hayworth. Oh, man. No way. I've got to be careful what I wish for.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

DES

user-pic

February 23, 2010 9:13 PM   

McCain's first wife Carol was a swimsuit & runway model for Jantzen Swimwear. She faithfully wrote and waited for her husband to be released as a POW. While her husband was still a POW in 1969 she was involved in an auto accident and smashed her legs broke pelvis and etc. She wanted to spare her husband any grief so she didn't tell him about her accident and many painful surgeries. Ross Perot a POW advocate paid for all her medical care and surgeries. She ended up 4 inches shorter due to leg surgeries and was confined to a wheelchair and crutches. Due to lack of mobility she also gained weight. Long story short McCain comes home he is limping from injuries & she is limping. Shortly after reuniting with Carol he throws his short dumpy wife overboard for a younger rich heiress named Cindy, the rest is history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_McCain

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 7:41 AM    in reply to DES

But, but, he's a man of integrity.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 9:24 PM   

I think he's senile.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 9:26 PM   

I guess when you spend your entire life on the government tit you'll say anything to stay on that tit. Just the same...Hayworth is a whack-job.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 9:27 PM   

You can get away with telling these kind of lies when your opponent is a Democrat. When your opponent is another Republican, not so much!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 9:31 PM   

And we can't take his seat away because.............?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:02 PM   

McCain, in his own words,
"I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:04 PM   

Hacktastic, Gramps!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:14 PM   

So he is not only caught lying, but is admitting to be stupid too?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 11:46 PM    in reply to xargaw

I think it's just two strategies. If your deliberate incompetence gets too obvious, pretend you made a genuine mistake. Combining the two provides seamless deniability for screwing the public.

And, if you ever do get into a situation where you just totally missed what was going on, the public will be so used to the method that they won't even notice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 10:23 PM   

John McCain will be one happy camper sitting in the Alzheimer's ward with taxpayer provided health care.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 23, 2010 11:07 PM   

He's oh sooo mavericky!!!

Mavericky in McCain-speak = lying.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 8:42 AM   

He is trying to demonstrate how dumb he is on purpose. Got to get the tea vote out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 9:27 AM   


LEAVE PRESIDENT MCCAIN ALONE!!!!!

He's just tired from all the Sunday Morning news talk shows he does, fighting the Liberal Media.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 9:46 AM    in reply to Grumpy Demo

Yeah. And get off his lawn, too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 9:59 AM    in reply to Rick Jones

Make that lawnS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 1:17 PM    in reply to Grumpy Demo

"fighting the Liberal Media."

That's right. If it wasn't for "Holy Joe & the Maverick" doin' the Sunday talk shows (incessantly), that damned liberal media would get away with even more than it already does...

BTW, "Holy Joe & the Maverick" just might be a good name for a TV show. Sit com, dramedy or just plain soap or soap opera?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 10:24 AM   

So his campaign strategy is to claim he was too stupid to understand how the bailout worked?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 12:51 PM    in reply to BottyGuy

Yes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

February 24, 2010 10:26 AM   

John McCain is the same person and the same senator with the same brand of politics. And yet, where have all his defenders gone? Even the media (his most loyal base) only offers him pity. That tire swing is a lonely place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on